William W. O’Neill

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sidney C. Smith, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Ted E. Feldman, MD, FACC, FSCAI[‡][1] John W. Hirshfeld, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA,FSCAI[‡][1] Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI Morton J. Kern, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI[‡][1] Spencer B. King III, MD, MACC, FSCAI Douglass A. Morrison, MD, PhD, FACC

A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: The air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study

OBJECTIVES The Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) study was designed to determine the best reperfusion strategy for patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at hospitals without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) capability. BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that high-risk patients have better outcomes with primary PTCA than with thrombolytic therapy. It is unknown whether this advantage would be lost if the patient had to be transferred for PTCA, and reperfusion was delayed. METHODS Patients with high-risk AMI (age >70 years, anterior MI, Killip class II/III, heart rate >100 beats/min or systolic BP <100 mm Hg) who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy were randomized to either transfer for primary PTCA or on-site thrombolysis. RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized before the study ended (71 to transfer for PTCA and 67 to thrombolysis). The time from arrival to treatment was delayed in the transfer group (155 vs. 51 min, p < 0.0001), largely due to the initiation of transfer (43 min) and transport time (26 min). Patients randomized to transfer had a reduced hospital stay (6.1 +/- 4.3 vs. 7.5 +/- 4.3 days, p = 0.015) and less ischemia (12.7% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.007). At 30 days, a 38% reduction in major adverse cardiac events was observed for the transfer group; however, because of the inability to recruit the necessary sample size, this did not achieve statistical significance (8.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS Patients with high-risk AMI at hospitals without a catheterization laboratory may have an improved outcome when transferred for primary PTCA versus on-site thrombolysis; however, this will require further study. The marked delay in the transfer process suggests a role for triaging patients directly to specialized heart-attack centers.

A prospective randomized trial of prevention measures in patients at high risk for contrast nephropathy ☆: Results of the P.R.I.N.C.E. study

Objectives This study was done to test the hypothesis that a forced diuresis with maintenance of intravascular volume after contrast exposure would reduce the rate of contrast-induced renal injury. Background We have previously shown a graded relationship with the degree of postprocedure renal failure and the probability of in-hospital death in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Earlier studies of singular prevention strategies (atrial natriuretic factor, loop diuretics, dopamine, mannitol) have shown no clear benefit across a spectrum of patients at risk. Methods A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial was conducted where 98 participants were randomized to forced diuresis with intravenous crystalloid, furosemide, mannitol (if pulmonary capillary wedge pressure <20 mm Hg), and low-dose dopamine (n = 43) versus intravenous crystalloid and matching placebos (n = 55). Results The groups were similar with respect to baseline serum creatinine (2.44 ± 0.80 and 2.55 ± 0.91 mg/dl), age, weight, diabetic status, left ventricular function, degree of prehydration, contrast volume and ionicity, and extent of peripheral vascular disease. The forced diuresis resulted in higher urine flow rate (163.26 ± 54.47 vs. 122.57 ± 54.27 ml/h) over the 24 h after contrast exposure (p = 0.001). Two participants in the experimental arm versus five in the control arm required dialysis, with all seven cases having measured flow rates <145 ml/h in the 24 h after the procedure. The mean individual change in serum creatinine at 48 h, the primary end point, was 0.48 ± 0.86 versus 0.51 ± 0.87, in the experimental and control arms, respectively, p = 0.87. There were no differences in the rates of renal failure across six definitions of renal failure by intent-to-treat analysis. However, in all participants combined, the rise in serum creatinine was related to the degree of induced diuresis after controlling for baseline renal function, r = −0.36, p = 0.005. The rates of renal failure in those with urine flow rates greater than 150 ml/h in the postprocedure period were significantly lower, 8/37 (21.6%) versus 28/61 (45.9%), p = 0.03. Conclusions Forced diuresis with intravenous crystalloid, furosemide, and mannitol if hemodynamics permit, beginning at the start of angiography provides a modest benefit against contrast-induced nephropathy provided a high urine flow rate can be achieved.

Induction of mild systemic hypothermia with endovascular cooling during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of endovascular cooling during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND In experimental models of AMI, mild systemic hypothermia has been shown to reduce metabolic demand and limit infarct size. METHODS In a multi-center study, 42 patients with AMI (<6 h from symptom onset) were randomized to primary PCI with or without endovascular cooling (target core temperature 33 degrees C). Cooling was maintained for 3 h after reperfusion. Skin warming, oral buspirone, and intravenous meperidine were used to reduce the shivering threshold. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. Infarct size at 30 days was measured using (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. RESULTS Endovascular cooling was performed successfully in 20 patients (95%). All achieved a core temperature below 34 degrees C (mean target temperature 33.2 +/- 0.9 degrees C). The mean temperature at reperfusion was 34.7 +/- 0.9 degrees C. Cooling was well tolerated, with no hemodynamic instability or increase in arrhythmia. Nine patients experienced mild episodic shivering. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 0% vs. 10% (p = NS) of treated versus control patients. The median infarct size was non-significantly smaller in patients who received cooling compared with the control group (2% vs. 8% of the left ventricle, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS Endovascular cooling can be performed safely as an adjunct to primary PCI for AMI. Further clinical trials are required to determine whether induction of mild systemic hypothermia with endovascular cooling will limit infarct size in patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Primary Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction: In-Hospital and 30-Day Results of the PAMI Stent Pilot Trial

Abstract Objectives. The goals of this study were to examine the safety and feasibility of a routine (primary) stent strategy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background. Limitations of reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in AMI include in-hospital recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in 10% to 15% of patients, restenosis in 37% to 49% and late infarct-related artery reocclusion in 9% to 14%. By lowering the residual stenosis and sealing dissection planes created by PTCA, primary stenting may further improve short- and long-term outcomes after mechanical reperfusion. Methods. Three hundred twelve consecutive patients treated with primary PTCA for AMI at nine international centers were prospectively enrolled. After PTCA, stenting was attempted in all eligible lesions (vessel size 3.0 to 4.0 mm; lesion length ≤2 stents; and the absence of giant thrombus burden after PTCA, major side branch jeopardy or excessive proximal tortuosity or calcification). Patients with stents were treated with aspirin, ticlopidine and a 60-h tapering heparin regimen. Results. Stenting was attempted in 240 (77%) of 312 patients, successfully in 236 (98%), with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow restored in 230 patients (96%). Patients with stents had low rates of in-hospital death (0.8%), reinfarction (1.7%), recurrent ischemia (3.8%) and predischarge target vessel revascularization for ischemia (1.3%). At 30-day follow-up, no additional deaths or reinfarctions occurred among patients with stents, and target vessel revascularization was required in only one additional patient (0.4%). Conclusions. Primary stenting is safe and feasible in the majority of patients with AMI and results in excellent short-term outcomes.

Non–Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Stents for the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions: Angiographic Follow-Up of the DELIVER Clinical Trial

Background—Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antitumor activity, has been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The DELIVER trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical evaluation of the non–polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent compared with the stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent. Methods and Results—A total of 1043 patients with focal de novo coronary lesions, <25 mm in length, in 2.5- to 4.0-mm vessels were randomized (ACHIEVE n=524; ML PENTA n=519). Angiographic follow-up was performed in a subset of 442 patients (ACHIEVE n=228; ML PENTA n=214). Prespecified end points were a 40% reduction in target-vessel failure at 9 months (primary clinical end point) and a 50% reduction in binary restenosis at 8 months (major secondary end point). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients in ACHIEVE had more type C lesions and a larger reference diameter. At follow-up, stent late loss was 0.81 versus 0.98 mm (P =0.003), stent binary restenosis was 14.9% versus 20.6% (P =0.076), and target-vessel failure was 11.9% versus 14.5% (P =0.12) for ACHIEVE and ML PENTA, respectively. Conclusions—The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent decreased neointimal proliferation compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent; however, this reduction was insufficient to meet the prespecified primary end point of target-vessel failure and the secondary end point of binary restenosis.

A prospective randomized trial of triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy: Results of the medicine versus angiography in thrombolytic exclusion (MATE) trial

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine if early triage angiography with revascularization, if indicated, favorably affects clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction who are ineligible for thrombolysis. BACKGROUND The majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction and other acute coronary syndromes are considered ineligible for thrombolysis and therefore are not afforded the opportunity for early reperfusion. METHODS This multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluated in a controlled fashion the outcomes following triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Eligible patients (n=201) with <24 h of symptoms were randomized to early triage angiography and subsequent therapies based on the angiogram versus conventional medical therapy consisting of aspirin, intravenous heparin, nitroglycerin, beta-blockers, and analgesics. RESULTS In the triage angiography group, 109 patients underwent early angiography and 64 (58%) received revascularization, whereas in the conservative group, 54 (60%) subsequently underwent nonprotocol angiography in response to recurrent ischemia and 33 (37%) received revascularization (p=0.004). The mean time to revascularization was 27+/-32 versus 88+/-98 h (p=0.0001) and the primary endpoint of recurrent ischemic events or death occurred in 14 (13%) versus 31 (34%) of the triage angiography and conservative groups, respectively (45% risk reduction, 95% CI 27-59%, p=0.0002). There were no differences between the groups with respect to initial hospital costs or length of stay. Long-term follow-up at a median of 21 months revealed no significant differences in the endpoints of late revascularization, recurrent myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS Early triage angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not eligible for thrombolytics reduced the composite of recurrent ischemic events or death and shortened the time to definitive revascularization during the index hospitalization. Despite more frequent early revascularization after triage angiography, we found no long-term benefit in cardiac outcomes compared with conservative medical therapy with revascularization prompted by recurrent ischemia.

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a new form of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (activase) in acute myocardial infarction.

A new, predominantly single chain preparation of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator was evaluated to determine coronary thrombolytic efficacy in 100 patients with acute myocardial infarction. At 3.6 +/- 1.2 hours (mean +/- SD) from symptom onset, patients received either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (1.25 mg/kg body weight over 3 hours) or placebo on a 3:1 randomized, double-blind basis. Coronary angiography, performed 68 +/- 13 minutes after initiation of the study drug infusion, demonstrated patency of the infarct-related artery in 40 (57%) of 70 patients in the tissue plasminogen activator group compared with 3 (13%) of 23 patients in the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Patients in the placebo group were then eligible to receive intracoronary streptokinase. At 90 minutes the patency was observed in 49 (69%) of 71 tissue plasminogen activator patients compared with 5 (24%) of 21 placebo patients (p less than 0.001). At 120 minutes patency was observed in 59 (79%) of 75 patients of the tissue plasminogen activator group and in 10 (40%) of 25 in the intracoronary streptokinase/placebo group. A nadir value of less than 100 mg/dl fibrinogen occurred in 8 (11%) of 73 patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator versus 8 (40%) of 20 patients treated with intracoronary streptokinase (p = 0.002). Moderate or severe bleeding episodes occurred in 39% of patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator compared with 32% of patients who received placebo/intracoronary streptokinase (p = NS). Thus, this tissue plasminogen activator preparation achieves a high rate of recanalization and, at the doses employed, exhibits increased fibrinogen sparing compared with intracoronary streptokinase.

Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and to identify the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). BACKGROUND Percutaneous interventions of SVGs have been associated with more procedural complications and higher restenosis rates compared with interventions on native vessels. METHODS From 1993 to 1997, 1,062 patients underwent percutaneous intervention on 1,142 SVG lesions. Procedural, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes were recorded in a database and analyzed. RESULTS In-hospital MACE occurred in 137 patients (13%) including death (8%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (2%) and coronary artery bypass surgery (3%). Late MACE occurred in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%). Any MACE occurred in 457 (43%) patients. Follow-up was available in 1,056 (99%) patients at 3 +/- 1 year. Univariate predictors were restenotic lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, confidence interval [CI]: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.0003), unstable angina (OR: 1.99, CI: 1.27 to 2.91, p = 0.04) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.24, p = 0.02) for in-hospital MACE, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR: 2.18, CI: 1.34 to 3.44, p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.02) and previous MI (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.25, p = 0.007) for late MACE. Independent multivariate predictors for late MACE were restenotic lesion (relative risk [RR] 1.33, p = 0.02), PVD (RR: 1.31, p = 0.01), CHF (RR: 1.42, p = 0.01) and multiple stents (RR: 1.47, p = 0.004). Angiographic follow-up was available for 422 patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 122 (29%) of stented SVGs and 181 (43%) of nonstented SVGs (p = 0.04). Stent implantation did not confer a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS Despite the use of new interventional devices, SVG interventions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; SVG stenting is not associated with better three-year event-free survival. This may be due to progressive disease at nonstented sites.

Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: report from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-I) trial

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare the two-year outcome after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Primary angioplasty, that is, angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy, has been shown to be an effective reperfusion modality for patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction. This report reviews the two-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. METHODS At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 h of the onset of myocardial infarction were randomized to undergo primary angioplasty (195 patients) or to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (200 patients) followed by conservative care. Patients were followed by physician visits, phone call, letter and review of hospital records for any hospital admission at one month, six months, one year and two years. RESULTS At two years, patients undergoing primary angioplasty had less recurrent ischemia (36.4% vs. 48% for t-PA, p = 0.026), lower reintervention rates (27.2% vs. 46.5% for t-PA, p < 0.0001) and reduced hospital readmission rates (58.5% vs. 69.0% for t-PA, p = 0.035). The combined end point of death or reinfarction was 14.9% for angioplasty versus 23% for t-PA, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis found angioplasty to be independently predictive of a reduction in death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The initial benefit of primary angioplasty performed by experienced operators is maintained over a two-year follow-up period with improved infarct-free survival and reduced rate of reintervention.