Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Xiangqian Wu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Xiangqian Wu.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2011

The Global Space-Based Inter-Calibration System

Mitch Goldberg; George Ohring; James J. Butler; Changyong Cao; R. Datla; David R. Doelling; V. Gärtner; T. Hewison; B. Iacovazzi; D. Kim; T. Kurino; J. Lafeuille; P. Minnis; D. Renaut; J. Schmetz; David C. Tobin; Likun Wang; Fuzhong Weng; Xiangqian Wu; Fangfang Yu; Peng Zhang; Tong Zhu

The Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) is a new international program to assure the comparability of satellite measurements taken at different times and locations by different instruments operated by different satellite agencies. Sponsored by the World Meteorological Organization and the Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites, GSICS will intercalibrate the instruments of the international constellation of operational low-earth-orbiting (LEO) and geostationary earth-orbiting (GEO) environmental satellites and tie these to common reference standards. The intercomparability of the observations will result in more accurate measurements for assimilation in numerical weather prediction models, construction of more reliable climate data records, and progress toward achieving the societal goals of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems. GSICS includes globally coordinated activities for prelaunch instrument characterization, onboard routine calibration, sensor intercomparison of...


IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2013

GSICS Inter-Calibration of Infrared Channels of Geostationary Imagers Using Metop/IASI

Tim J. Hewison; Xiangqian Wu; Fangfang Yu; Yoshihiko Tahara; Xiuqing Hu; Dohyeong Kim; Marianne Koenig

The first products of the Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) include bias monitoring and calibration corrections for the thermal infrared (IR) channels of current meteorological sensors on geostationary satellites. These use the hyperspectral Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) on the low Earth orbit (LEO) Metop satellite as a common cross-calibration reference. This paper describes the algorithm, which uses a weighted linear regression, to compare collocated radiances observed from each pair of geostationary-LEO instruments. The regression coefficients define the GSICS Correction, and their uncertainties provide quality indicators, ensuring traceability to the selected community reference, IASI. Examples are given for the Meteosat, GOES, MTSAT, Fengyun-2, and COMS imagers. Some channels of these instruments show biases that vary with time due to variations in the thermal environment, stray light, and optical contamination. These results demonstrate how inter-calibration can be a powerful tool to monitor and correct biases, and help diagnose their root causes.


Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | 2010

Comparison of AIRS and IASI Radiances Using GOES Imagers as Transfer Radiometers toward Climate Data Records

Likun Wang; Xiangqian Wu; Mitch Goldberg; Changyong Cao; Yaping Li; Seung-hee Sohn

Abstract The Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), together with the future Cross-track Infrared Sounder, will provide long-term hyperspectral measurements of the earth and its atmosphere at ∼10 km spatial resolution. Quantifying the radiometric difference between AIRS and IASI is crucial for creating fundamental climate data records and establishing the space-based infrared calibration standard. Since AIRS and IASI have different local equator crossing times, a direct comparison of these two instruments over the tropical regions is not feasible. Using the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imagers as transfer radiometers, this study compares AIRS and IASI over warm scenes in the tropical regions for a time period of 16 months. The double differences between AIRS and IASI radiance biases relative to the GOES-11 and -12 imagers are used to quantify the radiance differences between AIRS and IASI within the GOES imager spectral ...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Performance of the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) products

Lawrence E. Flynn; Craig S. Long; Xiangqian Wu; R. Evans; C. T. Beck; Irina Petropavlovskikh; G. McConville; Wei Yu; Z. Zhang; Jianguo Niu; E. Beach; Y. Hao; Chunhui Pan; Bhaswar Sen; M. Novicki; S. Zhou; C. Seftor

NOAA, through the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) program, in partnership with the National Aeronautical and Space Administration, launched the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) satellite, a risk reduction and data continuity mission, on 28 October 2011. The JPSS program is executing the S-NPP Calibration and Validation program to ensure that the data products comply with the requirements of the sponsoring agencies. The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) consists of two telescopes feeding three detectors measuring solar radiance scattered by the Earths atmosphere directly and solar irradiance by using diffusers. The measurements are used to generate estimates of total column ozone and vertical ozone profiles for use in near-real-time applications and extension of ozone climate data records. The calibration and validation efforts are progressing well, and both Level 1 (Sensor Data Records) and Level 2 (Ozone Environmental Data Records) have advanced to release at Provisional Maturity. This paper provides information on the product performance over the first 22 months of the mission. The products are evaluated through the use of internal consistency analysis techniques and comparisons to other satellite instrument and ground-based products. The initial performance finds total ozone showing negative bias of 2 to 4% with respect to correlative products and ozone profiles often within ±5% in the middle and upper stratosphere of current operational products. Potential improvements in the measurements and algorithms are identified. These will be implemented in coming months to reduce the differences further.


IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2013

Diurnal and Scan Angle Variations in the Calibration of GOES Imager Infrared Channels

Fangfang Yu; Xiangqian Wu; M. K. Rama Varma Raja; Yaping Li; Likun Wang; Mitchell D. Goldberg

The current Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) Imager infrared (IR) channels experience a midnight effect that can result in erroneous instrument responsivity around satellite midnight. An empirical method named the Midnight Blackbody Calibration Correction (MBCC) was developed and implemented in the GOES Imager IR operational calibration, aiming to correct the midnight calibration errors. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the MBCC performance for the GOES-11/-12 Imager IR channels by examining the diurnal variation of the mean brightness temperature (Tb) bias with respect to reference instruments. Two well-calibrated hyperspectral radiometers on low Earth orbits (LEOs), the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder on the Aqua satellite and the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) on the Metop-A satellite, are used as the reference instruments in this study. However, as the timing of the collocated geostationary-LEO intercalibration data is related to the GOES scan angle, it is then necessary to assess the GOES scan angle calibration variations, which becomes the second objective of this study. Our results show that the applications and performance of the MBCC method varies greatly between the different channels and different times. While it is usually applied with high frequency for about 8 h around satellite midnight for the short-wave channels (Ch2), it may only be intensively used right after satellite midnight or even barely used for the other IR channels. The MBCC method, if applied with high frequency, can reduce the mean day/night calibration difference to less than 0.15 K in almost all the GOES IR channels studied in this paper except for Ch4 (10.7 μm). The uncertainty of the nighttime GOES and IASI Tb difference for different scan angles is less than 0.1 K in each IR channel, indicating that there is no apparent systematic variation with the scan angle, and therefore, the estimated diurnal cycles of GOES Imager calibration is not prone to the systematic effects due to scan angle.


IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2013

Correction for GOES Imager Spectral Response Function Using GSICS. Part I: Theory

Xiangqian Wu; Fangfang Yu

A cold bias of ~-2 K was found for Channel 6 (13.3 μm) of the Imager instrument on the 13th of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES-13) during its postlaunch tests. Similar bias was found previously for GOES-12 and for other instruments (the High Resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, and the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager) in the similar spectral region. It was often suspected that the spectral response function (SRF) of these instruments may be in error; in some cases, it had been demonstrated that an altered SRF can eliminate most of the differences between the measured and the expected values. Using products recently developed for the Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System, this paper concluded that an SRF error is the root cause for the GOES Imager Channel 6 bias. Based on this theory, an algorithm was developed to correct for the bias. Application of this correction to GOES-13 Imager Channel 6 resulted in an SRF shift of -2.1 cm-1. The remaining biases have mean of nearly zero and much reduced standard deviation and are independent of the thermal structure of the interlaying atmosphere. This correction has also been successfully applied of other channels and of other GOES, which was described in a companion paper.


IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing | 2013

Performance and Calibration of the Nadir Suomi-NPP Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite From Early-Orbit Images

Chunhui Pan; Matthew G. Kowalewski; Rich Buss; Lawrence E. Flynn; Xiangqian Wu; Maria Caponi; Fuzhong Weng

The Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS) was launched aboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership spacecraft on October 28, 2011. A successful thorough Early Orbit Checkout (EOC) enabled the current Intensive Calibration and Validation stage. We present our analyses and results of OMPS Nadir early-orbit sensor performance and calibration. We collected and analyzed data from both nominal and diagnostic activities via orbital measurements of detector dark current, sensor linearity, and solar irradiance. Our results demonstrate that the OMPS Nadir sensors smoothly transitioned from ground to orbit by meeting or exceeding sensor level requirements. The orbital measurements agree with the predicted values determined during the prelaunch calibration and characterization of OMPS. Our results also suggest that the effects of charge coupled device (CCD) lattice damage due to energetic particle hits onto the CCD must be accounted for in the dark current calibration.


IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2013

Correction for GOES Imager Spectral Response Function Using GSICS. Part II: Applications

Fangfang Yu; Xiangqian Wu

During the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-14 and -15 post-launch test (PLT) for science periods, an up to ~ 2 K mean brightness temperature (Tb) bias with respect to collocated Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observations was observed in the absorptive IR channels of the GOES-14/15 Imagers. These large scene-dependent biases were believed to be caused mainly by spectral characterization errors. In this paper, we refined the spectral response function (SRF) shift algorithm which was developed during the GOES-13 PLT period to improve the GOES-14/15 Imager IR radiometric calibration accuracy by accurately calculating the impact of blackbody on the calibrated scene radiance. The uncertainty of the SRF shift algorithm was estimated and used to guide the final selection of the total amount of central wave-number shift. This refined algorithm was first verified with GOES-13 Imager Ch6 data and then used to evaluate and further revise the audited GOES-14/15 SRFs provided by the instrument vendor. Based on this algorithm, the optimal SRF shifts were -1.98 cm-1 for GOES-13 Ch6, -8.25 cm-1 for GOES-14 Ch3, -0.25 cm-1 for GOES-14 Ch6, -6.25 cm-1 for GOES-15 Ch3 and +0.50 cm-1 for GOES-15 Ch6. The newly shifted SRFs were operationally implemented into the GOES-14/15 Imager IR calibrations in the August of 2011 and successfully reduced the mean all-sky Tb bias with respect to the reference instrument to less than 0.15 K. The scene-dependent bias, which can be nonlinear at large erroneous SRF, was also greatly reduced. The same method was applied to correct the GOES-12 Imager Ch6 SRF which has a changing SRF error during its mission life. A strong linear relationship between the optimal SRF shifts and the mean Tb bias with respect to the AIRS data was observed at this channel. This strong linear relationship can be used to revise the GOES-12 Ch6 SRF for a better radiance simulation. The method described in this paper is particularly important to evaluate and revise the erroneous SRF, if it exists, after satellite launch yet before it becomes fully operational.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2009

GSICS GEO-LEO intercalibration: baseline algorithm and early results

Xiangqian Wu; Tim J. Hewison; Yoshihiko Tahara

The Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) is a critical space component of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) that provides users with high-quality inter-calibrated satellite radiances. In an early development, GSICS has implemented the inter-calibration of imaging instruments on geostationary (GEO) satellites with hyperspectral sounding instruments AIRS and IASI on Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. This paper summarizes the major components and the theoretical basis of the baseline algorithm that is common to all implementations, and demonstrates the initial impact of the GSICS Correction.


Remote Sensing | 2016

Comparison of the Calibration Algorithms and SI Traceability of MODIS, VIIRS, GOES, and GOES-R ABI Sensors

Raju Datla; Xi Shao; Changyong Cao; Xiangqian Wu

The radiometric calibration equations for the thermal emissive bands (TEB) and the reflective solar bands (RSB) measurements of the earth scenes by the polar satellite sensors, (Terra and Aqua) MODIS and Suomi NPP (VIIRS), and geostationary sensors, GOES Imager and the GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) are analyzed towards calibration algorithm harmonization on the basis of SI traceability which is one of the goals of the NOAA National Calibration Center (NCC). One of the overarching goals of NCC is to provide knowledge base on the NOAA operational satellite sensors and recommend best practices for achieving SI traceability for the radiance measurements on-orbit. As such, the calibration methodologies of these satellite optical sensors are reviewed in light of the recommended practice for radiometric calibration at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The equivalence of some of the spectral bands in these sensors for their end products is presented. The operational and calibration features of the sensors for on-orbit observation of radiance are also compared in tabular form. This review is also to serve as a quick cross reference to researchers and analysts on how the observed signals from these sensors in space are converted to radiances.

Collaboration


Dive into the Xiangqian Wu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fangfang Yu

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Changyong Cao

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence E. Flynn

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fuzhong Weng

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael G. Grotenhuis

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiaoxiong Xiong

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Beach

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jianguo Niu

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael P. Weinreb

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge