Xizhong Cui

Bundled care for septic shock: An analysis of clinical trials

Context: Sepsis bundles have been developed to improve patient outcomes by combining component therapies. Valid bundles require effective components with additive benefits. Proponents encourage evaluation of bundles, both as a whole and based on the performance of each component. Objective: Assess the association between outcome and the utilization of component therapies in studies of sepsis bundles. Data Source: Database searches (January 1980 to July 2008) of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, using the terms sepsis, bundles, guidelines, and early goal directed therapy. Data Extraction: Inclusion required comparison of septic adults who received bundled care vs. nonprotocolized care. Survival and use rates for individual interventions were abstracted. Main Results: Eight unblinded trials, one randomized and seven with historical controls, were identified. Sepsis bundles were associated with a consistent (I2 = 0%, p = .87) and significant increase in survival (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.49–2.45; p < .0001). For all studies reporting such data, there were consistent (I2 = 0%, p ≥ .64) decreases in time to antibiotics, and increases in the appropriateness of antibiotics (p ≤ .0002 for both). In contrast, significant heterogeneity was seen across trials for all other treatments (antibiotic use within a specified time period; administration of fluids, vasopressors, inotropes, and packed red blood cells titrated to hemodynamic goals; corticosteroids and human recombinant activated protein C use) (all I2 ≥ 67%, p < .002). Except for antibiotics, sepsis bundle components are still being investigated for efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Conclusion: Bundle use was associated with consistent and significant improvement in survival and antibiotic use. Use of other bundle components changed heterogeneously across studies, making their impact on survival uncertain. However, this analysis should be interpreted cautiously as these studies were unblinded, and only one was randomized.

Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: One size does not fit all.

In this issue of Critical Care Medicine, Dr. Kallet and colleagues (1) report a significant improvement in mortality in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI) who received lung protective ventilation based on the recommendations of the ARDS Network trial

Eritoran tetrasodium (E5564) treatment for sepsis: review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Introduction: Sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite years of extensive research, effective drugs that inhibit the pro-inflammatory effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and improve outcome when added to conventional sepsis treatments are lacking. Eritoran tetrasodium (E5564) is a promising candidate therapy for sepsis belonging to a new class of such drugs which inhibit LPS-induced inflammation by blocking toll-like receptor 4. Areas covered: This review focuses on the rationale for the use of eritoran tetrasodium in sepsis as well as on its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety. Preclinical and clinical studies from a MEDLINE/PubMed literature search in August 2010 with the search terms ‘eritoran’ and ‘E5564’ are discussed. Expert opinion: Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies of eritoran tetrasodium indicate it can limit excessive inflammatory mediator release associated with LPS and improve survival in sepsis models. While early clinical results are promising, its efficacy and safety for treating patients with sepsis are currently under investigation. Even if the ongoing Phase III clinical trial enrolling patients with severe sepsis and increased risk of death shows benefit from eritoran, questions remain and confirmatory studies would be necessary to define its clinical usage.

An overview of anthrax infection including the recently identified form of disease in injection drug users

PurposeBacillus anthracis infection (anthrax) can be highly lethal. Two recent outbreaks related to contaminated mail in the USA and heroin in the UK and Europe and its potential as a bioterrorist weapon have greatly increased concerns over anthrax in the developed world.MethodsThis review summarizes the microbiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of anthrax.Results and conclusionsAnthrax, a gram-positive bacterium, has typically been associated with three forms of infection: cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and inhalational. However, the anthrax outbreak among injection drug users has emphasized the importance of what is now considered a fourth disease form (i.e., injectional anthrax) that is characterized by severe soft tissue infection. While cutaneous anthrax is most common, its early stages are distinct and prompt appropriate treatment commonly produces a good outcome. However, early symptoms with the other three disease forms can be nonspecific and mistaken for less lethal conditions. As a result, patients with gastrointestinal, inhalational, or injectional anthrax may have advanced infection at presentation that can be highly lethal. Once anthrax is suspected, the diagnosis can usually be made with gram stain and culture from blood or tissue followed by confirmatory testing (e.g., PCR). While antibiotics are the mainstay of anthrax treatment, use of adjunctive therapies such as anthrax toxin antagonists are a consideration. Prompt surgical therapy appears to be important for successful management of injectional anthrax.

Bacillus anthracis Edema and Lethal Toxin Have Different Hemodynamic Effects but Function Together to Worsen Shock and Outcome in a Rat Model

INTRODUCTION To better define the contribution of edema toxins (ETx) and lethal toxins (LeTx) to shock with Bacillus anthracis, recombinant preparations of each were investigated alone or together in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS Lethal dose ranges (0%-100% lethality) of ETx (200-800 microg/kg as a 24-h infusion) were higher than those of LeTx (12.5-200 microg/kg) (P<.0001). However, compared with LeTx, similarly lethal ETx doses produced earlier and greater reductions in mean blood pressure (MBP) and increased, rather than decreased, heart rate (HR) (P<.05 for all). Combining either similar weight or lethal doses of ETx and LeTx increased the hazard ratio for death (log +/- standard error) similar to the sum calculated with the toxins effects alone (2.6+/-1.1 observed vs. 2.9+/-1.0 calculated for similar weight and 3.1+/-1.0 vs. 3.9+/-1.5 for similar lethal doses; P=.5 for both). Early (< or =10 h) and late during infusion, ETx and LeTx together also altered MBP and HR in patterns consistent with the sum of their individual effects. CONCLUSIONS ETx was approximately 10 times less lethal than LeTx but produced greater hypotension and added to the latters harmful effects. These findings suggest that it may be appropriate for antitoxin therapies for B. anthracis to target both ETx and LeTx.

Late Treatment with a Protective Antigen-Directed Monoclonal Antibody Improves Hemodynamic Function and Survival in a Lethal Toxin-Infused Rat Model of Anthrax Sepsis

BACKGROUND In animal models, treatment with 5H3, a fully human protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody (PA-MAb), improved survival when administered close to the time of Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin (LeTx) bolus or live bacterial challenge. However, treatment with PA-MAb would be most valuable clinically if it were beneficial even when administered after the onset of shock and lethality due to LeTx. METHODS We investigated the effects of PA-MAb versus placebo administered in rats (n=324) at the time of or 3, 6, 9, or 12 h after the initiation of a 24-h LeTx infusion. RESULTS In rats receiving placebo, mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were decreased in nonsurvivors, compared with those in survivors, at 6 h and then worsened further, with lethality first evident at 8 h (median, 16 h; range, 8-152 h). At each treatment time, survival rates were greater for PA-MAb than for placebo, although improvement was decreased at later treatment times (P=.001, for the effect of time). Compared with placebo, PA-MAb significantly increased MBP during the 12 h after the initiation of treatment, but the increase was greatest for treatment at 3 h; similarly, PA-MAb significantly increased HR at all treatment times. CONCLUSION In this rat model, improvements in outcome due to PA-MAb were significant when it was administered up to 6 h (and approached significance when administered up to 12 h) after initial exposure to LeTx. Clinically, PA-MAb may be beneficial even when administered after the onset of shock and lethality due to LeTx.

The evolving experience with therapeutic TNF inhibition in sepsis: considering the potential influence of risk of death

Introduction: Septic shock is highly lethal and its incidence is increasing. Although TNF-α plays a key role in sepsis pathogenesis, past efforts to therapeutically inhibit it had limited success. However, there is continued interest in such therapies and there are now ongoing Phase II sepsis trials testing the effects of AZD9773, a TNF-directed polyclonal antibody fragment preparation. Experience with anti-inflammatory agents suggested that their efficacy may relate to sepsis-associated risk of death. Areas covered: An overview of the biology of TNF and experimental data implicating TNF as a key mediator in sepsis pathogenesis; a review of the earlier clinical experience with anti-TNF therapies demonstrating that when examined across 12 trials, these agents had a highly consistent overall effect which although not reaching significance, was on the side of benefit; a review of data showing that sepsis-associated risk of death may influence the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents like anti-TNF ones and a review of the rational and clinical experience to date with AZD9773 and its precursor, CytoFab. Expert opinion: Discusses variables that may need to be accounted for to maximize the success of clinical trials in sepsis testing agents that modulate host inflammation.

The Heart Is an Early Target of Anthrax Lethal Toxin in Mice: A Protective Role for Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase (nNOS)

Anthrax lethal toxin (LT) induces vascular insufficiency in experimental animals through unknown mechanisms. In this study, we show that neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) deficiency in mice causes strikingly increased sensitivity to LT, while deficiencies in the two other NOS enzymes (iNOS and eNOS) have no effect on LT-mediated mortality. The increased sensitivity of nNOS−/− mice was independent of macrophage sensitivity to toxin, or cytokine responses, and could be replicated in nNOS-sufficient wild-type (WT) mice through pharmacological inhibition of the enzyme with 7-nitroindazole. Histopathological analyses showed that LT induced architectural changes in heart morphology of nNOS−/− mice, with rapid appearance of novel inter-fiber spaces but no associated apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. LT-treated WT mice had no histopathology observed at the light microscopy level. Electron microscopic analyses of LT-treated mice, however, revealed striking pathological changes in the hearts of both nNOS−/− and WT mice, varying only in severity and timing. Endothelial/capillary necrosis and degeneration, inter-myocyte edema, myofilament and mitochondrial degeneration, and altered sarcoplasmic reticulum cisternae were observed in both LT-treated WT and nNOS−/− mice. Furthermore, multiple biomarkers of cardiac injury (myoglobin, cardiac troponin-I, and heart fatty acid binding protein) were elevated in LT-treated mice very rapidly (by 6 h after LT injection) and reached concentrations rarely reported in mice. Cardiac protective nitrite therapy and allopurinol therapy did not have beneficial effects in LT-treated mice. Surprisingly, the potent nitric oxide scavenger, carboxy-PTIO, showed some protective effect against LT. Echocardiography on LT-treated mice indicated an average reduction in ejection fraction following LT treatment in both nNOS−/− and WT mice, indicative of decreased contractile function in the heart. We report the heart as an early target of LT in mice and discuss a protective role for nNOS against LT-mediated cardiac damage.

Anthrax Lethal and Edema Toxins Produce Different Patterns of Cardiovascular and Renal Dysfunction and Synergistically Decrease Survival in Canines

BACKGROUND High mortality in the 2001 US and recent European anthrax outbreaks suggests that better understanding of the effects of the toxins produced by this bacterium is needed to improve treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS Here, 24-h edema (ETx) and lethal (LeTx) toxin infusions were investigated for 96 hin sedated canines receiving mechanical ventilation. The initial study compared similarly lethal doses of ETx (n=8) or LeTx (n=15) alone. ETx was 24 times less lethal than LeTx, and the median time to death in nonsurvivors (n=6 and n=9, respectively) was shorter with ETx (42 vs 67 h; P=.04). Compared with controls(n=9), both toxins decreased arterial and central venous pressures and systemic vascular resistance and increased heart rate, cardiac index, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, creatinine (Cr) concentration, BUN:Cr ratio, and hepatic transaminase levels (P ≤ .05 for toxin effect or time interaction). However, ETx stimulated early diuresis,reduced serum sodium levels, and had more pronounced vasodilatory effects, compared with LeTx, as reflected by greater or earlier central venous pressures, systemic vascular resistance, and changes in the BUN:Cr ratio(P ≤ .01). LeTx progressively decreased the left ventricular ejection fraction (P ≤ .002). In a subsequent study, a lethal dose of LeTx with an equimolar nonlethal ETx dose (n=8) increased mortality, compared with LeTx alone (n=8; P= .05). CONCLUSION Shock with ETx or LeTx may require differing supportive therapies, whereas toxin antagonists should likely target both toxins.

Sublethal Doses of Bacillus anthracis Lethal Toxin Inhibit Inflammation with Lipopolysaccharide and Escherichia coli Challenge but Have Opposite Effects on Survival

BACKGROUND On the basis of the findings of previous in vitro studies, we hypothesized that anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx) would have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo. METHODS We investigated the effects of sublethal doses of LeTx in rats receiving intravascular challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or intratracheal challenge with Escherichia coli. RESULTS In rats receiving 24-h infusions of LPS, compared with control rats, pretreatment with high or low sublethal doses of LeTx 3 h before infusion produced similar patterns of reduction in the hazards ratio (HR) of survival at 168 h (0.60 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.37-0.98]; P=.03, for the doses combined). LeTx increased mean arterial blood pressure throughout the period of LPS infusion (P=.001); decreased the levels of 10 of 13 cytokines assessed (i.e., interleukin [IL]-1 alpha , IL-1 beta , IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon- gamma , tumor necrosis factor- alpha , granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, migratory inhibitory protein [MIP]-1 alpha , MIP-2, MIP-3 alpha , and RANTES) at 2 h; decreased all 13 cytokine levels at 8 h; decreased only 4 cytokine levels at 24 h; and decreased the plasma level of nitric oxide (NO) at 8 h and 24 h but not at 2 h (P< or =.02, for the effect of LeTx, across time, on both cytokine levels and the NO level). Although pretreatment with LeTx before challenge with E. coli altered mean arterial blood pressure, cytokine levels, and the NO level in a pattern similar to that noted in association with LPS infusion, it increased the HR in a pattern different from that associated with LPS (4.36 [95% CI, 0.3-63.4]; P=.04, for the effects of LeTx with LPS vs. E. coli). CONCLUSION Inhibition of inflammation with LeTx can occur in vivo, and, although beneficial with noninfectious stimuli, it may be harmful with bacteria.