Won Kil Pae

Nasogastric Decompression is not Necessary in Operations for Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomised Trial

OBJECTIVE To assess the need for routine nasogastric decompression after extensive resections in patients with gastric cancer. DESIGN Prospective randomised study. SETTING University hospital, Korea. SUBJECTS Over a 1-year period (July 1999-July 200), 136 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy with D2 or more lymph node dissection. INTERVENTIONS Randomised to have nasogastric decompression (n = 69) or not (n = 67). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative course, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS Time to passage of first flatus, time to taking liquid diet, length of operation, and postoperative hospital stay were all significantly shorter in the no decompression group. Two patients in each group required subsequent nasogastric decompression. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning the presence of postoperative fever, nausea, vomiting, anastomotic leaks, or pulmonary or wound complications. No patients died. CONCLUSIONS Routine nasogastric decompression is not necessary in elective operations for gastric cancer.

Proximal Gastrectomy Reconstructed by Jejunal Pouch Interposition for Upper Third Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Study

Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition (PGJP) has been advocated as an alternative operation for upper third gastric cancer. However, there has been no prospective randomized trial comparing PGJP with total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (TGRY). The aim of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term results of PGJP and TGRY in a randomized clinical trial. Fifty-one patients with upper third gastric cancer were randomized to either PGJP (n = 25) or TGRY (n = 26). Outcome measures were postoperative complications, nutritional status assessed by serum nutritional parameters, and postgastrectomy symptoms. There were no significant differences in operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Blood loss was significantly less in the PGJP group (P = 0.036). Nineteen patients (73%) in the TGRY group had one or more postgastrectomy symptoms, which was significantly more frequent than in the PGJP group (32%; P = 0.012). There were also significant differences between the two groups with regard to food intake, weight recovery, hemoglobin, and serum vitamin B12 levels in favor of PGJP. In conclusion, proximal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition for upper third gastric cancer is safe, and is associated with a greater reduction in postgastrectomy symptoms and better nutritional status compared with conventional total gastrectomy.

Long-term Results of Proximal and Total Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Upper Third of the Stomach

PURPOSE The choice of surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper one third of the stomach is controversial. This study was performed to analyze the surgical results of a 11-year experience with these lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 1990 to December 2000, 259 patients with upper third gastric cancer underwent proximal gastrectomy (n=74) or total gastrectomy (n=185) through an abdominal approach. Morbidity, mortality, recurrence patterns, and survival were compared between these two groups retrospectively. RESULTS There were no significant differences in general complication and mortality rates between the two groups. However, the incidences of reflux esophagitis (16.2%) and anastomotic stricture (35.1%) were more common in the proximal gastrectomy group compared with the total gastrectomy group (0.5 and 8.1%). Regarding the main patterns of recurrence, local recurrence was dominant in the proximal gastrectomy group, whereas distant recurrence was dominant in the total gastrectomy group. Five-year overall survival (54.8 versus 47.8%) and survival according to tumor stage were no different between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of resection was not an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION The extent of resection for upper third gastric cancer did not appear to affect long-term outcome. However, proximal gastrectomy is associated with an increased risk of reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stricture, and local recurrence.

Predictive value of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma.

PURPOSE Peritoneal metastasis is a crucial factor for the prognosis in gastric cancer, but its diagnosis is difficult before laparotomy. This study analyzed the usefulness of diagnostic imaging and various tumor markers in the detection of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The sera from 768 patients with gastric cancer were measured for CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels using a commercial immunoradiometric assay. All the patients underwent diagnostic imaging with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) before laparotomy. RESULTS Preoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 were above the cut-off levels in 15.4%, 8.7% and 5.7% of all cases, respectively. Eighty-eight patients were diagnosed with peritoneal metastasis by laparotomy. CT and US revealed peritoneal dissemination in 15 of 88 patients (17%). Among the three tumor markers, CA19-9 and CA125 showed similar detection rates of peritoneal metastasis (37.5% and 38.6%, respectively). In particular, the serum CA125 levels showed the best sensitivity (38.6%), specificity (98.4%), and diagnostic accuracy (91.5%), and the highest odd ratio (24.46, 95% CI: 11.17 approximately 53.57) for predicting peritoneal metastasis among the markers tested. CEA did not add significant predictive information (p=0.471). CONCLUSION Preoperative serum CA19-9 and CA125 levels may provide a predictable value in determining peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Analysis of Local Recurrence Following Proximal Gastrectomy in Patients with Upper Third Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE Little is known about local recurrence following proximal gastrectomy in patients with upper third gastric cancer. We performed this study to evaluate the long-term results of a proximal gastrectomy, and to analyze the risk factors of local recurrence affecting survival in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We undertook a retrospective study of 63 patients who underwent potentially curative proximal gastrectomy between 1990 and 1999, with special reference to local recurrence. RESULTS During a median follow-up period of 37 months, 25 of the 63 patients (39.7%) developed a recurrence of cancer, with local recurrence in 15 patients (23.8%), the majority of these occurring at the remnant stomach or anastomosis. The median time to local recurrence was 38 months (8~78 months). Univariate analysis of risk factors for local recurrence revealed an infiltrative or diffuse gross type, with a tumor sizes>5 cm, a distal resection margin <or=3 cm and serosal invasion. Reoperation for cure was possible in only 4 patients and most died within the first year following diagnosis of recurrence. CONCLUSION When performing a proximal gastrectomy for upper third gastric cancer, even after curative resection, all risk factors should be considered to reduce rates of local recurrence.