William D. Warren

Asymmetric Methylation in the Hypermethylated CpG Promoter Region of the Human L1 Retrotransposon

We have investigated the function and sequence specificity of DNA methylation in the hypermethylated CpG island promoter region of the endogenous human LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon family. In nontransformed human embryonic fibroblasts, inhibition of DNA methylation with 5-azadeoxycytidine induced a greater than 4-fold increase in transcription from potentially functional L1 elements without increasing the transcription level of the majority of degenerate elements, implicating hypermethylation in the repression of L1 activity. Using bisulfite genomic sequencing to assess the pattern of methylation in a subset of nondegenerate L1 elements, we found 29 sites within a 460-base pair region of the noncoding (top) DNA strand of the L1 promoter in which cytosine methylation was maintained with high efficiency. Of these, 25 were at CG dinucleotides and four were in non-CG sites. When the methylation sites were analyzed for the complementary (bottom) strand, the only highly conserved sites of methylation were in CG dinucleotides. Several of these sites of CG methylation in the bottom (coding) strand were at positions where top (noncoding) strand-derived sequences were unmethylated, suggesting that these sites might be maintained in a hemi-methylated state. Hence, there is a subset of human L1 elements in which methylation is efficiently maintained in asymmetric non-CG sites and further that this non-CG methylation may be part of a wider phenomenon involving hemi-methylation at CG dinucleotides. Maintenance of asymmetric methylation at non-CG sites (and possibly at hemi-methylated CG dinucleotides) could be through a novel DNA methyltransferase activity. Alternatively, the promoter region of L1 elements may be induced by factor binding to form some type of secondary structure that presents as a highly efficient substrate for de novo methylation.

Depletion of Drad21/Scc1 in Drosophila Cells Leads to Instability of the Cohesin Complex and Disruption of Mitotic Progression

BACKGROUND The coordination of cell cycle events is necessary to ensure the proper duplication and dissemination of the genome. In this study, we examine the consequences of depleting Drad21 and SA, two non-SMC subunits of the cohesin complex, by dsRNA-mediated interference in Drosophila cultured cells. RESULTS We have shown that a bona fide cohesin complex exists in Drosophila embryos. Strikingly, the Drad21/Scc1 and SA/Scc3 non-SMC subunits associate more intimately with one another than they do with the SMCs. We have observed defects in mitotic progression in cells from which Drad21 has been depleted: cells delay in prometaphase with normally condensed, but prematurely separated, sister chromatids and with abnormal spindle morphology. Much milder defects are observed when SA is depleted from cells. The dynamics of the chromosome passenger protein, INCENP, are affected after Drad21 depletion. We have also made the surprising observation that SA is unstable in the absence of Drad21; however, we have shown that the converse is not true. Interference with Drad21 in living Drosophila embryos also has deleterious effects on mitotic progression. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that Drad21, as a member of a cohesin complex, is required in Drosophila cultured cells and embryos for proper mitotic progression. The protein is required in cultured cells for chromosome cohesion, spindle morphology, dynamics of a chromosome passenger protein, and stability of the cohesin complex, but apparently not for normal chromosome condensation. The observation of SA instability in the absence of Drad21 implies that the expression of cohesin subunits and assembly of the cohesin complex will be tightly regulated.

The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein

The cohesin complex is a key player in regulating cell division. Cohesin proteins SMC1, SMC3, Rad21, and stromalin (SA), along with associated proteins Nipped-B, Pds5, and EcoI, maintain sister chromatid cohesion before segregation to daughter cells during anaphase. Recent chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data reveal extensive overlap of Nipped-B and cohesin components with RNA polymerase II binding at active genes in Drosophila. These and other data strongly suggest a role for cohesion in transcription; however, there is no clear evidence for any specific mechanisms by which cohesin and associated proteins regulate transcription. We report here a link between cohesin components and trithorax group (trxG) function, thus implicating these proteins in transcription activation and/or elongation. We show that the Drosophila Rad21 protein is encoded by verthandi (vtd), a member of the trxG gene family that is also involved in regulating the hedgehog (hh) gene. In addition, mutations in the associated protein Nipped-B show similar trxG activity i.e., like vtd, they act as dominant suppressors of Pc and hhMrt without impairing cell division. Our results provide a framework to further investigate how cohesin and associated components might regulate transcription.

A Subset of Drosophila Integrator Proteins Is Essential for Efficient U7 snRNA and Spliceosomal snRNA 3-End Formation†

ABSTRACT Proper gene expression relies on a class of ubiquitously expressed, uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Vertebrate snRNAs are transcribed from a unique promoter, which is required for proper 3′-end formation, and cleavage of the nascent transcript involves the activity of a poorly understood set of proteins called the Integrator complex. To examine 3′-end formation in Drosophila melanogaster, we developed a cell-based reporter that monitors aberrant 3′-end formation of snRNA through the gain in expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP). We used this reporter in Drosophila S2 cells to determine requirements for U7 snRNA 3′-end formation and found that processing was strongly dependent upon nucleotides located within the 3′ stem-loop as well as sequences likely to comprise the Drosophila equivalent of the vertebrate 3′ box. Substitution of the actin promoter for the snRNA promoter abolished proper 3′-end formation, demonstrating the conserved requirement for an snRNA promoter in Drosophila. We tested the requirement for all Drosophila Integrator subunits and found that Integrators 1, 4, 9, and 11 were essential for 3′-end formation and that Integrators 3 and 10 may be dispensable for processing. Depletion of cleavage and polyadenylation factors or of histone pre-mRNA processing factors did not affect U7 snRNA processing efficiency, demonstrating that the Integrator complex does not share components with the mRNA 3′-end processing machinery. Finally, flies harboring mutations in either Integrator 4 or 7 fail to complete development and accumulate significant levels of misprocessed snRNA in the larval stages.

Corona is required for higher-order assembly of transverse filaments into full-length synaptonemal complex in Drosophila oocytes.

The synaptonemal complex (SC) is an intricate structure that forms between homologous chromosomes early during the meiotic prophase, where it mediates homolog pairing interactions and promotes the formation of genetic exchanges. In Drosophila melanogaster, C(3)G protein forms the transverse filaments (TFs) of the SC. The N termini of C(3)G homodimers localize to the Central Element (CE) of the SC, while the C-termini of C(3)G connect the TFs to the chromosomes via associations with the axial elements/lateral elements (AEs/LEs) of the SC. Here, we show that the Drosophila protein Corona (CONA) co-localizes with C(3)G in a mutually dependent fashion and is required for the polymerization of C(3)G into mature thread-like structures, in the context both of paired homologous chromosomes and of C(3)G polycomplexes that lack AEs/LEs. Although AEs assemble in cona oocytes, they exhibit defects that are characteristic of c(3)G mutant oocytes, including failure of AE alignment and synapsis. These results demonstrate that CONA, which does not contain a coiled coil domain, is required for the stable ‘zippering’ of TFs to form the central region of the Drosophila SC. We speculate that CONAs role in SC formation may be similar to that of the mammalian CE proteins SYCE2 and TEX12. However, the observation that AE alignment and pairing occurs in Tex12 and Syce2 mutant meiocytes but not in cona oocytes suggests that the SC plays a more critical role in the stable association of homologs in Drosophila than it does in mammalian cells.

Drad21, a Drosophila rad21 homologue expressed in S-phase cells.

Cohesin is an evolutionarily conserved multiprotein complex required to establish and maintain sister chromatid cohesion. Here, we report the cloning and initial characterization of the Drosophila homologue of the fission yeast rad21 cohesin subunit, called Drad21. The Drad21 coding region was localized to centromeric heterochromatin and encodes a 715 amino acid (aa) protein with 42% aa identity to vertebrate Rad21p-homologues, 25% with Scc1p/Mcd1p (S. cerevisiae) and 28% with Rad21p (S. pombe). Sequences with similarity to the sites of proteolytic cleavage identified in Scc1p/Mcd1p are not evident in DRAD21. Northern blot and mRNA in-situ studies show that Drad21 is developmentally regulated, with high levels of expression in early embryogenesis, in S-phase cells of proliferating imaginal tissues, and in the early endocycling cells of the embryonic gut.

Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 3 Produces Mitotic Defects Independent of Alterations in Histone H3 Lysine 9 Acetylation and Methylation

The constitutive heterochromatin of the centromere is marked by high levels of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and binding of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), which are believed to also have an important role in mitosis. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are a class of anticancer agents that affect many cellular processes, including mitosis. Here we examine the mechanism by which these drugs disrupt mitosis. We have used Drosophila melanogaster embryos to demonstrate that treatment with the HDACi 100 μg/ml suberic bishydroxamic acid (IC50 12 μg/ml), conditions that induce extensive H3K9 acetylation and aberrant mitosis in mammalian cells, induced aberrant mitosis in the absence of de novo transcription. We have examined the effect of the same treatment on the levels of H3K9 modification and HP1 binding in human cancer cells and found only minor effects on H3K9 methylation and HP1 binding. Complete loss of trimethylated H3K9 or depletion of HP1α and β had no effect on mitosis, although specific depletion of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) replicates the mitotic defects induced by the drugs without increasing H3K9 acetylation. These data demonstrate that H3K9 methylation and HP1 binding are not the targets responsible for HDACi-induced aberrant mitosis, but it is a consequence of selective inhibition of HDAC3.

Functional Analysis of the Integrator Subunit 12 Identifies a Microdomain that Mediates Activation of the Drosophila Integrator Complex

Background: Small nuclear RNA (snRNA) 3′ end processing is carried out by the poorly understood integrator complex. Results: An essential microdomain within IntS12 binds IntS1 and is required for integrator complex activity. Conclusion: A small binding interface between the largest and smallest integrator subunits is critical for snRNA processing. Significance: These data uncover the unexpected findings that the IntS12 PHD finger is nearly dispensable for snRNA processing, whereas a microdomain is required. The Drosophila integrator complex consists of 14 subunits that associate with the C terminus of Rpb1 and catalyze the endonucleolytic cleavage of nascent snRNAs near their 3′ ends. Although disruption of almost any integrator subunit causes snRNA misprocessing, very little is known about the role of the individual subunits or the network of structural and functional interactions that exist within the complex. Here we developed an RNAi rescue assay in Drosophila S2 cells to identify functional domains within integrator subunit 12 (IntS12) required for snRNA 3′ end formation. Surprisingly, the defining feature of the Ints12 protein, a highly conserved and centrally located plant homeodomain finger domain, is not required for reporter snRNA 3′ end cleavage. Rather, we find a small, 45-amino acid N-terminal microdomain to be both necessary and nearly sufficient for snRNA biogenesis in cells depleted of endogenous IntS12 protein. This IntS12 microdomain can function autonomously, restoring full integrator processing activity when introduced into a heterologous protein. Moreover, mutations within the microdomain not only disrupt IntS12 function but also abolish binding to other integrator subunits. Finally, the IntS12 microdomain is sufficient to interact and stabilize the putative scaffold integrator subunit, IntS1. Collectively, these results identify an unexpected interaction between the largest and smallest integrator subunits that is essential for the 3′ end formation of Drosophila snRNA.

DNA methylation in mouse A-repeats in DNA methyltransferase-knockout ES cells and in normal cells determined by bisulfite genomic sequencing

Mouse ES cells with a null mutation of the known DNA methyltransferase retain some residual DNA methylation and can methylate foreign sequences de novo. We have used bisulfite genomic sequencing to examine the sequence specificity and distributions of methylation of a hypermethylated CG island sequence, mouse A-repeats. There were 13 CG dinucleotides in the region examined, 12 of which were methylated to variable extents in all DNAs. We found that: (1) there is considerable residual DNA methylation in ES cells lacking the known DNA methyltransferase (29% of normal methylation in the complete knockout ES DNA); (2) this other activity methylates at exactly the same CG sites as the major methyltransferase; and (3) differences in the distribution of methylated sites between A-repeats in these DNAs are consistent with this other activity methylating in a random de novo fashion. Also, the lack of any methylation in non-CG sites argues that, in other studies where non-CG methylation sites have been found by bisulfite sequencing, detection of such sites of non-CG methylation is not an inherent artifact in this methodology.

Phenotypic analysis of deflated/Ints7 function in Drosophila development

The Drosophila gene deflated (CG18176; renamed after the pupal lethal abdominal phenotype of mutant individuals) is a member of a conserved gene family found in all multicellular organisms. The human orthologue of deflated (Ints7) encodes a subunit of the Integrator complex that associates with RNA polymerase II and has been implicated in snRNA processing. Since loss‐of‐function analyses of deflated have not yet been reported, we undertook to investigate deflated expression patterns and mutant phenotypes. deflated mRNA was detected at low levels in proliferating cells in postblastoderm embryos and GFP tagged protein is predominately nuclear. Generation and analysis of four mutant alleles revealed deflated is essential for normal development, as mutant individuals displayed pleiotropic defects affecting many stages of development, consistent with perturbation of cell signalling or cell proliferation. Our data demonstrate multiple roles in development for an Ints7 homologue and to demonstrate its requirement for normal cell signalling and proliferation. Developmental Dynamics 238:1131–1139, 2009.