XiaoChen Tang
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by XiaoChen Tang.
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry | 2018
Junjie Wang; Yingying Tang; Adrian Curtin; Raymond C.K. Chan; Ya Wang; Hui Li; Tianhong Zhang; ZhenYing Qian; Qian Guo; Yu Li; Xu Liu; XiaoChen Tang; Jijun Wang
&NA; Abnormal auditory steady state response (ASSR) is a typical finding among schizophrenia patients, which is thought to directly reflect deficient gamma band oscillations in the brain. However, whether these ASSR alterations are state dependent, e.g. during eye‐open or eye‐closed conditions, has not yet been carefully elucidated in schizophrenia. Our study aimed to explore whether the abnormality of ASSR in patients with first‐episode schizophrenia (FEP) is altered under eye‐open (EO) and eye‐closed (EC) states. ASSR was elicited using 40 Hz click trains under EO and EC states. Twenty‐eight healthy control subjects (HC) and thirty‐three FEP individuals, 17 of whom were medication‐naïve, were recruited. The event‐related spectrum perturbation (ERSP) and intertrial coherence (ITC) in response to 40 Hz click sounds were quantified. Compared to HC group, FEP group showed a lower ITC and ERSP during EO state, as well as a decreased ITC during EC state. Our results suggest that abnormalities in gamma band oscillations among first‐episode schizophrenia patients are present under both eye open and eye close states. Although differences in gamma band oscillations between EO and EC states within the FEP group were not observed, exploratory results suggest that state‐sensitivity may be contingent on medication use.
Schizophrenia Research | 2017
Tianhong Zhang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; Yingying Tang; LiHua Xu; XiaoChen Tang; YiKang Zhu; LiJuan Jiang; Bin Zhang; ZhenYing Qian; Annabelle Chow; XiaoHua Liu; ChunBo Li; Zeping Xiao; Jijun Wang
The association between neurocognition and the theory of mind (ToM) abilities during the progression of psychosis is unclear. This study included 83 individuals with attenuated psychosis syndrome (APS), from which 26 converted to psychosis (converters) after a follow up period of 18months. Comprehensive cognitive tests (including MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Faux-Pas Task, and Reading-Mind-in-Eyes Tasks) were administered at baseline. A structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of neurocognition on the ToM functioning in both APS and healthy controls (HC) datasets. At baseline, the converters and non-converters groups differed significantly on several domains of cognitive performance. The SEM analysis demonstrated that the path from neurocognition to ToM was statistically significant in the APS dataset (p<0.001). However, in the HC dataset, the result of the same analysis was not significant (p=0.117). Positive correlations between neurocognition and ToM were observed, and the most obvious correlations were found in the converters group compared with the non-converters group (p=0.064) and compared with the HC group (p=0.002). The correlation between ToM abilities and neurocognition may be increased during the progression of the condition, especially for individuals who convert to psychosis after a short period.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Tianhong Zhang; LiHua Xu; Yingying Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; XiaoChen Tang; Qiang Hu; Yan Wang; YiKang Zhu; LiJuan Jiang; Li Hui; XiaoHua Liu; Chunbo Li; JiJun Wang
Perceptual abnormalities (PAs) such as auditory hallucinations are one of the most common symptoms of psychotic patients. However, it remains unclear whether symptoms of sub-clinical PAs also play a key role in predicting psychosis. In an ongoing prospective follow-up study of individuals at a clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis, we evaluated the potential of first-time experience of PAs and/or thought content disorders (TCDs) to predict psychosis. Conversion to psychosis was the major focus of this follow-up study. A total of 511 CHRs were recruited, of whom 443 (86.7%) completed the clinical follow-up of at least 6 months and up to 2 years. CHRs were divided into four groups according to the presence of PAs and/or TCDs. At the follow-up endpoint, 39 (19.9%) CHRs in the “TCDs-only” group, 2 (8.3%) in the “PAs-only” group, 45 (17.0%) in the “TCDs-and-PAs” group, and 1 (3.8%) in the “None” group converted to psychosis. Survival analysis revealed a higher conversion rate in CHRs with TCDs compared with those with PAs only. CHRs with isolated PAs had shown a higher level of dysphoric mood at baseline compared with those with TCDs. About 89% TCDs contents were related with their experienced PAs. Compared with TCDs, the isolated PAs are not strongly associated with increased susceptibility to psychosis.
Schizophrenia Research | 2018
LiHua Xu; Yan Wang; HuiRu Cui; Yingying Tang; Junjie Wang; XiaoChen Tang; Bin Zhang; YanYan Wei; YiKang Zhu; LiJuan Jiang; ZhenYing Qian; HuiJun Li; Tianhong Zhang; Jijun Wang
Two-stage screening, involving a self-rating report, followed by a structured interview, has been proposed for identifying clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR) for nearly two decades. This study used PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-R) and Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) to investigate the predictive validity of the two-stage screening. Of 566 participants who completed two-stage screening in this study, 192 were PS-R(-) and 374 were PS-R(+). After being interviewed with SIPS, 112 were rated as CHR(+), 109 were diagnosed with psychosis, and the other 345 individuals were CHR(-). Those who were rated through SIPS as CHR(+) and CHR(-) were followed up within 2 years to observe their clinical outcome. Ninety one (81.3%) CHR(+) and 171 (49.6%) CHR(-) individuals completed the investigation at baseline and the two-year follow-up. The cumulative conversion rate to psychosis was 27.5% in CHR(+) group, but only 1.7% in CHR(-) group, with a significant difference between the two groups (log-rank test, χ2 = 30.07, p < 0.001). In terms of two-stage screening, PS-R(-)/CHR(-), PS-R(-)/CHR(+), and PS-R(+)/CHR(-) groups were viewed as expected negative (EN), and the PS-R(+)/CHR(+) group as expected positive (EP), and the sensitivity and specificity was 64.3% and 79.1%, respectively. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis showed that EP group were more likely to convert to psychosis than EN group (log-rank test, χ2 = 16.702, p < 0.001). Two-stage screening indeed saves much time and alleviates the workload, but may exclude some target individuals. Optimizing self-report scale, and forming a nurse-doctor-interviewer coalition are likely to improve the use of self-rating report and structured interview.
Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2018
Tianhong Zhang; LiHua Xu; HuiRu Cui; Yingying Tang; YanYan Wei; XiaoChen Tang; XiaoHua Liu; XinMei Cao; ChunBo Li; Jijun Wang
There is a strong correlation between neurocognition and social cognition. However, none of these studies have examined the key role of time consumption during social cognition tasks. Participants included 84 individuals with clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR), 95 healthy controls (HC), and 66 case controls (schizophrenia patients, SZ), who were assessed through the Reading-Mind-in-Eyes Tasks (RMET) with computerized recording of the response time (RT). Neurocognitive tests were also performed for the HC and CHR groups. A comparison of RMET performance revealed significantly lower scores in the SZ group compared to the HC group, with CHR individuals scoring between these two. However, both CHR and SZ subjects spent almost twice as long of the time on RMET compared to the HC subjects. Significant positive correlation was found between RMET accuracy and RT, though only in SZ patients. Taking the RT into consideration, the RMET performances were impacted by different neurocognition domains. Our findings provide new evidence about how time consumption in mind-reading may impact the relationship between social cognition and neurocognition, and we discuss the potential importance of recording the response time during social cognition assessment in individuals with early psychosis.
Brain Stimulation | 2018
Tianhong Zhang; JunJuan Zhu; LiHua Xu; XiaoChen Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; Yan Wang; Qiang Hu; ZhenYing Qian; XiaoHua Liu; Yingying Tang; ChunBo Li; Jijun Wang
BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is considered as an effective treatment for adults with major depressive disorder. However, it remains unknown whether rTMS has comparable or better efficacy in adolescents. OBJECTIVE The current naturalistic study aimed to investigate the efficacy and clinical outcome of add-on rTMS in a large sample of adolescent patients compared to adult patients. METHODS This study included 117 patients (42 adolescents vs. 75 adults) with mood or anxiety disorders who were treated with at least 10 sessions of rTMS. rTMS was applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (10 Hz). Symptoms of depression and anxiety were measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) respectively, at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up. Comparisons of clinical improvement and rates of response/remission were made across age groups. MAJOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS All the age groups showed significant improvements in clinical symptoms. No safety or tolerability concerns were identified. Symptomatic improvements and response/remission rates were more significant in adolescent patients than in adults. Decrease in HAMD and HAMA scores after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of rTMS treatment were positively correlated in adolescents, but not in adults. General linear model repeated measures demonstrated significant effect of time × age group interaction on the HAMD score, in response to 10 sessions of rTMS. Add-on rTMS is feasible, tolerable, effective and more applicable to adolescents with mood or anxiety disorders. However, double-blinded and sham-controlled trials are needed for validating this conclusion.
Schizophrenia Research | 2017
Tianhong Zhang; Xiaoli Guo; Yingying Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; LiHua Xu; XiaoChen Tang; XiaoHua Liu; ChunBo Li; KaiDa Jiang; Zeping Xiao; Jijun Wang
Psychological Medicine | 2017
TianHong Zhang; LiHua Xu; Yingying Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; Junjie Wang; XiaoChen Tang; ChunBo Li; JiJun Wang
Psychological Medicine | 2018
Tianhong Zhang; LiHua Xu; Yingying Tang; Huijun Li; XiaoChen Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; Yan Wang; Qiang Hu; XiaoHua Liu; Chunbo Li; Zheng Lu; Robert W. McCarley; Larry J. Seidman; Jijun Wang
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | 2018
Tianhong Zhang; LiHua Xu; Yingying Tang; HuiRu Cui; XiaoChen Tang; YanYan Wei; Yan Wang; Qiang Hu; ZhenYing Qian; XiaoHua Liu; ChunBo Li; JiJun Wang