William J. Kostuk

Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

Background— Extent and severity of myocardial ischemia are determinants of risk for patients with coronary artery disease, and ischemia reduction is an important therapeutic goal. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) nuclear substudy compared the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemia reduction added to optimal medical therapy (OMT) with the use of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS). Methods and Results— Of the 2287 COURAGE patients, 314 were enrolled in this substudy of serial rest/stress MPS performed before treatment and 6 to 18 months (mean=374±50 days) after randomization using paired exercise (n=84) or vasodilator stress (n=230). A blinded core laboratory analyzed quantitative MPS measures of percent ischemic myocardium. Moderate to severe ischemia encumbered ≥10% myocardium. The primary end point was ≥5% reduction in ischemic myocardium at follow-up. Treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. At follow-up, the reduction in ischemic myocardium was greater with PCI+OMT (−2.7%; 95% confidence interval, −1.7%, −3.8%) than with OMT (−0.5%; 95% confidence interval, −1.6%, 0.6%; P<0.0001). More PCI+OMT patients exhibited significant ischemia reduction (33% versus 19%; P=0.0004), especially patients with moderate to severe pretreatment ischemia (78% versus 52%; P=0.007). Patients with ischemia reduction had lower unadjusted risk for death or myocardial infarction (P=0.037 [risk-adjusted P=0.26]), particularly if baseline ischemia was moderate to severe (P=0.001 [risk-adjusted P=0.08]). Death or myocardial infarction rates ranged from 0% to 39% for patients with no residual ischemia to ≥10% residual ischemia on follow-up MPS (P=0.002 [risk-adjusted P=0.09]). Conclusions— In COURAGE patients who underwent serial MPS, adding PCI to OMT resulted in greater reduction in ischemia compared with OMT alone. Our findings suggest a treatment target of ≥5% ischemia reduction with OMT with or without coronary revascularization.

Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina. Results of a Canadian multicenter trial.

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 555 patients with unstable angina who were hospitalized in coronary care units. Patients received one of four possible treatment regimens: aspirin (325 mg four times daily), sulfinpyrazone (200 mg four times daily), both, or neither. They were entered into the trial within eight days of hospitalization and were treated and followed for up to two years (mean, 18 months). The incidence of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, considered together, was 8.6 per cent in the groups given aspirin and 17.0 per cent in the other groups, representing a risk reduction with aspirin of 51 per cent (P = 0.008). The corresponding figures for either cardiac death alone or death from any cause were 3.0 per cent in the groups given aspirin and 11.7 per cent in the other groups, representing a risk reduction of 71 per cent (P = 0.004). Analysis by intention to treat yielded smaller risk reductions with aspirin of 30 per cent (P = 0.072), 56 per cent (P = 0.009), and 43 per cent (P = 0.035) for the outcomes of cardiac death or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, cardiac death alone, and all deaths, respectively. There was no observed benefit of sulfinpyrazone for any outcome event, and there was no evidence of an interaction between sulfinpyrazone and aspirin. Considered together with the results of a previous clinical trial, these findings provide strong evidence for a beneficial effect of aspirin in patients with unstable angina.

Further Evidence Relating Mitral-Valve Prolapse to Cerebral Ischemic Events

Echocardiography demonstrates prolapse of the mitral valve in at least 5 per cent of the population. Since some observations have linked this condition to stroke, we studied its incidence in two groups of patients with cerebral ischemia. The older group contained 141 patients over 45 years of age (mean, 64.7 years) who had transient ischemia or partial stroke. Prolapse was found in eight (5.7 per cent) of these patients and in 10 (7.1 per cent) of 141 age-matched controls. The second group contained 60 patients who had transient ischemia or partial stroke and were under 45 years old (mean 33.9 years). Prolapse was detected in 24 patients (40 per cent) but in only five (6.8 per cent) of 60 age-matched controls (mean age, 33.7 years). The odds ratio, 9.33, was highly significant (P less than 0.001). In six of the 24 patients there were other potential causes for cerebral ischemia leaving 18 whom the only recognizable potential cause was a prolapsing mitral valve (odds ratio, 7.00; P less than 0.001). This study suggests that this entity has a role in cerebral ischemia, at least in younger patients. (N Engl J Med 302:139-144, 1980).

Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine whether the extent of viability or scar is important in the amount of recovery of left ventricular (LV) function, and to develop a model for predicting recovery after revascularization that could be tested in a randomized trial. BACKGROUND F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is used to define viable myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe LV dysfunction and to guide revascularization decisions. Whether this approach improves clinical outcomes has not been tested in a randomized trial. Before doing so, an objective model for prediction of recovery is required. METHODS A total of 82 patients with CAD and an ejection fraction (EF) < or =35% had FDG PET perfusion imaging before revascularization. Complete follow-up was available on 70 patients (86%). Patients had radionuclide angiograms at baseline and three months post-revascularization. RESULTS Diabetes (p = 0.029), time to operation (p = 0.008), and scar score (p = 0.001) were significant independent predictors of the change in EF. Previous coronary artery bypass graft confounded the effect of age. There was a significant interaction between the perfusion tracer used and mismatch score (p = 0.02). The multivariable prediction model incorporating PET and clinical variables had a goodness of fit with p = 0.001. Across tertiles of scar scores (I, small: 0% to 16%; II, moderate: 16% to 27.5%; III, large: 27.5% to 47%), the changes in EFs were 9.0 +/- 1.9%, 3.7 +/- 1.6%, and 1.3 +/- 1.5% (p = 0.003: I vs. III), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe LV dysfunction, the amount of scar was a significant independent predictor of LV function recovery after revascularization. A combination of PET and clinical parameters predicts the degree of recovery. This model is being applied in a large randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of therapy guided by FDG PET.

Activity‐Sensing, Rate‐Responsive Pacing: Improvement in Myocardial Performance with Exercise

A sensor that detects body activity by low frequency sonic impulses has been incorporated in a pacemaker so that body activity may be translated to an increased pacing rate in response to exercise. The pacemaker is designed for patients who may benefit from an increased cardiac output mediated by an increased heart rate during exercise. Following permanent pacemaker implantation, six patients (mean age 69 years) entered a single blind, randomized, crossover trial for comparison of activity‐sensing, rate‐responsive pacing (A) to fixed rate demand pacing (D). Ventricular function was assessed by gated radionuclide ventriculography at rest and at exercise, while exercise capacity was assessed by treadmill performance, along with measurements of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Total treadmill duration and maximum oxygen consumption were similar in the two pacing modes (A = 284 ± 244 s, 13.4 ± 3.4 ml O2/min/kg; D = 256 ± 250 s, 11.7 ± 3.7 ml O2/min/kg). Anaerobic threshold, however, was significantly improved (A = 266 ± 199 s, (p<.05), 13.0 ± 2.2 ml O2/min/kg (p < .01); D = 231 ± 208 s, 10.8 ± 2.3 ml O2/min/kg). This improvement was associated with an enhanced exercise cardiac output (A = 4.51 ± 1.3 L/min/m2; D = 3.61 ± .84 L/min/m2; p < .05) which was mediated by an increased heart rate (A = 95 ± 12 bpm; D = 68 ± 2 bpm; p < .01), maintenance of stroke volume (A = 47 ± 10 ml/m2; D = 54 ± 14 ml/m2) and absence of cardiac dilatation (EDVI A = 109 ± 25 ml/m2; D = 120 ± 32 ml/m2). Holter monitoring revealed rare instances of unexpected heart rate increases secondary to external activation of the sensor with no significant adverse effects being encountered. We conclude that activity‐sensing, rate‐responsive pacing offers the potential for increased exercise tolerance secondary to improved cardiac function.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a generalized cardiomyopathy?

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD)isa recently described entity characterized byright ventricular myopathic changes andright ventricular tachycardia. Thepresenceor extentofleft ventricular dysfunction inARVD isnotknown. We assessed right ventricular andleft ventricular function andsize insixpatients withARVDbyechocardiography andradionuclide angio- cardiography doneinpatients atrestandduring exercise. Allpatients hadrecurrent ventricular tachycardia ofleft bundle branch blockmorphology, andright ventricular origin oftheventricular tachycardia was confirmed byendocardial mapping infourpatients. Theresults werecompared with those of10normal subjects andfive patients withWolff-Parkinson-White syndrome taking amiodar- one.Thelatter group was a control group,since we didnotwithhold amiodarone therapy infour patients withARVD.Mean(+ SD)right ventricular ejection fraction (EF)inpatients withARVD was 25+ 11%atrestand26 12%during exercise. Innormal subjects right ventricular EFwas 51+ 4% atrestand59 6% during exercise (p .05). Innormal subjects, left ventricular EFwas 61+ 4%atrest and72 5%during exercise (p .05) tothose of normal subjects. We conclude that right ventricular dysfunction predominates inpatients withARVD butlatent left ventricular dysfunction ispresent more often thaniscommonly recognized. These findings may haveimportant diagnostic andtherapeutic implications. Circulation 68,No.2,251-257, 1983.

Baseline stress myocardial perfusion imaging results and outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease randomized to optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND The COURAGE trial reported similar clinical outcomes for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) receiving optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current post hoc substudy analysis examined the relationship between baseline stress myocardial ischemia and clinical outcomes based on randomized treatment assignment. METHODS A total of 1,381 randomized patients (OMT n = 699, PCI + OMT n = 682) underwent baseline stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. Site investigators interpreted the extent of ischemia by the number of ischemic segments using a 6-segment myocardial model. Patients were divided into those with no to mild (<3 ischemic segments) and moderate to severe ischemia (≥ 3 ischemic segments). Cox proportional hazards models were calculated to assess time to the primary end point of death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At baseline, moderate to severe ischemia occurred in more than one-quarter of patients (n = 468), and the incidence was comparable in both treatment groups (P = .36). The primary end point, death or myocardial infarction, was similar in the OMT and PCI + OMT treatment groups for no to mild (18% and 19%, P = .92) and moderate to severe ischemia (19% and 22%, P = .53, interaction P value = .65). There was no gradient increase in events for the overall cohort with the extent of ischemia. CONCLUSIONS From the COURAGE trial post hoc substudy, the extent of site-defined ischemia did not predict adverse events and did not alter treatment effectiveness. Currently, evidence supports equipoise as to whether the extent and severity of ischemia impact on therapeutic effectiveness.

The role of donor age and ischemic time on survival following orthotopic heart transplantation

BACKGROUND The advances in immunotherapy, along with a liberalization of eligibility criteria have contributed significantly to the ever increasing demand for donor organs. In an attempt to expand the donor pool, transplant programs are now accepting older donors as well as donors from more remote areas. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of donor age and organ ischemic time on survival following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS From April 1981 to December 1996 372 adult patients underwent OHT at the University of Western Ontario. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of outcome. Variables affecting survival were then entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to develop probability models for 30-day- and 1-year-mortality. RESULTS The mean age of the recipient population was 45.6 +/- 12.3 years (range 18-64 years: 54 < or = 30; 237 were 31-55; 91 > 56 years). The majority (329 patients, 86.1%) were male and the most common indications for OHT were ischemic (n = 180) and idiopathic (n = 171) cardiomyopathy. Total ischemic time (TIT) was 202.4 +/- 84.5 minutes (range 47-457 minutes). In 86 donors TIT was under 2 hours while it was between 2 and 4 hours in 168, and more than 4 hours in 128 donors. Actuarial survival was 80%, 73%, and 55% at 1, 5, and 10 years respectively. By Cox proportional hazards models, recipient status (Status I-II vs III-IV; risk ratio 1.75; p = 0.003) and donor age, examined as either a continuous or categorical variable ([age < 35 vs > or = 35; risk ratio 1.98; p < 0.001], [age < 50 vs > or = 50; risk ratio 2.20; p < 0.001], [age < 35 vs 35-49 versus > or = 50; risk ratio 1.83; p < 0.001]), were the only predictors of operative mortality. In this analysis, total graft ischemic time had no effect on survival. However, using the Kaplan-Meier method followed by Mantel-Cox logrank analysis, ischemic time did have a significant effect on survival if donor age was > 50 years (p = 0.009). By stepwise logistic regression analysis, a probability model for survival was then developed based on donor age, the interaction between donor age and ischemic time, and patient status. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in myocardial preservation and peri-operative management may allow for the safe utilization of donor organs with prolonged ischemic times. Older donors are associated with decreased peri-operative and long-term survival following. OHT, particularly if graft ischemic time exceeds 240 minutes and if these donor hearts are transplanted into urgent (Status III-IV) recipients.

Frequency of angiographic detection and quantitative assessment of coronary arterial disease one and three years after cardiac transplantation

The reported high incidence of coronary atherosclerosis in many transplant series led us to critically review our experience in 83 patients who have had selective coronary angiography at greater than or equal to 1 years after transplantation. Angiograms were reviewed for evidence of coronary vascular disease, and quantitative analysis of multiple coronary artery segments was performed in serial films. Qualitative analysis revealed only 3 of 83 patients with any angiographic abnormality at follow-up, 1 with minimal luminal irregularities in the right coronary artery at 1 year, a second with a 50% diameter stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery and minimal irregularity of the proximal circumflex artery at 1 year and a third patient who developed a new 30% diameter eccentric proximal right coronary artery stenosis at 3-year follow-up. The cumulative incidence of graft vascular disease assessed angiographically was therefore 2% at 1 year and 4% at 3 years. Quantitative analysis, however, showed a significant decrease in coronary artery luminal diameter over time. The mean left main coronary artery diameter decreased from 5.4 +/- 0.9 mm at 1 year to 4.7 +/- 0.8 mm at 3 years (p = 0.0007).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Predicting Outcome in the COURAGE Trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): Coronary Anatomy Versus Ischemia

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the relative utility of anatomic and ischemic burden of coronary artery disease for predicting outcomes. BACKGROUND Both anatomic burden and ischemic burden of coronary artery disease determine patient prognosis and influence myocardial revascularization decisions. When both measures are available, their relative utility for prognostication and management choice is controversial. METHODS A total of 621 patients enrolled in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial with baseline quantitative nuclear single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and quantitative coronary angiography were studied. Several multiple regression models were constructed to determine independent predictors of the endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding periprocedural MI) and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Ischemic burden during stress SPECT, anatomic burden derived from angiography, left ventricular ejection fraction, and assignment to either optimal medical therapy (OMT) + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or OMT alone were analyzed. RESULTS In nonadjusted and adjusted regression models, anatomic burden and left ventricular ejection fraction were consistent predictors of death, MI, and NSTE-ACS, whereas ischemic burden and treatment assignment were not. There was a marginal (p = 0.03) effect of the interaction term of anatomic and ischemic burden for the prediction of clinical outcome, but separately or in combination, neither anatomy nor ischemia interacted with therapeutic strategy to predict outcome. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients treated with OMT, anatomic burden was a consistent predictor of death, MI, and NSTE-ACS, whereas ischemic burden was not. Importantly, neither determination, even in combination, identified a patient profile benefiting preferentially from an invasive therapeutic strategy. (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation [COURAGE]; NCT00007657).