Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William O. Williford is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William O. Williford.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1996

The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia

Herbert Lepor; William O. Williford; Michael J. Barry; Michael K. Brawer; Christopher M. Dixon; Glenn J. Gormley; Clair Haakenson; Madeline Machi; Perinchery Narayan; Robert J. Padley

BACKGROUND Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia can be treated with alpha 1-adrenergic-antagonist drugs that relax prostatic smooth muscle or with drugs that inhibit 5 alpha-reductase and therefore reduce tissue androgen concentrations. However, the effects of the two types of drugs have not been compared. METHODS We compared the safety and efficacy of placebo, terazosin (10 mg daily), finasteride (5 mg daily), and the combination of both drugs in 1229 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. American Urological Association symptom scores and peak urinary-flow rates were determined at base line and periodically for one year. RESULTS The mean changes from base line in the symptom scores in the placebo, finasteride, terazosin, and combination-therapy groups at one year were decreases of 2.6, 3.2, 6.1, and 6.2 points, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). The mean changes at one year in the peak urinary-flow rates were increases of 1.4, 1.6, 2.7, and 3.2 ml per second, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). Finasteride had no more effect on either measure than placebo. In the placebo group, 1.6 percent of the men discontinued the study because of adverse effects, as did 4.8 to 7.8 percent of the men in the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin alone.


The Journal of Urology | 1995

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Specific Health Status Measures in Clinical Research: How Much Change in the American Urological Association Symptom Index and the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index is Perceptible to Patients?

Michael J. Barry; William O. Williford; Yuchiao Chang; Madeline Machi; Karen M. Jones; Elizabeth Walker-Corkery; Herbert Lepor

PURPOSE We assessed the relationship between changes in scores for the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) impact index with patient global ratings of improvement in a large Veterans Affairs trial comparing different pharmacological therapies for BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS The primary analyses compared absolute score changes from baseline with global ratings of improvement at 13 weeks for 1,218 men. RESULTS Subjects who rated themselves as being slightly improved had a mean decrease in AUA symptom index and BPH impact index scores of 3.1 and 0.4 points, respectively. However, the baseline scores strongly influenced this relationship. CONCLUSIONS These data provide guidance for investigators using the AUA symptom index and BPH impact index as outcome measures.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2001

Determinants of functional outcome and healthcare costs in bipolar disorder: a high-intensity follow-up study

Mark S. Bauer; Gail F. Kirk; Christopher Gavin; William O. Williford

BACKGROUND Review of published studies reveals few data regarding determinants of the poor functional outcome and high healthcare costs that are characteristic of bipolar disorder. In order to identify potential mechanisms, critical to designing optimal treatment strategies, this longitudinal study investigated (a) the degree to which disease outcome is correlated with functional outcome and direct treatment costs, and (b) whether similar demographic or clinical characteristics predict disease and functional outcome and healthcare costs. METHODS Disease and functional outcome were assessed in bimonthly structured interviews over 48 weeks in 43 outpatient veterans with bipolar disorder. Direct mental health treatment costs from the VA perspective were determined from the VA database and patient interview. Regression analysis was used to determine association among the three outcome domains, and to identify clinical or demographic variables that predicted each of the three domains. RESULTS Functional outcome was correlated with depressive, but not manic, symptoms during follow-up. Costs were not correlated with any measure of disease or functional outcome. Several demographic, but not clinical, characteristics predicted functional outcome. In contrast, several clinical, but not demographic, characteristics predicted symptom status. No predictors were associated with direct treatment costs. LIMITATIONS Subjects were predominantly male veterans of relatively homogeneous social class, followed prospectively for approximately one year in a clinic designed specifically to minimize barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS Data from this and prior studies indicate that ongoing depressive symptoms are strongly associated with functional outcome, although substantial variance remains unexplained. Optimal models to explain functional outcome and healthcare costs will need to address factors besides simply disease severity and chronicity. The authors present a heuristic paradigm for understanding both the research and therapeutic aspects of these findings.


The Journal of Urology | 1998

THE IMPACT OF MEDICAL THERAPY ON BOTHER DUE TO SYMPTOMS, QUALITY OF LIFE AND GLOBAL OUTCOME, AND FACTORS PREDICTING RESPONSE

Herbert Lepor; William O. Williford; Michael J. Barry; Clair Haakenson; Karen M. Jones

PURPOSE We determine the effect of placebo, finasteride, terazosin and a combination of drugs on bother due to symptoms, quality of life and patient perception of improvement, and identify baseline clinical factors that predict clinical response to medical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 1,229 subjects with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were randomized to 1 year of placebo, finasteride, terazosin or drug combination. The primary outcome measures were American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score and peak flow rate. Relevant secondary outcome measures were symptom problem score, BPH impact score and global rating of improvement. RESULTS Group mean differences in symptom problem and BPH impact scores between the finasteride versus placebo, and terazosin versus combination groups were not statistically or clinically significant. Group mean differences in all outcome measures were highly statistically significant between the terazosin and finasteride, and combination and finasteride groups. The percentage of subjects who rated improvement as marked or moderate with placebo, finasteride, terazosin and combination was 39, 44, 61 and 65%, respectively. In the subsets of men in the placebo, finasteride, terazosin and combination groups with prostates greater than 50 cm.3 group mean decrease from baseline in AUA symptom score was -2.5, -3.6, -6 and -7, group mean increase in peak flow rate was 0.6, 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 ml. per second, group mean decrease in symptom problem score was -2.2, - 1.9, -3.1 and -4.5, and group mean decrease in BPH impact score was -0.6, -0.3, -1.1 and -1.5, respectively. A correlational analysis failed to show a significant relationship between baseline prostate volume and treatment response to finasteride. There was a significant but weak relationship between change in AUA symptom score and peak flow rate in the finasteride and combination groups. The symptom responses with terazosin were independent of baseline peak flow rate. CONCLUSIONS In men with clinical BPH finasteride and placebo are equally effective, while terazosin and combination are significantly more effective. In men with clinical BPH and large prostates the advantage of finasteride over placebo in terms of symptom reduction, impact on bother due to symptoms and quality of life is small at best, while the advantage of terazosin and combination over finasteride and placebo is highly significant. Baseline prostate volume was not a predictor of response to finasteride in the overall study population. On the basis of our results alpha1 blockers, such as terazosin, should be first line medical treatment for BPH.


The Journal of Urology | 2000

The mechanism of adverse events associated with terazosin : An analysis of the veterans affairs cooperative study

Herbert Lepor; Karen M. Jones; William O. Williford

PURPOSE We determined the mechanism of adverse events associated with alpha1-blockers for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS We randomized 1,229 men with clinical BPH at 31 Veterans Affairs medical centers into equal treatment groups, including those who received placebo, terazosin, finasteride, and combined terazosin and finasteride therapy, respectively. Adverse events were captured at all study visits during our 1-year study. Our current review of adverse events is limited to patients randomized to the placebo and terazosin groups. We compared the incidence of orthostatic blood pressure change, postural symptoms and orthostatic hypotension in men who were normotensive and hypertensive at baseline, respectively. We also determined the association of changes in systolic blood pressure with the incidence of treatment related adverse events. RESULTS The treatment related rates of dizziness, asthenia, postural hypotension and syncope were 19%, 6%, 6% and 1%, respectively. Of these adverse events only postural hypotension was associated with orthostatic blood pressure changes. The incidence of asthenia, dizziness and postural hypotension was not significantly greater in patients with a systolic blood pressure decrease of 5 or greater and less than 5 mm. Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Dizziness and asthenia are not associated with changes in blood pressure, suggesting that these treatment related adverse events associated with alpha1-blockers are not related to vascular events. Designing a subtype selective alpha1 antagonist that has less effect on blood pressure may not result in marked improvement in tolerability over commercially available alpha1-blockers.


Psychiatric Services | 2008

Factors associated with prospective long-term treatment adherence among individuals with bipolar disorder.

Martha Sajatovic; Kousick Biswas; M.P.H. Amy K. Kilbourne; Howard H. Fenn; William O. Williford; Mark S. Bauer

OBJECTIVE Clinical characteristics, adverse effects of medication, and treatment attitudes have been associated with adherence in bipolar populations in cross-sectional studies. The aim of this secondary analysis from a larger study was to identify the association between baseline variables and average treatment adherence over a subsequent three-year period. METHODS Veterans with bipolar disorder were evaluated on self-reported adherence status at baseline and every six months over a three-year period. The sample was dichotomized into two clinically relevant categories: those who were primarily adherent and those who were primarily nonadherent. Demographic and clinical variables were examined for the two groups of patients in relation to their average adherence over the three-year period. RESULTS The study recruited a sample of 306 persons with severe bipolar disorder. The sample was predominantly male (278 men, or 91%), with a mean+/-SD age of 46.6+/-10.1 years. A total of 240 individuals (78%) were largely adherent to treatment, and 37 individuals (12%) were largely nonadherent to treatment. Nonadherent individuals were less likely to be on intensive somatotherapy regimens (p=.001); experienced more barriers to care, including lack of telephone access (p<.05) and life obligations and commitments (p<.05); and had more prior suicide attempts (p=.003). CONCLUSIONS Nonadherent individuals with bipolar disorder received less intensive pharmacologic treatments, had more suicide attempts, and experienced more barriers to care than adherent individuals. Nonadherence may have system as well as patient components. Consideration of nonadherence as a function of both patient factors and system factors will enhance our ability to understand nonadherence and intervene more effectively.


Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | 1993

Does Perioperative Total Parenteral Nutrition Reduce Medical Care Costs

John M. Eisenberg; Henry A. Glick; Gordon P. Buzby; Bruce Kinosian; William O. Williford

An economic analysis accompanied a multicenter Department of Veterans Affairs randomized, controlled trial of perioperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The cost of providing TPN for an average of 16.15 days before and after surgery was


The Prostate | 1999

Effect of finasteride and/or terazosin on serum PSA: Results of VA cooperative study #359†

Michael K. Brawer; Daniel W. Lin; William O. Williford; Karen M. Jones; Herbert Lepor

2405, more than half of which (


Controlled Clinical Trials | 1994

Development for and results of the use of a gastroesophageal reflux disease activity index as an outcome variable in a clinical trial

William O. Williford; William F. Krol; Stuart J. Spechler

1025) included costs of purchasing, preparing, and delivering the TPN solution itself; lipid solutions accounted for another


The Journal of Urology | 2000

FILLING AND VOIDING SYMPTOMS IN THE AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX: THE VALUE OF THEIR DISTINCTION IN A VETERANS AFFAIRS RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF MEDICAL THERAPY IN MEN WITH A CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Michael J. Barry; William O. Williford; Floyd J. Fowler; Karen M. Jones; Herbert Lepor

181, additional nursing care for

Collaboration


Dive into the William O. Williford's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph F. Collins

United States Department of Veterans Affairs

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David G. Weiss

United States Department of Veterans Affairs

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen F. Bingham

United States Department of Veterans Affairs

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martha Sajatovic

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas P. Beresford

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Salim Yusuf

Population Health Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge