Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William M. Gelbart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William M. Gelbart.


Science | 2007

Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector

Vishvanath Nene; Jennifer R. Wortman; Daniel John Lawson; Brian J. Haas; Chinnappa D. Kodira; Zhijian Jake Tu; Brendan J. Loftus; Zhiyong Xi; Karyn Megy; Manfred Grabherr; Quinghu Ren; Evgeny M. Zdobnov; Neil F. Lobo; Kathryn S. Campbell; Susan E. Brown; Maria F. Bonaldo; Jingsong Zhu; Steven P. Sinkins; David G. Hogenkamp; Paolo Amedeo; Peter Arensburger; Peter W. Atkinson; Shelby Bidwell; Jim Biedler; Ewan Birney; Robert V. Bruggner; Javier Costas; Monique R. Coy; Jonathan Crabtree; Matt Crawford

We present a draft sequence of the genome of Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for yellow fever and dengue fever, which at ∼1376 million base pairs is about 5 times the size of the genome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Nearly 50% of the Ae. aegypti genome consists of transposable elements. These contribute to a factor of ∼4 to 6 increase in average gene length and in sizes of intergenic regions relative to An. gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster. Nonetheless, chromosomal synteny is generally maintained among all three insects, although conservation of orthologous gene order is higher (by a factor of ∼2) between the mosquito species than between either of them and the fruit fly. An increase in genes encoding odorant binding, cytochrome P450, and cuticle domains relative to An. gambiae suggests that members of these protein families underpin some of the biological differences between the two mosquito species.


Nature | 2007

Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures

Alexander Stark; Michael F. Lin; Pouya Kheradpour; Jakob Skou Pedersen; Leopold Parts; Joseph W. Carlson; Madeline A. Crosby; Matthew D. Rasmussen; Sushmita Roy; Ameya N. Deoras; J. Graham Ruby; Julius Brennecke; Harvard FlyBase curators; Berkeley Drosophila Genome; Emily Hodges; Angie S. Hinrichs; Anat Caspi; Benedict Paten; Seung-Won Park; Mira V. Han; Morgan L. Maeder; Benjamin J. Polansky; Bryanne E. Robson; Stein Aerts; Jacques van Helden; Bassem A. Hassan; Donald G. Gilbert; Deborah A. Eastman; Michael D. Rice; Michael Weir

Sequencing of multiple related species followed by comparative genomics analysis constitutes a powerful approach for the systematic understanding of any genome. Here, we use the genomes of 12 Drosophila species for the de novo discovery of functional elements in the fly. Each type of functional element shows characteristic patterns of change, or ‘evolutionary signatures’, dictated by its precise selective constraints. Such signatures enable recognition of new protein-coding genes and exons, spurious and incorrect gene annotations, and numerous unusual gene structures, including abundant stop-codon readthrough. Similarly, we predict non-protein-coding RNA genes and structures, and new microRNA (miRNA) genes. We provide evidence of miRNA processing and functionality from both hairpin arms and both DNA strands. We identify several classes of pre- and post-transcriptional regulatory motifs, and predict individual motif instances with high confidence. We also study how discovery power scales with the divergence and number of species compared, and we provide general guidelines for comparative studies.


Archive | 1994

Micelles, membranes, microemulsions, and monolayers

William M. Gelbart; Avinoam Ben-Shaul; Didier Roux

Contents: Statistical Thermodynamics of Amphiphile Self-Assembly (A. Ben-Shaul & W. Gelbart).- Micellar Growth, Flexibility and Polymorphism in Dilute Solutions (G. Porte).- Micellar Liquid Crystals (N. Boden).- Geometric Foundations of Mesomorphic Polymorphism (J. Charvolin & J.F. Sadoc).- Lamellar Phases: Effect of Fluctuations (Theory) (D. Sornette & N. Ostrowsky).- Lyotropic Lamellar Lx Phases (D. Roux, C.R. Safinya, & F. Nallet). Structure of Microemulsions: Experimenta (L. Auvray).- Lattice Theories of Microemulsions (G. Gompper & M. Schick).- Fluctuating Interfaces (S.A. Safran).- Interfacial Tension (D. Langevin & J. Meunier).- Critical Behavior of Surfactant Solutions (A-M. Bellocq).- Structures and Phase Transitions in Langmuir Monolayers (D. Andelman et al.).


Cell | 1996

The transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase DLAR controls motor axon guidance in Drosophila

Neil X. Krueger; David Van Vactor; Hong I. Wan; William M. Gelbart; Corey S. Goodman; Haruo Saito

DLAR is a receptor-like, transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase in Drosophila that is expressed almost exclusively by developing neurons. Analysis of Dlar loss-of-function mutations shows that DLAR plays a key role during motoneuron growth cone guidance. Segmental nerve b (SNb) motor axons normally exit the common motor pathway, enter the ventral target region, and then synapse on specific ventral muscles. In Dlar mutant embryos, SNb axons bypass their normal target region and instead continue to extend along the common pathway. SNd motor axons also make pathfinding errors, while SNa and SNc axons appear normal. Thus, DLAR controls the ability of certain motor axons to navigate specific choices points in the developing Drosophila nervous system.


Genome Biology | 2002

Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review

Sima Misra; Madeline A. Crosby; Christopher J. Mungall; Beverley B. Matthews; Kathryn S. Campbell; Pavel Hradecky; Yanmei Huang; Joshua S Kaminker; Gillian Millburn; Simon E Prochnik; Christopher D. Smith; Jonathan L Tupy; Eleanor J Whitfield; Leyla Bayraktaroglu; Benjamin P. Berman; Brian Bettencourt; Susan E. Celniker; Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey; Rachel Drysdale; Nomi L. Harris; John Richter; Susan Russo; Andrew J. Schroeder; ShengQiang Shu; Mark Stapleton; Chihiro Yamada; Michael Ashburner; William M. Gelbart; Gerald M. Rubin; Suzanna E. Lewis

BackgroundThe recent completion of the Drosophila melanogaster genomic sequence to high quality and the availability of a greatly expanded set of Drosophila cDNA sequences, aligning to 78% of the predicted euchromatic genes, afforded FlyBase the opportunity to significantly improve genomic annotations. We made the annotation process more rigorous by inspecting each gene visually, utilizing a comprehensive set of curation rules, requiring traceable evidence for each gene model, and comparing each predicted peptide to SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL sequences.ResultsAlthough the number of predicted protein-coding genes in Drosophila remains essentially unchanged, the revised annotation significantly improves gene models, resulting in structural changes to 85% of the transcripts and 45% of the predicted proteins. We annotated transposable elements and non-protein-coding RNAs as new features, and extended the annotation of untranslated (UTR) sequences and alternative transcripts to include more than 70% and 20% of genes, respectively. Finally, cDNA sequence provided evidence for dicistronic transcripts, neighboring genes with overlapping UTRs on the same DNA sequence strand, alternatively spliced genes that encode distinct, non-overlapping peptides, and numerous nested genes.ConclusionsIdentification of so many unusual gene models not only suggests that some mechanisms for gene regulation are more prevalent than previously believed, but also underscores the complex challenges of eukaryotic gene prediction. At present, experimental data and human curation remain essential to generate high-quality genome annotations.


Cell | 1982

Decapentaplegic: A gene complex affecting morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

Forrest A. Spencer; F.Michael Hoffmann; William M. Gelbart

The decapentaplegic gene complex (2-4.0) in Drosophila melanogaster is defined by a series of allelic mutations affecting imaginal disk development. Decapentaplegic (dpp) mutant individuals exhibit a variety of pattern deficiencies and duplications in structures derived from one or more of the 15 major imaginal disks. Based on dpp mutant phenotypes, we suggest that the dpp gene complex is involved in the elaboration of positional information within developing epidermal tissue. The dpp mutations are recessive and fall into six phenotypic classes. Milder alleles (classes I and II) affect only one or a few disks while most alleles (classes III, IV, V and EL) affect all major imaginal disks. Class EL homozygotes are embryonic lethals; development is arrested before germ-band shortening late in gastrulation. Presently inseparable from EL, is a haplo-insufficient function (Hin-d) associated with the distal (left) end of the dpp gene complex. The dpp gene complex occupies most or all of 22F1--3, three densely staining polytene chromosome bands. A colinearity exists between map positions of the four identified functional units within the complex and the severities of mutant phenotypes caused by disruption of these functions. Most dpp mutations are gross chromosomal rearrangements; they exert polar effects on the decapentaplegic functions that are proximal to the rearrangement breakpoints in 22F. Many structural similarities exist between the decapentaplegic and bithorax gene complexes.


Cell | 1995

Drosophila Dpp signaling is mediated by the punt gene product: A dual ligand-binding type II receptor of the TGFβ receptor family

Anthea Letsou; Kavita Arora; Jeffrey L. Wrana; Karl Simin; Vern Twombly; Joumana Jamal; Karen Staehling-Hampton; F. Michael Hoffmann; William M. Gelbart; Joan Massagué; Michael B. O'Connor

Signaling by TGF beta-related factors requires ligand-induced association between type I and type II transmembrane serine/threonine kinases. In Drosophila, the saxophone (sax) and thick veins (tkv) genes encode type I receptors that mediate signaling by decapentaplegic (dpp), a member of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) subgroup of TGF beta-type factors. In this report, we demonstrate that the Drosophila punt gene encodes atr-II, a previously described type II receptor that on its own is able to bind activin but not BMP2, a vertebrate ortholog of dpp. Mutations in punt produce phenotypes similar to those exhibited by tkv, sax, and dpp mutants. Furthermore, punt will bind BMP2 in concert with tkv or sax, forming complexes with these receptors. We suggest that punt functions as a type II receptors for dpp and propose that BMP signaling in vertebrates may also involve sharing of type II receptors by diverse ligands.


Cell | 1991

Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of inverted repeat transposons in Drosophila and plants: hobo, activator, and Tam3

Brian R. Calvi; Timothy J. Hong; Seth D. Findley; William M. Gelbart

We have sequenced HFL1 from D. melanogaster, the only cloned hobo element shown to have transposase activity. The 2959 bp HFL1 sequence predicts a 2.0 kb open reading frame (ORF1) with substantial amino acid similarity to the transposases of Activator (Ac) from maize (Zea mays) and Tam3 from snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus). Mutational analysis of a C-terminal region of ORF1 conserved with Ac and Tam3 indicates that it is essential for hobo transposase activity. This is an example of extensive amino acid sequence identity between short inverted repeat elements in different kingdoms. We discuss the possibility that the conservation of hobo, Ac, and Tam3 transposases represents an example of horizontal transmission of genetic information between plants and animals.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2001

DNA packaging and ejection forces in bacteriophage

James T. Kindt; Shelly Tzlil; Avinoam Ben-Shaul; William M. Gelbart

We calculate the forces required to package (or, equivalently, acting to eject) DNA into (from) a bacteriophage capsid, as a function of the loaded (ejected) length, under conditions for which the DNA is either self-repelling or self-attracting. Through computer simulation and analytical theory, we find the loading force to increase more than 10-fold (to tens of piconewtons) during the final third of the loading process; correspondingly, the internal pressure drops 10-fold to a few atmospheres (matching the osmotic pressure in the cell) upon ejection of just a small fraction of the phage genome. We also determine an evolution of the arrangement of packaged DNA from toroidal to spool-like structures.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2003

Osmotic pressure inhibition of DNA ejection from phage

Alex Evilevitch; Laurence Lavelle; Charles M. Knobler; Eric Raspaud; William M. Gelbart

Bacterial viral capsids in aqueous solution can be opened in vitro by addition of their specific receptor proteins, with consequent full ejection of their genomes. We demonstrate that it is possible to control the extent of this ejection by varying the external osmotic pressure. In the particular case of bacteriophage λ, the ejection is 50% inhibited by osmotic pressures (of polyethylene glycol) comparable to those operative in the cytoplasm of host bacteria; it is completely suppressed by a pressure of 20 atmospheres. Furthermore, our experiments monitor directly a dramatic decrease of the stress inside the unopened phage capsid upon addition of polyvalent cations to the host solution, in agreement with many recent theories of DNA interactions.

Collaboration


Dive into the William M. Gelbart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Jf Griffiths

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Avinoam Ben-Shaul

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aron M. Yoffe

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge