William Kaye

Higher survival rates among younger patients after pediatric intensive care unit cardiac arrests.

BACKGROUND. Age is an important determinant of outcome from adult cardiac arrests but has not been identified previously as an important factor in pediatric cardiac arrests except among premature infants. Chest compressions can result in more effective blood flow during cardiac arrest in an infant than an older child or adult because of increased chest wall compliance. We, therefore, hypothesized that survival from cardiac arrest would be better among infants than older children. METHODS. We evaluated 464 pediatric ICU arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 2000 to 2002. NICU cardiac arrests were excluded. Data from each arrest include >200 variables describing facility, patient, prearrest, arrest intervention, outcome, and quality improvement data. Age was categorized as newborn (<1 month; N = 62), infant (1 month to <1 year; N = 105), younger child (1 year to <8 years; N = 90), and older child (8 years to <21 years; N = 207). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between age and survival. RESULTS. Overall survival was 22%, with 27% of newborns, 36% of infants, 19% of younger children and 16% of older children surviving to hospital discharge. Newborns and infants demonstrated double and triple the odds of surviving to hospital discharge from a cardiac arrest in an intensive care setting when compared with older children. When potential confounders were controlled, newborns increased their advantage to almost fivefold, while infants maintained their survival advantage to older children. CONCLUSIONS. Survival from pediatric ICU cardiac arrest is age dependent. Newborns and infants have better survival rates even after adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general public

To evaluate retention of CPR skills by medical residents (MDs), registered nurses (RNs), we tested single-rescuer CPR skills of 21 MDs, 17 RNs, and 21 laypersons using recording manikin and American Heart Association criteria. All study participants had been trained from 4 to 12 months before testing. No MD or RN and only one layperson performed each step correctly and in proper sequence. If calls for assistance were eliminated, one additional layperson, two MDs, and two RNs performed correctly. There were no significant differences between the MDs and RNs. MDs and RNs did better (p < .01) in assessment compared to laypersons, but some individuals in each group initiated ventilations and compressions without assessing need. There was no difference in the ability to perform ventilations; all three groups did poorly. MDs and RNs performed compression skills better than laypersons (p < .01), but all had difficulty with rate and depth of compressions. Moreover, only one-third of the general public demonstrated correct hand placement. Despite more training and experience, MD and RN performance was comparable to layperson performance. These data suggest that improving basic life-support skills could save more lives.

Strengthening the In-Hospital Chain of Survival With Rapid Defibrillation by First Responders Using Automated External Defibrillators: Training and Retention Issues

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine whether staff outside critical care areas who were proficient in basic life support (BLS) could be easily trained to use automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and whether they would retain these skills. DESIGN Prospective, longitudinal cohort series. SETTING Two university teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty nurses who had previously learned BLS and constituted the staff from three medical/surgical nursing units from each study hospital. INTERVENTIONS The nurses were taught how to use the Heartstart 1000s, a lightweight portable shock-advisory AED, in a 2-hour class with an instructor and manikin-to-student ratio of 1:5. The course emphasized hands-on practice of the BLS-AED algorithm on a computerized manikin. RESULTS Using a similar scenario, each nurse was evaluated on the computerized manikin immediately after training (posttest). At 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 9 months after the initial training, convenience samples of the cohort in three different groups were evaluated for retention. Satisfactory performance was defined as delivery of the first AED shock within 2 minutes of recognition of the arrest. At the posttest after training, 139 of 140 nurses (99%) demonstrated satisfactory performance. Of 77 nurses evaluated, 31 of 32 at 1 to 3 months, 18 of 18 at 4 to 6 months, and 24 of 27 at 7 to 9 months after initial training (95% overall) performed satisfactorily. CONCLUSION As has been demonstrated with prehospital emergency personnel, nurses outside critical care areas who are proficient in BLS can easily learn and retain the knowledge and skills to use AEDs. Automated external defibrillation, a BLS skill, should be incorporated into BLS programs (BLS-AED) for all hospital personnel expected to respond to a patient in cardiac arrest, with rapid defibrillation taking priority over CPR.

A reliable and valid method for evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation training outcomes

In order to compare the quality of CPR performance after various training methods, training outcome assessment must provide meaningful data and do it in a way that is reliable. Few studies have provided details of their assessment procedures, and even fewer report on whether the measures to evaluate performance are reliable (yielding information consistently over multiple trials), or valid (measuring the outcome intended). Few studies have attempted to replicate assessment methods used by other authors. Conventional skill sheets have not been shown to assess compressions and ventilations reliably and validly. When using an instrumented manikin, skill checklists can be simplified by eliminating qualitative assessment of compressions and ventilations. Using a sample of 171 CPR trainees rated by trained evaluators, we provide details of agreement between two evaluators and use an established statistic (Cronbachs alpha) to assess the reliability of a 14-item simplified CPR checklist. The level of agreement between two raters was high (Pearson product-moment correlation = 0.87) as was the reliability estimate obtained by Cronbachs alpha (0.89). As criterion-related evidence of the validity of the CPR checklist to assess CPR performance, a correlation with a five-point subjective overall rating of CPR was estimated (Spearman correlation = 0.92). We urge standardized reporting of CPR training outcomes in order to achieve comparability across studies.

Advanced cardiac life support refresher course using standardized objective-based mega code testing

The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends that those whose daily work requires knowledge and skills in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) not only be trained in ACLS, but also be given a refresher training at least every 2 yr. However, AMA offers no recommended course for retraining; no systematic studies of retraining have been conducted on which to base these recommendations. In this paper we review and present our recommendation for a standardized approach to refresher training. Using the goals and objectives of the ACLS training program as evaluation criteria, we tested with the Mega Code a sample population who had previously been trained in ACLS. The results revealed deficiencies in ACLS knowledge and skills in the areas of assessment, defibrillation, drug therapy, and determining the cause of an abnormal blood gas value. We combined this information with our knowledge of other deficiencies identified during actual resuscitation attempts and other basic life-support and ACLS teaching experiences. We then designed a refresher course which was consistent with the overall goals and objectives of the ACLS training program, but which placed emphasis on the deficiencies identified in the pretesting. We taught our newly designed refresher course in three sessions, which included basic life support, endotracheal intubation, arrhythmia recognition and therapeutic modalities, defibrillation, and Mega Code practice. In a fourth session, using Mega Code testing, we evaluated knowledge and skill learning immediately after training. We similarly tested retention 2 to 4 months later. Performance immediately after refresher training showed improvement in all areas where performance had been weak. Two to four months later, performance in assessment, defibrillation, and drug therapy was maintained to some degree. However, the ability to determine the cause of an abnormal blood gas value remained weak, suggesting a need to examine how those skills are taught.

Organizing and implementing a hospital-wide first-responder automated external defibrillation program: strengthening the in-hospital chain of survival

First-responder automated external defibrillation (AED) in the hospital is consistent with the American Heart Associations (AHA) early defibrillation standard or care. With trained personnel and automated external defibrillators immediately available, early defibrillation should have a greater impact on survival than early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Therefore, in our hospitals we modified basic life support to include automated external defibrillation (BLS-AED) for all personnel who are expected to respond to a cardiac arrest, with rapid defibrillation taking priority over CPR. We describe how we organized and implemented this hospital-wide first-responder BLS-AED program. Planning the process includes gaining support from key leaders who are responsible for resuscitation practice, and identifying the target audience of the training program. Hospital unit needs for AED or conventional defibrillation and equipment must be identified, the training program developed, and existing policies and procedures modified. Several barriers to implementation may exist. Education about the efficacy and safety of AED and experience once the BLS-AED program is in place can overcome attitudes and bias. Concerns about the cost of equipment and training must be addressed. Program evaluation may include patient issues such as measuring the time to the first defibrillation and patient outcome; as well as training and retention issues.

Bilateral internal carotid artery dissection from vomiting

Dissection of the internal carotid artery is responsible for approximately 5% of ischemic strokes in adults. The pathophysiology of dissection can be either traumatic or spontaneous. The true incidence of spontaneous dissection is unknown. Once considered very rare, an increased awareness, combined with noninvasive evaluation by ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography, has demonstrated a more frequent occurrence. Trivial trauma (ie, rather than external blunt or penetrating trauma) such as vomiting has rarely been documented as causing bilateral dissection. It is well recognized by neurologists but often not by other physicians. Prognosis is good, but delay in diagnosis may result in residual neurologic deficits. It should therefore be suspected early, especially in younger patients presenting with transient ischemic attacks or stroke.

Future directions for resuscitation research. III. External cardiopulmonary resuscitation advanced life support

This discussion about advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) reflects disappointment with the over 50% of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts that fail to achieve restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Hospital discharge rates are equally poor for in-hospital CPR attempts outside special care units. Early bystander CPR and early defibrillation (manual, semi-automatic or automatic) are the most effective methods for achieving ROSC from ventricular fibrillation (VF). Automated external defibrillation (AED), which is effective in the hands of first responders in the out-of-hospital setting, should also be used and evaluated in hospitals, inside and outside of special care units. The first countershock is most important. Biphasic waveforms seem to have advantages over monophasic ones. Tracheal intubation has obvious efficacy when the airway is threatened. Scientific documentation of specific types, doses, and timing of drug treatments (epinephrine, bicarbonate, lidocaine, bretylium) are weak. Clinical trials have failed so far to document anything statistically but a breakthrough effect. Interactions between catecholamines and buffers need further exploration. A major cause of unsuccessful attempts at ROSC is the underlying disease, which present ACLS guidelines do not consider adequately. Early thrombolysis and early coronary revascularization procedures should also be considered for selected victims of sudden cardiac death. Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) could be a breakthrough measure, but cannot be initiated rapidly enough in the field due to technical limitations. Open-chest CPR by ambulance physicians deserves further trials. In searches for causes of VF, neurocardiology gives clues for new directions. Fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds are influenced by the peripheral sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems and impulses from the frontal cerebral cortex. CPR for cardiac arrest of the mother in advanced pregnancy requires modifications and outcome data. Until more recognizable critical factors for ROSC are identified, titrated sequencing of ACLS measures, based on physiologic rationale and sound judgement, rather than rigid standards, gives the best chance for achieving survival with good cerebral function.

Measuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance: a comparison of the heartsaver checklist to manikin strip

Both checklists and recording manikin strips (strips) are used for evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance. To examine their relationship, we simultaneously evaluated single rescuer CPR of 255 subjects using both checklists and strips. For Group 1 (N = 192; general public tested in Heartsaver course) we compared the total number of initial ventilations and compressions judged to be correct by checklists with those judged to be correct by strips. For Group II (N = 63; physicians, nurses, general public tested in retention studies) we compared each subjects checklist with their own strip for evaluation of correct ventilations and compressions. In Group I, CPR was judged to be correct two to four times more frequently by checklists than by strips. In Group II, all correlations were poor. The most common disagreements were with performances evaluated as correct by checklist but not by strip. Therefore, the current checklist may be a poor instrument for measuring CPR. More accurate evaluation should improve learning and therefore improve outcome following cardiac arrest.

The Effect of Cimetidine and Ranitidine on Cognitive Function in Postoperative Cardiac Surgical Patients

Objective: To compare the incidence of delirium in postoperative cardiac surgical patients treated with either cimetidine or ranitidine. Method: Cardiac surgery patients were randomized to receive either cimetidine or ranitidine postoperatively. Each patient underwent three Mini-Mental Status Examinations (MMSE) and the medical record was reviewed for pertinent past medical history, laboratory data, and evidence of delirium on three occasions: one day preoperatively (before H-2 blocker was given), in the early postoperative period (while receiving the H-2 blocker); usually two days postoperatively on the day of hospital discharge (several days after the H-2 blocker had been discontinued). Results: Overall, both groups in the early postoperative period showed a significant decrease in the MMSE score (27.11 ± 4.44 to 25.38 ± 2.87, mean ± SD; t = 5.16, p < .0005), which resolved by the time of hospital discharge. There was no significant difference between cimetidine and ranitidine. Both age and preoperative MMSE score were strongly associated with the development of delirium. Conclusions: We found no significant difference between cimetidines versus ranitidines effect upon cognitive functioning in the postoperative cardiac surgical patient. This was true even when controlling for age and length of stay.