Winfried Hausner

Activation of archaeal transcription by recruitment of the TATA-binding protein

The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii encodes two putative transcription regulators, Ptr1 and Ptr2, that are members of the Lrp/AsnC family of bacterial transcription regulators. In contrast, this archaeons RNA polymerase and core transcription factors are of eukaryotic type. Using the M. jannaschii high-temperature in vitro transcription system, we show that Ptr2 is a potent transcriptional activator, and that it conveys its stimulatory effects on its cognate eukaryal-type transcription machinery from an upstream activating region composed of two Ptr2-binding sites. Transcriptional activation is generated, at least in part, by Ptr2-mediated recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the promoter.

Two Transcription Factors Related with the Eucaryal Transcription Factors TATA-binding Protein and Transcription Factor IIB Direct Promoter Recognition by an Archaeal RNA Polymerase

We reported previously that cell-free transcription in the Archaea Methanococcus and Pyrococcus depends upon two archaeal transcription factors, archaeal transcription factor A (aTFA) and archaeal transcription factor B (aTFB). In the genome of Pyrococcus genes encoding putative homologues of eucaryal transcription factors TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TFIIB have been detected. Here, we report that Escherichia coli synthesized Pyrococcus homologues of TBP and TFIIB are able to replace endogenous aTFB and aTFA in cell-free transcription reactions. Antibodies raised against archaeal TBP and TFIIB bind to polypeptides of identical molecular mass in the aTFB and aTFA fraction. These data identify aTFB as archaeal TBP and aTFA as the archaeal homologue of TFIIB. At the Pyrococcus glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) promoter these two bacterially produced transcription factors and endogenous RNA polymerase are sufficient to direct accurate and active initiation of transcription. DNase I protection experiments revealed Pyrococcus-TBP producing a characteristic footprint between position −20 and −34 centered around the TATA box of gdh promoter. Pyrococcus-TFIIB did not bind to the TATA box but bound cooperatively with Pyrococcus-TBP generating an extended DNase I footprinting pattern ranging from position −19 to −42. These data suggest that the Pyrococcus homologue of TFIIB associates with the TBP-promoter binary complex as its eucaryal counterpart, but in contrast to eucaryal TFIIB, it causes an extension of the protection to the region upstream of the TATA box.

SHUTTLE VECTOR BASED TRANSFORMATION SYSTEM FOR PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS

ABSTRACT Pyrococcus furiosus is a model organism for analyses of molecular biology and biochemistry of archaea, but so far no useful genetic tools for this species have been described. We report here a genetic transformation system for P. furiosus based on the shuttle vector system pYS2 from Pyrococcus abyssi. In the redesigned vector, the pyrE gene from Sulfolobus was replaced as a selectable marker by the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase gene (HMG-CoA) conferring resistance of transformants to the antibiotic simvastatin. Use of this modified plasmid resulted in the overexpression of the HMG-CoA reductase in P. furiosus, allowing the selection of strains by growth in the presence of simvastatin. The modified shuttle vector replicated in P. furiosus, but the copy number was only one to two per chromosome. This system was used for overexpression of His6-tagged subunit D of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) in Pyrococcus cells. Functional RNAP was purified from transformed cells in two steps by Ni-NTA and gel filtration chromatography. Our data provide evidence that expression of transformed genes can be controlled from a regulated gluconeogenetic promoter.

TrmB, a sugar sensing regulator of ABC transporter genes in Pyrococcus furiosus exhibits dual promoter specificity and is controlled by different inducers

TrmB is the transcriptional repressor for the gene cluster of the trehalose/maltose ABC transporter of the hyperthermophilic archaea Thermococcus litoralis and Pyrococcus furiosus (malE or TM operon), with maltose and trehalose acting as inducers. We found that TrmB (the protein is identical in both organisms) also regulated the transcription of genes encoding a separate maltodextrin ABC transporter in P. furiosus (mdxE or MD operon) with maltotriose, longer maltodextrins and sucrose acting as inducers, but not with maltose or trehalose. In vitro transcription of the malE and the mdxE operons was inhibited by TrmB binding to the different operator sequences. Inhibition of the TM operon was released by maltose and trehalose whereas inhibition of the MD operon was released by maltotriose and larger maltodextrins as well as by sucrose. Scanning mutagenesis of the TM operator revealed the role of the palindromic TACTNNNAGTA sequence for TrmB recognition. TrmB exhibits a broad spectrum of sugar‐binding specificity, binding maltose, sucrose, maltotriose and trehalose in decreasing order of affinity, half‐maximal binding occurring at 20, 60, 250 and 500 µM substrate concentration respectively. Of all substrates, only maltose shows sigmoidal binding characteristics with a Hill coefficient of 2. As measured by molecular sieve chromatography and cross‐linking TrmB behaved as dimer in dilute buffer solution at room temperature. We conclude that TrmB acts as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator acting on two different promoters and being differentially controlled by binding to different sugars. We believe this to represent a novel strategy of prokaryotic transcription regulation.

Transcriptional fidelity and proofreading in Archaea and implications for the mechanism of TFS-induced RNA cleavage

We have addressed the question whether TFS, a protein that stimulates the intrinsic cleavage activity of the archaeal RNA polymerase, is able to improve the fidelity  of  transcription  in  Methanococcus.  Using non‐specific transcription experiments, we could demonstrate that misincorporation of non‐templated nucleotides  is  reduced  in  the  presence  of  TFS.  A more detailed analysis revealed that elongation complexes containing a misincorporated nucleotide were arrested, but could be reactivated by TFS. RNase as well as exonuclease III footprinting experiments demonstrated that this arrest was not combined with extended backtracking. Analysis of paused elongation complexes demonstrated that TFS is able to induce a cleavage resynthesis cycle in such complexes, which resulted in the accumulation of dinucleotides corresponding to the last two nucleotides of the transcript. Further analysis of cleavage products revealed that, even under conditions that strongly promote misincorporation, still 50% of the released dinucleotides were correctly incorporated. Therefore, we assume that pausing of elongation complexes is an important determinant of TFS‐induced RNA cleavage from the 3′ end. As the incorporation rate of wrong nucleotides is about 700‐fold reduced, it is possible that this delay also provides an appropriate time window for cleavage induction in order to maintain transcriptional fidelity by preventing misincorporation.

Promoter architecture and response to a positive regulator of archaeal transcription

The archaeal transcription apparatus is chimeric: its core components (RNA polymerase and basal factors) closely resemble those of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II, but the putative archaeal transcriptional regulators are overwhelmingly of bacterial type. Particular interest attaches to how these bacterial‐type effectors, especially activators, regulate a eukaryote‐like transcription system. The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanocaldococcus jannaschii encodes a potent transcriptional activator, Ptr2, related to the Lrp/AsnC family of bacterial regulators. Ptr2 activates rubredoxin 2 (rb2) transcription through a bipartite upstream activating site (UAS), and conveys its stimulatory effects on its cognate transcription machinery through direct recruitment of the TATA binding protein (TBP). A functional dissection of the highly constrained architecture of the rb2 promoter shows that a ‘one‐site’ minimal UAS suffices for activation by Ptr2, and specifies the required placement of this site. The presence of such a simplified UAS upstream of the natural rubrerythrin (rbr) promoter also suffices for positive regulation by Ptr2 in vitro, and TBP recruitment remains the primary means of transcriptional activation at this promoter.

Transcription Factors and Termination of Transcription in Methanococcus

Summary We have recently shown that specific transcription in cell extracts of Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus depends upon a transcription factor that was separated from the RNA polymerase by phosphocellulose chromatography. Here, we provide evidence for a second transcription factor. This factor copurified with RNA polymerase during initial Chromatographic steps, but it was resolved as a distinct activity required for cell-free transcription after centrifugation in sucrose density gradients. The native molecular weight of this factor was estimated by gel filtration to be 56 000. After electrophoresis under denaturing conditions, a 28 kDa polypeptide was correlated with factor activity. Thus, the native transcription factor appeared to be a dimer composed of two polypeptides of identical molecular mass. Oligo-dT sequences at the 3′-end of a tRNA Val gene and internal sequences of this tRNA were modified by DNA deletions in order to investigate the nature of archaeal transcription terminators. Deletion of two residues of the decameric sequence 5′-TTTTAATTTT-3′ reduced termination efficiency to about 27 percent of wild-type levels. Deletion of two additional residues from the 3′-end completely abolished terminator function. Deletions in the DNA region encoding the TΨC stem and loop of tRNA also significantly reduced termination efficiency. In addition a Rho-independent terminator of Escherichia coli perfectly replaced the decameric Methanococcus terminator sequence. These findings suggested that transcription termination sequences in archaea are similar to the terminator sequences in bacteria.

Events during Initiation of Archaeal Transcription: Open Complex Formation and DNA-Protein Interactions

Transcription in Archaea is initiated by association of a TATA box binding protein (TBP) with a TATA box. This interaction is stabilized by the binding of the transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) orthologue TFB. We show here that the RNA polymerase of the archaeon Methanococcus, in contrast to polymerase II, does not require hydrolysis of the beta-gamma bond of ATP for initiation of transcription and open complex formation on linearized DNA. Permanganate probing revealed that the archaeal open complex spanned at least the DNA region from -11 to -1 at a tRNA(Val) promoter. The Methanococcus TBP-TFB promoter complex protected the DNA region from -40 to -14 on the noncoding DNA strand and the DNA segment from -36 to -17 on the coding DNA strand from DNase I digestion. This DNase I footprint was extended only to the downstream end by the addition of the RNA polymerase to position +17 on the noncoding strand and to position +13 on the coding DNA strand.

The role of TrmB and TrmB-like transcriptional regulators for sugar transport and metabolism in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus.

TrmB of Pyrococcus furiosus was discovered as the trehalose/maltose-specific repressor for the genes encoding the trehalose/maltose high-affinity ABC transporter (the TM system). TrmB also represses the genes encoding the high affinity maltodextrin-specific ABC transporter (the MD system) with maltodextrin and sucrose as inducers. In addition, TrmB binds glucose leading to an increased repression of both, the TM and the MD system. Thus, TrmB recognizes different promoters and depending on the promoter it will be activated or inactivated for promoter binding by different sugar effectors. The TrmB-like protein TrmBL1 of P. furiosus is a global regulator and recognizes preferentially, but not exclusively, the TGM (for Thermococcales–glycolytic motif) sequence that is found upstream of the MD system as well as of genes encoding enzymes involved in the glycolytic and the gluconeogenic pathway. It responds to maltose and maltotriose as inducers and functions as repressor for the genes encoding the MD system and glycolytic enzymes, but as activator for genes encoding gluconeogenic enzymes. The TrmB-like protein TrmBL2 of P. furiosus lacks the sugar-binding domain that has been determined in TrmB. It recognizes the MD promoter, but not all TGM harboring promoters. It is evolutionary the most conserved among the Thermococcales. The regulatory range of TrmBL2 remains unclear.

Activation of Archaeal Transcription Mediated by Recruitment of Transcription Factor B

Background: Archaeal transcription is activated by a novel mechanism. Results: The novel regulator PF1088 (TFB-RF1) is able to activate archaeal transcription by TFB recruitment. Conclusion: Archaeal transcription can be activated by recruitment of not only TATA-binding protein but also TFB. Significance: Exploring the hybrid transcription machinery in Archaea could reveal basic transcription mechanisms for all forms of life. Archaeal promoters consist of a TATA box and a purine-rich adjacent upstream sequence (transcription factor B (TFB)-responsive element (BRE)), which are bound by the transcription factors TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TFB. Currently, only a few activators of archaeal transcription have been experimentally characterized. The best studied activator, Ptr2, mediates activation by recruitment of TBP. Here, we present a detailed biochemical analysis of an archaeal transcriptional activator, PF1088, which was identified in Pyrococcus furiosus by a bioinformatic approach. Operon predictions suggested that an upstream gene, pf1089, is polycistronically transcribed with pf1088. We demonstrate that PF1088 stimulates in vitro transcription by up to 7-fold when the pf1089 promoter is used as a template. By DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments, we show that the binding site of PF1088 is located directly upstream of the BRE of pf1089. Mutational analysis indicated that activation requires the presence of the binding site for PF1088. Furthermore, we show that activation of transcription by PF1088 is dependent upon the presence of an imperfect BRE and is abolished when the pf1089 BRE is replaced with a BRE from a strong archaeal promoter. Gel shift experiments showed that TFB recruitment to the pf1089 operon is stimulated by PF1088, and TFB seems to stabilize PF1088 operator binding even in the absence of TBP. Taken together, these results represent the first biochemical evidence for a transcriptional activator working as a TFB recruitment factor in Archaea, for which the designation TFB-RF1 is suggested.