Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William J. Floyd is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William J. Floyd.


Topology and its Applications | 1982

Incompressible surfaces in punctured-torus bundles

William J. Floyd; Allen Hatcher

Abstract We derive in this paper the classification up to isotopy of the incompressible surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds which fiber over the circle with fiber a once-punctured torus. From this classification it follows that most of the 3-manifolds obtained by compactifying these bundles via a circle at infinity are closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds which contain 1.0 incompressible surfaces, i.e., are not Haken manifolds.


Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of The American Mathematical Society | 2001

Finite subdivision rules

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry

We introduce and study finite subdivision rules. A finite subdivision rule R consists of a finite 2-dimensional CW complex SR, a subdivision R(SR) of SR, and a continuous cellular map φR : R(SR) → SR whose restriction to each open cell is a homeomorphism. If R is a finite subdivision rule, X is a 2-dimensional CW complex, and f : X → SR is a continuous cellular map whose restriction to each open cell is a homeomorphism, then we can recursively subdivide X to obtain an infinite sequence of tilings. We wish to determine when this sequence of tilings is conformal in the sense of Cannon’s combinatorial Riemann mapping theorem. In this setting, it is proved that the two axioms of conformality can be replaced by a single axiom which is implied by either of them, and that it suffices to check conformality for finitely many test annuli. Theorems are given which show how to exploit symmetry, and many examples are computed.


Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of The American Mathematical Society | 2003

Constructing rational maps from subdivision rules

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Richard Kenyon; Walter R. Parry

Suppose R is a finite subdivision rule with an edge pairing. Then the subdivision map σR is either a homeomorphism, a covering of a torus, or a critically finite branched covering of a 2-sphere. If R has mesh approaching 0 and SR is a 2-sphere, it is proved in Theorem 3.1 that if R is conformal then σR is realizable by a rational map. Furthermore, a general construction is given which, starting with a one tile rotationally invariant finite subdivision rule, produces a finite subdivision rule Q with an edge pairing such that σQ is realizable by a rational map. In this paper we illustrate a technique for constructing critically finite rational maps. The starting point for the construction is an orientation-preserving finite subdivision rule R with an edge pairing. For such a finite subdivision rule the CW-complex SR is a surface, and the map σR : SR → SR is a branched covering. If SR is orientable, then unless σR is a homeomorphism or a covering of the torus, SR is a 2-sphere and σR is critically finite. In the latter case, SR has an orbifold structure OR and σR induces a map τR : T (OR) → T (OR) on the Teichmüller space of the orbifold. By work of Thurston, σR can be realized by a rational map exactly if τR has a fixed point. Alternatively, we prove that σR can be realized by a rational map if R has mesh approaching 0 and is conformal. We next give a general construction which, starting with a one tile rotationally invariant finite subdivision rule R, produces an orientation-preserving finite subdivision rule Q with an edge pairing such that Q is conformal if and only if R is conformal; we then show in Theorem 3.2 that σQ is realizable by a rational map. We next give several examples of orientation-preserving finite subdivision rules with edge pairings. For each example R for which the associated map σR can be realized by a rational map, we explicitly construct a rational map realizing it. We conclude with some questions. A motivation for this work is the Bowers-Stephenson paper [1]. In that paper they construct an expansion complex for the pentagonal subdivision rule (see Figure 4) and numerically approximate the expansion constant. In Example 4.4 we consider an associated finite subdivision ruleQ with an edge pairing and construct a rational map fQ(z) = 2z(z+9/16)5 27(z−3/128)3(z−1)2 which realizes σQ. The expansion constant for the pentagonal subdivision rule is (f ′ Q(0)) 1/5 = (−324)1/5. We thank Curt McMullen, Kevin Pilgrim, and the referee for helpful comments. Date: September 30, 2002. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 37F10, 52C20; Secondary 57M12.


Geometriae Dedicata | 1989

Solvgroups are not almost convex

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; M.A. Grayson; William P. Thurston

We show that no cocompact discrete group based on solvgeometry, Sol, is almost convex. This reflects the geometry of Sol, and implies that the Cayley graph of a cocompact discrete group based on Sol cannot be efficiently constructed by finitely many local replacement rules.


Transactions of the American Mathematical Society | 1993

Symmetries of planar growth functions. II

William J. Floyd

Chapter 4, Exercises]. If G is also a Weyl group, then via the Bruhat decomposition, this symmetry reflects Poincar6 duality on a homogeneous space (see [9, P. 123-124]). If G is an infinite Coxeter group, Bourbaki (and also Steinberg [I4, p. 12]) showed that f(z) is the power series of a rational function, which we will also call f [1, p. 45]. In the case that G is compact hyperbolic or irreduc-


Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of The American Mathematical Society | 2006

Expansion complexes for finite subdivision rules. II

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry

This paper gives applications of earlier work of the authors on the use of expansion complexes for studying conformality of finite subdivision rules. The first application is that a one-tile rotationally invariant finite subdivision rule (with bounded valence and mesh approaching 0) has an invariant partial conformal structure, and hence is conformal. The paper next considers one-tile single valence finite subdivision rules. It is shown that an expansion map for such a finite subdivision rule can be conjugated to a linear map, and that the finite subdivision rule is conformal exactly when this linear map is either a dilation or has eigenvalues that are not real. Finally, an example is given of an irreducible finite subdivision rule that has a parabolic expansion complex and a hyperbolic expansion complex.


Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of The American Mathematical Society | 2007

Constructing subdivision rules from rational maps

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry

This paper deepens the connections between critically finite rational maps and finite subdivision rules. The main theorem is that if f is a critically finite rational map with no periodic critical points, then for any sufficiently large integer n the iterate f is the subdivision map of a finite subdivision rule. We are interested here in connections between finite subdivision rules and rational maps. Finite subdivision rules arose out of our attempt to resolve Cannon’s Conjecture: If G is a Gromov-hyperbolic group whose space at infinity is a 2-sphere, then G has a cocompact, properly discontinuous, isometric action on hyperbolic 3-space. Cannon’s Conjecture can be reduced (see, for example, the Cannon-Swenson paper [5]) to a conjecture about (combinatorial) conformality for the action of such a group G on its space at infinity, and finite subdivision rules were developed to give models for the action of a Gromov-hyperbolic group on the 2-sphere at infinity. There is also a connection between finite subdivision rules and rational maps. If R is an orientation-preserving finite subdivision rule such that the subdivision complex SR is a 2-sphere, then the subdivision map σR is a critically finite branched map of this 2-sphere. In joint work [3] with Kenyon we consider these subdivision maps under the additional hypotheses that R has bounded valence (this is equivalent to its not having periodic critical points) and mesh approaching 0. In [3, Theorem 3.1] we show that if R is conformal (in the combinatorial sense) then the subdivision map σR is equivalent to a rational map. The converse follows from [4, Theorem 4.7]. In this paper we consider the problem of when a rational map f can be equivalent to the subdivision map of a finite subdivision rule. Since a subdivision complex has only finitely many vertices, such a rational map must be critically finite. We specialize here to the case that f has no periodic critical points. Our main theorem, which has also been proved by Bonk and Meyer [1] when f has a hyperbolic orbifold (which includes all but some well-understood examples), is the following: Date: March 15, 2007. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 37F10, 52C20; Secondary 57M12.


Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of The American Mathematical Society | 2012

Nearly Euclidean Thurston maps

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry; Kevin M. Pilgrim

We introduce and study a class of Thurston maps from the 2-sphere to itself which we call nearly Euclidean Thurston (NET) maps. These are simple generalizations of Euclidean Thurston maps.


Algebraic & Geometric Topology | 2003

Heegaard diagrams and surgery descriptions for twisted face-pairing 3-manifolds

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry

The twisted face-pairing construction of our earlier papers gives an ecient way of generating, mechanically and with little eort, myriads of relatively simple face-pairing descriptions of interesting closed 3-manifolds. The corresponding description in terms of surgery, or Dehn-lling, reveals the twist construction as a carefully organized surgery on a link. In this paper, we work out the relationship between the twisted face-pairing description of closed 3-manifolds and the more common descriptions by surgery and Heegaard diagrams. We show that all Heegaard diagrams have a natural decomposition into subdiagrams called Heegaard cylinders, each of which has a natural shape given by the ratio of two positive integers. We characterize the Heegaard diagrams arising naturally from a twisted face-pairing description as those whose Heegaard cylinders all have inte- gral shape. This characterization allows us to use the Kirby calculus and standard tools of Heegaard theory to attack the problem of nding which closed, orientable 3-manifolds have a twisted face-pairing description.


Transactions of the American Mathematical Society | 2002

Twisted face-pairing 3-manifolds

James W. Cannon; William J. Floyd; Walter R. Parry

This paper is an enriched version of our introductory paper on twisted face-pairing 3-manifolds. Just as every edge-pairing of a 2-dimensional disk yields a closed 2-manifold, so also every face-pairing e of a faceted 3-ball P yields a closed 3-dimensional pseudomanifold. In dimension 3, the pseudomanifold may suffer from the defect that it fails to be a true 3-manifold at some of its vertices. The method of twisted face-pairing shows how to correct this defect of the quotient pseudomanifold P/∈ systematically. The method describes how to modify P by edge subdivision and how to modify any orientation-reversing face-pairing ∈ of P by twisting, so as to yield an infinite parametrized family of face-pairings (Q, δ) whose quotient complexes Q/δ are all closed orientable 3-manifolds. The method is so efficient that, starting even with almost trivial face-pairings ∈, it yields a rich family of highly nontrivial, yet relatively simple, 3-manifolds. This paper solves two problems raised by the introductory paper: (1) Replace the computational proof of the introductory paper by a conceptual geometric proof of the fact that the quotient complex Q/δ of a twisted face-pairing is a closed 3-manifold. We do so by showing that the quotient complex has just one vertex and that its link is the faceted sphere dual to Q. (2) The twist construction has an ambiguity which allows one to twist all faces clockwise or to twist all faces counterclockwise. The fundamental groups of the two resulting quotient complexes are not at all obviously isomorphic. Are the two manifolds the same, or are they distinct? We prove the highly nonobvious fact that clockwise twists and counterclockwise twists yield the same manifold. The homeomorphism between them is a duality homeomorphism which reverses orientation and interchanges natural 0-handles with 3-handles, natural 1-handles with 2-handles. This duality result of (2) is central to our further studies of twisted face-pairings. We also relate the fundamental groups and homology groups of the twisted face-pairing 3-manifolds Q/δ and of the original pseudomanifold P/∈ (with vertices removed). We conclude the paper by giving examples of twisted face-pairing 3-manifolds. These examples include manifolds from five of Thurstons eight 3-dimensional geometries.

Collaboration


Dive into the William J. Floyd's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walter R. Parry

Eastern Michigan University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

LeeR Lambert

Brigham Young University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge