William Haufe

Ezetimibe for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: assessment by novel magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance elastography in a randomized trial (MOZART trial).

Ezetimibe inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption and lowers low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that it reduces liver fat as estimated by ultrasound in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Therefore, we aimed to examine the efficacy of ezetimibe versus placebo in reducing liver fat by the magnetic resonance imaging‐derived proton density‐fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) and liver histology in patients with biopsy‐proven NASH. In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 50 patients with biopsy‐proven NASH were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg orally daily or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in liver fat as measured by MRI‐PDFF in colocalized regions of interest within each of the nine liver segments. Novel assessment by two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional magnetic resonance elastography was also performed. Ezetimibe was not significantly better than placebo at reducing liver fat as measured by MRI‐PDFF (mean difference between the ezetimibe and placebo arms ‐1.3%, P = 0.4). Compared to baseline, however, end‐of‐treatment MRI‐PDFF was significantly lower in the ezetimibe arm (15%‐11.6%, P < 0.016) but not in the placebo arm (18.5%‐16.4%, P = 0.15). There were no significant differences in histologic response rates, serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, or longitudinal changes in two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional magnetic resonance elastography‐derived liver stiffness between the ezetimibe and placebo arms. Compared to histologic nonresponders (25/35), histologic responders (10/35) had a significantly greater reduction in MRI‐PDFF (‐4.35 ± 4.9% versus ‐0.30 ± 4.1%, P < 0.019). Conclusions: Ezetimibe did not significantly reduce liver fat in NASH. This trial demonstrates the application of colocalization of MRI‐PDFF‐derived fat maps and magnetic resonance elastography‐derived stiffness maps of the liver before and after treatment to noninvasively assess treatment response in NASH. (Hepatology 2015;61:1239–1250)

Magnetic resonance elastography is superior to acoustic radiation force impulse for the Diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with biopsy‐proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective study

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), an advanced magnetic resonance–based imaging technique, and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), an ultrasound‐based imaging technique, are accurate for diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis. However, no head‐to‐head comparisons between MRE and ARFI for diagnosing NAFLD fibrosis have been performed. We compared MRE versus ARFI head‐to‐head for diagnosing fibrosis in well‐characterized patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD. This cross‐sectional analysis of a prospective cohort involved 125 patients (54.4% female) who underwent MRE, ARFI, and contemporaneous liver biopsies scored using the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network histological scoring system. The performances of MRE versus ARFI for diagnosing fibrosis were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). The mean (± standard deviation) age and body mass index were 48.9 (±15.4) years and 31.8 (±7.0) kg/m2, respectively. For diagnosing any fibrosis (≥ stage 1), the MRE AUROC was 0.799 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.723‐0.875), significantly (P = 0.012) higher than the ARFI AUROC of 0.664 (95% CI 0.568‐0.760). In stratified analysis by presence or absence of obesity, MRE was superior to ARFI for diagnosing any fibrosis in obese patients (P < 0.001) but not in nonobese patients (P = 0.722). The MRE AUROCs for diagnosing ≥stages 2, 3, and 4 fibrosis were 0.885 (95% CI 0.816‐0.953), 0.934 (95% CI 0.863‐1.000), and 0.882 (95% CI 0.729‐1.000); and the ARFI AUROCs were 0.848 (95% CI 0.776‐0.921), 0.896 (95% CI 0.824‐0.968), and 0.862 (95% CI 0.721‐1.000). MRE had higher AUROCs than ARFI for discriminating dichotomized fibrosis stages at all dichotomization cutoff points, but the AUROC differences decreased as the cutoff points (fibrosis stages) increased. Conclusion: MRE is more accurate than ARFI for diagnosing any fibrosis in NAFLD patients, especially those who are obese. (Hepatology 2016;63:453–461)

Sitagliptin vs. placebo for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS Uncontrolled studies show sitagliptin, an oral DPP-4 inhibitor, may improve alanine aminotransferase and liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. We aimed to compare sitagliptin vs. the efficacy of a placebo in reducing liver fat measured by MRI-derived proton density-fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). METHODS This randomized, double-blind, allocation-concealed, placebo-controlled trial included 50 NAFLD patients with prediabetes or early diabetes randomized to sitagliptin orally 100mg/day or placebo for 24weeks. Primary outcome was liver fat change measured by MRI-PDFF in colocalized regions of interest within each of nine liver segments. Additional advanced assessments included MR spectroscopy (MRS) for internal validation of MRI-PDFFs accuracy, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and FIBROSpect® II to assess liver fibrosis. RESULTS Sitagliptin was not significantly better than placebo in reducing liver fat measured by MRI-PDFF (mean difference between sitagliptin and placebo arms: -1.3%, p=0.4). Compared to baseline, there were no significant differences in end-of-treatment MRI-PDFF for sitagliptin (18.1% to 16.9%, p=0.27) or placebo (16.6% to 14.0%, p=0.07). The groups had no significant differences for changes in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, low-density lipoprotein, homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance, and MRE-derived liver stiffness. In both groups at baseline and post-treatment, MRI-PDFF and MRS showed robust correlation coefficients ranging from r(2)=0.96 to r(2)=0.99 (p<0.0001), demonstrating the strong internal validity of the findings. FIBROSpect® II showed no changes in the sitagliptin group but was significantly increased in the placebo group (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Sitagliptin was safe but not better than placebo in reducing liver fat in prediabetic or diabetic patients with NAFLD. LAY SUMMARY In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the anti-diabetic drug sitagliptin was no more effective than placebo for improving liver fat and liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This study demonstrates that non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging-proton density-fat fraction and magnetic resonance elastography, can be used to assess treatment response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease clinical trials.

MRE is superior to ARFI for the diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD: A prospective study

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), an advanced magnetic resonance–based imaging technique, and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), an ultrasound‐based imaging technique, are accurate for diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis. However, no head‐to‐head comparisons between MRE and ARFI for diagnosing NAFLD fibrosis have been performed. We compared MRE versus ARFI head‐to‐head for diagnosing fibrosis in well‐characterized patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD. This cross‐sectional analysis of a prospective cohort involved 125 patients (54.4% female) who underwent MRE, ARFI, and contemporaneous liver biopsies scored using the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network histological scoring system. The performances of MRE versus ARFI for diagnosing fibrosis were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). The mean (± standard deviation) age and body mass index were 48.9 (±15.4) years and 31.8 (±7.0) kg/m2, respectively. For diagnosing any fibrosis (≥ stage 1), the MRE AUROC was 0.799 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.723‐0.875), significantly (P = 0.012) higher than the ARFI AUROC of 0.664 (95% CI 0.568‐0.760). In stratified analysis by presence or absence of obesity, MRE was superior to ARFI for diagnosing any fibrosis in obese patients (P < 0.001) but not in nonobese patients (P = 0.722). The MRE AUROCs for diagnosing ≥stages 2, 3, and 4 fibrosis were 0.885 (95% CI 0.816‐0.953), 0.934 (95% CI 0.863‐1.000), and 0.882 (95% CI 0.729‐1.000); and the ARFI AUROCs were 0.848 (95% CI 0.776‐0.921), 0.896 (95% CI 0.824‐0.968), and 0.862 (95% CI 0.721‐1.000). MRE had higher AUROCs than ARFI for discriminating dichotomized fibrosis stages at all dichotomization cutoff points, but the AUROC differences decreased as the cutoff points (fibrosis stages) increased. Conclusion: MRE is more accurate than ARFI for diagnosing any fibrosis in NAFLD patients, especially those who are obese. (Hepatology 2016;63:453–461)

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography vs. eight clinical prediction rules for non‐invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in biopsy‐proven non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study

Two‐dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (2D‐MRE) is an advanced magnetic resonance method with high diagnostic accuracy for predicting advanced fibrosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. However, no prospective, head‐to‐head comparisons between 2D‐MRE and clinical prediction rules (CPRs) have been performed in patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD.

Novel 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Advanced Fibrosis in NAFLD: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES:Recent studies show two-dimensional (2D)-magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is accurate in diagnosing advanced fibrosis (stages 3 and 4) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. Three-dimensional (3D)-MRE is a more advanced version of the technology that can image shear-wave fields in 3D of the entire liver. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-MRE and 2D-MRE for diagnosing advanced fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD.METHODS:This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective study included 100 consecutive patients (56% women) with biopsy-proven NAFLD who also underwent MRE. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of 2D- and 3D-MRE in diagnosing advanced fibrosis.RESULTS:The mean (±s.d.) of age and body mass index were 50.2 (±13.6) years and 32.1 (±5.0) kg/m2, respectively. The AUROC for diagnosing advanced fibrosis was 0.981 for 3D-MRE at 40 Hz, 0.927 for 3D-MRE at 60 Hz (standard shear-wave frequency), and 0.921 for 2D-MRE at 60 Hz (standard shear-wave frequency). At a threshold of 2.43 kPa, 3D-MRE at 40 Hz had sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.94, positive predictive value 0.72, and negative predictive value 1.0 for diagnosing advanced fibrosis. 3D-MRE at 40 Hz had significantly higher AUROC (P<0.05) than 2D-MRE at 60 Hz for diagnosing advanced fibrosis.CONCLUSIONS:Utilizing a prospective study design, we demonstrate that 3D MRE at 40 Hz has the highest diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing NAFLD advanced fibrosis. Both 2D- and 3D-MRE at 60 Hz, the standard shear-wave frequency, are also highly accurate in diagnosing NAFLD advanced fibrosis.

Reproducibility of MR-based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same-day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects

To examine the reproducibility of quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) methods to estimate hepatic proton density fat‐fraction (PDFF) at different magnetic field strengths.

Association of noninvasive quantitative decline in liver fat content on MRI with histologic response in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton-density-fat-fraction (MRI-PDFF) has been shown to be a noninvasive, accurate and reproducible imaging-based biomarker for assessing steatosis and treatment response in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) clinical trials. However, there are no data on the magnitude of MRI-PDFF reduction corresponding to histologic response in the setting of a NASH clinical trial. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare the magnitude of MRI-PDFF reduction between histologic responders versus histologic nonresponders in NASH patients. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of the MOZART trial, which included 50 patients with biopsy-proven NASH randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg/day orally or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary aim was to perform a head-to-head comparative analysis of histologic responders [defined as a ⩾2-point reduction in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) without worsening fibrosis] versus nonresponders, and the corresponding quantitative change in liver fat content measured via MRI-PDFF. Results: Of the 35 patients who underwent paired liver biopsy and MRI-PDFF assessment at the beginning and end of treatment, 10 demonstrated a histologic response. Compared with histologic nonresponders, histologic responders had a statistically significant reduction in MRI-PDFF of −4.1% ± 4.9 versus −0.6 ± 4.1 (p < 0.04) with a mean relative percent change of −29.3% ± 33.0 versus +2.0% ± 24.0 (p < 0.004), respectively. Conclusions: Utilizing paired MRI-PDFF and liver histology data, we demonstrate that a relative reduction of 29% in liver fat on MRI-PDFF is associated with a histologic response in NASH. After external validation by independent research groups, these results can be incorporated into designing future NASH clinical trials, especially those utilizing change in hepatic fat quantified by MRI-PDFF, as a treatment endpoint.

Magnetic Resonance Elastography Measured Shear Stiffness as a Biomarker of Fibrosis in Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a promising technique for noninvasive assessment of fibrosis, a major determinant of outcome in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, data in children are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MRE for the detection of fibrosis and advanced fibrosis in children with NAFLD and to assess agreement between manual and novel automated reading methods. We performed a prospective, multicenter study of two‐dimensional (2D) MRE in children with NAFLD. MR elastograms were analyzed manually at two reading centers, and using a new automated technique. Analysis using each approach was done independently. Correlations were determined between MRE analysis methods and fibrosis stage. Thresholds for classifying the presence of fibrosis and of advanced fibrosis were computed and cross‐validated. In 90 children with a mean age of 13.1 ± 2.4 years, median hepatic stiffness was 2.35 kPa. Stiffness values derived by each reading center were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.83). All three analyses were significantly correlated with fibrosis stage (center 1, ρ = 0.53; center 2, ρ = 0.55; and automated analysis, ρ = 0.52; P < 0.001). Overall cross‐validated accuracy for detecting any fibrosis was 72.2% for all methods (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.8%‐81.1%). Overall cross‐validated accuracy for assessing advanced fibrosis was 88.9% (95% CI, 80.5%‐94.5%) for center 1, 90.0% (95% CI, 81.9%‐95.3%) for center 2, and 86.7% (95% CI, 77.9%‐92.9%) for automated analysis. Conclusion: 2D MRE can estimate hepatic stiffness in children with NAFLD. Further refinement and validation of automated analysis techniques will be an important step in standardizing MRE. How to best integrate MRE into clinical protocols for the assessment of NAFLD in children will require prospective evaluation. (Hepatology 2017;66:1474–1485)

Magnetic resonance elastography identifies fibrosis in adults with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency liver disease: a prospective study

Limited data exist on the clinical presentation and non‐invasive detection of liver fibrosis in adults with homozygous Z genotype alpha‐1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency.