William W. Huang

Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa.

Objective This clinical practice guideline is an update and replacement for an earlier guideline published in 2006 by the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. This update provides evidence-based recommendations to manage acute otitis externa (AOE), defined as diffuse inflammation of the external ear canal, which may also involve the pinna or tympanic membrane. The variations in management of AOE and the importance of accurate diagnosis suggest a need for updating the clinical practice guideline. The primary outcome considered in this guideline is clinical resolution of AOE. Purpose The primary purpose of the original guideline was to promote appropriate use of oral and topical antimicrobials for AOE and to highlight the need for adequate pain relief. An updated guideline is needed because of new clinical trials, new systematic reviews, and the lack of consumer participation in the initial guideline development group. The target patient is aged 2 years or older with diffuse AOE. Differential diagnosis will be discussed, but recommendations for management will be limited to diffuse AOE, which is almost exclusively a bacterial infection. This guideline is intended for primary care and specialist clinicians, including otolaryngologists–head and neck surgeons, pediatricians, family physicians, emergency physicians, internists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. This guideline is applicable in any setting in which patients with diffuse AOE would be identified, monitored, or managed. Action Statements The development group made strong recommendations that (1) clinicians should assess patients with AOE for pain and recommend analgesic treatment based on the severity of pain and (2) clinicians should not prescribe systemic antimicrobials as initial therapy for diffuse, uncomplicated AOE unless there is extension outside the ear canal or the presence of specific host factors that would indicate a need for systemic therapy. The development group made recommendations that (1) clinicians should distinguish diffuse AOE from other causes of otalgia, otorrhea, and inflammation of the external ear canal; (2) clinicians should assess the patient with diffuse AOE for factors that modify management (nonintact tympanic membrane, tympanostomy tube, diabetes, immunocompromised state, prior radiotherapy); (3) clinicians should prescribe topical preparations for initial therapy of diffuse, uncomplicated AOE; (4) clinicians should enhance the delivery of topical drops by informing the patient how to administer topical drops and by performing aural toilet, placing a wick, or both, when the ear canal is obstructed; (5) clinicians should prescribe a non-ototoxic preparation when the patient has a known or suspected perforation of the tympanic membrane, including a tympanostomy tube; and (6) clinicians should reassess the patient who fails to respond to the initial therapeutic option within 48 to 72 hours to confirm the diagnosis of diffuse AOE and to exclude other causes of illness.

The genetics of pyoderma gangrenosum and implications for treatment: a systematic review

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by painful skin ulcerations for which treatment can be challenging. The genetic basis of PG may provide a better understanding of the disease and new targets for treatment. We systematically reviewed the published literature regarding the syndromes and genetic mutations associated with PG. A literature search was performed through the clinical queries PubMed (National Library of Medicine) database and the Cochrane database. The studies were assessed and then categorized as relating to syndromes or specific gene mutations. Two hundred and eight articles were identified, describing 823 cases of PG. A total of 537 (65·2%) cases were associated with inflammatory bowel disease, 133 (16·1%) with polyarthritis and 103 (12·5%) with haematological disorders. Thirty‐one cases of pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum and acne, and its variants, were identified. Two patients had mutations in MTHFR and two had mutations in JAK2. Fourteen (1·7%) cases were familial. PG responded to different treatments depending on the setting. For example, treatment with B vitamins improved PG in cases of mutations in MTHFR, whereas patients with myelodysplastic syndrome improved with thalidomide treatment. PG can occur in isolation, associated with systemic disease or as part of various syndromes. Different genetic causes may be best treated with particular treatments. Understanding its genetic basis can help elucidate new potential targets for drug development.

To test or not to test? An evidence-based assessment of the value of screening and monitoring tests when using systemic biologic agents to treat psoriasis

The development of new treatments for psoriasis provides dermatologists novel ways to help control the disease but raises questions about what laboratory screening tests are required. As of yet, no consensus or guidelines exist for dermatologists to follow and there may be misconceptions about the relative need for screening and monitoring tests in patients treated with biologic agents. Current practice ranges from no testing to blanket screening panels. The purposes of this review are to (1) systematically review the literature on the use of screening and monitoring tests when initiating and continuing biologic treatments (adalimumab, alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab) for moderate to severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis; and (2) suggest practical guidelines for dermatologists on which to base such testing. We searched the Cochrane Collaborative Database (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Cochrane Reviews] and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [Clinical Trials]) and the MEDLINE database using medical subject headings as search terms when available or key words when appropriate. We compiled published data on risk and risk assessment related to systemic psoriasis treatments, used expert opinion where appropriate when published clinical data were not adequately informative, and assigned evidence grades for various screening tests based on standard methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Finally, we developed a table of evidence grades for tests used to monitor different systemic medications. There is not strong evidence to recommend most screening tests for monitoring biological treatments. Neither is there strong evidence not to do such testing. Ultimately, from a practical standpoint, it is incumbent on the clinician to consider each patient independently and determine what screening tests are most appropriate for each individual patient.

To test or not to test? An updated evidence-based assessment of the value of screening and monitoring tests when using systemic biologic agents to treat psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND Safety profiles of systemic biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) encompass a wide spectrum of adverse events. To date, no uniform evidence-based guidelines exist regarding screening and monitoring patients who are undergoing biologic therapy. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify studies evaluating screening and monitoring tests in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA with systemic biologic agents, and to propose evidence-based practical guidelines. METHODS The MEDLINE database was searched to identify data on risks associated with adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab. Articles were reviewed and graded according to methods developed by the US Preventative Services Task Force. RESULTS Evidence was strongest (grade B) for tuberculosis screening. Interferon-gamma release assay was preferable to tuberculin skin testing. Among known hepatitis B virus carriers, the evidence grade was C for monitoring liver function tests and viral load. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by the lack of high-quality controlled trials evaluating screening and monitoring tests in patients treated with biologic agents. CONCLUSIONS Baseline tuberculosis testing remains the only screening test with strong evidence to support its practice. Other screening and monitoring tests commonly performed in patients who are taking biologic agents are supported only in certain clinical settings or lack evidence to support or recommend against their practice.

Clinical Practice Guideline Acute Otitis Externa Executive Summary

The American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) has published a supplement to this issue featuring the updated Clinical Practice Guideline: Acute Otitis Externa, as a supplement to Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. To assist in implementing the guideline recommendations, this article summarizes the rationale, purpose, and key action statements. The 8 recommendations developed address appropriate diagnosis of acute otitis externa (AOE) and the use of oral and topical antimicrobials and highlight the need for adequate pain relief. An updated guideline is needed due to new clinical trials, new systematic reviews, and the lack of consumer participation in the initial guideline development group.

Social Media in Professional Medicine: New Resident Perceptions and Practices

Background For younger generations, unconstrained online social activity is the norm. Little data are available about perceptions among young medical practitioners who enter the professional clinical arena, while the impact of existing social media policy on these perceptions is unclear. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the existing perceptions about social media and professionalism among new physicians entering in professional clinical practice; and to determine the effects of formal social media instruction and policy on young professionals’ ability to navigate case-based scenarios about online behavior in the context of professional medicine. Methods This was a prospective observational study involving the new resident physicians at a large academic medical center. Medical residents from 9 specialties were invited to participate and answer an anonymous questionnaire about social media in clinical medicine. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC), chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used as appropriate, and the correct responses were compared between different groups using the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance. Results Familiarity with current institutional policy was associated with an average of 2.2 more correct responses (P=.01). Instruction on social media use during medical school was related to correct responses for 2 additional questions (P=.03). On dividing the groups into no policy exposure, single policy exposure, or both exposures, the mean differences were found to be statistically significant (3.5, 7.5, and 9.4, respectively) (P=.03). Conclusions In this study, a number of young physicians demonstrated a casual approach to social media activity in the context of professional medical practice. Several areas of potential educational opportunity and focus were identified: (1) online privacy, (2) maintaining digital professionalism, (3) safeguarding the protected health information of patients, and (4) the impact of existing social media policies. Prior social media instruction and/or familiarity with a social media policy are associated with an improved performance on case-based questions regarding online professionalism. This suggests a correlation between an instruction about online professionalism and more cautious online behavior. Improving the content and delivery of social media policy may assist in preserving institutional priorities, protecting patient information, and safeguarding young professionals from online misadventure.

Adherence to Oral and Topical Medications in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus is not Well Characterized

IntroductionTreatment adherence plays a large role in chronic dermatologic diseases and may play an important role in the outcomes of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). We sought to gauge what is currently known about adherence to topical and oral medications in patients with CLE.MethodsA review of MEDLINE was performed using a combination of the phrases “adherence”, “compliance”, “lupus”, and “cutaneous”. Studies were hand searched and prospective and cross-sectional studies evaluating medication adherence in patients with CLE and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were included.ResultsOnly two articles explored adherence in patients with CLE, while 17 articles discussed treatment adherence in patients with SLE. Depression was consistently cited as detrimental to adherence. The impact that race, ethnicity, and education has on adherence is unclear. Three studies noted a clear connection between adherence and disease activity, while two others did not. Few studies investigated methods that have improved adherence to treatment which have showed promise.ConclusionMuch of what we know about adherence to medication in patients with lupus is limited to SLE. Although cutaneous symptoms are among the most common manifestations of SLE, cutaneous disease is often managed at least in part with topical agents, and adherence to topical treatment was not assessed in any of the articles, though one study investigated sunscreen usage in patients with CLE. Understanding adherence in patients with CLE may help contribute to better CLE treatment outcomes.

Adherence in dermatology

Abstract Non-adherence to treatment and medical recommendations is one of the leading causes of treatment failure, poor clinical outcomes, and increased healthcare utilization. Although non-adherence is observed across all medical specialties, adherence to treatment in dermatology deserves special attention given the multiple different routes of treatment. Adherence can be measured using subjective methods (patient reporting and questionnaires) or objective methods (pill counts, electronic chips, and pharmacy records). Adherence to dermatologic treatments varies based on the specific condition but is poor for systemic therapies and even worse with topical agents. Among the factors that influence adherence, duration of treatment, complexity of regimen, and access play a large role. Interventions to improve adherence can range from simplifying treatment regimens to scheduling more frequent office visits. Due to the profound effect on cost, healthcare outcomes, and mortality, understanding and improving adherence is equally as important as making the correct diagnosis and prescribing the correct treatment.

Cutaneous cryosurgery in the United States

Abstract Background: Cryosurgery is a common treatment modality for many dermatological conditions; however, the extent to which it is used and by which medical specialties is not well characterized. Objective: To determine the rates of cryosurgery use over time, the top dermatoses treated by cryosurgery, patient demographics and the rate at which practitioners used cryosurgery. Methods: We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 1993 to 2010 in order to quantify the use of cryosurgery in outpatient offices. For visits where cryosurgery was utilized, the leading diagnoses, treating physician specialties, and patient ages were tabulated. Results: Cryosurgery was most commonly used for treating actinic keratoses (48% of visits), seborrheic keratoses (25% of visits) and verrucae (21% of visits). Dermatologists performed 82% of all cryosurgeries, followed by family/internal medicine physicians (13.6%) and pediatricians (2.8%). The use of cryosurgery for these dermatoses has increased over time (p < 0.0001), especially in patients over the age of 65 years. Physicians in offices with health maintenance organization-based practices were more likely to utilize cryosurgery. Limitations: Since NAMCS data are cross-sectional, we are unable to determine whether patients tried and failed other treatments. Conclusions: As the baby boomer generation ages, the demand for cryosurgery will likely further increase.

Successful treatment of recalcitrant warts with topical squaric acid in immunosuppressed child.

Abstract:  Although spontaneous resolution of verrucous vulgaris is the norm, many treatment modalities are available including local destruction, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and sensitizing agents. The choice of treatment will vary with patients age and desire for treatment, prior treatments, potential side effects, location of lesions, and patients immune status. Treatment of verruca vulgaris in immunosuppressed patients presents therapeutic challenges as lesions in this population are often refractory to conventional modalities. Here we present a case of successful treatment of recalcitrant warts with topical squaric acid in an immunosuppressed child.