William H. Blahd

Efficacy of the posttraumatic cross table lateral view of the cervical spine

This is a retrospective study of 128 patients with a discharge diagnosis of cervical spine fracture, dislocation, or subluxation. The study was undertaken to establish the accuracy of the posttraumatic cross table lateral view radiograph of the cervical spine (CTLV). The radiographs were read by the faculty emergency physician author. If his diagnosis differed from the patients final radiologic diagnosis, the radiograph was reevaluated by the radiologist author. The accuracy in diagnosing posttraumatic cervical spine abnormalities on CTLV alone was 74.2% and 79.7% for the emergency physician and radiologist, respectively. Thirty percent of cases undiagnosed by the emergency physician were subsequently treated as unstable injuries. Thirty-five percent of C1, 14.8% of C2, and 42.4% of C6 abnormalities were missed on CTLV by both the emergency physician and the radiologist. The results indicate that the CTLV, alone, is unreliable and potentially dangerous as a screening exam in diagnosing posttraumatic abnormalities of the cervical spine.

Efficacy of the post-traumatic cross table lateral view of the cervical spine

This is a retrospective study of 128 patients with a discharge diagnosis of cervical spine fracture, dislocation, or subluxation. The study was undertaken to establish the accuracy of the posttraumatic cross table lateral view radiograph of the cervical spine (CTLV). The radiographs were read by the faculty emergency physician author. If his diagnosis differed from the patients final radiologic diagnosis, the radiograph was reevaluated by the radiologist author. The accuracy in diagnosing posttraumatic cervical spine abnormalities on CTLV alone was 74.2% and 79.7% for the emergency physician and radiologist, respectively. Thirty percent of cases undiagnosed by the emergency physician were subsequently treated as unstable injuries. Thirty-five percent of C1, 14.8% of C2, and 42.4% of C6 abnormalities were missed on CTLV by both the emergency physician and the radiologist. The results indicate that the CTLV, alone, is unreliable and potentially dangerous as a screening exam in diagnosing posttraumatic abnormalities of the cervical spine.

Diagnosis of intraperitoneal extravasation of urine by peritoneal lavage

The diagnosis of intraperitoneal extravasation of urine in the multiple trauma patient is often delayed, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. To determine if intraperitoneal extravasation of urine can be detected by peritoneal lavage, an animal study was designed to investigate whether urea nitrogen and creatinine levels in the urine, serum, and lavage fluid would be predictive of urinary extravasation. Seventeen adult mongrel dogs, weighing 21 to 30 kg, were divided into two groups. The six dogs in Group 1 were utilized as controls, and had peritoneal lavage (15 mL normal saline/kg) performed using the open technique (direct visualization of the peritoneum). Blood, urine and lavage urea nitrogen and creatinine and lavage red cell count were measured. Group 2 (11 dogs) had varying amounts of urine (5 mL to 330 mL) instilled into the peritoneal cavity. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage was performed 30 to 45 minutes after the instillation of urine in all Group 2 animals. Group 2A (nine dogs) had urine instilled under direct visualization through a peritoneal lavage catheter. As bladder dome rupture is the most common cause of intraperitoneal urine extravasation, Group 2B (two dogs) had bladder dome ruptures performed by cystoscopic approach using the resectoscope. Cystograms were obtained in the bladder-ruptured dogs after completion of the peritoneal lavage to confirm intraperitoneal extravasation of bladder contents. In these animals, urine was instilled back into the bladder following bladder rupture. Results demonstrate that urea nitrogen and creatinine can be measured in peritoneal lavage fluid when extravasation of urine is in amounts of 15 mL or greater, and not measurable in amounts of 5 mL or less.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)