William Hsu

A New Defibrillator Discrimination Algorithm Utilizing Electrogram Morphology Analysis

Inappropriate therapies delivered by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for supraventricular arrhythmias remain a common problem, particularly in the event of rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation or marked sinus tachycardia. The ability to differentiate between ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular arrhythmias is the major goal of discrimination algorithms. Therefore, we developed a new algorithm, SimDis, utilizing morphological features of the shocking electrograms. This algorithm was developed from electrogram data obtained from 36 patients undergoing ICD implantation. An independent test set was evaluated in 25 patients. Recordings were made in sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia, and following the induction of ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. The arrhythmia complex is defined as wide if the duration is at least 30% greater than the template in sinus rhythm. For narrow complexes, four maximum and minimum values were measured to form a 4‐element feature vector, which was compared with a representative feature vector during normal sinus rhythm. For each rhythm, any wide complex was classified as ventricular tachycardia. For narrow complexes, the second step of the algorithm compared the electrogram with the template, computing similarity and dissimilarity values. These values were then mapped to determine if they fell within a previously established discrimination boundary. On the independent test set, the SimDis algorithm correctly classified 100% of ventricular tachycardias (27/27), 98% of sinus tachycardias (54/55), and 100% of episodes of atrial fibrillation (37/37). We conclude that the SimDis algorithm yields high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99%) for arrhythmia discrimination, using the computational capabilities of an ICD system.

Effect of Shock Timing on Defibrillation Success

The goal of this study was to determine whether delivering transvenous defibrillation shocks, coordinated with the up/down‐slope VF waveform patterns in the shocking lead, would improve the probability of successful defibrillation. Anesthetized swine (32–38 kg, n = 8) were implanted with an RV → SVC + SQArray transvenous system to measure VF waveform patterns and to deliver shocks. The shocks were generated by a Cardiac Pacemakers Inc. biphasic waveform generator. Energy required for 50% success probability (E50) was determined using the multishock up‐down protocol. VF was repeatedly induced and defibrillation shocks at E50 were given after 10 seconds. The defibrillation outcome, delivered energy (Ed), peak voltage (V), peak current (I), system impedance (Z) and VF waveform pattern at the time of shock were recorded and measured. Out of a total of 685 shocks, 324 (47%) succeeded and 361 (53%) failed. The Ed, V, I, and Z were similar for the two defibrillation outcome groups (success or failure). VF patterns were classified as high or low amplitude at the time of the shock based on the peak‐to‐peak amplitude of signals recorded between shocking electrodes. Shocks that coincided with high amplitude VF patterns were further divided into shocks that occurred on the up‐slope or on the down‐slope. The probability of success when the E50 shocks were coincident with high or low amplitude fibrillation did not differ significantly (Students t‐test: 46% vs 48%, P = NS). However, during high amplitude fibrillation, shocks delivered on the up‐slope were significantly more successful than those delivered on the down‐slope (Chi‐square: 67% vs 39%; P < 0.001). These results suggest that delivering defibrillation shocks during the up‐slope of the high amplitude signal in the shocking lead may improve the probability of successful defibrillation of ICDs.

Improved Internal Defibrillation Success With Shocks Timed to the Morphology Electrogram

BACKGROUNDnA previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment).nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnTen pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P<0.00 1). E80 was reduced 15.5%, from 27.1+/-2.5 to 22.9+/-1.8 J (P<0.002). The width of the probability-of-success curve (E80-E20) for the test treatment was also significantly narrower than that for the control treatment (7.1+/-0.9 versus 10.8+/-1.7, P<0.01). Normalized curve width (E80-E20)/E50 was decreased from 51+/-5% of E50 for control shocks to 37+/-4% of E50 for synchronous shocks (P<0.02).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this model, defibrillation threshold is lower and more deterministic when shocks are timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram. If a similar reduction is observed in humans, shock timing may lower defibrillation threshold and simplify programming of shock intensity.

Can shocks timed to action potentials in low-gradient regions improve both internal and out-of-hospital defibrillation?☆

Abstract During the first minute of fibrillation, circulating wavefronts excite new fibrillation action potentials almost immediately following termination of the preceding action potential. The extension of refractoriness hypothesis states that a successful defibrillating shock must produce a uniform postshock refractoriness of a specific optimal duration throughout the ventricle, which blocks these wavefronts and terminates fibrillation. We hypothesized that, if shocks are appropriately timed early in the fibrillation action potential in low-voltage-gradient regions, postshock refractoriness will already be long and the shock need not be strong enough to further extend it. This will result in a lower defibrillation threshold (DFT). This hypothesis was tested in the isolated rabbit heart model. Shocks were synchronized to monophasic action potentials recorded from a low-intensity region. An up/down protocol was used. I 50 for early shocks was 17% lower than that for late shocks (31% decrease in E 50 ). Standard deviation of I 50 was reduced from 32% for late shocks to 18% for early shocks. Therefore, shock synchronization improves both DFT and inter-subject variability during early fibrillation. As fibrillation duration increases, action potential frequency decreases and periods of diastole occur. Because of these ischemic changes, it is uncertain whether shock timing can produce similar improvements in defibrillation under out-of-hospital conditions.

Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement

Previous studies suggested that time periods exist during ventricular fibrillation when defibrillation shocks are more effective. However, there is no agreement on the amount of energy that can be saved or whether an implantable defibrillator can time shocks to these time periods. We conducted a study having two parts to investigate if there was any advantage to synchronizing internal defibrillation shocks to morphological patterns in ventricular fibrillation (VF). VF electrograms were recorded from the same three-electrode lead system used for internal defibrillation. In Part 1, we found no difference in the probability of successful defibrillation between shocks that were delivered into coarse and fine VF (48% vs 46%). However, shocks that were delivered to the upslope of coarse VF electrograms were more efficacious than those to the downslope of the waveform (67% vs 39%, P < .001). In the second study, we developed a real time computer system to prospectively deliver shocks on the upslope feature we identified in the first study. We found that the energy requirements at E50 and E80 were significantly lower for shocks delivered on the upslope of coarse VF than those delivered randomly at the end of 10 sec. We estimated a probability of success (POS) defibrillation curve using a maximum likelihood method for the timed and random shocks. The POS curve width was significantly narrower for shocks that were delivered to the upslope feature than the control treatment (7.1 +/- 0.9 vs. 10.8 +/- 1.7 J, P < 0.01). If these findings extend to clinical defibrillation, they may allow programming of internal defibrillators at lower energies. This could reduce potential postshock cardiac dysfunction, allow production of smaller devices, and improve battery life.

Clinical Evaluation of a Prototype Passive Fixation Dual Chamber Single Pass Lead For Dual Chamber ICD Systems

Dual chamber ICD systems use two separate leads for sensing. We developed and tested a new prototype of a single pass dual chamber passive fixation lead for dual chamber ICDs. Methods and Results: The prototype was a modification of the Guidant CPI Endotak DSP lead. The additional sensing electrode for the right atrium consisted of a side‐mounted porous atrial ring electrode (AR). Atrial signals were recorded from the lead in patients during normal sinus rhythm (NSR), atrial fibrillation (AFib), and/or atrial flutter (AFl) with the AR in stable contact with the atrial wall or floating. During NSR, with the AR in contact with the atrial wall, an average P wave amplitude of 7.2 ± 1.5 mV (mean ± SD, n = 12) was measured. After induction of AFib/AFl, the single amplitude decreased to 3.6 ± 1.5 mV (n = 8) during AFib and 3.4 ± 1.7 mV (n = 9) during AFl. Amplitudes dropped between 53% and 75% when the AR lost atrial wall contact. The atrial pacing threshold was 1.0 ± 0.4 V (n = 16) when the AR was in contact with the atrial wall. Conclusions: In future dual chamber ICDs the signals from a passive fixation single pass lead could be used for atrial sensing and pacing as long as the sensing electrode for the right atrium remains in contact with the atrial wall. This system might lead to a simpler, less invasive implantation of dual chamber ICD systems.