Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William S.L. Banks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William S.L. Banks.


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2017

Channel response to sediment release: insights from a paired analysis of dam removal

Mathias J. Collins; Noah P. Snyder; Graham C. Boardman; William S.L. Banks; Mary Andrews; Matthew E. Baker; Maricate Conlon; Allen C. Gellis; Serena McClain; Andrew J. Miller; Peter R. Wilcock

Dam removals with unmanaged sediment releases are good opportunities to learn about channel response to abruptly increased bed material supply. Understanding these events is important because they affect aquatic habitats and human uses of floodplains. A longstanding paradigm in geomorphology holds that response rates to landscape disturbance exponentially decay through time. However, a previous study of the Merrimack Village Dam (MVD) removal on the Souhegan River in New Hampshire, USA, showed that an exponential function poorly described the early geomorphic response. Erosion of impounded sediments there was two-phased. We had an opportunity to quantitatively test the two-phase response model proposed for MVD by extending the record there and comparing it with data from the Simkins Dam removal on the Patapsco River in Maryland, USA. The watershed sizes are the same order of magnitude (102 km2), and at both sites low-head dams were removed (~3–4 m) and ~65 000 m3 of sand-sized sediments were discharged to low-gradient reaches. Analyzing four years of repeat morphometry and sediment surveys at the Simkins site, as well as continuous discharge and turbidity data, we observed the two-phase erosion response described for MVD. In the early phase, approximately 50% of the impounded sediment at Simkins was eroded rapidly during modest flows. After incision to base level and widening, a second phase began when further erosion depended on floods large enough to go over bank and access impounded sediments more distant from the newly-formed channel. Fitting functional forms to the data for both sites, we found that two-phase exponential models with changing decay constants fit the erosion data better than single-phase models. Valley width influences the two-phase erosion responses upstream, but downstream responses appear more closely related to local gradient, sediment re-supply from the upstream impoundments, and base flows. Copyright


Scientific Investigations Report | 2010

Simulation of groundwater flow to assess future withdrawals associated with Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland

Jeff P. Raffensperger; Brandon J. Fleming; William S.L. Banks; Marilee A. Horn; Mark R. Nardi; David C. Andreasen

..........................................................................................................................................................


Scientific Investigations Report | 2009

Sources, Transport, and Storage of Sediment at Selected Sites in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Allen C. Gellis; Cliff R. Hupp; Milan J. Pavich; Jurate M. Landwehr; William S.L. Banks; Bernard E. Hubbard; Michael J. Langland; Jerry C. Ritchie; Joanna M. Reuter


Ground Water | 1996

Using Thermal‐Infrared Imagery to Delineate Ground‐Water Discharged

William S.L. Banks; Randall L. Paylor; W. Brian Hughes


Hydrological Processes | 2013

Suspended sediment source apportionment in Chesapeake Bay watershed using Bayesian chemical mass balance receptor modeling

Arash Massoudieh; Allen C. Gellis; William S.L. Banks; Michael Wieczorek


Scientific Investigations Report | 2004

Summary of suspended-sediment data for streams draining the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, water years 1952-2002

Allen C. Gellis; William S.L. Banks; Michael J. Langland; Sarah K. Martucci


Scientific Investigations Report | 2013

Water volume and sediment volume and density in Lake Linganore between Boyers Mill Road Bridge and Bens Branch, Frederick County, Maryland, 2012

Andrew J. Sekellick; William S.L. Banks; Michael K. Myers


Circular | 2017

The Surge, Wave, and Tide Hydrodynamics (SWaTH) network of the U.S. Geological Survey—Past and future implementation of storm-response monitoring, data collection, and data delivery

Richard J. Verdi; R. Russell Lotspeich; Jeanne C. Robbins; Ronald J. Busciolano; John R. Mullaney; Andrew J. Massey; William S.L. Banks; Mark A. Roland; Harry L. Jenter; Marie C. Peppler; Thomas P. Suro; Christopher E. Schubert; Mark R. Nardi


Scientific Investigations Report | 2012

Well network installation and hydrogeologic data collection, Assateague Island National Seashore, Worcester County, Maryland, 2010

William S.L. Banks; John P. Masterson; Carole D. Johnson


Scientific Investigations Report | 2011

Collection, processing, and interpretation of ground-penetrating radar data to determine sediment thickness at selected locations in Deep Creek Lake, Garrett County, Maryland, 2007

William S.L. Banks; Carole D. Johnson

Collaboration


Dive into the William S.L. Banks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allen C. Gellis

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carole D. Johnson

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark R. Nardi

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Milan J. Pavich

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arash Massoudieh

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cliff R. Hupp

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeff P. Raffensperger

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge