Xinxin Zhai
Georgia Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xinxin Zhai.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2016
Mariel D. Friberg; Xinxin Zhai; Heather A. Holmes; Howard H. Chang; Matthew J. Strickland; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Paige E. Tolbert; Armistead G. Russell; James A. Mulholland
Investigations of ambient air pollution health effects rely on complete and accurate spatiotemporal air pollutant estimates. Three methods are developed for fusing ambient monitor measurements and 12 km resolution chemical transport model (CMAQ) simulations to estimate daily air pollutant concentrations across Georgia. Temporal variance is determined by observations in one method, with the annual mean CMAQ field providing spatial structure. A second method involves scaling daily CMAQ simulated fields using mean observations to reduce bias. Finally, a weighted average of these results based on prediction of temporal variance provides optimized daily estimates for each 12 × 12 km grid. These methods were applied to daily metrics of 12 pollutants (CO, NO2, NOx, O3, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and five PM2.5 components) over the state of Georgia for a seven-year period (2002-2008). Cross-validation demonstrates a wide range in optimized model performance across pollutants, with SO2 predicted most poorly due to limitations in coal combustion plume monitoring and modeling. For the other pollutants studied, 54-88% of the spatiotemporal variance (Pearson R(2) from cross-validation) was captured, with ozone and PM2.5 predicted best. The optimized fusion approach developed provides daily spatial field estimates of air pollutant concentrations and uncertainties that are consistent with observations, emissions, and meteorology.
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology | 2017
Audrey Flak Pennington; Matthew J. Strickland; Mitchel Klein; Xinxin Zhai; Armistead G. Russell; Craig Hansen; Lyndsey A. Darrow
Prenatal air pollution exposure is frequently estimated using maternal residential location at the time of delivery as a proxy for residence during pregnancy. We describe residential mobility during pregnancy among 19,951 children from the Kaiser Air Pollution and Pediatric Asthma Study, quantify measurement error in spatially resolved estimates of prenatal exposure to mobile source fine particulate matter (PM2.5) due to ignoring this mobility, and simulate the impact of this error on estimates of epidemiologic associations. Two exposure estimates were compared, one calculated using complete residential histories during pregnancy (weighted average based on time spent at each address) and the second calculated using only residence at birth. Estimates were computed using annual averages of primary PM2.5 from traffic emissions modeled using a Research LINE-source dispersion model for near-surface releases (RLINE) at 250 m resolution. In this cohort, 18.6% of children were born to mothers who moved at least once during pregnancy. Mobile source PM2.5 exposure estimates calculated using complete residential histories during pregnancy and only residence at birth were highly correlated (rS>0.9). Simulations indicated that ignoring residential mobility resulted in modest bias of epidemiologic associations toward the null, but varied by maternal characteristics and prenatal exposure windows of interest (ranging from −2% to −10% bias).
Epidemiology | 2018
Audrey Flak Pennington; Matthew J. Strickland; Mitchel Klein; Xinxin Zhai; Josephine T. Bates; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Craig Hansen; Armistead G. Russell; Paige E. Tolbert; Lyndsey A. Darrow
Background: Early-life exposure to traffic-related air pollution exacerbates childhood asthma, but it is unclear what role it plays in asthma development. Methods: The association between exposure to primary mobile source pollutants during pregnancy and during infancy and asthma incidence by ages 2 through 6 was examined in the Kaiser Air Pollution and Pediatric Asthma Study, a racially diverse birth cohort of 24,608 children born between 2000 and 2010 and insured by Kaiser Permanente Georgia. We estimated concentrations of mobile source fine particulate matter (PM2.5, µg/m3), nitrogen oxides (NOX, ppb), and carbon monoxide (CO, ppm) at the maternal and child residence using a Research LINE source dispersion model for near-surface releases. Asthma was defined using diagnoses and medication dispensings from medical records. We used binomial generalized linear regression to model the impact of exposure continuously and by quintiles on asthma risk. Results: Controlling for covariates and modeling log-transformed exposure, a 2.7-fold increase in first year of life PM2.5 was associated with an absolute 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%, 6.6%) increase in risk of asthma by age 5. Quintile analysis showed an increase in risk from the first to second quintile, but similar risk across quintiles 2–5. Risk differences increased with follow-up age. Results were similar for NOX and CO and for exposure during pregnancy and the first year of life owing to high correlation. Conclusions: Results provide limited evidence for an association of early-life mobile source air pollution with childhood asthma incidence with a steeper concentration–response relationship observed at lower levels of exposure.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2018
Josephine T. Bates; Audrey Flak Pennington; Xinxin Zhai; Mariel D. Friberg; Francesca Metcalf; Lyndsey A. Darrow; Matthew J. Strickland; James A. Mulholland; Armistead G. Russell
Abstract Epidemiologic studies rely on accurately characterizing spatiotemporal variation in air pollutant concentrations. This work presents two model fusion approaches that use publicly available chemical transport simulations, dispersion model simulations, and observations to estimate air pollutant concentrations at a neighborhood-level spatial resolution while incorporating comprehensive chemistry and emissions sources. The first method is additive and the alternative method is multiplicative. These approaches are applied to Atlanta, GA at a 250 m grid resolution to obtain daily 24-hr averaged PM2.5 and 1-hr max CO and NOx concentrations during the years 2003–2008 for use in health studies. The modeled concentrations provide comprehensive estimates with steep spatial gradients near roadways, secondary formation and loss, and effects of regional sources that can influence daily variation in ambient pollutant concentrations. Results show high temporal and spatial correlation and low biases across monitors, providing accurate pollutant concentration estimates for epidemiologic analyses.
International Technical Meeting on Air Pollution Modelling and its Application | 2016
Ran Huang; Xinxin Zhai; Cesunica Ivey; Mariel D. Friberg; Xuefei Hu; Yang Liu; James A. Mulholland; Armistead G. Russell
A data fusion approach is developed to blend ground-based observations and simulated data from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Spatiotemporal information and finer temporal scale variations have been captured by the resulting fields that are provided by both air quality modeling and observations. The approach is applied to daily PM2.5 total mass, five major particulate species (OC, EC, SO4 2−, NO3 −, and NH4 +), and three gaseous pollutants (CO, NOx, NO2) during 2006–2008 over North Carolina (USA). Applying the data fusion method significantly reduces biases in CMAQ fields to almost zero at monitor locations. The results show improvements in capturing spatial and temporal variability with observations, which is important to health and planning studies. The correlation for the cross-validation test decreased from 0.98 (no withholding) to 0.91 (10% random data withholding) when comparing modeled results to observations. If 10% monitor-based withholding is used, the correlation is 0.91 (random 10% of monitors withheld), and the correlation is 0.88 if spatially-specific withholding is used (10% of monitors withheld are grouped spatially). Results from a satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth (AOD) method were compared with PM2.5 total mass concentration from data fusion, and the data-fusion fields have slightly less overall error; an R2 of 0.95 compared to 0.81 (AOD). Comparing results from an application of the Integrated Mobile Source Indicator method shows that the data fusion fields can be used to estimate mobile source impacts. Overall, the data fusion approach is attractive for providing spatiotemporal pollutant fields for speciated particulate pollutants, as the demand for accurate, fused, air quality model fields is growing.
Archive | 2014
Heather A. Holmes; Xinxin Zhai; Jeremiah Redman; Kyle Digby; Cesunica Ivey; Sivaraman Balachandran; Sheila A. Sororian; Mariel D. Friberg; Wenxian Zhang; Marissa L. Maier; Yongtao Hu; Armistead G. Russell; James A. Mulholland; Howard H. Chang
The growing availability of spatially resolved health data sets (i.e., resident and county level patient records) requires spatially resolved exposure or air quality metrics to investigate the impact of air pollution on health outcomes. While daily air quality data are essential in time-series epidemiologic analysis, the spatial distribution of the observations is limited. Air pollution modeling (i.e., chemical transport modeling (CTM)) addresses this by producing spatially resolved air quality predictions using terrain, emissions and meteorology inputs. However, predicted concentrations may be biased. This work incorporates unique data fusion approaches to combine air quality observations from regulatory monitoring networks (OBS) with the output from a CTM (CMAQ) to generate spatially and temporally resolved gaseous and PM species concentrations. Species concentrations alone cannot directly identify emission sources or characterize pollutant mixtures, therefore source apportionment (SA) models are required to estimate source impacts. The focus of this work is a comparison of SA results for three U.S. regions with differing air pollution sources, St. Louis, Missouri; Atlanta, Georgia; and Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas.
Atmospheric Environment | 2016
Xinxin Zhai; Armistead G. Russell; Poornima Sampath; James A. Mulholland; Byeong-Uk Kim; Yunhee Kim; David D'Onofrio
Atmospheric Environment | 2017
Xinxin Zhai; James A. Mulholland; Armistead G. Russell; Heather A. Holmes
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health | 2018
Ran Huang; Xinxin Zhai; Cesunica Ivey; Mariel D. Friberg; Xuefei Hu; Yang Liu; Qian Di; Joel Schwartz; James A. Mulholland; Armistead G. Russell
Environmental Epidemiology | 2018
Caitlin M. Kennedy; Audrey Flak Pennington; Lyndsey A. Darrow; Mitchel Klein; Xinxin Zhai; Josephine T. Bates; Armistead G. Russell; Craig Hansen; Paige E. Tolbert; Matthew J. Strickland