William Hawthorne

Incarceration Among Adults Who Are in the Public Mental Health System: Rates, Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes

OBJECTIVE Incarceration of people with mental illness has become a major social, clinical, and economic concern, with an estimated 2.1 million incarcerations in 2007. Prior studies have primarily focused on mental illness rates among incarcerated persons. This study examined rates of and risk factors for incarceration and reincarceration, as well as short-term outcomes after incarceration, among patients in a large public mental health system. METHODS The data set included 39,463 patient records combined with 4,544 matching incarceration records from the county jail system during fiscal year 2005-2006. Risk factors for incarceration and reincarceration were analyzed with logistic regression. Time after release from the index incarceration until receiving services was examined with survival analysis. RESULTS During the year, 11.5% of patients (N=4,544) were incarcerated. Risk factors for incarceration included prior incarcerations; co-occurring substance-related diagnoses; homelessness; schizophrenia, bipolar, or other psychotic disorder diagnoses; male gender; no Medicaid insurance; and being African American. Patients older than 45, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those from Latino, Asian, and other non-Euro-American racial-ethnic groups were less likely to be incarcerated. Risk factors for reincarceration included co-occurring substance-related diagnoses; prior incarceration; diagnosed schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; homelessness; and incarceration for three or fewer days. Patients whose first service after release from incarceration was outpatient or case management were less likely to receive subsequent emergency services or to be reincarcerated within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable factors affecting incarceration risk include homelessness, substance abuse, lack of medical insurance, and timely receipt of outpatient or case management services after release from incarceration.

Patterns of Public Mental Health Service Use by Age in Patients With Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE Authors examined the relationship between age and use of public mental health services by adults with schizophrenia in a large mental health care system. METHODS The study sample included 4,975 patients treated for schizophrenia in San Diego Countys Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) during fiscal year 1999-2000. They compared three age-groups: 18-44 years (young adults), 45-64 (middle-aged), and 65-or-older (elderly) on 1) the number of individuals treated for schizophrenia per 10,000 people in the county, and 2) the use of six different types of public mental health services, including hospitalization, emergency psychiatric unit, crisis house, outpatient clinic, day treatment, and case management. RESULTS Elderly patients with schizophrenia were underrepresented among AMHS users with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The use of hospitalization, emergency room, crisis house, and day treatment was highest among young-adult patients and decreased with age. Outpatient treatment use was similar for young-adult and middle-aged patients and lower for elderly patients. The only type of service use that seemed to increase with age was case management. Even after controlling for gender, ethnicity, living situation, substance use disorder, and insurance status, most of the above-mentioned age-related differences in service use persisted. CONCLUSION Among patients with schizophrenia in a public mental health system, old age was associated with significantly lower use of all mental health services except case management. Research is needed to explore reasons for this differential use of services across age-groups.

Diagnostic variability for schizophrenia and major depression in a large public mental health care system dataset

Administrative datasets can provide information about mental health treatment in real world settings; however, an important limitation in using these datasets is the uncertainty regarding psychiatric diagnosis. To better understand the psychiatric diagnoses, we investigated the diagnostic variability of schizophrenia and major depression in a large public mental health system. Using schizophrenia and major depression as the two comparison diagnoses, we compared the variability of diagnoses assigned to patients with one recorded diagnosis of schizophrenia or major depression. In addition, for both of these diagnoses, the diagnostic variability was compared across seven types of treatment settings. Statistical analyses were conducted using t tests for continuous data and chi-square tests for categorical data. We found that schizophrenia had greater diagnostic variability than major depression (31% vs. 43%). For both schizophrenia and major depression, variability was significantly higher in jail and the emergency psychiatric unit than in inpatient or outpatient settings. These findings demonstrate that the variability of psychiatric diagnoses recorded in the administrative dataset of a large public mental health system varies by diagnosis and by treatment setting. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between psychiatric diagnosis, diagnostic variability and treatment setting.