Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Wolfgang Pfützner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Wolfgang Pfützner.


Journal of Immunology | 2010

Birch Pollen Immunotherapy Leads to Differential Induction of Regulatory T Cells and Delayed Helper T Cell Immune Deviation

Christian Möbs; Caroline Slotosch; Harald Löffler; Thilo Jakob; Michael Hertl; Wolfgang Pfützner

Correction of an imbalance between allergen-specific T cell subsets is considered a critical event in establishing allergen tolerance by specific immunotherapy (SIT). In a comprehensive, longitudinal study, distinct T cell populations and Ig subtypes were analyzed in subjects allergic to birch pollen during decisive time points of SIT (i.e., induction and maintenance phase), as well as in and out of birch pollen season. An increase in Bet v 1-specific, IL-10–secreting T cells, fulfilling the criteria of inducible type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells, was observed by the end of the induction phase; this resulted in a decreased ratio of allergen-specific IL-5+ Th2/Tr1 cells. In contrast, CD4+CD25+CD127low regulatory T cell numbers did not change. Furthermore, enhanced concentrations of allergen-specific IgG Abs were observed, whereas allergen-specific IgE and IgA levels remained unchanged. After 1 y of SIT, a reduced ratio of allergen-specific Th2/IFN-γ+ Th1 cells was apparent. Although untreated and SIT-treated allergic subjects developed enhanced Th2 cell responses during birch pollen season, only SIT-treated patients experienced elevated numbers of allergen-specific Tr1 cells, which were associated with reduced skin prick test reactivity and diminished clinical symptoms. In coculture assays, allergen-specific Tr1 cells showed an IL-10– and dose-dependent inhibition of CD4+CD25− T effector cells. Thus, SIT has differential effects on regulatory T cell subsets, resulting in an early induction of allergen-specific Tr1 cells associated with an increase in allergen-specific IgG, and it leads to a delayed shift from an allergen-specific Th2- to a Th1-dominated immune response.


The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2014

Specific immunotherapy modifies allergen-specific CD4+ T-cell responses in an epitope-dependent manner

Erik Wambre; Jonathan H. DeLong; Eddie A. James; Nadia Torres-Chinn; Wolfgang Pfützner; Christian Möbs; Stephen R. Durham; Stephen J. Till; David Robinson; William W. Kwok

BACKGROUND Understanding the mechanisms by which the immune system induces and controls allergic inflammation at the T-cell epitope level is critical for the design of new allergy vaccine strategies. OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize allergen-specific T-cell responses linked with allergy or peripheral tolerance and to determine how CD4(+) T-cell responses to individual allergen-derived epitopes change over allergen-specific immunotherapy. METHODS Timothy grass pollen (TGP) allergy was used as a model for studying grass pollen allergies. The breadth, magnitude, epitope hierarchy, and phenotype of the DR04:01-restricted TGP-specific T-cell responses in 10 subjects with grass pollen allergy, 5 nonatopic subjects, and 6 allergy vaccine-treated subjects was determined by using an ex vivo peptide-MHC class II tetramer approach. RESULTS CD4(+) T cells in allergic subjects are directed to a broad range of TGP epitopes characterized by defined immunodominance hierarchy patterns and with distinct functional profiles that depend on the epitope recognized. Epitopes that are restricted specifically to either TH2 or TH1/TR1 responses were identified. Allergen-specific immunotherapy was associated with preferential deletion of allergen-specific TH2 cells and without a significant change in the frequency of TH1/TR1 cells. CONCLUSIONS Preferential allergen-specific TH2 cell deletion after repeated high-dose antigen stimulation can be another independent mechanism to restore tolerance to allergen during immunotherapy.


The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2012

Birch pollen immunotherapy results in long-term loss of Bet v 1–specific TH2 responses, transient TR1 activation, and synthesis of IgE-blocking antibodies

Christian Möbs; H. Ipsen; Lea Mayer; Caroline Slotosch; Arnd Petersen; Peter Adler Würtzen; Michael Hertl; Wolfgang Pfützner

BACKGROUND Early events of specific immunotherapy (SIT) are induction of allergen-specific IL-10-producing T(R)1 cells and production of IgG antibodies, but there is little knowledge about the long-term immune mechanisms responsible for sustained allergen tolerance. OBJECTIVE Bet v 1-specific immune responses of 16 patients with birch pollen allergy were characterized up to 54 months at defined time points before, during, and after a 3-year period of SIT. METHODS We sought to analyze allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses. Bet v 1-specific IL-5-, IFN-γ-, and IL-10-secreting T cells were quantified in peripheral blood, and birch pollen-specific IgE and IgG antibody levels were determined in serum. Furthermore, the inhibitory capacity of SIT-induced IgG was evaluated by blocking allergen binding to IgE and inhibition of facilitated allergen presentation. RESULTS Seasonal increases in Bet v 1-specific T(H)2 cell numbers ceased to appear after the first year of SIT without deviation to a T(H)1-dominated immune response. Furthermore, the frequency of IL-10-producing T(R)1 cells, which had increased during the first year of SIT, returned to pretreatment levels in the second year. In contrast, allergen-specific IgG antibody concentrations continuously increased during SIT but started to decrease after cessation of treatment. Functional analysis confirmed the ability of the IgG antibodies to inhibit IgE-allergen interactions, which peaked at the end of SIT but then slowly started to decrease. CONCLUSION Long-term allergen tolerance achieved by SIT is associated with the development of peripheral T-cell tolerance characterized by decreased reactivity of Bet v 1-specific T(H)2 cells and enriched allergen-specific IgG competing with IgE antibodies for allergen binding.


Journal of Virology | 2002

In Vivo Assessment of Gene Delivery to Keratinocytes by Lentiviral Vectors

Ulrich Kühn; Atsushi Terunuma; Wolfgang Pfützner; Ruth A. Foster; Jonathan C. Vogel

ABSTRACT For skin gene therapy, introduction of a desired gene into keratinocyte progenitor or stem cells could overcome the problem of achieving persistent gene expression in a significant percentage of keratinocytes. Although keratinocyte stem cells have not yet been completely characterized and purified for gene targeting purposes, lentiviral vectors may be superior to retroviral vectors at gene introduction into these stem cells, which are believed to divide and cycle slowly. Our initial in vitro studies demonstrate that lentiviral vectors are able to efficiently transduce nondividing keratinocytes, unlike retroviral vectors, and do not require the lentiviral accessory genes for keratinocyte transduction. When lentiviral vectors expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were directly injected into the dermis of human skin grafted onto immunocompromised mice, transduction of dividing basal and nondividing suprabasal keratinocytes could be demonstrated, which was not the case when control retroviral vectors were used. However, flow cytometry analysis demonstrated low transduction efficiency, and histological analysis at later time points provided no evidence for progenitor cell targeting. In an alternative in vivo method, human keratinocytes were transduced in tissue culture (ex vivo) with either lentiviral or retroviral vectors and grafted as skin equivalents onto immunocompromised mice. GFP expression was analyzed in these human skin grafts after several cycles of epidermal turnover, and both the lentiviral and retroviral vector-transduced grafts had similar percentages of GFP-expressing keratinocytes. This ex vivo grafting study provides a good in vivo assessment of gene introduction into progenitor cells and suggests that lentiviral vectors are not necessarily superior to retroviral vectors at introducing genes into keratinocyte progenitor cells during in vitro culture.


Allergo journal international | 2015

Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions

Knut Brockow; Bernhard Przybilla; Werner Aberer; Andreas J. Bircher; Randolf Brehler; Heinrich Dickel; Thomas Fuchs; Thilo Jakob; Lars Lange; Wolfgang Pfützner; Maja Mockenhaupt; Hagen Ott; O. Pfaar; Johannes Ring; Bernhardt Sachs; H. Sitter; Axel Trautmann; R. Treudler; Bettina Wedi; Margitta Worm; G. Wurpts; Torsten Zuberbier; Hans F. Merk

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable adverse drug reactions. They manifest either within 1–6 h following drug intake (immediate reactions) with mild to life-threatening symptoms of anaphylaxis, or several hours to days later (delayed reactions), primarily as exanthematous eruptions. It is not always possible to detect involvement of the immune system (allergy). Waiving diagnostic tests can result in severe reactions on renewed exposure on the one hand, and to unjustified treatment restrictions on the other. With this guideline, experts from various specialist societies and institutions have formulated recommendations and an algorithm for the diagnosis of allergies. The key principles of diagnosing allergic/hypersensitivity drug reactions are presented. Where possible, the objective is to perform allergy diagnostics within 4 weeks–6 months following the reaction. A clinical classification of symptoms based on the morphology and time course of the reaction is required in order to plan a diagnostic work-up. In the case of typical symptoms of a drug hypersensitivity reaction and unequivocal findings from validated skin and/or laboratory tests, a reaction can be attributed to a trigger with sufficient confidence. However, skin and laboratory tests are often negative or insufficiently reliable. In such cases, controlled provocation testing is required to clarify drug reactions. This method is reliable and safe when attention is paid to indications and contraindications and performed under appropriate medical supervision. The results of the overall assessment are discussed with the patient and documented in an „allergy passport“ in order to ensure targeted avoidance in the future and allow the use of alternative drugs where possible.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 1997

Malignant melanoma and levodopa: Is there a relationship? Two new cases and a review of the literature

Wolfgang Pfützner; Bernhard Przybilla

The incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) is rising. Besides UV radiation, other factors may contribute to this. We describe two patients in whom MM developed during treatment with levodopa. Levodopa has been implicated as an agent that could enhance the development of MM. However, review of the literature does not provide evidence of a definite relationship between treatment with levodopa and the development of MM. Despite this, it is suggested that patients treated with levodopa, particularly those with a history of MM, be observed carefully for changes in or development of new pigmented lesions.


Human Gene Therapy | 1999

Selection of Keratinocytes Transduced with the Multidrug Resistance Gene in an in Vitro Skin Model Presents a Strategy for Enhancing Gene Expression in Vivo

Wolfgang Pfützner; Ulrich R. Hengge; Mohamed A. Joari; Ruth-Ann Foster; Jonathan C. Vogel

In gene therapy studies, achieving prolonged, high-level gene expression in a significant percentage of cells has been difficult. One solution to enhance expression would be to select for cells expressing both the desired gene and a linked selectable marker gene in a bicistronic vector. As a potential target tissue, the skin is easily accessible for safe topical application of a selecting agent that could lead to significant gene expression in a high percentage of keratinocytes. To test the feasibility of such an approach, a skin raft culture model was developed. Human keratinocytes were transduced with the multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, which confers resistance to a variety of cytostatic and antimitotic compounds, such as colchicine. While growing on acellular dermis, transduced keratinocytes were treated with various doses of colchicine (10-50 ng/ml). Colchicine treatment increased the percentage of keratinocytes expressing MDR to almost 100% in raft cultures, Significantly, keratinocytes in colchicine-treated, MDR-transduced raft cultures were able to proliferate normally and form a stratified, differentiated epidermis. This model suggests that topical selection for MDR-expressing keratinocytes in vivo should be feasible without hampering the biologic integrity of skin. Thus, topical selection leading to enhanced expression of a desired gene, linked to a resistance gene, holds future promise for skin gene therapy.


British Journal of Dermatology | 2009

IgG autoantibody reactivity against bullous pemphigoid (BP) 180 and BP230 in elderly patients with pruritic dermatoses.

Claudio Feliciani; Giacomo Caldarola; Andrea Kneisel; E Podstawa; M Pfütze; Wolfgang Pfützner; Michael Hertl

Background  Pruritic dermatoses of the elderly often pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Specifically, a prodromal phase of bullous pemphigoid (BP) has to be considered in patients with pruritic lesions of polymorphic appearance. These conditions frequently do not fulfil all the clinical, histological and immunopathological criteria for establishing the diagnosis of BP.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002

Topical colchicine selection of keratinocytes transduced with the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) can sustain and enhance transgene expression in vivo

Wolfgang Pfützner; Atsushi Terunuma; Christine L. Tock; E. K. Snead; T. M. Kolodka; M. M. Gottesman; L. Taichman; Jon Vogel

For skin gene therapy, achieving prolonged high-level gene expression in a significant percentage of keratinocytes (KC) is difficult because we cannot selectively target KC stem cells. We now demonstrate that topical colchicine treatment can be used to select, in vivo, KC progenitor cells transduced with the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1). When human skin equivalents containing MDR1-transduced KC were grafted onto immunocompromised mice, topical colchicine treatments significantly increased (7-fold) the percentage of KC expressing MDR1, compared to vehicle-treated controls, for up to 24 wk. Topical colchicine treatment also significantly enhanced the amount of MDR1 protein expressed in individual KC. Furthermore, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of MDR1 transgene copy number demonstrates that topical colchicine treatment selects and enriches for KC progenitor cells in the skin that contain and express MDR1. For clinical skin gene therapy applications, this in vivo selection approach promises to enhance both the duration and expression level of a desired therapeutic gene in KC, by linking its expression to the MDR1 selectable marker gene.


Allergy | 2013

Kinetics, cross-reactivity, and specificity of Bet v 1-specific IgG4 antibodies induced by immunotherapy with birch pollen

Brinda Subbarayal; Dirk Schiller; Christian Möbs; N. W. de Jong; C. Ebner; N. Reider; D. Bartel; Jonas Lidholm; Wolfgang Pfützner; R. Gerth van Wijk; Stefan Vieths; Barbara Bohle

IgE antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen frequently cross‐react with Bet v 1 homologous food proteins, for example Cor a 1 in hazelnut and Mal d 1 in apple. Specific immunotherapy with birch pollen (BP‐SIT) induces IgG4 antibodies that inhibit IgE binding to Bet v 1. However, information on cross‐reactivity of BP‐SIT‐induced Bet v 1‐specific IgG4 antibodies with food allergens is limited. In this study, we investigated the kinetics of production, cross‐reactivity, and IgE‐blocking activity of Bet v 1‐specific IgG4 antibodies emerging during conventional BP‐SIT and whether IgG4‐epitopes overlapped with IgE epitopes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Wolfgang Pfützner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Bohle

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margitta Worm

Humboldt University of Berlin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan C. Vogel

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Werner Aberer

Medical University of Graz

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brinda Subbarayal

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge