Xiaoyan Chang
Baylor College of Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xiaoyan Chang.
American Journal of Physiology-endocrinology and Metabolism | 1999
Douglas G. Burrin; T.J. Wester; Teresa A. Davis; Marta L. Fiorotto; Xiaoyan Chang
Our objective was to determine how dexamethasone (Dex) affects gastrointestinal protein metabolism and growth in neonatal pigs. Two-day-old pigs were given daily subcutaneous injections of either Dex (1 mg/kg body wt, n = 7) or saline (control, n = 6) for 7 days. In vivo protein synthesis was measured after 7 days with a bolus of [3H]phenylalanine. Tissue protein contents were measured in an initial control group of 2-day-old pigs and in control and Dex pigs after 7 days to estimate protein accretion and degradation. In control pigs, the protein accretion in the ileum was nearly sixfold greater than in the jejunum during the 7-day period. Dex nominally altered stomach growth but completely blocked the accretion of protein and DNA in the jejunum and ileum, with reduced villus height in the ileum. Dex increased the fractional protein degradation rate in the ileum (28%) and decreased the absolute protein synthesis rate in the jejunum and ileum by 17 and 21%, respectively. Dex resulted in a 40% lower total intestinal lactase activity compared with controls via reductions in both specific activity and tissue mass, especially in the ileum. Dex significantly decreased the circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, -2, and -3. However, the tissue abundance of the IGF-I receptor in the stomach and ileum was greater in Dex pigs than controls. Our results suggest that Dex significantly inhibits small intestinal growth via both increased degradation and decreased synthesis of protein. Furthermore, the inhibition of intestinal growth resulted in significantly decreased lactose digestive capacity.Our objective was to determine how dexamethasone (Dex) affects gastrointestinal protein metabolism and growth in neonatal pigs. Two-day-old pigs were given daily subcutaneous injections of either Dex (1 mg/kg body wt, n = 7) or saline (control, n = 6) for 7 days. In vivo protein synthesis was measured after 7 days with a bolus of [3H]phenylalanine. Tissue protein contents were measured in an initial control group of 2-day-old pigs and in control and Dex pigs after 7 days to estimate protein accretion and degradation. In control pigs, the protein accretion in the ileum was nearly sixfold greater than in the jejunum during the 7-day period. Dex nominally altered stomach growth but completely blocked the accretion of protein and DNA in the jejunum and ileum, with reduced villus height in the ileum. Dex increased the fractional protein degradation rate in the ileum (28%) and decreased the absolute protein synthesis rate in the jejunum and ileum by 17 and 21%, respectively. Dex resulted in a 40% lower total intestinal lactase activity compared with controls via reductions in both specific activity and tissue mass, especially in the ileum. Dex significantly decreased the circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, -2, and -3. However, the tissue abundance of the IGF-I receptor in the stomach and ileum was greater in Dex pigs than controls. Our results suggest that Dex significantly inhibits small intestinal growth via both increased degradation and decreased synthesis of protein. Furthermore, the inhibition of intestinal growth resulted in significantly decreased lactose digestive capacity.
Journal of Nutrition | 2010
Barbara Stoll; David A Horst; Liwei Cui; Xiaoyan Chang; Kenneth J. Ellis; Darryl L. Hadsell; Agus Suryawan; Ashish Kurundkar; Teresa A. Davis; Douglas G. Burrin
Prematurity and overfeeding in infants are associated with insulin resistance in childhood and may increase the risk of adult disease. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a major source of infant nutritional support and may influence neonatal metabolic function. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that TPN induces increased adiposity and insulin resistance compared with enteral nutrition (EN) in neonatal pigs. Neonatal pigs were either fed enteral formula orally or i.v. administered a TPN mixture for 17 d; macronutrient intake was similar in both groups. During the 17-d period, we measured body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning; fasting i.v. glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps (CLAMP) were performed to quantify insulin resistance. On d 17, tissue was collected after 1-h, low-dose CLAMP for tissue insulin signaling assays. TPN pigs gained less lean and more body fat and developed hepatic steatosis compared with EN pigs. After 7 and 13 d, IVGTT showed evidence of insulin resistance in the TPN compared with the EN group. Fasting plasma glucose and insulin also were higher in TPN pigs. CLAMP showed that insulin sensitivity was markedly lower in TPN pigs than in EN pigs. TPN also reduced the abundance of the insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate 1, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase in skeletal muscle and liver and the proliferation of total pancreatic cells and β-cells. Hepatic proinflammatory genes as well as c-Jun-N-terminal kinase 1 phosphorylation, plasma interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α were all higher in TPN pigs than in EN pigs. The results demonstrate that chronic TPN induces a hepatic inflammatory response that is associated with significant insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and fat deposition compared with EN in neonatal pigs. Further studies are warranted to establish the mechanism of TPN-induced insulin resistance and hepatic metabolic dysfunction and whether there are persistent metabolic consequences of this lifesaving form of infant nutritional support.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | 2012
Barbara Stoll; Patrycja Puiman; Liwei Cui; Xiaoyan Chang; Nancy M. Benight; Caroline Bauchart-Thevret; Bolette Hartmann; Jens J. Holst; Douglas G. Burrin
BACKGROUND We previously showed that parenteral nutrition (PN) compared with formula feeding results in hepatic insulin resistance and steatosis in neonatal pigs. The current aim was to test whether the route of feeding (intravenous [IV] vs enteral) rather than other feeding modalities (diet, pattern) had contributed to the outcome. METHODS Neonatal pigs were fed enterally or parenterally for 14 days with 1 of 4 feeding modalities as follows: (1) enteral polymeric formula intermittently (FORM), (2) enteral elemental diet (ED) intermittently (IEN), (3) enteral ED continuously (CEN), and (4) parenteral ED continuously (PN). Subgroups of pigs underwent IV glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps (CLAMP). Following CLAMP, pigs were euthanized and tissues collected for further analysis. RESULTS Insulin secretion during IVGTT was significantly higher and glucose infusion rates during CLAMP were lower in CEN and PN than in FORM and IEN. Endogenous glucose production rate was suppressed to zero in all groups during CLAMP. In the fed state, plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, and GLP-2 were different between feeding modalities. Insulin receptor phosphorylation in liver and muscle was decreased in IEN, CEN, and PN compared with FORM. Liver weight was highest in PN. Steatosis and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity tended to be highest in PN and CEN. Enterally fed groups had higher plasma GLP-2 and jejunum weight compared with PN. CONCLUSIONS PN and enteral nutrition (EN) when given continuously as an elemental diet reduces insulin sensitivity and the secretion of key gut incretins. The intermittent vs continuous pattern of EN produced the optimal effect on metabolic function.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | 2006
Barbara J. Stoll; Pamela T. Price; Peter J. Reeds; Xiaoyan Chang; Josef F. Henry; Johannes B. van Goudoever; Jens J. Holst; Douglas G. Burrin
BACKGROUND We previously showed that the level of enteral nutrient intake determines the rate of intestinal growth in piglets. Our objective was to determine whether providing enteral nutrition in the form of elemental nutrients (glucose, amino acids, lipid [ED]) rather than cows milk formula (lactose, protein, lipid [FORM]) reduces small intestinal growth and lactase activity. METHODS Three-week-old piglets were fed either ED (n = 7) intragastrically or FORM (n = 6) orally for 6 days. RESULTS Intestinal protein and DNA masses, villus height, and crypt depth were not different in ED and FORM pigs. Crypt cell proliferation, measured by in vivo bromodeoxyuridine labeling, was significantly (p < .05) higher (+37%) in ED than in FORM pigs. Rates of mucosal protein synthesis (%/d), measured by in vivo 2H-leucine incorporation, were higher (p < .05) in ED than FORM (147 vs 89) pigs. Circulating concentrations (pmol/L) of the intestinotrophic peptide, glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2), were also higher (p < .05) in ED than in FORM (148 vs 87) pigs. The mean lactase-specific activity (micromol/min/g) in proximal and distal segments was higher (p < .05) in FORM than in ED (124 vs 58) pigs. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that intestinal mucosal growth and villus morphology are similar in pigs fed ED and FORM, despite higher cell proliferation and protein synthesis rates and lower lactase activity with ED. This implies that elemental diets may be as trophic as polymeric formulas to simultaneously provide nutrition and a stimulus for intestinal growth during bowel rest.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2000
Douglas G. Burrin; Barbara J. Stoll; Ruhong Jiang; Xiaoyan Chang; Bolette Hartmann; Jens J. Holst; George H Greeley; Peter J. Reeds
Endocrinology | 2005
Douglas G. Burrin; Barbara Stoll; Xinfu Guan; Liwei Cui; Xiaoyan Chang; Jens J. Holst
Journal of Nutrition | 2000
Ruhong Jiang; Xiaoyan Chang; Barbara Stoll; Ming Z. Fan; John D. Arthington; Eric Weaver; Joy M. Campbell; Douglas G. Burrin
American Journal of Physiology-gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | 2000
Barbara Stoll; Xiaoyan Chang; Ming Z. Fan; Peter J. Reeds; Douglas G. Burrin
American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2006
John Stephens; Barbara Stoll; J. J. Cottrell; Xiaoyan Chang; Michael A. Helmrath; Douglas G. Burrin
Journal of Nutrition | 2000
Ruhong Jiang; Xiaoyan Chang; Barbara Stoll; Kenneth J. Ellis; Roman J. Shypailo; Eric Weaver; Joy M. Campbell; Douglas G. Burrin