William F. Eisele
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William F. Eisele.
Health Physics | 2013
Erika Michelotti; Andrew A. Green; Jeffrey J. Whicker; William F. Eisele; David Patrick Fuehne; Michael W. McNaughton
AbstractGaussian plume models, such as CAP88, are used regularly for estimating downwind concentrations from stack emissions. At many facilities, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) requires that CAP88 be used to demonstrate compliance with air quality regulations for public protection from emissions of radionuclides. Gaussian plume models have the advantage of being relatively simple and their use pragmatic; however, these models are based on simplifying assumptions and generally they are not capable of incorporating dynamic meteorological conditions or complex topography. These limitations encourage validation tests to understand the capabilities and limitations of the model for the specific application. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has complex topography but is required to use CAP88 for compliance with the Clean Air Act Subpart H. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the CAP88 predictions against ambient air measurements using released tritium as a tracer. Stack emissions of tritium from two LANL stacks were measured and the dispersion modeled with CAP88 using local meteorology. Ambient air measurements of tritium were made at various distances and directions from the stacks. Model predictions and ambient air measurements were compared over the course of a full year’s data. Comparative results were consistent with other studies and showed the CAP88 predictions of downwind tritium concentrations were on average about three times higher than those measured, and the accuracy of the model predictions were generally more consistent for annual averages than for bi-weekly data.
Archive | 2016
Michael W. McNaughton; William F. Eisele
All soil guidelines were determined using RESRAD, version 6.1. All offsite guidelines are based on 15 mrem/year. This dose rate is sufficiently low to protect human health and is in accordance with DOE guidance and the proposed EPA 40-CFR-196 regulations for members of the public (never promulgated). For those onsite areas where general employees (non-radiological workers) could have routine access, soil concentrations should be based on a dose rate of 30 mrem/year (approximately one-third of the onsite LANL non-radiological worker dose of 100 mrem/year). In this case, soil concentration guidelines may be obtained by doubling the 15 mrem/year guidelines. Several scenarios were developed to provide maximum flexibility for application of the guidelines. The offsite guidelines were developed using: residential scenarios for both adults and children; a construction worker scenario; a resource user (e.g., a hunter) scenario; a child playing within canyon reaches scenario, a trail using jogger within canyon reaches scenario, and a trail using hiker within canyon reaches scenario. The residential guidelines represent the lowest values from both the adult residential scenario and the child residential scenario.
Health Physics | 2013
Michael W. McNaughton; Burgandy Brock; William F. Eisele; David Patrick Fuehne; Andrew A. Green; Jeffrey J. Whicker
AbstractVersions of the computer program, CAP88, are widely used to calculate the radiological doses from radionuclides emitted into the air. CAP88-PC Version-3 includes an extensive library of radionuclides, but there are many more that are not included. Surrogates are often used to substitute for nuclides not in the library, though the results are usually overestimates. This paper addresses nuclides that are not in the library and describes methods to obtain more accurate results.
Archive | 2012
Michael W. McNaughton; Shannon P. Allen; Debra C. Archuleta; Burgandy Brock; Melissa A. Coronado; Jean M. Dewart; William F. Eisele; David Patrick Fuehne; Milan S. Gadd; Andrew A. Green; Joan J. Lujan; Carolyn MacDonell; Jeffrey J. Whicker
In response to the disasters in Japan on March 11, 2011, and the subsequent emissions from Fukushima-Daiichi, we monitored the air near Los Alamos using four air-monitoring systems: the standard AIRNET samplers, the standard rad-NESHAP samplers, the NEWNET system, and high-volume air samplers. Each of these systems has advantages and disadvantages. In combination, they provide a comprehensive set of measurements of airborne radionuclides near Los Alamos during the weeks following March 11. We report air-monitoring measurements of the fission products released from the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear-power-plant accident in 2011. Clear gamma-spectrometry peaks were observed from Cs-134, Cs-136, Cs-137, I-131, I132, Te-132, and Te-129m. These data, together with measurements of other radionuclides, are adequate for an assessment and assure us that radionuclides from Fukushima Daiichi did not present a threat to human health at or near Los Alamos. The data demonstrate the capabilities of the Los Alamos air-monitoring systems.
Health Physics | 2012
Jeffrey J. Whicker; David Baltz; William F. Eisele; Orval F. Hart; Michael W. McNaughton; Andrew A. Green
AbstractSmoke from a wildfire in northern New Mexico that moved along the border of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) was monitored for 239Pu in the event that the fire might cross into LANL property containing locations with low, but greater than background, levels of 239Pu and other alpha-emitting radionuclides. Three Environmental Continuous Air Monitors (ECAMs) in operation at LANL at the time of the fire provided near real-time measurements of the 239Pu in the smoke. Sampling data from routine measurements of PM-10 and PM-2.5 concentrations in the city of Los Alamos showed that smoke in the air rose during the fire to several hundred &mgr;g m−3, which produced limited visibility (several hundred meters) and resulted in poor air quality alerts for about a week-long period. Previous studies have shown that airborne dust can significantly impair continuous air monitors, so the purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the ECAMs under smoky conditions, which is important for many emergency response scenarios. Additionally, ECAMs are not required to be tested in smoke by ANSI standards, so there is little to no published data on performance of any ECAM while sampling smoke. Results show that the deployed ECAMs had reduced flow as the filter clogged with fine particles, but the goodness-of-fit parameter of the peak shape fitting algorithms and the minimum detectable concentration and dose were not impacted until the flow was reduced by more than about 20%, and even then they were within tolerable limits. Overall, ECAM performance was not impacted during the fire even under heavy smoke conditions and fluctuating radon levels, though changing the filters to limit any reductions in flow to less than 20% would maintain optimal ECAM performance.
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2013
Erika Michelotti; Jeffrey J. Whicker; William F. Eisele; David D. Breshears; Thomas B. Kirchner
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2011
Jeffrey J. Whicker; Jean M. Dewart; Shannon P. Allen; William F. Eisele; Michael W. McNaughton; Andrew A. Green
Archive | 2014
Jessica Mcdonnel Gillis; Jeffrey J. Whicker; Michael W. McNaughton; William F. Eisele
Archive | 2013
Michael W. McNaughton; Philip R. Fresquez; William F. Eisele
Archive | 2013
Erika Michelotti; Jean M. Dewart; Jeffrey J. Whicker; William F. Eisele; Andrew A. Green; Michael W. McNaughton; Shannon P. Allen