Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William H. Farmer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William H. Farmer.


Review of Development Economics | 2012

Climate change, agriculture and food security in Tanzania

Channing Arndt; William H. Farmer; Kenneth Strzepek; James Thurlow

The consequences of climate change for agriculture and food security in developing countries are of serious concern. Due to their reliance on rain-fed agriculture, both as a source of income and consumption, many low-income countries are considered to be the most vulnerable to climate change. This paper estimates the impact of climate change on food security in Tanzania. Representative climate projections are used in calibrated crop models to predict crop yield changes for 110 districts in the country. The results are in turn imposed on a highly-disaggregated, recursive dynamic economy-wide model of Tanzania. The authors find that, relative to a no-climate-change baseline and considering domestic agricultural production as the principal channel of impact, food security in Tanzania appears likely to deteriorate as a consequence of climate change. The analysis points to a high degree of diversity of outcomes (including some favorable outcomes) across climate scenarios, sectors, and regions. Noteworthy differences in impacts across households are also present both by region and by income category.


Journal of Climate | 2013

Quantifying the Likelihood of Regional Climate Change: A Hybridized Approach

C. Adam Schlosser; Xiang Gao; Kenneth Strzepek; Andrei P. Sokolov; Chris E. Forest; Sirein Awadalla; William H. Farmer

AbstractThe growing need for risk-based assessments of impacts and adaptation to climate change calls for increased capability in climate projections: specifically, the quantification of the likelihood of regional outcomes and the representation of their uncertainty. Herein, the authors present a technique that extends the latitudinal projections of the 2D atmospheric model of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) by applying longitudinally resolved patterns from observations, and from climate model projections archived from exercises carried out for the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The method maps the IGSM zonal means across longitude using a set of transformation coefficients, and this approach is demonstrated in application to near-surface air temperature and precipitation, for which high-quality observational datasets and model simulations of climate change are available. The current climatology ...


Water Resources Research | 2015

Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic modeling

Stacey A. Archfield; Martyn P. Clark; Berit Arheimer; Lauren E. Hay; Hilary McMillan; Julie E. Kiang; Jan Seibert; Kirsti Hakala; Andrew R. Bock; Thorsten Wagener; William H. Farmer; Vazken Andréassian; Sabine Attinger; Alberto Viglione; Rodney R. Knight; Steven L. Markstrom; Thomas M. Over

In the past, hydrologic modeling of surface water resources has mainly focused on simulating the hydrologic cycle at local to regional catchment modeling domains. There now exists a level of maturity among the catchment, global water security, and land surface modeling communities such that these communities are converging toward continental domain hydrologic models. This commentary, written from a catchment hydrology community perspective, provides a review of progress in each community toward this achievement, identifies common challenges the communities face, and details immediate and specific areas in which these communities can mutually benefit one another from the convergence of their research perspectives. Those include: (1) creating new incentives and infrastructure to report and share model inputs, outputs, and parameters in data services and open access, machine-independent formats for model replication or reanalysis; (2) ensuring that hydrologic models have: sufficient complexity to represent the dominant physical processes and adequate representation of anthropogenic impacts on the terrestrial water cycle, a process-based approach to model parameter estimation, and appropriate parameterizations to represent large-scale fluxes and scaling behavior; (3) maintaining a balance between model complexity and data availability as well as uncertainties; and (4) quantifying and communicating significant advancements toward these modeling goals.


Water Resources Research | 2016

On the deterministic and stochastic use of hydrologic models

William H. Farmer; Richard M. Vogel

Environmental simulation models, such as precipitation-runoff watershed models, are increasingly used in a deterministic manner for environmental and water resources design, planning, and management. In operational hydrology, simulated responses are now routinely used to plan, design, and manage a very wide class of water resource systems. However, all such models are calibrated to existing data sets and retain some residual error. This residual, typically unknown in practice, is often ignored, implicitly trusting simulated responses as if they are deterministic quantities. In general, ignoring the residuals will result in simulated responses with distributional properties that do not mimic those of the observed responses. This discrepancy has major implications for the operational use of environmental simulation models as is shown here. Both a simple linear model and a distributed-parameter precipitation-runoff model are used to document the expected bias in the distributional properties of simulated responses when the residuals are ignored. The systematic reintroduction of residuals into simulated responses in a manner that produces stochastic output is shown to improve the distributional properties of the simulated responses. Every effort should be made to understand the distributional behavior of simulation residuals and to use environmental simulation models in a stochastic manner. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Water Resources Research | 2015

Multiple regression and inverse moments improve the characterization of the spatial scaling behavior of daily streamflows in the Southeast United States

William H. Farmer; Thomas M. Over; Richard M. Vogel

Understanding the spatial structure of daily streamflow is essential for managing freshwater resources, especially in poorly gaged regions. Spatial scaling assumptions are common in flood frequency prediction (e.g., index-flood method) and the prediction of continuous streamflow at ungaged sites (e.g. drainage-area ratio), with simple scaling by drainage area being the most common assumption. In this study, scaling analyses of daily streamflow from 173 streamgages in the southeastern United States resulted in three important findings. First, the use of only positive integer moment orders, as has been done in most previous studies, captures only the probabilistic and spatial scaling behavior of flows above an exceedance probability near the median; negative moment orders (inverse moments) are needed for lower streamflows. Second, assessing scaling by using drainage area alone is shown to result in a high degree of omitted-variable bias, masking the true spatial scaling behavior. Multiple regression is shown to mitigate this bias, controlling for regional heterogeneity of basin attributes, especially those correlated with drainage area. Previous univariate scaling analyses have neglected the scaling of low-flow events and may have produced biased estimates of the spatial scaling exponent. Third, the multiple regression results show that mean flows scale with an exponent of one, low flows scale with spatial scaling exponents greater than one, and high flows scale with exponents less than one. The relationship between scaling exponents and exceedance probabilities may be a fundamental signature of regional streamflow. This signature may improve our understanding of the physical processes generating streamflow at different exceedance probabilities.


Environmental Modelling and Software | 2018

Improving predictions of hydrological low-flow indices in ungaged basins using machine learning

Scott C. Worland; William H. Farmer; Julie E. Kiang

Abstract We compare the ability of eight machine-learning models (elastic net, gradient boosting, kernel-k-nearest neighbors, two variants of support vector machines, M5-cubist, random forest, and a meta-learning ensemble M5-cubist model) and four baseline models (ordinary kriging, a unit area discharge model, and two variants of censored regression) to generate estimates of the annual minimum 7-day mean streamflow with an annual exceedance probability of 90% (7Q10) at 224 unregulated sites in South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, USA. The machine-learning models produced substantially lower cross validation errors compared to the baseline models. The meta-learning M5-cubist model had the lowest root-mean-squared-error of 26.72 cubic feet per second. Partial dependence plots show that 7Q10s are likely moderated by late summer and early fall precipitation and the infiltration capacity of basin soils.


Journal of Hydrology | 2013

Performance-weighted methods for estimating monthly streamflow at ungauged sites

William H. Farmer; Richard M. Vogel


Archive | 2012

CliCrop: a Crop Water-Stress and Irrigation Demand Model for an Integrated Global Assessment Model Approach

C.A. Fant; A. Gueneau; Ken Strzepek; Sirein Awadalla; William H. Farmer; E. Blanc; C.A. Schlosser


Advances in Water Resources | 2016

Regional flow duration curves: Geostatistical techniques versus multivariate regression

Alessio Pugliese; William H. Farmer; Attilio Castellarin; Stacey A. Archfield; Richard M. Vogel


Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2016

Ordinary kriging as a tool to estimate historical daily streamflow records

William H. Farmer

Collaboration


Dive into the William H. Farmer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas M. Over

Eastern Illinois University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie E. Kiang

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stacey A. Archfield

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Adam Schlosser

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth Strzepek

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren E. Hay

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew R. Bock

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rodney R. Knight

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge