William J. Geese

First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND Nivolumab has been associated with longer overall survival than docetaxel among patients with previously treated non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In an open‐label phase 3 trial, we compared first‐line nivolumab with chemotherapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1)–positive NSCLC. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and a PD‐L1 tumor‐expression level of 1% or more to receive nivolumab (administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight once every 2 weeks) or platinum‐based chemotherapy (administered once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles). Patients receiving chemotherapy could cross over to receive nivolumab at the time of disease progression. The primary end point was progression‐free survival, as assessed by means of blinded independent central review, among patients with a PD‐L1 expression level of 5% or more. RESULTS Among the 423 patients with a PD‐L1 expression level of 5% or more, the median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months with nivolumab versus 5.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.45; P=0.25), and the median overall survival was 14.4 months versus 13.2 months (hazard ratio for death, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.30). A total of 128 of 212 patients (60%) in the chemotherapy group received nivolumab as subsequent therapy. Treatment‐related adverse events of any grade occurred in 71% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 92% of those who received chemotherapy. Treatment‐related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 51% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab was not associated with significantly longer progression‐free survival than chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with a PD‐L1 expression level of 5% or more. Overall survival was similar between groups. Nivolumab had a favorable safety profile, as compared with chemotherapy, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 026 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02041533.)

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study

BACKGROUND Nivolumab has shown improved survival in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and activity of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for NSCLC. METHODS The open-label, phase 1, multicohort study (CheckMate 012) cohorts reported here were enrolled at eight US academic centres. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent stage IIIb or stage IV, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 12 weeks, or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal of consent. Data from the latter two cohorts, which were considered potentially suitable for further clinical development, are presented in this report; data from the other cohort (as well as several earlier cohorts) are described in the appendix. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability, assessed in all treated patients. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01454102. FINDINGS Between May 15, 2014, and March 25, 2015, 78 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 12 weeks (n=38) or nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 6 weeks (n=40). One patient in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort was excluded before treatment; therefore 77 patients actually received treatment (38 in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort; 39 in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort). At data cut-off on Jan 7, 2016, 29 (76%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 32 (82%) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort had discontinued treatment. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (37%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (33%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort; the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased lipase (three [8%] and no patients), pneumonitis (two [5%] and one [3%] patients), adrenal insufficiency (one [3%] and two [5%] patients), and colitis (one [3%] and two [5%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 12 (32%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11 (28%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) prompted treatment discontinuation in four (11%) patients in the every-12-weeks cohort and five (13%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Confirmed objective responses were achieved in 18 (47% [95% CI 31-64]) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 15 (38% [95% CI 23-55]) patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort; median duration of response was not reached in either cohort, with median follow-up times of 12·8 months (IQR 9·3-15·5) in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11·8 months (6·7-15·9) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort. In patients with PD-L1 of 1% or greater, confirmed objective responses were achieved in 12 (57%) of 21 patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (57%) of 23 patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort. INTERPRETATION In NSCLC, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a tolerable safety profile and showed encouraging clinical activity characterised by a high response rate and durable response. To our knowledge, the results of this study are the first suggestion of improved benefit compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with NSCLC, supporting further assessment of this combination in a phase 3 study. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden

BACKGROUND Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy for the treatment of non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 trial, and tumor mutational burden has emerged as a potential biomarker of benefit. In this part of an open‐label, multipart, phase 3 trial, we examined progression‐free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy among patients with a high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations per megabase). METHODS We enrolled patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC that was not previously treated with chemotherapy. Those with a level of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression of at least 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy; those with a tumor PD‐L1 expression level of less than 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Tumor mutational burden was determined by the FoundationOne CDx assay. RESULTS Progression‐free survival among patients with a high tumor mutational burden was significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy. The 1‐year progression‐free survival rate was 42.6% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 13.2% with chemotherapy, and the median progression‐free survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 13.2) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.8) (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 97.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.81; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 45.3% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 26.9% with chemotherapy. The benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy was broadly consistent within subgroups, including patients with a PD‐L1 expression level of at least 1% and those with a level of less than 1%. The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment‐related adverse events was 31.2% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.1% with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Progression‐free survival was significantly longer with first‐line nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC and a high tumor mutational burden, irrespective of PD‐L1 expression level. The results validate the benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in NSCLC and the role of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for patient selection. (Funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 227 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477826.)

Implementation of Amplicon Parallel Sequencing Leads to Improvement of Diagnosis and Therapy of Lung Cancer Patients

Introduction: The Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer was set up to rapidly translate scientific advances into early clinical trials of targeted therapies in lung cancer performing molecular analyses of more than 3500 patients annually. Because sequential analysis of the relevant driver mutations on fixated samples is challenging in terms of workload, tissue availability, and cost, we established multiplex parallel sequencing in routine diagnostics. The aim was to analyze all therapeutically relevant mutations in lung cancer samples in a high-throughput fashion while significantly reducing turnaround time and amount of input DNA compared with conventional dideoxy sequencing of single polymerase chain reaction amplicons. Methods: In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of a 102 amplicon multiplex polymerase chain reaction followed by sequencing on an Illumina sequencer on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue in routine diagnostics. Analysis of a validation cohort of 180 samples showed this approach to require significantly less input material and to be more reliable, robust, and cost-effective than conventional dideoxy sequencing. Subsequently, 2657 lung cancer patients were analyzed. Results: We observed that comprehensive biomarker testing provided novel information in addition to histological diagnosis and clinical staging. In 2657 consecutively analyzed lung cancer samples, we identified driver mutations at the expected prevalence. Furthermore we found potentially targetable DDR2 mutations at a frequency of 3% in both adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. Conclusion: Overall, our data demonstrate the utility of systematic sequencing analysis in a clinical routine setting and highlight the dramatic impact of such an approach on the availability of therapeutic strategies for the targeted treatment of individual cancer patients.

Genetic analysis implicates resistin in HIV lipodystrophy.

Objectives:To investigate the role of genetic variation in influencing the risk of metabolic complications associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Methods:Cluster analysis of metabolic traits of 189 patients enrolled in ACTG5005s, the metabolic substudy of ACTG384, a clinical trial of HAART, was performed to identify a subgroup of individuals with increased risk of developing a cluster of metabolic abnormalities after exposure to HAART. Almost 300 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 135 candidate genes were evaluated for their association with this subgroup. Results:A subgroup of patients was identified that had a normal metabolic profile at baseline but developed significantly elevated lipids and insulin resistance on HAART. This high-risk subgroup of patients also experienced significant body composition changes, particularly limb fat loss. Candidate gene analysis revealed that a single nucleotide polymorphism in resistin, a gene previously implicated in obesity and insulin resistance, was associated with this high-risk group (P = 0.0003). Conclusion:Genetic variation in resistin is associated with metabolic complications caused by HAART.

Abstract CT077: Five-year follow-up from the CA209-003 study of nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Clinical characteristics of long-term survivors

Introduction: Prior to the introduction of immunotherapies, treatment options were limited for patients (pts) with NSCLC who progressed after first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy. The majority of pts with advanced disease died within 1 y of diagnosis, and 5-y survival for metastatic NSCLC was ~1%. Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, showed encouraging activity in pts with heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC in a phase 1 dose-escalation cohort expansion trial (CA209-003; NCT00730639). Based on improved overall survival (OS) versus docetaxel in 2 phase 3 studies in previously treated advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 017 and 057), nivolumab was approved in this population. Reports of long-term efficacy and safety with immune checkpoint inhibitors are limited. Here we report updated results from CA209-003 based on ~5 y of follow-up, representing the longest survival follow-up for an immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced NSCLC to date. Methods: Pts with heavily pretreated (1-5 prior systemic regimens) advanced NSCLC received nivolumab (1, 3, or 10 mg/kg) every 2 wk in 8-wk cycles for up to 96 wk. The primary objective was safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included objective response rate and duration of response. OS from the time of first dose was an exploratory objective. The minimum follow-up for the current analysis was 58.25 mo. Results: At database lock, the Kaplan-Meier-estimated 5-y OS rate in all pts (N = 129) was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10, 23). OS rates at 5 y were similar in pts with squamous (SQ; n = 54; 16% [95% CI: 8, 28]) and non-SQ (n = 74; 15% [95% CI: 8, 25]) NSCLC (excludes 1 pt with unknown histology). Of the 16 pts who survived ≥5 y (median age: 61.5 y [range: 44, 80]), 9 pts were male and 12 were current smokers at baseline (2 former smokers; 2 unknown). In 10 evaluable pts, PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was ≥1% in 7 pts (≥50% in 5) and Conclusions: Nivolumab resulted in durable OS in a notable proportion of pts with pretreated advanced NSCLC, as demonstrated by a 5-y OS rate of 16%. Long-term survivors had diverse baseline and on-treatment characteristics including histology, PD-L1 expression level (including pts with Citation Format: Julie Brahmer, Leora Horn, David Jackman, David Spigel, Scott Antonia, Matthew Hellmann, John Powderly, Rebecca Heist, Lecia Sequist, David C. Smith, Philip Leming, William J. Geese, Dennis Yoon, Ang Li, Scott Gettinger. Five-year follow-up from the CA209-003 study of nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Clinical characteristics of long-term survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT077. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT077

Dasatinib plus Capecitabine for Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety and Efficacy in Phase I Study CA180004

Purpose: Dasatinib is an Src family kinase inhibitor with modest activity in advanced breast cancer. We aimed to assess toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for dasatinib plus capecitabine, estimate efficacy, and explore effects on angiogenesis. Experimental Design: Dose levels (DL) were dasatinib 50 mg twice daily (DL1), 70 mg twice daily (DL2 and DL3), or 100 mg daily (DL3a); plus capecitabine on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle, at 825 mg/m2 twice daily (DL1 and DL2) or 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily [DL3 and DL3a (MTD)]. DL3a was expanded to evaluate safety/efficacy. Plasma samples were collected for biomarker analysis. Results: Thirty-one and 21 patients were treated in the escalation and expansion phases. Sixty percent of tumors were hormone receptor–positive. Most common adverse events (AE) were any grade nausea (58%), hand–foot syndrome (44%), diarrhea (33%), fatigue (33%), vomiting (31%), and asthenia (31%). Most common grade 3/4 AEs were hand–foot syndrome (12%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (8%), pleural effusion (8%), and vomiting (6%). The MTD was defined at DL3a (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily and dasatinib 100 mg daily). Of 25 response-evaluable patients treated at DL3a, confirmed partial response was noted in 24% and stable disease in an additional 32%; median progression-free survival was 14.4 weeks. Significant decreases in plasma VEGF-A and increases in VEGFR-2 and collagen-IV were observed. Conclusions: Dasatinib 100 mg once daily plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily were tolerable and were associated with clinical benefit in 56% of response-evaluable patients. Biomarker changes were consistent with an antiangiogenic effect. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1884–93. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract CT082: Impact of tumor mutation burden on the efficacy of first-line nivolumab in stage iv or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: An exploratory analysis of CheckMate 026

Background: CheckMate 026 is a randomized trial of nivolumab monotherapy versus platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with untreated stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ≥1% programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression. Nivolumab was not associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with ≥5% PD-L1 expression, however, nivolumab had a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) was similar between treatment arms. In an exploratory analysis, we assessed whether patients with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) may derive enhanced benefit from nivolumab compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy. Methods: TMB scores for missense, somatic mutations were determined in patients with sufficient samples for whole exome sequencing of tumor and matched whole blood DNA. For the initial analyses, patients were equally divided into groups based on TMB tertile distribution. Patients in the low, medium, and high TMB tertiles had 0-99, 100-242, and ≥243 mutations, respectively. Results: Of 541 randomized patients, 312 (57.7%) had evaluable data to determine TMB. The percentage of patients with high TMB was lower in the nivolumab arm than in the chemotherapy arm (29.7% vs 39.0%). Baseline characteristics, PFS, and OS in patients evaluable for TMB were similar to all randomized patients. In patients with high TMB, PFS was improved (median PFS of 9.7 vs. 5.8 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.00) and objective response rate was higher with nivolumab versus chemotherapy (46.8% vs 28.3%). OS in patients with high TMB was similar between the 2 treatment arms, which may be attributable in part to a 65% crossover rate to nivolumab in the chemotherapy arm for this subgroup. Conclusions: This is the first pivotal randomized phase 3 trial to incorporate an analysis evaluating TMB and clinical benefit with programmed death-1 inhibitor therapy. The findings of this exploratory retrospective analysis suggest that nivolumab improves ORR and PFS compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with high TMB. Citation Format: Solange Peters, Benjamin Creelan, Matthew D. Hellmann, Mark A. Socinski, Martin Reck, Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran, Han Chang, William J. Geese, Luis Paz-Ares, David P. Carbone. Impact of tumor mutation burden on the efficacy of first-line nivolumab in stage iv or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: An exploratory analysis of CheckMate 026 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT082. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT082

Dasatinib Plus Capecitabine for Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety and Preliminary Efficacy in Phase I Study CA180004

Purpose: Dasatinib is an Src family kinase inhibitor with modest activity in advanced breast cancer. We aimed to assess toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for dasatinib plus capecitabine, estimate efficacy, and explore effects on angiogenesis. Experimental Design: Dose levels (DL) were dasatinib 50 mg twice daily (DL1), 70 mg twice daily (DL2 and DL3), or 100 mg daily (DL3a); plus capecitabine on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle, at 825 mg/m2 twice daily (DL1 and DL2) or 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily [DL3 and DL3a (MTD)]. DL3a was expanded to evaluate safety/efficacy. Plasma samples were collected for biomarker analysis. Results: Thirty-one and 21 patients were treated in the escalation and expansion phases. Sixty percent of tumors were hormone receptor–positive. Most common adverse events (AE) were any grade nausea (58%), hand–foot syndrome (44%), diarrhea (33%), fatigue (33%), vomiting (31%), and asthenia (31%). Most common grade 3/4 AEs were hand–foot syndrome (12%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (8%), pleural effusion (8%), and vomiting (6%). The MTD was defined at DL3a (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily and dasatinib 100 mg daily). Of 25 response-evaluable patients treated at DL3a, confirmed partial response was noted in 24% and stable disease in an additional 32%; median progression-free survival was 14.4 weeks. Significant decreases in plasma VEGF-A and increases in VEGFR-2 and collagen-IV were observed. Conclusions: Dasatinib 100 mg once daily plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily were tolerable and were associated with clinical benefit in 56% of response-evaluable patients. Biomarker changes were consistent with an antiangiogenic effect. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1884–93. ©2013 AACR.

Five-Year Follow-Up of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CA209-003 Study

Purpose In two phase III studies, nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor antibody, improved overall survival (OS) versus docetaxel in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report 5-year follow-up results from an early phase I study of nivolumab in this patient population and describe characteristics of 5-year survivors. Patients and Methods Patients with pretreated, advanced NSCLC received nivolumab 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in 8-week cycles for up to 96 weeks. OS from the time of first dose was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The estimated 5-year OS rate was 16% for all treated patients (N = 129); 5-year OS rates were similar for squamous (16%) and nonsquamous (15%) NSCLC. Of 16 5-year survivors, most (88%) were known current or former smokers. Of 10 5-year survivors with quantifiable PD-1 ligand 1 expression, 70% had ≥ 1% PD-1 ligand 1 expression at baseline. Twelve 5-year survivors (75%) achieved a partial response to nivolumab per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0, and two each (12%) had stable disease and progressive disease as best response. Nine 5-year survivors (56%) completed the maximum 96 weeks of nivolumab; four (25%) discontinued owing to adverse events and three (19%) owing to disease progression. As of a November 2016 database lock, 12 5-year survivors (75%) received no subsequent therapy and were without evidence of progressive disease at last follow-up. Conclusions Nivolumab treatment resulted in long-term OS and durable responses in a proportion of patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC. Long-term survivors had diverse baseline and on-treatment characteristics.