Xavier Briffault

Factors associated with use of psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrist providers by ESEMeD respondents in six European countries.

OBJECTIVE This study analyzed use of services from psychiatrists and other mental health professionals (psychologists, psychotherapists, counselors, and social workers) in six European countries. METHODS Data were from respondents (N=8,796) to the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD), a cross-sectional survey (2001-2003) of a representative sample of noninstitutionalized adults in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain that was conducted via computer-assisted interviews with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0. RESULTS Twenty-three percent of respondents reported lifetime use of any professional for mental health problems, and 60% consulted a mental health provider. Among these, 56% used a psychiatrist and 68% used a nonpsychiatrist provider. Factors associated with use of psychiatrists only were being retired or unemployed, having 12 or fewer years of education, living in France or Spain, having a severe disorder, and using psychotropic medication. Factors associated with use of nonpsychiatrist providers only were living in the Netherlands or Germany, never being married, and having an anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that there is no simple model of associations between mental health care system and patterns of service use. System characteristics, such as practitioner-population ratios, levels of practitioner availability, and gatekeeping and reimbursement policies, affect patterns of use of mental health providers. Recent British and Australian plans could be used as models for better allocation of services in some ESEMeD countries.

Factors associated with use of psychotherapy.

AbstractContextPsychotherapies are recommended in manuals of good practice. There is however little epidemiological data assessing access to this type of treatment, and in particular the combined role of the offer and socio-demographic characteristics. The present research aims to contribute data on the profiles of a sample of individuals who underwent psychotherapy in France, and on the respective impact of various factors such as mental health status, socio-demographic characteristics, life events and the care offer, focusing on a specific population for whom the mode of financial cover for this type of care is governed by a complementary health insurance (MGEN). Methodsetween June 1999 and March 2000 a survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted on a sample of MGEN-insured individuals. Ten thousand individuals aged between 20 and 60 were selected randomly, received a questionnaire, and up to three recalls in case of non-response. The overall response rate was 66.5%. The questionnaire comprised 261 questions enabling data collection concerning the main socio-demographic, professional and mental health variables.ResultsIn this population aged from 20 to 60, lifetime prevalence of recourse to psychotherapy was 11.8%. The main factor associated with use of psychotherapy is the severity of the clinical condition (assessed in terms of comorbidity). Certain traumatic events experienced in childhood are also related. The effect of socio-demographic variables varies according to severity, although it was noted that being female, having high educational status, and being single were consistently related to wider use of psychotherapy. The analysis also evidenced the importance of the density of the care offer.ConclusionOur results suggest that the use of psychotherapy, within a well-informed population with high quality insurance cover, is related primarily to clinical condition rather than to socio-demographic status, especially in people with high levels of comorbidity, although the effect of educational status remains. However, this study only looked at mere use of psychotherapy, without determining the suitability of the treatment provided. It is indeed possible, and even probable, that variables such as educational status, income, or care offer may have a link with resorting to the right type of care, in terms of both relevance and adequate duration.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Use of Health Care in Depression: A Survey in a Large Region of France Between 1991 and 2005

Objective: To compare the prevalence, risk factors, and use of care for depression between 2 periods, concerning changes in social factors and health care provision. Method: We compared data from 2 surveys carried out in a large urbanized French region (Île-de-France) 15 years apart (1991, n = 1192; 2005, n = 5308), using comparable methodology and tools. Results: The overall prevalence of depression has slightly increased over this period. In contrast, the tendency of people who claim they feel depressed has dramatically increased. At-risk populations have also changed during this period. The proportion of people consulting a psychiatrist for depression has not changed, while general practitioner (GP) consultations have decreased and psychologist consultations have increased 3-fold. Psychotropic use by people who are depressed has decreased significantly. Conclusion: The trend toward increased depressive symptoms does not correspond to an increase in depressed disorders. In a well-staffed urbanized French region, psychologists are playing a growing role in managing depression at the expense of GPs, when the use of a psychiatrist remains unchanged; decreased use of psychotropic drugs may be a consequence.

Prevention in mental health: Social representations from French professionals

Abstract In France, the last decade has been marked by an extensive development of public interventions in the field of mental health. The political investment in mental health has been the object of a public debate in which prevention was perceived by professional opinion leaders as a mean for politics to implement social control policies. However, it seems that the vigor of these condemnations has jeopardized the opportunity to initiate a debate on the ethical, sociological and epistemological foundations of prevention in mental health. Aim and method: EPIONE study was set up to meet the need for psychosocial research to evaluate the social representations of prevention in mental health professionals in charge of prevention, within the French context. Using one open-ended question (‘What do you think about prevention in mental health?’), representations from 616 professionals were analyzed through a computer-assisted process (Alceste software) and according to Denise Jodelet and Serge Moscovici models of social representations. Results: Results pointed out an important discrepancy between the political discourse and the social representations of professionals, who understand the field of prevention as intimately related to curative practices. Professionals do not seem concerned by preventive ‘top-down’ policies, which they perceive as technocrats’ issues. Finally, only a third of the total responses was related to the criticisms addressed to prevention, suggesting that mistrust toward prevention was not as developed among field professionals as it might seem when reading the most visible critical publications. Conclusion: We suggest that, in order to adapt public health and prevention policies, decision makers will have to rely on professionals’ background and on the field reality, as well as the epistemological, sociological and ethical problems raised by public prevention in mental health.

Nouvelles perspectives pour la recherche en psychothérapie: évaluation d’un protocole de recherche et proposition d’un dispositif méthodologique et technique

INTRODUCTION A recent report of the French research institute INSERM, based on a comprehensive review of the work done on the evaluation of psychotherapies Psychothérapies: trois approches évaluées, has shown the lack of research in France on this topic, notably in psychodynamic psychotherapy. The development of such research is needed. The first part of the paper deals with the limits of the third generation of studies on psychotherapy (medical model, use of RCT, DSM...) on which the INSERM report is based and reviews the existing propositions for a fourth generation of research in the field. METHODOLOGICAL FINDINGS: In the second part, a process-outcome research protocol developed by the authors, according to these new proposals as well as several on-going researches [J Clin Psychol, 27 2 (1998) 217-26, J Pragm Case Stud 3 (2000)(2), Arch Gen Psychiatry 59 (2002) 505-10, Psychother Res 12 3 (2002) 251-72 and Br J Psychiatry 165 (1994) 4-8] is presented. The proposed methodology is based on controlled single case studies. Quantitative and qualitative data are associated for the definition of the diagnosis, as well as initial, intermediate and final measures. Process analysis is used to describe the main characteristics of the on-going psychotherapy at different moments in time. It is thus possible to gain access to what is really done during the therapy and not only to what is supposed to be done, based on a manual or even on the name of the theory used by the therapist. DESIGN OF THE STUDY This methodology was tested during a one-year pilot study, in true conditions of psychotherapy with outpatients. The different phases of the analysis are presented: several tools dedicated to the observation, formalisation and data analysis are integrated in a coherent iterative process during the whole therapy. The interests and limits of each tool (ESM, DSM, PPQS, Hoglend, CORE...) are described together with the first results of the pilot study. DISCUSSION The overall architecture of a database designed to collect, search and analyse data is provided in the last part of the paper. CONCLUSION This framework offers two possibilities at the same time: it provides therapists with the ability to follow the evolution of their cases and to compare them with similar cases. It provides researchers with the ability to drive true comparative analysis, based on psychotherapies conducted in real situations and on detailed-enough descriptions to obtain significant outcomes.

The public health dogma of evidence-based mental disorders prevention and mental health promotion: French professionals' beliefs in regard to parenting programs

Abstract In the last few years, various international public health organizations such as the World Health Organization or the European Commission have recommended the worldwide dissemination of evidence-based mental health prevention programs. This public health ideal, relying on new scientific disciplines, is at the origin of multiple controversies in a number of countries. This article contributes to bring a reflection on the ways political experts, researchers and practitioners have integrated these new preventive strategies. More precisely, the objective is to present and to discuss the results of a qualitative study on French professionals’ representations and theoretical perspectives with regards to evidencebased parenting programs. Results are based on ethnographical inquiries in French public health institutions and on 12 semi-structured interviews with professionals. The results demonstrate three ways to conceive parenting support, themselves attached to distinct anthropological, socio-political and interventional models.

From e-Health to i-Health: Prospective Reflexions on the Use of Intelligent Systems in Mental Health Care

Depressive disorders cover a set of disabling problems, often chronic or recurrent. They are characterized by a high level of psychiatric and somatic comorbidities and represent an important public health problem. To date, therapeutic solutions remain unsatisfactory. For some researchers, this is a sign of decisive paradigmatic failure due to the way in which disorders are conceptualized. They hypothesize that the symptoms of a categorical disorder, or of different comorbid disorders, can be interwoven in chains of interdependencies on different elements, of which it would be possible to act independently and synergistically to influence the functioning of the symptom system, rather than limiting oneself to targeting a hypothetical single underlying cause. New connected technologies make it possible to invent new observation and intervention tools allowing better phenotypic characterization of disorders and their evolution, that fit particularly well into this new “symptoms network” paradigm. Synergies are possible and desirable between these technological and epistemological innovations and can possibly help to solve some of the difficult problems people with mental disorders face in their everyday life, as we will show through a fictional case study exploring the possibilities of connected technologies in mental disorders in the near future.

S31-03 Religion and spiritual advice as surrogate care provision for mental health problems in the ESEMED survey

Objective To complete missing information on the influence of spiritual and religious advisors as informal providers for mental health problems in Europe. Methods Recourse to religious practice or belief when coping with mental health problems was evaluated using data from the ESEMED survey. This was a stratified, multistage, clustered-area probability sample survey of mental health carried out in six European countries which included 8796 subjects. Between countries differences in sociodemographic characteristics, religious affiliation, and prevalence of mental disorders and management of mental disorders were evaluated. Results Religion appears to play a limited role in coping with mental health problems in Europe. Only 7.9% of individuals seeking help for such problems turned to a religious advisor. This proportion differed between countries from 13% in Italy, 12.5% in Germany, 10.5% in the Netherlands, 5.8% in France, 4.7% in Belgium to 4% in Spain. In addition, seeking help exclusively from religion was reported by only 1.3% of subjects. Practicing religion at least once a week and considering religion as important in daily life were predictors of using religion versus conventional health care only. Use of religion was not influenced by gender and age. Non-Christian respondents and individuals with alcohol disorders were more likely to use religion. In Spain, the use of religion is much lower than average. Conclusions Unlike the situation in the United States, organised religion does not provide alternative informal mental health care in Europe. At best, it could be considered as an adjunct to conventional care.