Wolfgang Mueck

Co‐administration of rivaroxaban with drugs that share its elimination pathways: pharmacokinetic effects in healthy subjects

AIMS The anticoagulant rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor for the management of thromboembolic disorders. Metabolism and excretion involve cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and 2J2 (CYP2J2), CYP-independent mechanisms, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) (ABCG2). METHODS The pharmacokinetic effects of substrates or inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-gp and Bcrp (ABCG2) on rivaroxaban were studied in healthy volunteers. RESULTS Rivaroxaban did not interact with midazolam (CYP3A4 probe substrate). Exposure to rivaroxaban when co-administered with midazolam was slightly decreased by 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] -28%, 7%) compared with rivaroxaban alone. The following drugs moderately affected rivaroxaban exposure, but not to a clinically relevant extent: erythromycin (moderate CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitor; 34% increase [95% CI 23%, 46%]), clarithromycin (strong CYP3A4/moderate P-gp inhibitor; 54% increase [95% CI 44%, 64%]) and fluconazole (moderate CYP3A4, possible Bcrp [ABCG2] inhibitor; 42% increase [95% CI 29%, 56%]). A significant increase in rivaroxaban exposure was demonstrated with the strong CYP3A4, P-gp/Bcrp (ABCG2) inhibitors (and potential CYP2J2 inhibitors) ketoconazole (158% increase [95% CI 136%, 182%] for a 400 mg once daily dose) and ritonavir (153% increase [95% CI 134%, 174%]). CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that rivaroxaban may be co-administered with CYP3A4 and/or P-gp substrates/moderate inhibitors, but not with strong combined CYP3A4, P-gp and Bcrp (ABCG2) inhibitors (mainly comprising azole-antimycotics, apart from fluconazole, and HIV protease inhibitors), which are multi-pathway inhibitors of rivaroxaban clearance and elimination.

Rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants: pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, specific patient populations and relevance of coagulation monitoring

Unlike traditional anticoagulants, the more recently developed agents rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban target specific factors in the coagulation cascade to attenuate thrombosis. Rivaroxaban and apixaban directly inhibit Factor Xa, whereas dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin. All three drugs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics that allow for fixed oral doses in a variety of settings. The population pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban, and also dabigatran, have been evaluated in a series of models using patient data from phase II and III clinical studies. These models point towards a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, even when extreme demographic factors are taken into account, meaning that doses rarely need to be adjusted. The exception is in certain patients with renal impairment, for whom pharmacokinetic modelling provided the rationale for reduced doses as part of some regimens. Although not routinely required, the ability to measure plasma concentrations of these agents could be advantageous in emergency situations, such as overdose. Specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics must be taken into account when selecting an appropriate assay for monitoring. The anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays now available are likely to provide the most appropriate means of determining plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban, and specific assays for dabigatran are in development.

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor

AIM This study investigated the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. METHOD This single centre, non-randomized, non-blinded study included subjects with mild (n = 8) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), according to the Child-Pugh classification, and gender-matched healthy subjects (n = 16). RESULTS Rivaroxaban was well tolerated irrespective of hepatic function. Mild hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, compared with healthy subjects. However, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, total body clearance was decreased, leading to a significant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The least-squares (LS)-mean values for AUC were 1.15-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.85, 1.57] and 2.27-fold (90% CI 1.68, 3.07) higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Consequently, the pharmacodynamic responses were significantly enhanced in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. For inhibition of Factor Xa, increases in the area under the effect-time curve and the maximum effect were observed, with LS-mean ratios of 2.59 and 1.24, respectively, vs. healthy subjects. Prolongation of prothrombin time was similar in healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but was significantly enhanced in those with moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION Moderate (but not mild) hepatic impairment reduced total body clearance of rivaroxaban after a single 10 mg dose, leading to increased rivaroxaban exposure and pharmacodynamic effects.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients with acute coronary syndromes

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban have been characterized in healthy subjects and in patients with total venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This article is the first description of the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rivaroxaban in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It is the largest population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on rivaroxaban conducted to date (n= 2290). The PK and PK-PD relationship of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS were similar to those in other patient populations. In addition, model-based simulations showed that the influence of renal function and age on the exposure to rivaroxaban in the ACS population were similar to the findings from Phase 1 special population studies. These findings suggest that rivaroxaban has highly predictable PK-PD and may provide a consistent anticoagulant effect across the studied patient populations, which allows an accurate prediction of the dose to control anticoagulation optimally. AIMS The aim of this analysis was to use a population approach to facilitate the understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to evaluate the influence of patient covariates on the exposure of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS. METHODS A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using pharmacokinetic samples from 2290 patients in Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 46. The relationship between pharmacokinetics and the primary pharmacodynamic end point, prothrombin time, was evaluated. RESULTS The pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS was adequately described by an oral one-compartment model. The estimated absorption rate, apparent clearance and volume of distribution were 1.24 h(-1) (interindividual variability, 139%), 6.48 l h(-1) (31%) and 57.9 l (10%), respectively. Simulations indicate that the influences of renal function, age and bodyweight on exposure in ACS patients are consistent with the findings in previous Phase 1 studies. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations exhibit a close-to-linear relationship with prothrombin time in the ACS population, with little interindividual variability. The estimated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for the ACS patients were comparable to those for venous thromboembolism prevention, deep vein thrombosis and atrial fibrillation patients. CONCLUSIONS The similarity in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban among different patient populations and the low interindividual variability in the exposure-prothrombin time relationship indicate that the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban is highly predictable and consistent across all the patient populations studied.

Absence of Clinically Relevant Interactions between Rivaroxaban - an Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor - and Digoxin or Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects:

Objective: To investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor approved for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and digoxin or atorvastatin. Methods: Two randomized, phase 1 clinical trials were undertaken in healthy men to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin or atorvastatin, and the safety of these drug combinations. Results: Steady-state rivaroxaban did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile of steady-state digoxin (n = 17). Digoxin did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetic profile of single-dose rivaroxaban and had minimal effects on rivaroxaban-induced inhibition of Factor Xa activity and prolongation of clotting time. Similarly, steady-state atorvastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile or the pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban and vice versa (n = 19). All drugs (alone or in combination) were well tolerated. Conclusions: There were no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmaco - dynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin, or between rivaroxaban and atorvastatin, suggesting that rivaroxaban can be coadministered with either drug. This study also confirmed that rivaroxaban does not interact with substrates for permeability (P)-glycoprotein alone (digoxin) or P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450(CYP)3A4 (atorvastatin).

Acute effects of riociguat in borderline or manifest pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Riociguat is the first oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator shown to improve pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PH). This pilot study assessed the impact of a single dose of riociguat on hemodynamics, gas exchange, and lung function in patients with PH associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Adults with COPD-associated borderline or manifest PH (pulmonary vascular resistance > 270 dyn·s·cm−5, mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 23 mmHg, ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity < 70%, and partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide in arterial blood > 50 and ≤ 55 mmHg, respectively) received riociguat 1 or 2.5 mg during right heart catheterization. Twenty-two patients completed the study (11 men, 11 women, aged 56–82 years; 1-mg group: n = 10 [mean FEV1: 43.1%]; 2.5-mg group: n = 12 [mean FEV1: 41.2%]). Riociguat caused significant improvements (P < 0.01) from baseline in mean pulmonary artery pressure (1 mg: −3.60 mmHg [–11.44%]; 2.5 mg: −4.83 mmHg [–14.76%]) and pulmonary vascular resistance (1 mg: −58.32 dyn·s·cm−5 [–15.35%]; 2.5 mg: −123.8 dyn·s·cm−5 [–32.96%]). No relevant changes in lung function or gas exchange were observed. Single doses of riociguat were well tolerated and showed promising hemodynamic effects without untoward effects on gas exchange or lung function in patients with COPD-associated PH. Placebo-controlled studies of chronic treatment with riociguat are warranted.

Open-label, randomized study of the effect of rivaroxaban with or without acetylsalicylic acid on thrombus formation in a perfusion chamber

INTRODUCTION Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, has demonstrated effectiveness for the management of both venous and arterial thrombosis. This study was designed to investigate the antithrombotic effect of rivaroxaban, with or without acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), in an ex vivo perfusion chamber at both low and high shear rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Healthy subjects (N=51) were enrolled in a randomized, crossover (rivaroxaban 5, 10 or 20mg with or without ASA), and parallel-group (compared with ASA plus clopidogrel) study. Thrombi formed on pig aorta strips were measured after a 5-minute perfusion at low and high shear rates with blood from the subjects by measuring D-dimer concentration (for fibrin deposition) and P-selectin content (for platelet deposition). RESULTS ASA alone had no impact on thrombus D-dimer levels, whereas rivaroxaban alone at peak concentrations decreased D-dimer levels by 9%, 84% and 65% at low shear rate and 37%, 73% and 74% at high shear rate after doses of 5, 10 and 20mg, respectively. Steady-state ASA plus rivaroxaban 5mg caused a greater reduction in D-dimer levels (63%) than monotherapy at low shear rate. Co-administration of ASA with clopidogrel was associated with a 30% decrease in D-dimer levels at low shear rate and a 14% decrease at high shear rate. No conclusive effect on P-selectin content was observed across the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Rivaroxaban dose-dependently inhibited ex vivo thrombus formation under low and high shear rates. Co-administration of ASA had an additional effect on the antithrombotic action of low-dose rivaroxaban.

Pharmacokinetics of the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat in individuals with renal impairment

Riociguat is the first oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. This pooled analysis of two non-randomized, non-blinded, observational studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of riociguat and its metabolite M1 (BAY 60-4552) in individuals with and without renal impairment. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 groups according to their creatinine clearance (CLCR): group 1, CLCR > 80 mL/min; group 2, CLCR 50–80 mL/min; group 3, CLCR 30–49 mL/min; group 4, CLCR < 30 mL/min. In the first study, group 4 received 0.5 mg riociguat; all other participants in both studies received 1 mg (single tablet doses). Pharmacokinetics were assessed using dense sampling. 63 participants (40 m, 23 f; age 36–78 years) completed the study. Riociguat was rapidly absorbed; median time to reach maximum concentration in plasma was 1 h in all 4 groups. Mean half-life of total riociguat was longer in groups 2–4 (9.5–11.4 h) than in group 1 (6.2 h), and renal clearance decreased with decreasing renal function. Exposure to total riociguat (mean area under the concentration–time curve/dose per kg body weight), was up to ∼100% higher in groups 2–4 than in group 1. However, exposure was highly variable in groups 2–4. Results for unbound riociguat and unbound M1 were similar to those for total riociguat and total M1. No serious or severe adverse events occurred. No change in safety or tolerability was observed with decreasing CLCR. Thus, the safety profile of riociguat in individuals with renal impairment was similar to that in healthy controls. Riociguat exposure was greater in individuals with renal impairment than in healthy controls, and was highly variable.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of ketoconazole, clarithromycin, and midazolam with riociguat

Background Riociguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, is under investigation for pulmonary hypertension treatment. Cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated oxidative metabolism is one of the major riociguat clearance pathways. The pharmacokinetic interactions between riociguat and ketoconazole (multi-pathway CYP and P-glycoprotein/ breast cancer resistance protein [P-gp/BCRP] inhibitor), clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), and midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate) were investigated.

Can dosage form-dependent food effects be predicted using biorelevant dissolution tests? Case example extended release nifedipine.

AIMS Food intake is known to have various effects on gastrointestinal luminal conditions in terms of transit times, hydrodynamic forces and/or luminal fluid composition and can therefore affect the dissolution behavior of solid oral dosage forms. The aim of this study was to investigate and detect the dosage form-dependent food effect that has been observed for two extended-release formulations of nifedipine using in vitro dissolution tests. METHODS Two monolithic extended release formulations, the osmotic pump Adalat® XL 60mg and matrix-type Adalat® Eins 30mg formulation, were investigated with biorelevant dissolution methods using the USP apparatus III and IV under both simulated prandial states, and their corresponding quality control dissolution method. In vitro data were compared to published and unpublished in vivo data using deconvolution-based in vitro - in vivo correlation (IVIVC) approaches. RESULTS Quality control dissolution methods tended to overestimate the dissolution rate due to the excessive solubilizing capabilities of the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-containing dissolution media. Using Level II biorelevant media the dosage form dependent food effect for nifedipine was described well when studied with the USP apparatus III, whereas the USP apparatus IV failed to detect the positive food effect for the matrix-type dosage form. CONCLUSIONS It was demonstrated that biorelevant methods can serve as a useful tool during formulation development as they were able to qualitatively reflect the in vivo data.