Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William Parsonage is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William Parsonage.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012

2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial.

Martin Than; Louise Cullen; Sally Aldous; William Parsonage; Christopher M. Reid; Jaimi Greenslade; Dylan Flaws; Christopher J. Hammett; Daren M. Beam; Michael Ardagh; R. Troughton; Anthony F T Brown; Peter M. George; Christopher M. Florkowski; Jeffrey A. Kline; W. Frank Peacock; Alan S. Maisel; Swee Han Lim; Arvin Lamanna; A. Mark Richards

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether a new accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) for possible cardiac chest pain could identify low-risk patients suitable for early discharge (with follow-up shortly after discharge). BACKGROUND Patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have a low short-term risk of adverse cardiac events may be suitable for early discharge and shorter hospital stays. METHODS This prospective observational study tested an ADP that included pre-test probability scoring by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score, electrocardiography, and 0 + 2 h values of laboratory troponin I as the sole biomarker. Patients presenting with chest pain due to suspected ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS Of 1,975 patients, 302 (15.3%) had a MACE. The ADP classified 392 patients (20%) as low risk. One (0.25%) of these patients had a MACE, giving the ADP a sensitivity of 99.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.1% to 99.9%), negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% CI: 98.6% to 100.0%), specificity of 23.4% (95% CI: 21.4% to 25.4%), and positive predictive value of 19.0% (95% CI: 17.2% to 21.0%). Many ADP negative patients had further investigations (74.1%), and therapeutic (18.3%) or procedural (2.0%) interventions during the initial hospital attendance and/or 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Using the ADP, a large group of patients was successfully identified as at low short-term risk of a MACE and therefore suitable for rapid discharge from the emergency department with early follow-up. This approach could decrease the observation period required for some patients with chest pain. (An observational study of the diagnostic utility of an accelerated diagnostic protocol using contemporary central laboratory cardiac troponin in the assessment of patients presenting to two Australasian hospitals with chest pain of possible cardiac origin; ACTRN12611001069943).


Critical pathways in cardiology | 2013

The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study.

A.J. Six; Louise Cullen; B.E. Backus; Jaimi Greenslade; William Parsonage; Sally Aldous; P.A. Doevendans; Martin Than

OBJECTIVE The HEART score for the early risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain contains 5 elements: history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin. It has been validated in The Netherlands. The purpose of this investigation was to perform an external validation of the HEART score in an Asia-Pacific population. METHODS Data were used from 2906 patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency departments of 14 hospitals. HEART scores were determined retrospectively. Three risk groups were composed based on previous research. The predictive values for the occurrence of 30-day major adverse coronary events (MACE) were assessed. A comparison was made with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score in terms of the value of C-statistics. RESULTS The low-risk group, HEART score ≤ 3, consisted of 820/2906 patients (28.2%). Fourteen (1.7%) patients were incorrectly defined as low risk (false negatives). The high-risk population, HEART score 7-10, consisted of 464 patients (16%) with a risk of MACE of 43.1%. The C-statistics were 0.83 (0.81-0.85) for HEART and 0.75 (0.72-0.77) for TIMI (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Utilization of the HEART score provided excellent determination of risk for 30-day MACE, comparing well with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score. This study externally validates previous findings that HEART is a powerful clinical tool in this setting. It quickly identifies both a large proportion of low-risk patients, in whom early discharge without additional testing goes with a risk of MACE of only 1.7%, and high-risk patients who are potential candidates for early invasive strategies.


Pharmacogenetics and Genomics | 2007

Arg389Gly-[beta]1-adrenergic receptors determine improvement in left ventricular systolic function in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with heart failure after chronic treatment with carvedilol

Lu Chen; Deborah E. Meyers; G. Javorsky; D. Burstow; Pakorn Lolekha; Margaret Lucas; Annalese B. T. Semmler; Santiyagu M. Savarimuthu; Kwun M. Fong; Ian A. Yang; John Atherton; Andrew J. Galbraith; William Parsonage; Peter C. M. Molenaar

Objective Administration of the &bgr;-adrenergic receptor blocker carvedilol to patients with chronic heart failure leads to clinically significant benefits, including improvement in left ventricular systolic function in some, but not all, patients. We sought to determine the basis of the variable effect obtained with carvedilol in patients with heart failure. Carvedilol blocks both &bgr;1-adrenergic and &bgr;2-adrenergic receptors, and both receptors exist as polymorphisms. We aimed to determine whether these polymorphisms contribute to variability in response to carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods We retrospectively and prospectively investigated 135 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic stable heart failure (New York Heart Association class II, III) treated with carvedilol. Baseline echocardiography was obtained before introduction of carvedilol and repeated after stabilization of a maximally tolerated dose of carvedilol (50–100 mg/day) for at least 1 year. Polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis were used to genotype &bgr;1-adrenergic and &bgr;2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms. Results When grouped according to receptor polymorphisms patients were well matched for severity of heart failure, comorbidity and treatment. No significant difference was observed in baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between groups (P>0.05). After 1.5 years of treatment with carvedilol patients with Arg389Arg-&bgr;1-adrenergic receptors had a significantly greater improvement in LVEF compared with Gly389 carriers (Arg389Arg 18.8%; Arg389Gly 9.4%; Gly389Gly 6.0%; P<0.001) whereas there were no differences attributable to other &bgr;1-adrenergic and &bgr;2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms (P>0.05). Conclusion In patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, carvedilol leads to a significantly greater improvement in LVEF in patients with the Arg389Arg-&bgr;1 adrenergic receptor phenotype.


Emergency Medicine Australasia | 2014

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol

Martin Than; Dylan Flaws; Sharon Sanders; Jenny Doust; Paul Glasziou; Jeffery A. Kline; Sally Aldous; Richard W. Troughton; Christopher M. Reid; William Parsonage; Chris Frampton; Jaimi Greenslade; Joanne M. Deely; Erik P. Hess; Amr Bin Sadiq; Rose Singleton; Rosie Shopland; Laura Vercoe; Morgana Woolhouse-Williams; Michael Ardagh; Patrick M. Bossuyt; Laura Bannister; Louise Cullen

Risk scores and accelerated diagnostic protocols can identify chest pain patients with low risk of major adverse cardiac event who could be discharged early from the ED, saving time and costs. We aimed to derive and validate a chest pain score and accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) that could safely increase the proportion of patients suitable for early discharge.


JAMA Cardiology | 2016

Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Troponin I 1-Hour Algorithm.

Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Tjark Schwemer; Francisco Ojeda; Rafael Bourry; Vanessa Sciacca; Sarina Schaefer; Christoph Waldeyer; Christoph Sinning; Thomas Renné; Martin Than; William Parsonage; Karin Wildi; Nataliya Makarova; Renate B. Schnabel; Ulf Landmesser; Christian Mueller; Louise Cullen; Jaimi Greenslade; Tanja Zeller; Stefan Blankenberg; Mahir Karakas; Dirk Westermann

IMPORTANCE Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) currently constitutes an unmet need. OBJECTIVE To test a 1-hour diagnostic algorithm to diagnose AMI using a high-sensitivity troponin I assay with a new cutoff level of 6 ng/L. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Biomarkers in Acute Cardiac Care study is a prospective study that investigated the application of the troponin I assay for the diagnosis of AMI in 1040 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain from July 19, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Results were validated in 2 independent cohorts of 4009 patients. Final follow-up was completed on July 1, 2015, and data were assessed from July 2 to December 15, 2015. EXPOSURE Acute chest pain suggestive of AMI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Accurate diagnosis or exclusion of AMI and 12-month mortality in patients with acute chest pain. RESULTS Of the 1040 patients included from the study cohort, 673 (64.7%) were male and had a median age of 65 (interquartile range, 52-75) years. With application of a low troponin I cutoff value of 6 ng/L, the rule-out algorithm showed a high negative predictive value of 99.8% (95% CI, 98.6%-100.0%) after 1 hour for non-ST-segment elevation MI type 1. The 1-hour approach was comparable to a 3-hour approach. Similarly, a rule-in algorithm based on troponin I levels provided a high positive predictive value with 82.8% (95% CI, 73.2%-90.0%). Moreover, application of the cutoff of 6 ng/L resulted in lower follow-up mortality (1.0%) compared with the routinely used 99th percentile (3.7%) for this assay. Two independent cohorts further validated the performance of this algorithm with high negative and positive predictive values. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients with possible AMI can be triaged within 1 hour after admission with no loss of safety compared with a 3-hour approach, when a low and sensitive cutoff is applied. This concept enables safe discharge or rapid treatment initiation after 1 hour.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 2017

Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis

John W. Pickering; Martin Than; Louise Cullen; Sally Aldous; Ewoud ter Avest; Richard Body; Edward Carlton; Paul O. Collinson; Anne Marie Dupuy; Ulf Ekelund; Kai M. Eggers; Christopher M. Florkowski; Yonathan Freund; Peter M. George; Steve Goodacre; Jaimi Greenslade; Allan S. Jaffe; Sarah J. Lord; Arash Mokhtari; Christian Mueller; Andrew W. Munro; Sebbane Mustapha; William Parsonage; W. Frank Peacock; Chris J. Pemberton; A. Mark Richards; Juan Sanchis; Lukas P. Staub; Richard W. Troughton; Raphael Twerenbold

Background High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) are sometimes used to rapidly rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Purpose To estimate the ability of a single hs-cTnT concentration below the limit of detection (<0.005 µg/L) and a nonischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) to rule out AMI in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. Data Sources EMBASE and MEDLINE without language restrictions (1 January 2008 to 14 December 2016). Study Selection Cohort studies involving adults presenting to the ED with possible acute coronary syndrome in whom an ECG and hs-cTnT measurements were obtained and AMI outcomes adjudicated during initial hospitalization. Data Extraction Investigators of studies provided data on the number of low-risk patients (no new ischemia on ECG and hs-cTnT measurements <0.005 µg/L) and the number who had AMI during hospitalization (primary outcome) or a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) or death within 30 days (secondary outcomes), by risk classification (low or not low risk). Two independent epidemiologists rated risk of bias of studies. Data Synthesis Of 9241 patients in 11 cohort studies, 2825 (30.6%) were classified as low risk. Fourteen (0.5%) low-risk patients had AMI. Sensitivity of the risk classification for AMI ranged from 87.5% to 100% in individual studies. Pooled estimated sensitivity was 98.7% (95% CI, 96.6% to 99.5%). Sensitivity for 30-day MACEs ranged from 87.9% to 100%; pooled sensitivity was 98.0% (CI, 94.7% to 99.3%). No low-risk patients died. Limitation Few studies, variation in timing and methods of reference standard troponin tests, and heterogeneity of risk and prevalence of AMI across studies. Conclusion A single hs-cTnT concentration below the limit of detection in combination with a nonischemic ECG may successfully rule out AMI in patients presenting to EDs with possible emergency acute coronary syndrome. Primary Funding Source Emergency Care Foundation.


Clinical Chemistry | 2016

Two-Hour Algorithm for Triage toward Rule-Out and Rule-In of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Use of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I

Jasper Boeddinghaus; Tobias Reichlin; Louise Cullen; Jaimi Greenslade; William Parsonage; Christopher J. Hammett; John W. Pickering; Tracey Hawkins; Sally Aldous; Raphael Twerenbold; Karin Wildi; Thomas Nestelberger; Karin Grimm; Maria Rubini-Giménez; Christian Puelacher; Vera Kern; Katharina Rentsch; Martin Than; Christian Mueller

BACKGROUND The early triage of patients toward rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is challenging. Therefore, we aimed to develop a 2-h algorithm that uses high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI). METHODS We prospectively enrolled 1435 (derivation cohort) and 1194 (external validation cohort) patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. hs-cTnI was measured at presentation and after 2 h in a blinded fashion. We derived and validated a diagnostic algorithm incorporating hs-cTnI values at presentation and absolute changes within the first 2 h. RESULTS AMI was the final diagnosis in 17% of patients in the derivation and 13% in the validation cohort. The 2-h algorithm developed in the derivation cohort classified 56% of patients as rule-out, 17% as rule-in, and 27% as observation. Resulting diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 99.2% and 99.8% for rule-out; specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 95.2% and 75.8% for rule-in. Applying the 2-h algorithm in the external validation cohort, 60% of patients were classified as rule-out, 13% as rule-in, and 27% as observation. Diagnostic sensitivity and NPV were 98.7% and 99.7% for rule-out; specificity and PPV were 97.4% and 82.2% for rule-in. Thirty-day survival was 100% for rule-out patients in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS A simple algorithm incorporating hs-cTnI baseline values and absolute 2-h changes allowed a triage toward safe rule-out or accurate rule-in of AMI in the majority of patients.


Circulation | 2016

Assessment of the European society of cardiology 0-hour/1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction

John W. Pickering; Jaimi Greenslade; Louise Cullen; Dylan Flaws; William Parsonage; Sally Aldous; Peter M. George; Andrew Worster; Peter A. Kavsak; Martin Than

Background: The new European Society of Cardiology guidelines to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department include a rapid assessment algorithm based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and sampling at 0 and 1 hour. Emergency department physicians require high sensitivity to confidently rule-out AMI, whereas cardiologists aim to minimize false-positive results. Methods: High-sensitivity troponin I and T assays were used to measure troponin concentrations in patients presenting with chest-pain symptoms and being investigated for possible acute coronary syndrome at hospitals in New Zealand, Australia, and Canada. AMI outcomes were independently adjudicated by at least 2 physicians. The European Society of Cardiology algorithm performance with each assay was assessed by the sensitivity and proportion with AMI ruled out and the positive predictive value and proportion ruled-in. Results: There were 2222 patients with serial high-sensitivity troponin T and high-sensitivity troponin I measurements. The high-sensitivity troponin T algorithm ruled out 1425 (64.1%) with a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.0%–98.8%) and ruled-in 292 (13.1%) with a positive predictive value of 63.4% (95% CI, 57.5%–68.9%). The high-sensitivity troponin I algorithm ruled out 1205 (54.2%) with a sensitivity of 98.8% (95% CI, 96.4%–99.7%)) and ruled-in 310 (14.0%) with a positive predictive value of 68.1% (95% CI, 62.6%–73.2%). Conclusions: The sensitivity of the European Society of Cardiology rapid assessment 0-/1-hour algorithm to rule-out AMI with high-sensitivity troponin may be insufficient for some emergency department physicians to confidently send patients home. These algorithms may prove useful to identify patients requiring expedited management. However, the positive predictive value was modest for both algorithms.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2015

Cost and outcomes of assessing patients with chest pain in an Australian emergency department.

Louise Cullen; Jaimi Greenslade; Katharina Merollini; Nicholas Graves; Christopher J. Hammett; Tracey Hawkins; Martin Than; Anthony F T Brown; Christopher B. Huang; Seyed E. Panahi; Emily Dalton; William Parsonage

Objectives: We sought to characterise the demographics, length of admission, final diagnoses, long‐term outcome and costs associated with the population who presented to an Australian emergency department (ED) with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS).


JAMA Cardiology | 2016

Evaluation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Levels in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Edward Carlton; Jaimi Greenslade; Louise Cullen; Richard Body; Martin Than; John W. Pickering; Sally Aldous; Simon Carley; Christopher J. Hammett; Jason Kendall; Brian Keevil; Sarah J. Lord; William Parsonage; Kim Greaves

IMPORTANCE Low concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I determined on presentation to the emergency department (ED) have been shown to have an excellent negative predictive value (NPV) for the identification of acute myocardial infarction. The sensitivity, and therefore clinical applicability, of such testing strategies is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic performance of low concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in patients with suspected cardiac chest pain and an electrocardiogram showing no ischemia as an indicator of acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A pooled analysis of 5 international (Australia, New Zealand, and England) prospective, observational cohort studies with blinded outcome assessment and 30-day follow-up was conducted. A total of 3155 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia were included in the analysis. Eligible patients had a nonischemic electrocardiogram determined and high-sensitivity troponin I measured at presentation. The lower limit of detection (1.2 ng/L) as well as cutoff concentrations rounded to the nearest integer for a high-sensitivity troponin I assay were used in the analysis. Recruitment was undertaken from November 1, 2007, to August 10, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction occurring within 30 days of ED presentation, adjudicated with serial troponin testing. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients potentially suitable for early discharge at each cutoff concentration. RESULTS Of the 3155 eligible patients, 1771 were male (56.1%), and mean (SD) age was 57.4 (13.3) years. Acute myocardial infarction developed in 291 individuals (9.2%). The 1.2-ng/L limit of detection gave a sensitivity of 99.0% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.7%) and an NPV of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.9%). This cutoff level would allow for early discharge of 594 patients (18.8%). All higher rounded cutoff values had sensitivities less than 98.0%. Diagnostic performance of the limit of detection was maintained when patients were stratified by age, sex, risk factors, presence of coronary artery disease, and early presentation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-sensitivity troponin I concentrations determined at presentation to the ED that were below the limit of detection identified 18.8% of patients potentially suitable for discharge, with a high sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction. Rounded cutoff values above the limit of detection may not have the required sensitivity for clinical implementation.

Collaboration


Dive into the William Parsonage's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Louise Cullen

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaimi Greenslade

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arvin Lamanna

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J. Hammett

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin Chu

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacobus P.J. Ungerer

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge