Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William M. Clemons is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William M. Clemons.


Nature | 2000

Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit.

Brian T. Wimberly; Ditlev E. Brodersen; William M. Clemons; Robert J. Morgan-Warren; Andrew P. Carter; Clemens Vonrhein; Thomas Hartsch; V. Ramakrishnan

Genetic information encoded in messenger RNA is translated into protein by the ribosome, which is a large nucleoprotein complex comprising two subunits, denoted 30S and 50S in bacteria. Here we report the crystal structure of the 30S subunit from Thermus thermophilus, refined to 3 Å resolution. The final atomic model rationalizes over four decades of biochemical data on the ribosome, and provides a wealth of information about RNA and protein structure, protein–RNA interactions and ribosome assembly. It is also a structural basis for analysis of the functions of the 30S subunit, such as decoding, and for understanding the action of antibiotics. The structure will facilitate the interpretation in molecular terms of lower resolution structural data on several functional states of the ribosome from electron microscopy and crystallography.


Nature | 2000

Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics

Andrew P. Carter; William M. Clemons; Ditlev E. Brodersen; Robert J. Morgan-Warren; Brian T. Wimberly; V. Ramakrishnan

The 30S ribosomal subunit has two primary functions in protein synthesis. It discriminates against aminoacyl transfer RNAs that do not match the codon of messenger RNA, thereby ensuring accuracy in translation of the genetic message in a process called decoding. Also, it works with the 50S subunit to move the tRNAs and associated mRNA by precisely one codon, in a process called translocation. Here we describe the functional implications of the high-resolution 30S crystal structure presented in the accompanying paper, and infer details of the interactions between the 30S subunit and its tRNA and mRNA ligands. We also describe the crystal structure of the 30S subunit complexed with the antibiotics paromomycin, streptomycin and spectinomycin, which interfere with decoding and translocation. This work reveals the structural basis for the action of these antibiotics, and leads to a model for the role of the universally conserved 16S RNA residues A1492 and A1493 in the decoding process.


Nature | 2004

X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel

Bert van den Berg; William M. Clemons; Ian Collinson; Yorgo Modis; Enno Hartmann; Stephen C. Harrison

A conserved heterotrimeric membrane protein complex, the Sec61 or SecY complex, forms a protein-conducting channel, allowing polypeptides to be transferred across or integrated into membranes. We report the crystal structure of the complex from Methanococcus jannaschii at a resolution of 3.2 Å. The structure suggests that one copy of the heterotrimer serves as a functional translocation channel. The α-subunit has two linked halves, transmembrane segments 1–5 and 6–10, clamped together by the γ-subunit. A cytoplasmic funnel leading into the channel is plugged by a short helix. Plug displacement can open the channel into an ‘hourglass’ with a ring of hydrophobic residues at its constriction. This ring may form a seal around the translocating polypeptide, hindering the permeation of other molecules. The structure also suggests mechanisms for signal-sequence recognition and for the lateral exit of transmembrane segments of nascent membrane proteins into lipid, and indicates binding sites for partners that provide the driving force for translocation.


Cell | 2000

The Structural Basis for the Action of the Antibiotics Tetracycline, Pactamycin, and Hygromycin B on the 30S Ribosomal Subunit

Ditlev E. Brodersen; William M. Clemons; Andrew P. Carter; Robert J. Morgan-Warren; Brian T. Wimberly; V. Ramakrishnan

We have used the recently determined atomic structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit to determine the structures of its complexes with the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B. The antibiotics bind to discrete sites on the 30S subunit in a manner consistent with much but not all biochemical data. For each of these antibiotics, interactions with the 30S subunit suggest a mechanism for its effects on ribosome function.


Nature | 1999

Structure of a bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit at 5.5 Å resolution

William M. Clemons; Joanna L. C. May; Brian T. Wimberly; John P. McCutcheon; Malcolm Capel; V. Ramakrishnan

The 30S ribosomal subunit binds messenger RNA and the anticodon stem-loop of transfer RNA during protein synthesis. A crystallographic analysis of the structure of the subunit from the bacterium Thermus thermophilus is presented. At a resolution of 5.5 Å, the phosphate backbone of the ribosomal RNA is visible, as are the α-helices of the ribosomal proteins, enabling double-helical regions of RNA to be identified throughout the subunit, all seven of the small-subunit proteins of known crystal structure to be positioned in the electron density map, and the fold of the entire central domain of the small-subunit ribosomal RNA to be determined.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2005

Disulfide bridge formation between SecY and a translocating polypeptide localizes the translocation pore to the center of SecY

Kurt S. Cannon; Eran Or; William M. Clemons; Yoko Shibata

During their biosynthesis, many proteins pass through the membrane via a hydrophilic channel formed by the heterotrimeric Sec61/SecY complex. Whether this channel forms at the interface of multiple copies of Sec61/SecY or is intrinsic to a monomeric complex, as suggested by the recently solved X-ray structure of the Methanococcus jannaschii SecY complex, is a matter of contention. By introducing a single cysteine at various positions in Escherichia coli SecY and testing its ability to form a disulfide bond with a single cysteine in a translocating chain, we provide evidence that translocating polypeptides pass through the center of the SecY complex. The strongest cross-links were observed with residues that would form a constriction in an hourglass-shaped pore. This suggests that the channel makes only limited contact with a translocating polypeptide, thus minimizing the energy required for translocation.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009

Model for eukaryotic tail-anchored protein binding based on the structure of Get3

Christian Suloway; Justin W. Chartron; Ma'ayan Zaslaver; William M. Clemons

The Get3 ATPase directs the delivery of tail-anchored (TA) proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). TA-proteins are characterized by having a single transmembrane helix (TM) at their extreme C terminus and include many essential proteins, such as SNAREs, apoptosis factors, and protein translocation components. These proteins cannot follow the SRP-dependent co-translational pathway that typifies most integral membrane proteins; instead, post-translationally, these proteins are recognized and bound by Get3 then delivered to the ER in the ATP dependent Get pathway. To elucidate a molecular mechanism for TA protein binding by Get3 we have determined three crystal structures in apo and ADP forms from Saccharomyces cerevisae (ScGet3-apo) and Aspergillus fumigatus (AfGet3-apo and AfGet3-ADP). Using structural information, we generated mutants to confirm important interfaces and essential residues. These results point to a model of how Get3 couples ATP hydrolysis to the binding and release of TA-proteins.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2010

Structural characterization of the Get4/Get5 complex and its interaction with Get3

Justin W. Chartron; Christian Suloway; Ma’ayan Zaslaver; William M. Clemons

The recently elucidated Get proteins are responsible for the targeted delivery of the majority of tail-anchored (TA) proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Get4 and Get5 have been identified in the early steps of the pathway mediating TA substrate delivery to the cytoplasmic targeting factor Get3. Here we report a crystal structure of Get4 and an N-terminal fragment of Get5 from Saccharomyces cerevisae. We show Get4 and Get5 (Get4/5) form an intimate complex that exists as a dimer (two copies of Get4/5) mediated by the C-terminus of Get5. We further demonstrate that Get3 specifically binds to a conserved surface on Get4 in a nucleotide dependent manner. This work provides further evidence for a model in which Get4/5 operates upstream of Get3 and mediates the specific delivery of a TA substrate.


Current Opinion in Structural Biology | 2012

The complex process of GETting tail-anchored membrane proteins to the ER.

Justin W. Chartron; William M. Clemons; Christian Suloway

Biosynthesis of membrane proteins requires that hydrophobic transmembrane (TM) regions be shielded from the cytoplasm while being directed to the correct membrane. Tail-anchored (TA) membrane proteins, characterized by a single C-terminal TM, pose an additional level of complexity because they must be post-translationally targeted. In eukaryotes, the GET pathway shuttles TA-proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. The key proteins required in yeast (Sgt2 and Get1-5) have been under extensive structural and biochemical investigation during recent years. The central protein Get3 utilizes nucleotide linked conformational changes to facilitate substrate loading and targeting. Here we analyze this complex process from a structural perspective, as understood in yeast, and further postulate on similar pathways in other domains of life.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2011

A Structural Model of the Sgt2 Protein and Its Interactions with Chaperones and the Get4/Get5 Complex

Justin W. Chartron; Grecia M. Gonzalez; William M. Clemons

The insertion of tail-anchored transmembrane (TA) proteins into the appropriate membrane is a post-translational event that requires stabilization of the transmembrane domain and targeting to the proper destination. Sgt2 is a heat-shock protein cognate (HSC) co-chaperone that preferentially binds endoplasmic reticulum-destined TA proteins and directs them to the GET pathway via Get4 and Get5. Here, we present the crystal structure from a fungal Sgt2 homolog of the tetratrico-repeat (TPR) domain and part of the linker that connects to the C-terminal domain. The linker extends into the two-carboxylate clamp of the TPR domain from a symmetry-related molecule mimicking the binding to HSCs. Based on this structure, we provide biochemical evidence that the Sgt2 TPR domain has the ability to directly bind multiple HSC family members. The structure allows us to propose features involved in this lower specificity relative to other TPR containing co-chaperones. We further show that a dimer of Sgt2 binds a single Get5 and use small angle x-ray scattering to characterize the domain arrangement of Sgt2 in solution. These results allow us to present a structural model of the Sgt2-Get4/Get5-HSC complex.

Collaboration


Dive into the William M. Clemons's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. Ramakrishnan

Laboratory of Molecular Biology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin W. Chartron

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian T. Wimberly

Laboratory of Molecular Biology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew P. Carter

Laboratory of Molecular Biology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shyam M. Saladi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Suloway

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meera Rao

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Morgan-Warren

Laboratory of Molecular Biology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Axel Müller

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge