William M. Klykylo
Wright State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William M. Klykylo.
Law and Human Behavior | 2010
Douglas Mossman; Michael D. Bowen; David J. Vanness; David Bienenfeld; Terry Correll; Jerald Kay; William M. Klykylo; Douglas S. Lehrer
This study asked whether latent class modeling methods and multiple ratings of the same cases might permit quantification of the accuracy of forensic assessments. Five evaluators examined 156 redacted court reports concerning criminal defendants who had undergone hospitalization for evaluation or restoration of their adjudicative competence. Evaluators rated each defendant’s Dusky-defined competence to stand trial on a five-point scale as well as each defendant’s understanding of, appreciation of, and reasoning about criminal proceedings. Having multiple ratings per defendant made it possible to estimate accuracy parameters using maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches, despite the absence of any “gold standard” for the defendants’ true competence status. Evaluators appeared to be very accurate, though this finding should be viewed with caution.
Medical Education | 1993
James Bourgeois; Jerald Kay; John R. Rudisill; David Bienenfeld; Paulette Marie Gillig; William M. Klykylo; Ronald J. Markert
Summary. A questionnaire containing 18 vignettes of common clinical educational situations with potentially abusive treatment of medical students and a 10‐item attitude assessment about abusive behaviour were administered to the first‐and fourth‐year medical students at a mid‐west US university medical school. The first‐ and fourth‐year groups did not differ significantly on perceived abusiveness of most of the vignettes, although several of the individual vignettes were perceived significantly differently by the two groups. As hypothesized, the fourth‐year students had experienced such situations more frequently. Attitudes towards abusive behaviour did not differ between the two groups. The authors contrast teaching interactions perceived as educationally useful and not abusive with those seen as abusive and not useful and offer explanations for the differences observed. Finally, the possible implications of the results for medical education are discussed.
Academic Psychiatry | 1997
David Bienenfeld; Ronald J. Markert; John R. Rudisill; Paulette Marie Gillig; James Bourgeois; William M. Klykylo; Brenda Roman; Barbara Warner; Jerald Kay
A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers’ career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health | 2001
Paulette Marie Gillig; Ronald J. Markert; David Bienenfeld; William M. Klykylo; John R. Rudisill; Jerald Kay; James Bourgeois
Around the late 1970s, the proportion Tasman, 1991; Clark & Vaccaro, 1987; Olafson, Klerman, & Pincos, 1993). Curof psychiatrists working in community mental health centers fell sharply. Some aurently, although some psychiatrists avoid even managed-care settings, others choose thors suggested that this was due to a change in psychiatrists’ roles in the public to work entirely in the public mental health sector. mental health system, which resulted in job dissatisfaction among all psychiatrists On the basis of the literature, we expected that psychiatrists currently working (Windle, Poppen, Thompson, & Marvella, 1988; Flaskeryd, 1986; Goldberg, Riba, & in community mental health centers would report a different “job description” than would psychiatrists in private, non-managed-care settings, and therefore would rePaulette Marie Gillig, M.D., Ph.D., is a Professor of Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry, port different reasons for choosing these School of Medicine, at Wright State University respective settings. We anticipated that in Dayton, Ohio. Ronald Markert, Ph.D.; David these choices would be based in part on Bienenfeld, M.D.; William Klykylo, M.D.; John lifestyle considerations, and in part on difRudisill, Ph.D.; Jerald Kay, M.D.; and James Bourgeois, O.D., M.D., also were affiliated with fering ideologies of the proper profesthe Department of Psychiatry at Wright State sional role of a psychiatrist (Baker & University. Baker, 1999). This research was supported by an educational research grant to Professor Gillig at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio, from the Ohio Department of Mental Health. METHOD Address for correspondence: Paulette Marie Gillig, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Psychiatry, Participants were a convenience sample Wright State University School of Medicine, of 272 full-time practicing psychiatrists seP.O. 927, Dayton, OH 45401. E-mail: pgillig@ your-net.com. lected from the American Psychiatric As-
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1996
Daniel J. Feeney; William M. Klykylo
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1989
Norbert B. Enzer; Jonathon Bloom-Feshbach; Sally Bloom-Feshbach; William M. Klykylo
Academic Psychiatry | 2000
David Bienenfeld; William M. Klykylo; Victor Knapp
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1997
Daniel J. Feeney; William M. Klykylo
Academic Psychiatry | 2003
David Bienenfeld; William M. Klykylo; Douglas S. Lehrer
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1997
Daniel J. Feeney; William M. Klykylo