Xiuqian Mu

The succinate receptor GPR91 in neurons has a major role in retinal angiogenesis

Vascularization is essential for tissue development and in restoration of tissue integrity after an ischemic injury. In studies of vascularization, the focus has largely been placed on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), yet other factors may also orchestrate this process. Here we show that succinate accumulates in the hypoxic retina of rodents and, via its cognate receptor G protein–coupled receptor-91 (GPR91), is a potent mediator of vessel growth in the settings of both normal retinal development and proliferative ischemic retinopathy. The effects of GPR91 are mediated by retinal ganglion neurons (RGCs), which, in response to increased succinate levels, regulate the production of numerous angiogenic factors including VEGF. Accordingly, succinate did not have proangiogenic effects in RGC-deficient rats. Our observations show a pathway of metabolite signaling where succinate, acting through GPR91, governs retinal angiogenesis and show the propensity of RGCs to act as sensors of ischemic stress. These findings provide a new therapeutic target for modulating revascularization.

Discrete gene sets depend on POU domain transcription factor Brn3b/Brn-3.2/POU4f2 for their expression in the mouse embryonic retina

Brn3b/Brn-3.2/POU4f2 is a POU domain transcription factor that is essential for retinal ganglion cell (RGC) differentiation, axonal outgrowth and survival. Our goal was to establish a link between Brn3b and the downstream events leading to RGC differentiation. We sought to determine both the number and types of genes that depend on Brn3b for their expression. RNA probes from wild-type and Brn3b-/- E14.5, E16.5 and E18.5 mouse retinas were hybridized to a microarray containing 18,816 retina-expressed cDNAs. At E14.5, we identified 87 genes whose expression was significantly altered in the absence of Brn3b and verified the results by real-time PCR and in situ hybridization. These genes fell into discrete sets that encoded transcription factors, proteins associated with neuron integrity and function, and secreted signaling molecules. We found that Brn3b influenced gene expression in non RGCs of the retina by controlling the expression of secreted signaling molecules such as sonic hedgehog and myostatin/Gdf8. At later developmental stages, additional alterations in gene expression were secondary consequences of aberrant RGC differentiation caused by the absence of Brn3b. Our results demonstrate that a small but crucial fraction of the RGC transcriptome is dependent on Brn3b. The Brn3b-dependent gene sets therefore provide a unique molecular signature for the developing retina.

Gene regulation logic in retinal ganglion cell development: Isl1 defines a critical branch distinct from but overlapping with Pou4f2

Understanding gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that control neuronal differentiation will provide systems-level perspectives on neurogenesis. We have previously constructed a model for a GRN in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) differentiation in which four hierarchical tiers of transcription factors ultimately control the expression of downstream terminal genes. Math5 occupies a central node in the hierarchy because it is essential for the formation of RGCs and the expression of the immediate downstream factor Pou4f2. Based on its expression, we also proposed that Isl1, a LIM-homeodomain factor, functions in parallel with Pou4f2 and downstream of Math5 in the RGC GRN. To determine whether this was the case, a conditional Isl1 allele was generated and deleted specifically in the developing retina. Although RGCs formed in Isl1-deleted retinas, most underwent apoptosis, and few remained at later stages. By microarray analysis, we identified a distinct set of genes whose expression depended on Isl1. These genes are all downstream of Math5, and some of them, but not all, also depend on Pou4f2. Additionally, Isl1 was required for the sustained expression of Pou4f2, suggesting that Isl1 positively regulates Pou4f2 after Math5 levels are diminished. The results demonstrate an essential role for Isl1 in RGC development and reveal two distinct but intersecting branches of the RGC GRN downstream of Math5, one directed by Pou4f2 and the other by Isl1. They also reveal that identical RGC expression patterns are achieved by different combinations of divergent inputs from upstream transcription factors.

Ganglion Cells Are Required for Normal Progenitor- Cell Proliferation but Not Cell-Fate Determination or Patterning in the Developing Mouse Retina

The vertebrate retina develops from an amorphous sheet of dividing retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) through a sequential process that culminates in an exquisitely patterned neural tissue. A current model for retinal development posits that sequential cell-type differentiation is the result of changes in the intrinsic competence state of multipotent RPCs as they advance in time and that the intrinsic changes are influenced by continuous changes in the extracellular environment. Although several studies support the proposition that newly differentiated cells alter the extrinsic state of the developing retina, it is still far from clear what role they play in modifying the extracellular environment and in influencing the properties of RPCs. Here, we specifically ablate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as they differentiate, and we determine the impact of RGC absence on retinal development. We find that RGCs are not essential for changing the competence of RPCs, but they are necessary for maintaining sufficient numbers of RPCs by regulating cell proliferation via growth factors. Intrinsic rather than extrinsic factors are likely to play the critical roles in determining retinal cell fate.

Retinal ganglion cell differentiation in cultured mouse retinal explants

The availability of genetically engineered mice harboring specific mutations in genes affecting one or more retinal cell types affords new opportunities for investigating the genetic regulatory mechanisms of vertebrate retina formation. When identifying critical regulatory genes involved in retina development it is often advantageous to complement in vivo analysis with in vitro characterization. In particular, by combining classical techniques of retinal explant culturing with gene transfer procedures relying on herpes simple virus (HSV) amplicon vectors, gain-of-function analysis with genes of interest can be performed quickly and efficiently. Here, details are provided for isolating and culturing explants containing retinal progenitor cells and for infecting the explants with HSV expression vectors that perturb or rescue retinal ganglion cells, the first cell type to differentiate in the retina. In addition, the availability of sensitive techniques to monitor gene expression, including detection of reporter gene expression using antibodies and detection of endogenous marker gene expression using quantitative RT-PCR, provides an effective means for comparing wild-type and mutant retinas from genetically engineered mice.

Onecut 1 and Onecut 2 Are Potential Regulators of Mouse Retinal Development

Our current study focuses on the expression of two members of the onecut transcription factor family, Onecut1 (Oc1) and Onecut2 (Oc2), in the developing mouse retina. By immunofluorescence staining, we found that Oc1 and Oc2 had very similar expression patterns throughout retinal development. Both factors started to be expressed in the retina at around embryonic day (E) 11.5. At early stages (E11.5 and E12.5), they were expressed in both the neuroblast layer (NBL) and ganglion cell layer (GCL). As development progressed (from E14.5 to postnatal day [P] 0), expression diminished in the retinal progenitor cells and became more restricted to the GCL. By P5, Oc1 and Oc2 were expressed at very low levels in the GCL. By co‐labeling with transcription factors known to be involved in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) development, we found that Oc1 and Oc2 had extensive overlap with Math5 in the NBL, and that they completely overlapped with Pou4f2 and Isl1 in the GCL, but only partially in the NBL. Co‐labeling of Oc1 with cell cycle markers confirmed that Oc1 was expressed in both proliferating retinal progenitors and postmitotic retinal cells. In addition, we demonstrated that expression of Oc1 and Oc2 did not require Math5, Isl1, or Pou4f2. Thus, Oc1 and Oc2 may regulate the formation of RGCs in a pathway independent of Math5, Pou4f2, and Isl1. Furthermore, we showed that Oc1 and Oc2 were expressed in both developing and mature horizontal cells (HCs). Therefore the two factors may also function in the genesis and maintenance of HCs. J. Comp. Neurol. 520:952–969, 2012.

Onecut1 and Onecut2 redundantly regulate early retinal cell fates during development

Significance We show that the onecut transcription factors, Onecut1 and Onecut2, redundantly regulate the formation of all four early-born retinal cell types, namely horizontal cells, ganglion cells, cones, and amacrine cells, and prevent precocious formation of the late retinal cell type, rods. Expression profiling suggests these two factors regulate a shared set of downstream genes to maintain competence for the early retinal cell types and to regulate generation of various subtypes of retinal ganglion cells. This study lays the foundation for further examination of how onecut factors regulate cell differentiation in the retina, as well as in the central nervous system in general. Previously, we have shown that Onecut1 (Oc1) and Onecut2 (Oc2) are expressed in retinal progenitor cells, developing retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), and horizontal cells (HCs). However, in Oc1-null mice, we only observed an 80% reduction in HCs, but no defects in other cell types. We postulated that the lack of defects in other cell types in Oc1-null retinas was a result of redundancy with Oc2. To test this theory, we have generated Oc2-null mice and now show that their retinas also only have defects in HCs, with a 50% reduction in their numbers. However, when both Oc1 and Oc2 are knocked out, the retinas exhibit more profound defects in the development of all early retinal cell types, including completely failed genesis of HCs, compromised generation of cones, reduced production (by 30%) of RGCs, and absence of starburst amacrine cells. Cone subtype diversification and RGC subtype composition also were affected in the double-null retina. Using RNA-Seq expression profiling, we have identified downstream genes of Oc1 and Oc2, which not only confirms the redundancy between the two factors and renders a molecular explanation for the defects in the double-null retinas, but also shows that the onecut factors suppress the production of the late cell type, rods, indicating that the two factors contribute to the competence of retinal progenitor cells for the early retinal cell fates. Our results provide insight into how onecut factors regulate the creation of cellular diversity in the retina and, by extension, in the central nervous system in general.

The deletion of Math5 disrupts retinal blood vessel and glial development in mice.

Retinal vascular development is a complex process that is not yet fully understood. The majority of research in this area has focused on astrocytes and the template they form in the inner retina, which precedes endothelial cells in the mouse retina. In humans and dogs, however, astrocyte migration follows behind development of blood vessels, suggesting that other cell types may guide this process. One such cell type is the ganglion cell, which differentiates before blood vessel formation and lies adjacent to the primary retinal vascular plexus. The present study investigated the potential role played by ganglion cells in vascular development using Math5(-/-) mice. It has previously been reported that Math5 regulates the differentiation of ganglion cells and Math5(-/-) mice have a 95% reduction in these cells. The development of blood vessels and glia was investigated using Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4 labeling and GFAP immunohistochemistry, respectively. JB-4 analysis demonstrated that the hyaloid vessels arose from choriovitreal vessels adjacent to the optic nerve area. As previously reported, Math5(-/-) mice had a rudimentary optic nerve. The primary retinal vessels did not develop post-natally in the Math5(-/-) mice, however, branches of the hyaloid vasculature eventually dove into the retina and formed the inner retinal capillary networks. An astrocyte template only formed in some areas of the Math5(-/-) retina. In addition, GFAP(+) Müller cells were seen throughout the retina that had long processes wrapped around the hyaloid vessels. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed Müller cell abnormalities and revealed disruptions in the inner limiting membrane. The present data demonstrates that the loss of ganglion cells in the Math5(-/-) mice is associated with a lack of retinal vascular development.

Two transcription factors, Pou4f2 and Isl1, are sufficient to specify the retinal ganglion cell fate

Significance Despite the progress made during the last two decades regarding the generation of retinal cell types, the mechanisms by which a retinal progenitor cell decides to adopt a particular cell type remain unclear. Using a binary knockin-transgenic system, we show that two factors, POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 2 (Pou4f2) and insulin gene enhancer protein 1 (Isl1), specify the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) fate and activate the whole gene-expression program required for ganglion cell differentiation. This study, for the first time to our knowledge, defines a set of determinant factors for any retinal cell type, offering significant insight into how cellular diversity is achieved in the central nervous system. It also provides guidance for generating RGCs in vitro for therapeutic purposes. As with other retinal cell types, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) arise from multipotent retinal progenitor cells (RPCs), and their formation is regulated by a hierarchical gene-regulatory network (GRN). Within this GRN, three transcription factors—atonal homolog 7 (Atoh7), POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 2 (Pou4f2), and insulin gene enhancer protein 1 (Isl1)—occupy key node positions at two different stages of RGC development. Atoh7 is upstream and is required for RPCs to gain competence for an RGC fate, whereas Pou4f2 and Isl1 are downstream and regulate RGC differentiation. However, the genetic and molecular basis for the specification of the RGC fate, a key step in RGC development, remains unclear. Here we report that ectopic expression of Pou4f2 and Isl1 in the Atoh7-null retina using a binary knockin-transgenic system is sufficient for the specification of the RGC fate. The RGCs thus formed are largely normal in gene expression, survive to postnatal stages, and are physiologically functional. Our results indicate that Pou4f2 and Isl1 compose a minimally sufficient regulatory core for the RGC fate. We further conclude that during development a core group of limited transcription factors, including Pou4f2 and Isl1, function downstream of Atoh7 to determine the RGC fate and initiate RGC differentiation.

The LIM homeobox gene Isl1 is required for the correct development of the striatonigral pathway in the mouse

Significance The basal ganglia process cortical information that controls purposeful movements and appropriate behavior via the striatopallidal and striatonigral pathways. Despite their importance, little is known about the developmental mechanisms that control the formation of these pathways. We show here that telencephalic progenitors expressing the transcription factor Islet1 give rise to striatonigral neurons and that this factor is required for normal development of the striatonigral pathway. Moreover, Islet1 mouse mutants exhibit hyperactivity and a paradoxical response to psychostimulants. Given that the underlying causes of basal ganglia disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are unknown, these findings may implicate possible alterations in neural circuitry. The mammalian striatum controls the output of the basal ganglia via two distinct efferent pathways, the direct (i.e., striatonigral) and the indirect (i.e., striatopallidal) pathways. The LIM homeodomain transcription factor Islet1 (Isl1) is expressed in a subpopulation of striatal progenitors; however, its specific role in striatal development remains unknown. Our genetic fate-mapping results show that Isl1-expressing progenitors give rise to striatal neurons belonging to the striatonigral pathway. Conditional inactivation of Isl1 in the telencephalon resulted in a smaller striatum with fewer striatonigral neurons and reduced projections to the substantia nigra. Additionally, conditional inactivation in the ventral forebrain (including both the telencephalon and diencephalon) revealed a unique role for Isl1 in diencephalic cells bordering the internal capsule for the normal development of the striatonigral pathway involving PlexinD1-Semaphorin 3e (Sema3e) signaling. Finally, Isl1 conditional mutants displayed a hyperlocomotion phenotype, and their locomotor response to psychostimulants was significantly blunted, indicating that the alterations in basal ganglia circuitry contribute to these mutant behaviors.