William D. Browning

A Comparison of Human Raters and an Intra-oral Spectrophotometer

Consistently choosing an accurate shade match is far more difficult than it appears. Recently, several electronic shade-matching devices have been marketed. One device is an intraoral spectrophotometer, Easyshade. The current study compared the accuracy and consistency of the Easyshade (ES) device to three clinicians experienced in tooth whitening trials and trained in the use of the Vitapan 3D Master shade. The maxillary anteriors of 16 participants were matched on three separate occasions one month apart. At each appointment, the three clinicians (R1, R2 & R3) and ES independently chose a single 3D Master tab. A trained research assistant used the Easyshade device to record CIE L*, C* and H* and a shade tab. In addition, color differences between shade tabs were calculated using the Delta E 2000 (delta e 00) formula. The CIE L*C*H* data were also used to establish standards for the five lightness groups of the 3D Master. An intrarater agreement was evaluated using an intraclass correlation statistic, and an inter-rater agreement was evaluated using a weighted Kappa statistic. The percentages of exact matches were: ES = 41%; R1 = 27%; R2 = 22% and R3 = 17%. Matches within a half-shade were also calculated. This represents a mismatch that is perceptible but acceptable. The percentages of matches within a half-tab were: ES = 91%; R1 = 69%; R2 = 85% and R3 = 79%. In terms of lightness, the intra-rater agreement was considered to be very good for ES and R2 and good for R1 and R3. For chroma, agreement for ES was considered good, and for the three clinicians, it was considered moderate. The mean color difference for the L*, C*, H* data recorded at each evaluation was 1.5, or only slightly greater than the color difference between the same tab on different guides (1.2). The delta e 00 data were the most accurate data collected, and they were used to establish a standard to which the tab choices of the four raters were compared. A weighted Kappa statistic was performed and, in terms of lightness, agreement was found to be good for all raters. For chroma, agreement was very good for ES and it was good for the clinicians. In terms of the number of exact matches and matches within a half-shade, the performance of ES was at least comparable to, if not better than, the dentists. Statistically, the same was true in terms of consistency and accuracy when making repeated matches of lightness and chroma using the 3D Master shade guide.

The Effect of Light Curing Source on the Residual Yellowing of Resin Composites

PURPOSE This study evaluated the amount of residual yellow in cured resin composites when polymerizing with either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or blue light-emitting diode (LED). MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve shades (bleaching to conventional shades) of microfill, hybrid and microhybrid resin composite specimens (n = 10) were polymerized with both light types. All the materials contained only camphorquinone as the photoinitiator. After exposure, the specimens were stored in the dark for 24 hours. Then, the specimen color parameters were recorded (L*, a*, b* and C*(ab)) and color differences (deltaE*(ab)) were determined by examining for changes among the test combinations. Group comparisons were examined using ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test, and pairwise comparisons were made using the Students t-tests at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS When a significant difference in the shade of yellow was noted, the QTH light produced a greater yellow tinge than most comparisons using the LED. The potential for producing more residual yellowing could not be anticipated with respect to composite filler classification or shade, as this effect may be more dependent on individual product composition. The extent to which residual yellowing differences were noted between light curing units fell within levels considered detectable by the human eye (deltaE > 2.0). CONCLUSION The selection of light curing unit to polymerize resin-based restorative materials can have a significant influence on the amount of residual yellow present, with the QTH light tending to leave more yellow than an LED unit.

Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in class I and II composite restorations

UNLABELLED The polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may affect restoration quality. A double blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare two curing techniques-Soft-Start (SS) and the plasma arc curing light (PAC). The hypothesis that, delaying the gel point (with SS) improves marginal seal, was tested at alpha = 0.05. Also, this report includes two-week, three-month, one-year and two-year results for post-op sensitivity. Twenty informed participants, each needing two Class II and/or complex Class I restorations, gave written consent. All the teeth were trans-illuminated to rule out pre-op crack lines before restoration placement. Fifty Z100-Single Bond restorations (25/SS and 25/PAC) were placed under rubber dam. Protocols: PAC (Control)-incremental curing < 2.0 mm, 2000 mW/cm2 for 10 seconds for all layers, SS (Treatment)-incremental curing <2.0 mm, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, except the final layer or enamel replacement increment, which was cured as follows-(mW/cm2/time) 200/3 seconds, wait 3 minutes; 200/3 seconds, wait 5 minutes; 600/20 seconds from multiple angles. Sensitivity to a standardized cold stimulus was performed preoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3, 12 and 24 months. Patients rated their sensitivity after stimulus by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, two independent, calibrated investigators evaluated the restorations clinically at each appointment. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at any appointment period (two-way ANOVA; p > 0.05). Several conditions were defined as indicating marginal stress before the start of the trial. At 24 months, there was no significant difference between the SS and PAC groups. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, Class I and II restorations placed with a SS technique did not show significant changes in post-op sensitivity or decreased signs of marginal stress.

Effect of restoration size on the clinical performance of posterior "packable" resin composites over 18 months.

Fifty predominantly moderate or large Class II or multiple-surface Class I resin composite restorations were placed in molars under rubber dam isolation. The restorative systems used were: Alert Condensable (Jeneric/Pentron) and SureFil (Dentsply/Caulk). The restorations were classified according to size, with 7 small, 25 moderate and 18 large, of which 8 were cusp replacement restorations. Baseline, 6, 12 and 18-month double-blinded clinical evaluations were carried out using modified USPHS criteria. The independent variables: restorative material, restoration size and three other clinical factors, were tested using a Multiple Logistic Regression procedure to determine if any were predictive of failure. Of the 50 restorations, four failed by the 18-month recall, three failed due to fracture of the restoration and one due to secondary caries. Both restorative systems demonstrated a 92% success rate. No association between restoration size (p = 0.99) or restorative material (p = 0.65) and failure was found. Similarly, the additional variables, occlusal contact type, presence of occlusal wear facets and first or second molar, were not predictive of failure.

Predictors of non-carious loss of cervical tooth tissues

This Predictor Variables study is designed to determine which one of 11 factors evaluated may be correlated to Non-carious Loss of Cervical Tooth Tissues (NLCTT) using subjects with and without NLCTT. The ultimate objective is to successfully predict the path toward risky behaviors and reduce the incidence of NLCTT.

Postoperative Sensitivity: A Comparison of Two Bonding Agents

Historically, postoperative pain associated with temperature was considered a thermal conduction problem. More recently, pulpal hydrodynamics has been used to explain this sensitivity. Relative to restorations placed with dentin bonding agents that require a separate etching step, agents that include an acidic primer are believed to result in a better seal of the dentinal tubules. This study compared pain associated with a standardized cold stimulus in two groups of restorations. One group was placed with a self-priming resin that required a separate etch step, the other with a self-etching, self-priming dentin bonding agent. This was a community-based, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Two hundred and nine restorations were placed for 76 participants. All teeth were asymptomatic at the start of the trial. Immediately following application of a standardized cold stimulus, participants rated the pain for each restored tooth using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). For each group of restorations, VAS scores at 13 weeks were compared to preoperative scores. In addition, the preoperative score was subtracted from the 13-week score, and the two groups of restorations were compared. For both groups of restorations, the median scores were significantly reduced at 13 weeks. This decrease in the VAS score reflects a reduction in sensitivity below that which existed preoperatively. There was no significant difference between the two groups of restorations in terms of change in sensitivity at 13 weeks.

Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM A new self-stick adhesive system has been purported to eliminate the need to use chemical adhesives with plastic impression trays; however, no testing has confirmed the claim. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro retentive strength of impression materials to plastic substrates having conventional adhesive (CA) or the self-stick adhesive system, with and without mechanical retention. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three types of impression materials (irreversible hydrocolloid (IH), vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), and polyether (PE)) were applied to polystyrene disc-shaped surfaces (33.68 cm(2)) that were held on the arms of a universal testing machine. The appropriate CA or the self-stick adhesive system (Self-Stick Dots) (SSD) was applied to the plates, which had either no mechanical retention, or equally spaced mechanical perforations (n=4). An in vivo pilot test determined the appropriate rate of plate separation. Plates with impression material were lowered to provide 4 mm of space, the material set, and plates were separated using the appropriate speed. Force at first separation was divided by plate area (peak stress). Five replications per test condition were made, and results were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni-adjusted t tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS Within each impression material/test combination, stress using SSD was significantly lower than CA (P<.05). Mechanical retention did not always provide significantly greater strength. The combination of mechanical retention and CA yielded the highest strength within each material type, except for PE, for which nonmechanical and CA strength did not differ from that of mechanical and CA. CONCLUSIONS Use of the self-stick adhesive system provided significantly lower retentive strength to plastic tray material than chemical adhesives for irreversible hydrocolloid, vinyl polysiloxane, and polyether.