William E. Dager

Removal of Dabigatran by Hemodialysis

Dabigatran is a newly available oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for anticoagulation therapy to prevent strokes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Unlike warfarin, dabigatrans observed therapeutic window and minimal drug-to-drug interaction suggest that invasive laboratory testing and dose adjustment is not necessary. In circumstances of excessive anticoagulation, such as overdoses, decreased kidney function, or instances of significant bleeding, reversing dabigatrans effects may be necessary. Unlike warfarin, no rapid-acting antidote to reverse the effects of dabigatran is known. However, hemodialysis has been suggested as a method of removing dabigatran and thereby reducing its anticoagulant effect. We describe a case in which hemodialysis was used in an attempt to remove dabigatran in a patient with excessive anticoagulation from dabigatran and severe intracranial hemorrhage. Serial dabigatran levels suggested that hemodialysis removed the drug. However, given the large volume of distribution of dabigatran in the terminal phase of elimination, a rebound in drug level was noted. We suggest that a longer duration of therapy or more continuous modality of hemodialysis may be needed in conjunction with the initial hemodialysis treatment of dabigatran coagulopathy.

Optimization of Inpatient Warfarin Therapy: Impact of Daily Consultation by a Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Service

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of daily consultation by a team of hospital pharmacists on the accuracy and rapidity of optimizing warfarin therapy. DESIGN: Comparison of a historical control cohort with a prospective cohort matched for treatment indication. SETTING: A 400-bed university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty consecutive patients hospitalized in 1992 and starting warfarin for the first time, with anticoagulation therapy managed by physicians, were compared with 60 patients matched for warfarin indication hospitalized in 1995, but with anticoagulation therapy managed with pharmacy consultation. RESULTS: Pharmacist management of initial warfarin therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the length of hospitalization compared with physician dosing, from 9.5 ± 5.6 days to 6.8 ± 4.4 days (p = 0.009). The number of patients and patient-days with international normalized ratio (INR) values >3.5 were reduced by pharmacist dosing from 37 patients and 142 days to 16 patients and 29 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of patients and patient-days with INR >6.0 were reduced from 20 patients and 50 days to two patients and six days, respectively (p < 0.001). There were six documented bleeding complications in 1992 compared with one in 1995 (p = 0.11). The mean INR at discharge was significantly lower in the pharmacy surveillance group, 2.6 ± 0.58, compared with the physician cohort, 3.3 ± 2.1 (p = 0.07). Readmissions after discharge due to bleeding or recurrent thrombosis were reduced from five (at 1 mo) and 10 (at 3 mo) to two and five readmissions, respectively, by pharmacist intervention (p = 0.43). The number of patients with concurrently prescribed drugs known to significantly interact with warfarin was significantly lower (6 vs. 13; p = 0.02) in the pharmacy surveillance group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients starting warfarin for the first time, daily consultation by a pharmacist significantly decreased the length of hospital stay and the number of patients who received excessive anticoagulation therapy. These findings translate into improved quality of care and potentially significant cost savings.

Antimicrobial Dosing Concepts and Recommendations for Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy or Intermittent Hemodialysis

Infectious diseases and impaired renal function often occur in critically ill patients, and delaying the start of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy or starting inappropriate therapy has been associated with poor outcomes. Our primary objective was to critically review and discuss the influence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) on the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of antimicrobial agents. The effect of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) on drug disposition in these two populations was also evaluated. Finally, proposed dosing strategies for selected antimicrobials in critically ill adult patients as well as those receiving CRRT or IHD have been compiled. We conducted a PubMed search (January 1980‐March 2008) to identify all English‐language literature published in which dosing recommendations were proposed for antimicrobials commonly used in critically ill patients, including those receiving CRRT or IHD. All pertinent reviews, selected studies, and associated references were evaluated to ensure their relevance. Forty antimicrobial, antifungal, and antiviral agents commonly used in critically ill patients were included for review. Dosage recommendations were synthesized from the 42 reviewed articles and peer‐reviewed, evidence‐based clinical drug databases to generate initial guidance for the determination of antimicrobial dosing strategies for critically ill adults. Because of the evolving process of critical illness, whether in patients with AKI or in those with CKD, prospective adaptation of these initial dosing recommendations to meet the needs of each individual patient will often rely on prospectively collected clinical and laboratory data.

Dabigatran Effects on the International Normalized Ratio, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Thrombin Time, and Fibrinogen: A Multicenter, In Vitro Study:

Background: Patients receiving the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran may have selected anticoagulation assays performed as part of routine care. The effect of dabigatran on the international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen requires clarification. Objective: To describe the effect of dabigatran on selected assays in North America and the United Kingdom. Methods: Pooled normal plasma enriched with dabigatran at concentrations of 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ng/mL were sent blinded to 19 centers in the US, the UK, and Canada to assess the effect of dabigatran on routine coagulation screening tests, the INR, aPTT, TT, and fibrinogen. Results: Data were returned from 16 centers. For effects on INR, Neoplastine CI Plus and Simplastin HTF were the most sensitive and Thromborel S the least sensitive to increasing dabigatran concentrations. For the aPTT, all reagents demonstrated decreasing sensitivity to increasing dabigatran concentrations. Measured fibrinogen either demonstrated no change or factitious decrease with increasing dabigatran concentrations. Commercial TT methods were very sensitive to low concentrations of dabigatran, with 9 of 10 reporting sites exceeding test limits at dabigatran concentrations of 100 ng/mL. Conclusions: The INR, aPTT, and TT rise as dabigatran concentrations increase. Both the INR and aPTT increase in a linear pattern with marginal slopes, creating challenges in using these assays as reliable means for assessing the amount of dabigatran present. The commercial TT assay is very sensitive at low concentrations of dabigatran. Fibrinogen test results may be either unaffected or lower in the presence of dabigatran.

Reversing Dabigatran in Life-threatening Bleeding Occurring During Cardiac Ablation With Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity

Objectives:We report a case of a patient receiving dabigatran who developed a life-threatening bleeding complication during cardiac ablation that rapidly resolved after administration of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA). Background:Therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin during cardiac ablation has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Cardiac tamponade is a potentially life-threatening procedural complication requiring emergent reversal of anticoagulation and pericardiocentesis. Dabigatran is superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but has not been evaluated for use during cardiac ablation. Dabigatran is without a known reversal agent and, should tamponade occur during ablation, it is unclear what reversal strategy could be used to establish hemostasis. Methods and Results:A 67-year-old man with history of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate, two previous atrial fibrillation ablations, and prescribed dabigatran 150 mg bid was admitted for an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. The last dabigatran dose was 7 hours prior to procedure. During the procedure, a transseptal perforation occurred, requiring an emergent pericardiocentesis. Within 60 minutes, approximately 4.5 L of blood was removed via the pericardiocentesis. Low-dose FEIBA (3159 units, 26 U/kg actual body weight) over 15 minutes was administered. Hemostasis was noted within minutes of initiating the infusion with cessation of bleeding after administration was complete. Conclusion:This case report describes the potential ability of a low dose of the activated prothrombin complex concentrate, FEIBA, to reestablish hemostasis independent of the pharmacologic effects of dabigatran. Additional studies are warranted to confirm the findings of our observation.

Reversal of Elevated International Normalized Ratios and Bleeding with Low-Dose Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Patients Receiving Warfarin

Study Objective. To assess the effectiveness of using low‐dose recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to reverse the effects of warfarin in critically ill patients with major bleeding events.

Racial and gender differences in the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Men have been reported to have a higher incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism than women. However, it is not known if this gender effect holds among different racial/ethnic groups and for both venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 18- to 65-year-old Caucasian, African-American and Hispanic cases hospitalized in California with unprovoked venous thromboembolism. The principal outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism 7-60 months after the index event. Among 11,514 cases that were followed for a mean of 3.0 years, men had a significantly higher rate (events/100 patient-years) of recurrent venous thromboembolism than women for both venous thrombosis [rate ratio (RR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.3-1.8] and pulmonary embolism [RR = 1.3, 95%CI:1.0-1.6]. Among men the recurrence rate did not vary significantly between the racial/ethnic groups (p > 0.05). However, the recurrence rate among Hispanic women with venous thrombosis was significantly higher than in Caucasian women (p < 0.001) and was comparable to the rate in men. Both Hispanic and African-American women with pulmonary embolism had a higher recurrence rate compared with Caucasian women (p < 0.02) that was comparable to the rate in men. We conclude that women in California had a 40% lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism compared to men. Rates were comparable among men of different races, but there were significant inter-racial differences among women, which also varied with the type of initial event. The effect of gender on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism can not be generalized because it varies between racial/ethnic groups and with the type of index event.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia : Treatment options and special considerations

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune‐mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid‐ and delayed‐onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors—argatroban and lepirudin—are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Treatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To describe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT or HIT-2), an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Available treatment options and considerations in developing a therapy approach are discussed. DATA SOURCES: A search of the National Library of Medicine (1992–June 2001) was done to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles related to laboratory recognition and treatment options of HIT, including the use of agents in selected clinical conditions, were reviewed and included. CONCLUSIONS: HIT is a rare but potentially severe adverse reaction to heparin that was, until recently, poorly understood and had limited treatment options. Recent advances describing the recognition and clinical manifestations of immune-mediated HIT, including recently available antithrombotic treatment options, have dramatically changed outcomes for patients having this syndrome.

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients.

Thrombocytopenia occurs in 15% to 58% of intensive care unit patients. The incidence varies based upon patient population, timing and frequency of platelet monitoring, and definition of thrombocytopenia. Up to 25% of acutely ill patients develop drug-induced thrombocytopenia. When drug-induced thrombocytopenia is suspected, nondrug related causes must be evaluated and excluded. Establishing the diagnosis of drug-induced thrombocytopenia is challenging, as hundreds of medications have been implicated. Medications commonly associated with drug-induced thrombocytopenia include glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, cinchona alkaloids, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and heparin. Once the diagnosis is suspected, clinicians should identify the start date of medications to assess the timeline of development. The likelihood of each medication causing thrombocytopenia must be evaluated. The risk vs. benefit of discontinuing the suspected medication and availability of alternative medications must be assessed. The role of corticosteroids, immune globulin, and plasmapheresis is uncertain. Once the offending agent has been discontinued, the overall prognosis is excellent. In the case of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an alternative anticoagulant should be initiated. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia should be documented in the medical record and reported according to institutional and national standards. This review focuses on immune-mediated drug-induced thrombocytopenia from medications commonly utilized in the critically ill patient.