William R. Fry

Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for penetrating abdominal trauma: a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND Considerable skepticism still exists about the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma. The reported experience with therapeutic laparoscopy has been limited. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a collective experience from three large urban trauma centers with 510 patients (316 stab wounds, 194 gunshot wounds) who were hemodynamically stable and had no urgent indications for celiotomy. RESULTS Laparotomy was avoided in 277 of the 510 patients (54.3%) either because of nonpenetration or insignificant findings on laparoscopy. All were discharged uneventfully after a mean hospital stay of 1.7 days. Twenty-six had successful therapeutic procedures on laparoscopy (diaphragmatic repair in 16 patients, cholecystectomy in 1 patient, hepatic repair in 6 patients, and closure of gastrotomy in 3 patients) with uneventful recovery. In the remaining 203 patients, laparotomy was therapeutic in 155. Fifty-two patients had nontherapeutic celiotomy for exclusion of bowel injuries or as mandatory laparotomy for penetrating gunshot wounds (19.7%). The overall incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomy was 10.2%. Complications from laparoscopy were minimal (10 of 510) and minor. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopy has an important diagnostic role in stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma. In carefully selected patients, therapeutic laparoscopy is practical, feasible, and offers all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma.

PURPOSE To assess the therapeutic potential of emergent laparoscopy in the trauma setting, a retrospective review was performed in a busy urban trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1991 and October 1993, 133 hemodynamically stable patients with suspected abdominal injury were evaluated laparoscopically. All laparoscopic procedures were performed in the operating room under general anesthesia. Mechanism of injury was stab wound (58), gunshot wound (57), and blunt trauma (18). No significant injuries were found in 72 patients (54%), and these patients received no further treatment. On the basis of laparoscopic findings, 52 patients underwent formal exploratory laparotomy. Surgical exploration confirmed the presence of significant injuries in 44 of the 52 patients (85%). Therapeutic laparoscopy was performed in 6 patients (5%) for diaphragm repair (4), gastrotomy repair (1), and splenorrhaphy (1). Additionally, 10 patients underwent laparoscopy-guided blood salvage for autotransfusion during laparoscopic evaluation of blunt trauma. Three small-bowel enterotomies were repaired during minilaparotomy. RESULTS No significant injuries were missed as a result of our use of laparoscopy in trauma assessment. Complications--trocar enterotomy, trocar laceration of the inferior epigastric artery, and transient hypotension--occurred in 3 patients secondary to the use of laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Trauma laparoscopy is a safe method for the evaluation of selected patients with abdominal trauma and can reduce the number of negative and nontherapeutic trauma laparotomies performed. Limited therapeutic intervention is possible in a small number of patients.

Preliminary report on videothoracoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of thoracic injury

A prospective trial of videothoracoscopy was conducted at an urban trauma center between February 1992 and February 1993 to determine the efficiency of this less invasive method of evaluation and treatment. Twenty-four consecutive patients with chest trauma (penetrating, n = 22; blunt, n = 2) were examined thoracoscopically for clotted hemothorax that otherwise would have been treated with thoracotomy (n = 9), suspected diaphragmatic injury (n = 10), and continued bleeding (n = 5). To ensure maximal exposure, general anesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube was used in each patient. Clotted hemothorax was successfully evacuated in eight of nine patients (89%). Diaphragmatic laceration was suspected in 10 patients (2 abnormal chest radiographs, 8 proximity penetrating wounds) and confirmed thoracoscopically in 5. In four patients, diaphragmatic lacerations were successfully repaired with thoracoscopic techniques. Five patients underwent thoracoscopy for continued hemorrhage (greater than 1,500 mL per 24 hours) after tube thoracostomy. Intercostal artery injury was confirmed in all patients, and diathermy provided hemostasis in three patients without thoracotomy. No complications occurred. These data suggest the following: (1) Videothoracoscopy is an accurate, safe, and minimally invasive method for the assessment of diaphragmatic injuries, control of continued chest wall bleeding, and early evacuation of clotted hemothorax. (2) This technique should be used more frequently in patients with thoracic trauma. (3) Technical advances may expand the therapeutic role of thoracoscopy.

Cardiac injuries : analysis of an unselected series of 251 cases

Retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 251 patients treated for cardiac injuries at Highland General Hospital trauma facility in Alameda County, California, to identify factors that contribute to patient survival and predict death. Thirty-six patients (14%) had blunt injuries, 153 patients (61%) had gunshot wounds (GSW), and 62 patients (25%) had stab wounds. The overall survival rate was 18.7%, GSW survival was 6.5%, stab wound survival was 37.1%, and blunt injury survival was 40%. Patients who arrived with some vital signs had 62.2% survival and patients who arrived with absent vital signs had < 1% survival. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that for patients with absent vital signs the only significant predictor of outcome was GSW as the mechanism of injury and for patients with vital signs the ISS and the presence of combined right and left heart injuries were significant independent predictors of outcome. We conclude that the routine and aggressive use of emergency room thoracotomy for patients with penetrating cardiac injury must be re-examined.

Extrathoracic carotid reconstruction: The subclavian-carotid artery bypass ☆

Although the predominant location of symptomatic carotid artery occlusive disease is the carotid bifurcation, proximal common carotid artery lesions cause similar symptoms. Common carotid artery lesions occur as isolated disease or in tandem with carotid bulb disease. Restoration of carotid artery inflow from subclavian based extraanatomic bypasses should provide adequate reconstruction of these lesions. To evaluate subclavian-carotid artery bypass, a retrospective review of all patients undergoing this procedure from Jan. 1, 1977, to Feb. 20, 1989, was performed. Twenty patients (14 men, 6 women) with a mean age of 60 years were treated. Fifteen patients (75%) were admitted with transient ischemic attacks. Five (25%) had nonfocal symptoms (e.g., dizziness, syncope). Arteriographic evaluation demonstrated severe proximal occlusive disease of the common carotid artery in all cases. Reconstruction bypasses were performed to the carotid bulb (45%), internal carotid artery (30%), and external carotid artery (25%). Four patients underwent endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery in conjunction with subclavian-carotid artery bypass. Bypass conduits included saphenous vein (75%) and prosthetic grafts (25%). Asymptomatic phrenic nerve neuropraxia was identified by postoperative chest radiography in four cases, with no resultant respiratory disease. No perioperative strokes occurred. One postoperative death (5%) resulted from a myocardial infarction. Long-term results were available for 18 patients (90%), with a mean follow-up of 50 months (range, 1 to 122 months). Four patients have died of causes unrelated to carotid vascular disease. Serial duplex scans have documented graft patency in all 18 patients. A single patient returned with focal neurologic symptoms as a result of a posterior circulation infarct.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)