William F. Gee

2001 American Urological Association Gallup Survey: changes in physician practice patterns, satisfaction with urology, and treatment of prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction.

PURPOSE The Health Policy Survey and Research Committee of the American Urological Association and the Gallup organization have performed 9 surveys of American urologists since 1992 for the purpose of assessing demographics and practice patterns. The results of the 2001 survey are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample of 507 urologists was interviewed in February and March 2001. Major content areas were physician practice patterns, cryosurgery/brachytherapy, prostate specific antigen, erectile dysfunction, Medicare and the Internet. RESULTS Membership in the American Urological Association continues to increase among American urologists. The number of patients seen weekly in the office also continues to increase. While age at retirement has not changed significantly, most urologists are satisfied with the specialty and increasing numbers are using the Internet. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive procedures such as brachytherapy for prostate cancer continue to proliferate and there is evidence that the specialty of urology is continuing to become more office based. The demand for urological services appears to be continuing to increase.

1997 American urological association gallup survey : Changes in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, and other practice trends from 1994 to 1997

PURPOSE The American Urological Association first commissioned the Gallup Organization to conduct a study to assess urologist practice patterns in 1992. We present the results of the 1997 survey, the sixth consecutive Gallup survey performed for the Association. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample of 502 American urologists who had completed urological residency and practiced at least 20 hours weekly in 1996 was interviewed by telephone in February and March 1997. RESULTS Emerging trends showed significant changes since 1994 in how urologists diagnosed and treated prostate cancer. The survey revealed a significant change in the tests routinely ordered to stage newly diagnosed prostate cancer and for diagnostic evaluation of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS Urologists are becoming more cost conscious and effective in ordering pretreatment testing. Urologists are becoming more oriented toward medical treatment for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and less laser surgery is being performed.

Practice Trends of American Urologists in the Treatment of Impotence, Incontinence and Infertility

PURPOSE Trends of urologist practice patterns in evaluating and treating impotence, incontinence and infertility in the United States were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS In July 1995 the executive interviewing branch of the Gallup Organization selected randomly and interviewed by telephone 533 practicing urologists in the United States who had provided urological patient care for more than 20 hours per week, practiced in 1994 and completed a urological residency program. RESULTS Treatment of male sexual dysfunction and female urinary incontinence comprises a significant portion of the professional activity of United States urologists. However, evaluation and management of male infertility occupy a small portion of the average urological work load. While more than half of United States urologist office clinical laboratories were inspected in 1994, only 2% failed evaluation due to major deficiencies. CONCLUSIONS Male sexual dysfunction and female urinary incontinence are major areas of urological practice in the United States but male infertility is not. Few United States urologist clinical laboratories failed inspection because of major deficiencies.

1998 AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GALLUP SURVEY: CHANGES IN PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS, TREATMENT OF URETERAL STONES AND IMPACT OF MANAGED CARE

PURPOSE The American Urological Association first commissioned the Gallup Organization to conduct a study to assess urologist practice patterns in 1992. We present the results of the seventh consecutive Gallup Survey performed for the Association. MATERIALS AND METHODS A random sample of 537 American urologists who completed urological residency and practiced at least 20 hours weekly in 1997 were interviewed by telephone in March 1998. Major topic areas included general demographics, practice patterns, treatment of ureteral stones and experience with managed care. RESULTS Demographic trends indicated a significant decrease in average urologist age from 49.4 years in 1992 to 46.8 in 1998. Of the urologists 99% reported that they treat ureteral stones. Managed care had an increasingly larger role in most practices, particularly in the western United States, where 73% of urologists reported that they contract with a Medicare health maintenance organization. CONCLUSIONS The average age of practicing urologists significantly decreased, which may be due to an increasing number of urologists retiring at an earlier age, although this finding is not clear. Nearly all urologists treated ureteral stones with considerable consistency. Finally, managed care appeared to have a major impact on most urologists throughout the United States.

American Urological Association and Society for Medical Decision Making Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening

Introduction: The American Urological Association Quality Improvement Summit occurs regularly to provide education and promote dialogue around the issues of quality improvement and patient safety. Nearly all prostate cancer screening guidelines recommend shared decision making strategies when determining whether prostate specific antigen testing is right for a specific patient. This summit, held in partnership with the Society for Medical Decision Making, focused on techniques to identify and understand patient values in relation to prostate cancer screening and treatment, and to promote incorporation of shared decision making into prostate cancer screening discussions. Methods: Information presented at the Quality Improvement Summit was provided by physicians and leading experts in the field of shared decision making. The open forum of this summit encouraged contributions from participants about their personal experiences with shared decision making and their thoughts on the tools presented during the day. Results: Shared decision making supports collaboration between physician and patient in situations where there are multiple preference sensitive options. Conclusions: Practitioners should include formal shared decision making procedures surrounding prostate specific antigen testing in their practices to ensure that testing is in accordance with patient values and desired outcomes. Tools and strategies like those reviewed in this Quality Improvement Summit are invaluable for alleviating potential burden on providers, ensuring communication and improving quality of care.