William J. Berg

Eligibility and Outcomes Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Trials for Patients in the State of a Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen: Recommendations From the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group

PURPOSE To define methodology to show clinical benefit for patients in the state of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). RESULTS HYPOTHESIS A clinical states framework was used to address the hypothesis that definitive phase III trials could not be conducted in this patient population. PATIENT POPULATION The Group focused on men with systemic (nonlocalized) recurrence and a defined risk of developing clinically detectable metastases. Models to define systemic versus local recurrence, and risk of metastatic progression were discussed. INTERVENTION Therapies that have shown favorable effects in more advanced clinical states; meaningful biologic surrogates of activity linked with efficacy in other tumor types; and/or effects on a target or pathway known to contribute to prostate cancer progression in this state can be considered for evaluation. OUTCOMES An intervention-specific posttherapy PSA-based outcome definition that would justify further testing should be described at the outset. Reporting: Trial reports should include a table showing the number of patients who achieve a specific PSA-based outcome, the number who remain enrolled onto the trial, and the number who came off study at different time points. The term PSA response should be abandoned. TRIAL DESIGN The phases of drug development for this state are optimizing dose and schedule, demonstration of a treatment effect, and clinical benefit. To move a drug forward should require a high bar that includes no rise in PSA in a defined proportion of patients for a specified period of time at a minimum. Agents that do not produce this effect can only be tested in combination. The preferred end point of clinical benefit is prostate cancer-specific survival; the time to development of metastatic disease is an alternative. CONCLUSION Methodology to show that an intervention alters the natural history of prostate cancer is described. At each stage of development, only agents with sufficient activity should be moved forward.

Effect of cytokine therapy on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship between treatment with cytokine therapy and survival, investigate the effect of nephrectomy on survival, and identify long-term survivors among a cohort of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 670 patients with advanced RCC treated on 24 clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy or cytokine therapy were the subjects of this retrospective analysis. Treatment was categorized as cytokine (containing interferon alfa and/or interleukin-2) in 396 patients (59%) and as chemotherapy (cytotoxic or hormonal therapy) in 274 (41%). Among the 670 patients, those with survival times of greater than 5 years were identified as long-term survivors. RESULTS Patients treated with cytokine therapy had a longer survival time than did those treated with chemotherapy, regardless of the year of treatment or risk category based on pretreatment features. The median survival times for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients were 27, 12, and 6 months for those treated with cytokines and 15, 7, and 3 months for those treated with chemotherapy, respectively. The magnitude of difference in median survival was greater in the favorable- and intermediate-risk groups. The median survival time was less than 6 months in the poor-risk group for both treatment programs. Median survival time was 14 months among patients with prior nephrectomy plus time from diagnosis to treatment greater than 1 year versus 8 months among those with time from diagnosis to treatment less than 1 year, regardless of pretreatment nephrectomy status. Thirty patients (4.5%) among the 670 patients were identified as long-term survivors; 12 were free of disease after nephrectomy and treatment with interferon alfa, interleukin-2, or surgical resection of metastasis. CONCLUSION The low proportion of patients with advanced RCC who achieve long-term survival emphasizes the need for clinical investigation to identify more effective therapy.

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study of First-Line Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy Plus PTK787/ZK 222584, an Oral Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK; vatalanib), an orally active, multitargeted angiogenesis inhibitor, has shown tolerability and promising activity in early-phase studies, which led to a phase III trial in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 1,168) with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive FOLFOX4 plus PTK/ZK or placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00056459). Stratification factors included WHO performance status (0 v 1 or 2) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; ≤ v > 1.5× the upper limit of normal). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS PFS, OS, and ORR were not statistically improved with PTK/ZK (P > .05). Median PFS by central review was 7.7 months with PTK/ZK versus 7.6 months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P = .118); median OS was 21.4 months with PTK/ZK versus 20.5 months with placebo (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.24; P = .260). In an exploratory post hoc analysis of PFS in patients (n = 158 per arm) with high serum LDH, a potential marker of hypoxia, PFS was longer with PTK/ZK versus placebo (7.7 v 5.8 months, respectively; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.91; P = .009). CONCLUSION Although the efficacy objectives of this study were not met, a subgroup of patients who may potentially benefit from small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy has been identified and further research is warranted.

Phase II Trial of Thalidomide for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-six patients with RCC were treated with thalidomide at a starting dose of 200 mg daily. Thalidomide was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks until a maximum dose of 800 mg or prohibitive toxicity was reached. Fifteen patients had prior nephrectomy, 11 patients had no prior systemic therapy, and 15 had received one prior systemic regimen. RESULTS A maximum dose of 800 mg, 600 mg, 400 mg, and 200 mg was reached in five, 10, eight, and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 dyspnea occurred in four and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 neurologic toxicity was observed in five and two patients, respectively. Of the 25 assessable patients, the best response was stable disease in 16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 82%) patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 32% (95% CI, 14% to 50%). Three patients achieved prolonged stable disease of 16, 16+, and 18+ months, including two patients who were refractory to previous cytokine therapy. Fifty-seven percent were alive at 1 year (95% CI, 37% to 76%). CONCLUSION This trial does not support the routine use of thalidomide to induce partial response for metastatic RCC. Because disease stabilization occurs as a part of the natural history of metastatic RCC, the potential effect of thalidomide on progression-free and overall survival for patients with advanced RCC is being addressed in a randomized phase III trial. New immunomodulatory analogs of thalidomide that have shown potentially greater antitumor effects in preclinical models warrant study in metastatic RCC.

Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Subcutaneous Recombinant Human Interleukin-12 Versus Interferon-α2a for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Recombinant human interleukin-12 (rHuIL-12) is a pleiotropic cytokine with anticancer activity against renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in preclinical models and in a phase I trial. A randomized phase II study of rHuIL-12 compared with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) evaluated clinical response for patients with previously untreated, advanced RCC. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either rHuIL-12 or IFN-alpha2a. rHuIL-12 was administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of IL-12 was escalated during cycle 1 to a maintenance dose of 1.25 microg/kg. IFN was administered at 9 million units by s.c. injection three times per week. Serum concentrations of IL-12, IFN-gamma, IL-10, and neopterin were obtained in 10 patients treated with rHuIL-12 after the first full dose of 1.25 microg/kg given on day 15 (dose 3) of cycle 1 and again after multiple doses on day 15 (dose 6) of cycle 2. Thirty patients were treated with rHuIL-12, and 16 patients were treated with IFN-alpha. Two (7%) of 30 patients treated with rHuIL-12 achieved a partial response, and the trial was closed to accrual based on the low response proportion. IL-12 was absorbed rapidly after s.c. drug administration, with the peak serum concentration appearing at approximately 12 h in both cycles. Serum IL-12 concentrations remained stable on multiple dosing. Levels of IFN-gamma, IL-10, and neopterin increased with rHuIL-12 and were maintained in cycle 2. rHuIL-12 is a novel cytokine with unique pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic features under study for the treatment of malignancy and other medical conditions. The low response proportion associated with rHuIL-12 single-agent therapy against metastatic RCC was disappointing, given the preclinical data. Further study of rHuIL-12 for other medical conditions is underway. For RCC, the study of new cytokines is of the highest priority.

A Phase II study of 13-cis-retinoic acid in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to determine the antitumor activity of 13-cis-retinoic acid as a single agent in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eligible patients had advanced renal cell carcinoma with bi-dimensionally measurable disease, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70, life expectancy of greater than three months, no evidence of brain metastases, and treatment with no more than one chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated with one mg/kg/day of 13-cis-retinoic acid orally. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in this study and 25 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Of the twenty-five evaluable patients, no major responses were achieved. Toxicity was mild, with no patient requiring a dose reduction. At the dose administered in this trial, 13-cis-retinoic acid is inactive as a single agent in renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II Trial of Irofulven (6-Hydroxymethylacylfulvene) for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to determine the antitumor activityof irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene) in patients withadvanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Eligible patients hadadvanced renal cell carcinoma with bidimensionally measurabledisease, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70, lifeexpectancy of greater than three months, no prior treatmentwith chemotherapy, and no evidence of brain metastases.Irofulven was administered at a dose of 11 mg/m2 by 5-minintravenous infusion, on 5 consecutive days. Cycles wererepeated every 28 days. Thirteen patients were enrolled inthis study and 12 were evaluable for response. Of the twelveevaluable patients, no major responses were achieved. Eightpatients had stable disease as best response. Toxicityincluded myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects.At the dose and schedule used in this trial, irofulven did notproduce clinical response in RCC.

Role of Interferon in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The outlook for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is poor, with a 5-yr survival proportion of less than 10% for patients presenting with stage IV disease (1). RCC is highly resistant to chemotherapy, with no single agent showing significant antitumor activity (2). Late relapses after nephrectomy, prolonged stable disease in the absence of systemic therapy (3), and rare spontaneous regressions (4) were clinical observations that suggested host immune mechanisms could be important in regulating tumor growth and fostered the study of immunotherapy against RCC.

A phase II study of pyrazoloacridine in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to determine the antitumor activity of pyrazoloacridine in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Eligible patients had advanced renal cell carcinoma with bidimensionally measurable disease, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70, life expectancy of greater than three months, no prior treatment with chemotherapy, and no evidence of brain metastases. Patients were treated intravenously with 750 mg/m2 every three weeks. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study and all were evaluable for response and toxicity. Of the twelve patients, no major responses were achieved. Toxicity was mild, with three patients requiring a 20% dose reduction. At the dose and schedule used in this trial, pyrazoloacridine is inactive in renal cell carcinoma.