Xi-Lei Zhou

A randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer patients with D2 resection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The role of postoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer with D2 lymph node curative dissection is not well established. In this study, we compared postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (IMRT-C) with chemotherapy-only in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We randomly assigned patients with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer to IMRT-C or chemotherapy-only groups. The adjuvant IMRT-C consisted of 400 mg of fluorouracil per square meter of body-surface area per day plus 20mg of leucovorin per square meter of body-surface area per day for 5 days, followed by 45 Gy of IMRT for 5 weeks, with fluorouracil and leucovorin on the first 4 and the last 3 days of radiotherapy. Two 5-day cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin were given 4 weeks after the completion of IMRT. Chemotherapy-only group was given the same chemotherapy regimens as IMRT-C group. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) in the chemotherapy-only group was 48 months, as compared with 58 months in the IMRT-C group; the hazard ratio for death was 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.65; P=0.122). IMRT-C was associated with increases in the median duration of recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36 months vs. 50 months), the hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.78; P=0.029). COX multivariate regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and TNM stage were both the independent prognostic factors. Rates of all grade adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS IMRT-C improved RFS, but did not significantly improve OS among patients with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. Using IMRT plus chemotherapy was feasible and well tolerated in patients with gastric cancer after D2 resection.

Comparison of efficacy for postoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy in patients with IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer: an early closed randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE The efficacy of postoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy (POCRT) on IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare POCRT with postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) alone in terms of survival and relapse patterns. METHODS Patients with completely resected IIIA-pN2 NSCLC were randomized into POCRT or POCT groups. Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) administered intravenously for four cycles on day 1, 22, 43, and 64. Patients in the POCRT group received radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) concurrently with the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS This study recruited 140 participants and was closed early because of slow accrual. Data were analyzed for 135 of them including 66 cases in the POCRT group and 69 cases in the POCT group. Patients were followed-up for a median period of 45 months. The POCRT group had a median survival (MS) of 40 months and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 37.9%. The POCT group had a MS of 28 months and a 5-year OS rate of 27.5%. The hazard ratio for death in the POCRT group was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.457-1.044, P=0.073). We observed a disease-free survival (DFS) of 28 months and a 5-year DFS rate of 30.3% in the POCRT group. Likewise, we observed a DFS of 18 months and a 5-year DFS rate of 18.8% in the POCT group. The recurrence hazard ratio in the POCT group was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.008-2.204, P=0.041). Subgroup analysis revealed that POCRT significantly increased the OS rate of the patients with ≥2 pN2 lymph nodes (P=0.021). The POCRT group had a significantly lower local relapse (P=0.009) and distant metastasis (P=0.05) rates as compared to that of the POCT group. One case died of pyemia and 9 cases suffered from grade 3 and 4 acute radiation esophagitis. The two groups had similar and tolerable hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Compared with POCT, POCRT increased both local/regional and distant DFS rate of the patients with IIIA-pN2 NSCLC, but not the OS rate. Considering the relatively small sample size of the current study, caution should be taken when adopting the conclusions.

High expression of long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 predicts chemoradioresistance and poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

To evaluate the clinical significance of lncRNAs in the resistance to cisplatin‐based chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We focused on lncRNAs which were frequently reported in ESCC or were involved in chemoradiotherapy resistance. LncRNA expressions were examined in paired cisplatin‐resistant and parental ESCC cell lines. Dysregulated lncRNAs were further measured in 162 pretreatment biopsy specimens of ESCC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Then the correlations between lncRNA expression and response to dCRT and prognosis were analyzed. Three lncRNAs (AFAP1‐AS1, UCA1, HOTAIR) were found to be deregulated in cisplatin‐resistant cells compared with their parent cells. AFAP1‐AS1 was significantly up‐regulated in tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues (P = 0.006). Furthermore, overexpression of AFAP1‐AS1 was closely associated with lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P = 0.016), advanced clinical stage (P = 0.002), and response to dCRT (P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that high expression of AFAP1‐AS1 was significantly associated with shorter progression free survival (PFS) (median, 15 months vs. 27 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median, 29 months vs. 42 months, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high expression of AFAP1‐AS1 was found to be an independent risk factor to predict poor PFS (HR, 1.626; P = 0.027) and OS (HR, 1.888; P = 0.004). Thus, high expression of AFAP1‐AS1 could serve as a potential biomarker to predict tumor response and survival. Determination of this lncRNA expression might be useful for selection ESCC patients for dCRT.

Clinical study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for esophageal cancer patients with positive lymph node metastasis

AIMS AND BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer patients with pathologic lymph node involvement generally have a poor prognosis. Many randomized controlled trials have not achieved consistent results similar to those of the RTOG8501 trial, and the long-term survival rate has not increased. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxic side effects of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone to treat N1 esophageal carcinoma. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN A total of 130 N1 esophageal carcinoma patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (n = 65) and radiotherapy group (n = 65). Both groups received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a total dose of 64-66 Gy. Meanwhile, to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, an additional chemotherapy protocol (nedaplatin, 20 mg/m²/d, 5-FU, 500 mg/m²/d for four days) was given from day 1, and such treatment was repeated until day 29. From day 21 after radiotherapy, two cycles of a consolidated chemotherapy protocol were given at an interval of 28 days. RESULTS The survival rates at one, two, and three years were 72.3%, 55.3%, and 40% in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, respectively, and 75.3%, 38.5%, and 18.5% in the radiotheray group (P = 0.007), respectively. The survival rates of the patients in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group who completed one to two cycles and three to four cycles at one, two, and three years were 70%, 53.3%, and 30%, and 74.2%, 57.1%, 48.6% (P = 0.128), respectively. Three-year distant metastasis rates were 10.7% in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and 16.9% in the radiotherapy group. Acute toxicity in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was higher than in the radiotherapy group. Late toxic side effects were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Compared with radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma with local lymph node enlargement can improve the three-year survival rate. Moreover, completion of three to four cycles of chemotherapy may have better efficacy than one to two cycles.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

The present study evaluated the clinical and prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). A total of 517 patients with ESCC were enrolled and analysed retrospectively. The NLR was calculated at three time points: baseline, post-treatment, and at the time of tumor progression. Elevated NLR was defined as a ratio ≥5. High NLR at baseline was present in 204 (39%) patients and was significantly correlated with larger tumour size, advanced TNM stage, worse ECOG performance status, and dCRT response (p < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 17 months, patients with higher NLR at baseline had poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, elevated NLR at baseline was independently associated with PFS and OS (HR = 1.529, p < 0.001 for PFS; HR = 1.856, p < 0.001 for OS). In addition, patients with high pre- and post-treatment NLR demonstrated worse clinical outcomes than other groups. Our results suggest that NLR is an independent prognostic indicator for patients with ESCC undergoing dCRT and changes in NLR level with treatment may indicate therapeutic benefit.

Survival benefit of radiotherapy to patients with small cell esophagus carcinoma - an analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data

Background and Aims Small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare malignant tumor. So far, few studies are found to research the effect of radiotherapy (RT) to it. This study is designed to explore the prognostic factors, and analyze survival benefit of RT to patients with SCEC. Results Patients with SCEC were more likely to be in female, older, higher disease stage than those with non-small cell esophageal carcinoma. RT was used in more than 50% SCEC patients. RT tended be reduced as the disease stage raise in SCEC. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age, year, disease stage, and RT were the prognostic factors of survival (P < 0.05). RT reduced nearly 75% risks of death in localized stage (P < 0.05), nearly 50% risks of death in regional stage (P > 0.05) and nearly 30% risks of death in distant stage (P > 0.05). Methods SCEC patients between 1973 and 2012 were searched from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data. Clinical factors including age, year, sex, race, stage, surgery, and RT were summarized. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to explore the independent prognostic factors of SCEC. Cox regression survival analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of RT to SCEC based on different stages. Conclusions Stage, age, year, and RT are independent prognostic factors of SCEC. Survival benefit of RT exists in any disease stage, but is only statistically significant in localized stage of SCEC.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of brain central neurocytoma.

Background & Aims This study is designed for the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of central neurocytoma (CN). Methods CN patients from 2004 to 2012 were enrolled from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data. Clinical characteristics including age, sex, race, tumor size, tumor number, surgery, and radiation therapy were summarized. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to explore the prognostic factors of CN. Results CN tended to be borderline malignant and single lesion. Compared with other brain tumor (NCN), Patients with CN (CNs) were more likely to be female, young, and non-white race. Surgery was the primary treatment of CN. Univariate and Multivariate analysis indicated tumor number and surgery were both independent prognostic factors of CN (P < 0.05). Unifocal CNs had a lower mortality risk than multifocal ones (HR 0.167, 95% CI 0.052-0.537), surgery significantly reduced the death risk of CNs (HR 0.284, 95% CI 0.088-0.921). Conclusions CN tend to be borderline malignant, single lesion, operated on. Most CNs are female and younger. single lesion and surgery are the independent positive prognostic factors of CN.

Combination of long noncoding RNA MALAT1 and carcinoembryonic antigen for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer

Purpose Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are present in body fluids, but their potential as tumor biomarkers has never been investigated in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) caused by lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of lncRNAs in pleural effusion, which could potentially serve as diagnostic and predictive markers for lung cancer-associated MPE (LC-MPE). Patients and methods RNAs from pleural effusion were extracted in 217 cases of LC-MPE and 132 cases of benign pleural effusion (BPE). Thirty-one lung cancer-associated lncRNAs were measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was also determined. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were established to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the identified lncRNAs and other biomarkers. The correlations between baseline pleural effusion lncRNAs expression and response to chemotherapy were also analyzed. Results Three lncRNAs (MALAT1, H19, and CUDR) were found to have potential as diagnostic markers in LC-MPE. The AUCs for MALAT1, H19, CUDR, and CEA were 0.891, 0.783, 0.824, and 0.826, respectively. Using a logistic model, the combination of MALAT1 and CEA (AUC, 0.924) provided higher sensitivity and accuracy in predicting LC-MPE than CEA (AUC, 0.826) alone. Moreover, baseline MALAT1 expression in pleural fluid was inversely correlated with chemotherapy response in patients with LC-MPE. Conclusion Pleural effusion lncRNAs were effective in differentiating LC-MPE from BPE. The combination of MALAT1 and CEA was more effective for LC-MPE diagnosis.