William E. Charash
University of Kentucky
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William E. Charash.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1993
William E. Charash; Timothy C. Fabian; Martin A. Croce
A recent retrospective analysis of femur fractures concluded that early surgical fixation in patients who have sustained blunt thoracic trauma (AIS score for Thorax > or = 2) was a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary failure. We conducted a review of all femur fractures admitted to a level I trauma center from November, 1988 to May, 1993. Inclusion criteria were ISS > or = 18, mid-shaft femur fractures treated with reamed intramedullary fixation, and no mortalities secondary to head trauma or hemorrhagic shock. One hundred thirty-eight patients met these criteria. Four patient groups were created: N1--no thoracic trauma (AIS score for thorax < 2), and early surgical fixation (< 24 hours after injury, n = 49); N2--no thoracic trauma and delayed fixation (> or = 24 hours, n = 8); T1--thoracic trauma (AIS score for Thorax > or = 2) and early fixation (n = 56); T2--thoracic trauma and delayed fixation (n = 25). There were no significant differences in age, Injury Severity Score, or Glasgow Coma Scale score between the four groups. Mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), LOS in the TICU, and duration of mechanical ventilation tended to be greater in patients with delayed fracture fixation, however, this was not statistically significant. The N2 patients had a pneumonia rate of 38% compared with 10% in group N1 (p = 0.07). The T2 patients had a pneumonia rate of 48% compared with 14% in group T1 (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2011
William E. Charash; Michael P. Caputo; Harry Clark; Peter W. Callas; Frederick B. Rogers; Bruce A. Crookes; Monica S. Alborg; Michael A. Ricci
BACKGROUND Rural trauma victims often require prolonged transport by s with limited scopes of practice. We evaluated the impact of telemedicine (TM) to a moving ambulance on outcomes in simulated trauma patients. METHODS This is an institutional review board approved, prospective double-blind study. Three trauma scenarios (blunt torso trauma, epigastric stab wound, and closed head injury) were created for a human patient simulator. Intermediate emergency medical technicians (EMTs; n = 20) managed the human patient simulator, in a moving ambulance. In the TM group, physicians (n = 12) provided consultation. In the non-TM group, EMTs communicated with medical control by radio, as necessary. We tabulated the fraction of 13 key signs, 5 pathologic processes, and 12 key interventions that were performed. Vital signs and Sao2 (%) were recorded. Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Lowest Sao2 (84 ± 0.7 vs. 78 ± 0), lowest systolic blood pressure (70 ± 1 vs. 53 ± 1), and highest heart rate (144 ± 0.9 vs. 159 ± 0.5) were significantly improved in the TM group (p < 0.001). Recognition rates for key signs (0.96 ± 0.01 vs. 0.79 ± 0.05), processes (0.98 ± 0.02 vs. 0.75 ± 0.05), and critical interventions (0.92 ± 0.02 vs. 0.49 ± 0.03) were higher in the TM group (p < 0.003). EMTs were successfully guided through needle decompression procedures in 22 of 24 cases (zero in the non-TM group). CONCLUSION TM to a moving ambulance improved the care of simulated trauma patients. Furthermore, procedurally naïve EMTs were able to perform needle thoracostomy and pericardiocentesis with TM guidance.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2012
Cassie A. Barton; Wesley McMillian; Turner M. Osler; William E. Charash; Peter Igneri; Nicholas C. Brenny; Joseph Aloi; John B. Fortune
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) are frequently performed bedside in the intensive care unit. Critically ill patients frequently require anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapies for myriad indications. There are no societal guidelines proffering strategies to manage AC/AP therapies periprocedurally for bedside PEG or PDT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the management of AC/AP therapies around PEG/PDT, assess periprocedural bleeding complications, and identify risk factors associated with bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of all adult patients admitted from October 2004 to December 2009 receiving a bedside PEG or PDT was conducted. Patients were identified by procedure codes via an in-hospital database. A medical record review was performed for each included patient. RESULTS: Four hundred fifteen patients were included, with 187 PEGs and 352 PDTs being performed. Prophylactic anticoagulation was held for approximately one dose before and two doses or less after the procedure. There was wide variation in patterns of holding therapy in patients receiving anticoagulation via continuous infusion. There were 19 recorded minor bleeding events, 1 (0.5%) with PEG and 18 (5.1%) with PDT, with no hemorrhagic events. No association was found between international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, or activated partial thromboplastin time values and bleed risk (p = 0.853, 0.689, and 0.440, respectively). Platelet count was significantly lower in patients with a bleeding event (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We found that while practice patterns were quite consistent in regard to the management of prophylactic anticoagulation, it varied widely in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. It seems that prophylactic anticoagulation use did not affect bleed risk with PEG/PDT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, therapeutic study.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1996
Bradley B. Hill; Thomas N. Zweng; Richard H. Maley; William E. Charash; Boulos Toursarkissian; Paul A. Kearney
Telemedicine Journal and E-health | 2008
Kerry Sibert; Michael A. Ricci; Michael P. Caputo; Peter W. Callas; Frederick B. Rogers; William E. Charash; Pat Malone; Stephen M. Leffler; Harry Clark; Jose Salinas; James Wall; Christopher Kocmoud
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1996
Bradley B. Hill; Thomas N. Zweng; Richard H. Maley; William E. Charash; Boulos Toursarkissian; Paul A. Kearney
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005
Frederick B. Rogers; Steven R. Shackford; Subashini R. Daniel; Bruce A. Crookes; Kennith H. Sartorelli; William E. Charash; Peter Igneri
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005
William E. Charash; Frederick B. Rogers; Michael P. Caputo; Bruce A. Crookes; Peter W. Callas; Michael A. Ricci
Critical Care Medicine | 2014
Benjamin Keveson; Mark Hamlin; William E. Charash; Ryan Clouser; Pamela Stevens; Gilman B. Allen
Critical Care Medicine | 2012
Jeffrey Endicott; Cassie A. Barton; John Ratliff; William E. Charash; Wesley McMillian
Collaboration
Dive into the William E. Charash's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs