William S. McKerrow

Antibiotics to improve recovery following tonsillectomy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if antibiotics improve recovery following tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Data sources: Electronic databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched using relevant search terms. Additional trials, if any, were retrieved by searching the references from all identified trials, reviews, correspondences, editorials, and conference proceedings. No language restriction was applied. Study selection: Systematic review of trials in which antibiotic was administered as a study medication intraoperatively and/or postoperatively, in children or adults undergoing tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Only randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials attaining preset quality scores were included. Outcomes analyzed: 1) pain, need for analgesia, fever, halitosis, and return to normal diet and activities; 2) secondary hemorrhage using 2 parameters—significant hemorrhage (ie, warranting readmission, blood transfusion, or return to theatre for hemostasis) and total hemorrhage; and 3) adverse events. RESULTS: Five trials met the eligibility criteria. Antibiotics significantly reduced the number of subjects manifesting fever (relative risk [RR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45, 0.85) and duration of halitosis (− 1.94 [−3.57, −0.30] days), and marginally reduced the time taken to resume normal activity (−0.63 [− 1.12, −0.14] days), but had no significant effect in reducing pain scores (−0.01 [−0.60, 0.57]) or need for analgesia. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the time taken to resume normal diet or incidence of significant and total hemorrhage, although data was underpowered to detect differences for these outcomes. In the antibiotic group 4 patients developed an adverse reaction (3 cases of rash and 1 case of oropharyngeal candidiasis), while in the control group 1 patient had an adverse reaction (rash). The RR of antibiotic-related adverse events was 2.45 (0.45, 13.31). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics appear to be effective in reducing some, but not all, morbid outcomes following tonsillectomy, and may increase the risk of adverse events. Further trials are needed to better define the role of antibiotics in facilitating post-tonsillectomy recovery.

Systematic review of the safety of electrosurgery for tonsillectomy

• In the meta‐analysis models, compared with cold steel dissection with ties/packs haemostasis (reference technique):

Should we be concerned about diphtheria in the UK

Diphtheria is a very rare condition in the developed world today with the advent of immunisation. Studies from the populations of England and Wales, however, suggest a recent increase in the number of notified cases. Sore throat due to a tonsillitis is the most common manifestation and can, thus, present to the clinician. It can also present as, or be complicated by, life-threatening upper airway obstruction. This case demonstrates the former and highlights the latter, in an attempt to raise awareness of a condition which may be seen more frequently in the future.

Comments on the Dutch tonsil randomized controlled trial

1 Benecke J.E., Jr & Stahl B.A. (2001) Otologic instrumentation. In Otologic Surgery, Brackmann D.E., Shelton C. & Arriaga M.A. (eds), pp. 6–8. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA 2 Wiesenthal A.A. & Garber L.Z. (1999) New method for packing the external auditory canal, middle ear space, and mastoid cavities after otologic surgery. J. Otolaryngol. 28, 260–265 3 Akin W.O. & Tobin H.A. (1974) Silicone rubber stent. An improved form of ear packing. Arch. Otolaryngol. 99, 462–463 4 Weber R., Keerl R., Hochapfel F. et al. (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 22, 306–320