William W. Schairer

What Are the Rates and Causes of Hospital Readmission After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related interventions such as revision TKA and the treatment of infected TKAs are commonly performed procedures. Hospital readmission rates are used to measure hospital performance, but risk factors (both medical and surgical) for readmission after TKA, revision TKA, and treatment for the infected TKA have not been well characterized.Questions/purposesWe measured (1) the unplanned hospital readmission rate in primary TKA and revision TKA, including antibiotic-spacer staged revision TKA to treat infection. We also evaluated (2) the medical and surgical causes of readmission and (3) risk factors associated with unplanned hospital readmission.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included a total of 1408 patients (1032 primary TKAs, 262 revision TKAs, 113 revision of infected TKAs) from one institution. All hospital readmissions within 90 days of discharge were evaluated for timing and cause. Diagnoses at readmission were categorized as surgical or medical. Readmission risk was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model that incorporated patient demographics and medical comorbidities.ResultsThe unplanned readmission rate for the entire cohort was 4% at 30 days and 8% at 90 days. At 90 days postoperatively, revision of an infected TKA had the highest readmission rate, followed by revision TKA, with primary TKA having the lowest rate. Approximately three-fourths of readmissions were the result of surgical causes, mostly infection, arthrofibrosis, and cellulitis, whereas the remainder of readmissions were the result of medical causes. Procedure type (primary TKA versus revision TKA or staged treatment for infected TKA), hospital stay more than 5 days, discharge destination, and a fluid/electrolyte abnormality were each associated with risk of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsPatients having revision TKA, whether for infection or other causes, are more likely to have an unplanned readmission to the hospital than are patients having primary TKA. When assessing hospital performance for TKA, it is important to distinguish among these surgical procedures.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Causes and Frequency of Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is a beneficial and cost-effective procedure for patients with osteoarthritis. Recent initiatives to improve hospital quality of care include assessing unplanned hospital readmission rates. Patients presenting for THA have different indications and medical comorbidities that may impact rates of readmission.Questions/purposesThis study measured (1) the unplanned hospital readmission rate in primary THA, revision THA, and antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA to treat infection. Additionally, we determined (2) the medical and surgical causes of readmission; and (3) the risk factors associated with unplanned readmission.MethodsA total of 1415 patients (988 primary THA, 344 revision THA, 82 antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA to treat infection) from a single institution were included. All hospital readmissions within 90xa0days of discharge were reviewed. Patient demographics and medical comorbidities were included in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess risk of readmission.ResultsThe overall unplanned readmission rate was 4% at 30xa0days and 7% at 90xa0days. At 90xa0days, primary THA (5%) had a lower unplanned readmission rate than revision THA (10%, pxa0<xa00.001) and antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA (18%, pxa0<xa00.001). Medical diagnoses were responsible for almost one-fourth of unplanned readmissions, whereas over half of surgical readmissions were the result of dislocation, surgical site infection, and postoperative hematoma. Type of procedure, hospital stay greater than 5xa0days, cardiac valvular disease, diabetes with end-organ complications, and substance abuse were each associated with increased risk of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsHigher rates of unplanned hospital readmissions in revision THA rather than primary THA suggest that healthcare quality measures that incorporate readmission rates as a proxy for quality of care should distinguish between primary and revision procedures. Failure to do so may negatively impact tertiary referral hospitals that often care for patients requiring complex revision procedures.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hospital readmission after spine fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To assess the rate, causes, and risk factors of unplanned hospital readmission after spine fusion for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Summary of Background Data. Hospital readmissions in the elderly are common, and with increasing emphasis on the quality of health care, readmission rates are used to assess hospital performance. Spine surgery has seen rapidly increased utilization during the past 2 decades. Surgical treatments of complex spinal deformity are known to have higher rates of complications than other types of spine surgery. However, there are no reports describing the rates and causes of hospital readmission after deformity surgery. Methods. Patients were identified at a single institution from 2006 through 2011 that received a spine fusion for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. All hospital readmissions within 90 days of discharge were reviewed for cause. Unplanned readmission rates were calculated via Kaplan-Meier failure analysis. Rates were compared across patients receiving different lengths of spine fusion (short: 2–3 vertebra, medium: 4–8, long: 9 or more). Risk factors were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards multivariate model. Results. Eight hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled (111 short, 402 medium, and 323 long fusions). The overall unplanned readmission rate was 8.4% at 30 days and 12.3% at 90 days. Patients with long spine fusion had higher rates of readmission than patients with medium or short length fusions. Surgical site infection accounted for 45.6% of readmissions. Risk factors for readmission include longer fusion length, higher patient severity of illness, and specific medical comorbidities. Conclusion. Unplanned hospital readmissions after spine fusion for adult spinal deformity are common, and are most often due to surgical site infection. Patient medical comorbidities are an important part of assessing risk and can be used by providers and patients to better assess individual risk prior to treatment. Level of Evidence: 3

Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae

OBJECTnProximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common and significant complication after corrective spinal deformity surgery. The object of this study was to compare-based on clinical outcomes, postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis rates, and prevalence of revision surgery-proximal thoracic (PT) and distal thoracic (DT) upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in adults who underwent spine fusion to the sacrum for the treatment of spinal deformity.nnnMETHODSnIn this retrospective study the authors evaluated clinical and radiographic data from consecutive adults (age > 21 years) with a deformity treated using long instrumented posterior spinal fusion to the sacrum in the period from 2007 to 2009. The PT group included patients in whom the UIV was between T-2 and T-5, whereas the DT group included patients in whom the UIV level was between T-9 and L-1. Perioperative surgical data were compared between the PT and DT groups. Additionally, segmental, regional, and global spinal alignments, as well as the sagittal Cobb angle at the proximal junction, were analyzed on preoperative, early postoperative, and final standing 36-in. radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measurements (visual analog scale, Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire-22, Oswestry Disability Index, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) were compared.nnnRESULTSnEighty-nine patients, 22 males and 67 females, had a minimum follow-up of 2 years, and thus were eligible for participation in this study. Sixty-seven patients were in the DT group and 22 were in the PT group. Operative time (p = 0.387) and estimated blood loss (p < 0.05) were slightly higher in the PT group. The overall rate of revision surgery was 48.0% and 54.5% in the DT and PT groups, respectively (p = 0.629). The prevalence of PJK according to radiological criteria was 34% in the DT group and 27% in the PT group (p = 0.609). The percent of patients with PJK that required surgical correction (surgical PJK) was 11.9% (8 of 67) in the DT group and 9.1% (2 of 22) in the PT group (p = 1.0). The onset of surgical PJK was significantly earlier than radiological PJK in the DT group (p < 0.01). The types of PJK were different in the PT and DT groups. Compression fracture at the UIV was more prevalent in the DT group, whereas subluxation was more prevalent in the PT group. Postoperatively, the PT group had less thoracic kyphosis (p = 0.02), less sagittal imbalance (p < 0.01), and less pelvic tilt (p = 0.04). In the DT group, early postoperative radiographs demonstrated that the proximal junctional angle of patients with surgical PJK was greater than in those without PJK and those with radiological PJK (p < 0.01). Clinical outcomes were significantly improved in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnBoth PT and DT UIVs improve segmental and global sagittal plane alignment as well as patient-reported quality of life in those treated for adult spinal deformity. The prevalence of PJK was not different in the PT and DT groups. However, compression fracture was the mechanism more frequently observed with DT PJK, and subluxation was the mechanism more frequently observed in PT PJK. Strategies to avoid PJK may include vertebral augmentation to prevent fracture at the DT spine and mechanical means to prevent vertebral subluxation at the PT spine.

Abnormal Tibiofemoral Kinematics Following ACL Reconstruction are Associated with Early Cartilage Matrix Degeneration Measured by MRI T1rho

PURPOSEnAltered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction may be a cause of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. T(1ρ) MRI is a technique that detects early cartilage matrix degeneration. Our study aimed to evaluate kinematics following ACL-reconstruction, cartilage health (using T(1ρ) MRI), and assess whether altered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction are associated with early cartilage degeneration.nnnMETHODSnEleven patients (average age: 33 ± 9 years) underwent 3T MRI 18 ± 5 months following ACL-reconstruction. Images were obtained at extension and 30° flexion under simulated loading (125 N). Tibial rotation (TR) and anterior tibial translation (ATT) between flexion and extension, and T(1ρ) relaxation times of the knee cartilage were analyzed. Cartilage was divided into five compartments: medial and lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC), medial and lateral tibias (MT/LT), and patella. A sub-analysis of the femoral weight-bearing (wb) regions was also performed. Patients were categorized as having abnormal or restored ATT and TR, and T(1ρ) percentage increase was compared between these two groups of patients.nnnRESULTSnAs a group, there were no significant differences between ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knee kinematics, however, there were individual variations. T(1ρ) relaxation times of the MFC and MFC-wb region were elevated (p ≤ 0.05) in the ACL-reconstructed knees compared to the uninjured contralateral knees. There were increases (p ≤ 0.05) in the MFC-wb, MT, patella and overall average cartilage T(1ρ) values of the abnormal ATT group compared to restored ATT group. The percentage increase in the T(1ρ) relaxation time in the MFC-wb cartilage approached significance (p=0.08) in the abnormal versus restored TR patients.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAbnormal kinematics following ACL-reconstruction appear to lead to cartilage degeneration, particularly in the medial compartment.

Pitfalls of calculating hospital readmission rates based on nonvalidated administrative data sets

OBJECTnAdministrative databases are increasingly being used to establish benchmarks for quality of care and to compare performance across peer hospitals. As proposals for accountable care organizations are being developed, readmission rates will be increasingly scrutinized. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether the all-cause readmissions rate appropriately reflects the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center hospitals clinically relevant readmission rate for spine surgery patients and to identify predictors of readmission.nnnMETHODSnData for 5780 consecutive patient encounters managed by 10 spine surgeons at UCSF Medical Center from October 2007 to June 2011 were abstracted from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) using the Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager. Of these 5780 patient encounters, 281 patients (4.9%) were rehospitalized within 30 days of the previous discharge date. The authors performed an independent chart review to determine clinically relevant reasons for readmission and extracted hospital administrative data to calculate direct costs. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate possible predictors of readmission. The two-sample t-test was used to examine the difference in direct cost between readmission and nonreadmission cases.nnnRESULTSnThe main reasons for readmission were infection (39.8%), nonoperative management (13.4%), and planned staged surgery (12.4%). The current all-cause readmission algorithm resulted in an artificially high readmission rate from the clinicians point of view. Based on the authors manual chart review, 69 cases (25% of the 281 total readmissions) should be excluded because 39 cases (13.9%) were planned staged procedures; 16 cases (5.7%) were unrelated to spine surgery; and 14 surgical cases (5.0%) were cancelled or rescheduled at index admission due to unpredictable reasons. When these 69 cases are excluded, the direct cost of readmission is reduced by 29%. The cost variance is in excess of

Current Trends in Rotator Cuff Repair: Surgical Technique, Setting, and Cost

3 million. Predictors of readmission were admission status (p < 0.0001), length of stay (p = 0.0001), risk of death (p < 0.0001), and age (p = 0.021).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe authors findings identify the potential pitfalls in the calculation of readmission rates from administrative data sets. Benchmarking algorithms for defining hospitals readmission rates must take into account planned staged surgery and eliminate unrelated reasons for readmission. When this is implemented in the calculation method, the readmission rate will be more accurate. Current tools overestimate the clinically relevant readmission rate and cost.

Hospital readmissions after primary shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSEnThe purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the surgical setting and hospital costs of shoulder arthroscopy and rotator cuff repair (RCR) using the Florida State surgical database and national inpatient database.nnnMETHODSnIn part I we analyzed population-adjusted shifts in RCR technique (arthroscopic v open) in the Florida surgical database from 2000-2007 and quantified the procedural codes associated with arthroscopic and open RCR. In part II we analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2001-2009 for the total number of inpatient RCRs, the inpatient hospital type (rural, urban non-teaching, or urban teaching), and the cost.nnnRESULTSnPart I showed a 163% increase in outpatient procedures in Florida, with a 353% increase in arthroscopic RCRs. There was a concurrent decrease in open RCRs; however, the overall trend was a 2-fold increase in total RCRs. Associated procedures such as subacromial decompression, distal clavicle resection, and extensive glenohumeral debridement increased by 440%, 589%, and 1,253%, respectively. Part II showed an overall 58.8% decrease in inpatient RCRs that was similar across all hospital settings, with an increase in RCR-associated hospital charges by 144.9%, whereas hospital costs only increased by 85.2%.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe study confirms a shift toward arthroscopic RCR and associated procedures in the outpatient setting. The increased financial cost partly explains the shift; nevertheless, future studies are needed to further examine national trends.nnnCLINICAL RELEVANCEnThis study examining RCR trends by hospital type, cost, and setting further elucidates how orthopaedic surgery practice is evolving with the implementation of arthroscopic RCR in the past decade.

Long fusion from sacrum to thoracic spine for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: upper versus lower thoracic spine as site of upper instrumented vertebra.

BACKGROUNDnAlthough shoulder arthroplasty procedures are more frequently performed in the United States, there is insufficient information on outcome measures such as hospital readmission rates or factors for readmission after surgery.nnnMETHODSnThe State Inpatient Database from 7 different states was used to identify patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) from 2005 through 2010. The database was used to determine the 90-day readmission rate, causes of readmission, and risk factors for readmission. Multivariate modeling and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to measure factors and risk for readmission.nnnRESULTSnIncluded were 26,218 patients receiving shoulder arthroplasty, with an overall 90-day readmission rate of 7.3%. RTSA had the highest rate (11.2%), followed by hemiarthroplasty (8.2%) and TSA (6.0%; P < .001). Medical complications contributed to 82% of readmissions, and surgical complications contributed to 18%. Osteoarthritis was the most common medical diagnosis (11%), followed by deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (4.4%) and pneumonia (3.9%). Infection was the most common surgical cause of readmission (4.8%), followed by dislocation (4.6%). There was a stepwise increase in risk of readmission with increasing age. Patients with Medicaid insurance had more than a 50% greater risk of readmission than patients with Medicare. Procedures performed at medium-volume and high-volume hospitals showed lower risk of readmission than low-volume centers.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatients undergoing RTSA had higher hospital readmission rates than those undergoing hemiarthroplasty or TSA, but most readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty were due to medical causes.

Longitudinal analysis of T1ρ and T2 quantitative MRI of knee cartilage laminar organization following microfracture surgery

OBJECTnDespite increasing numbers of patients with adult spinal deformity, it is unclear how to select the optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in long fusion surgery for these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of vertebrae in the upper thoracic (UT) versus lower thoracic (LT) spine as the upper instrumented vertebra in long fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity.nnnMETHODSnPatients who underwent fusion from the sacrum to the thoracic spine for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance at a single medical center were studied. The patients with a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 40 mm who had radiographs and completed the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) preoperatively and at final follow-up (≥ 2 years postoperatively) were included.nnnRESULTSnEighty patients (mean age of 61.1 ± 10.9 years; 69 women and 11 men) met the inclusion criteria. There were 31 patients in the UT group and 49 patients in the LT group. The mean follow-up period was 3.6 ± 1.6 years. The physical component summary (PCS) score of the SF-12 significantly improved from the preoperative assessment to final follow-up in each group (UT, 34 to 41; LT, 29 to 37; p = 0.001). This improvement reached the minimum clinically important difference in both groups. There was no significant difference in PCS score improvement between the 2 groups (p = 0.8). The UT group had significantly greater preoperative lumbar lordosis (28° vs 18°, p = 0.03) and greater thoracic kyphosis (36° vs 18°, p = 0.001). After surgery, there was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis or thoracic kyphosis. The UT group had significantly greater postoperative cervicothoracic kyphosis (20° vs 11°, p = 0.009). The UT group tended to maintain a smaller positive SVA (51 vs 73 mm, p = 0.08) and smaller T-1 spinopelvic inclination (-2.6° vs 0.6°, p = 0.06). The LT group tended to have more proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Radiographic PJK was 32% in the UT group and 41% in the LT group (p = 0.4). Surgical PJK was 6.4% in the UT group and 10% in the LT group (p = 0.6).nnnCONCLUSIONSnBoth the UT and LT groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes. A significant difference was not observed in improvement of clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.