Xu Xiong
Tulane University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xu Xiong.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2006
Xu Xiong; Pierre Buekens; William D. Fraser; J Beck; Steven Offenbacher
Background Recent studies suggest that periodontal disease, as a source of subclinical and persistent infection, may induce systemic inflammatory responses that increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1999
Xu Xiong; Damon Mayes; Nestor Demianczuk; David M. Olson; Sandra T. Davidge; Christine V. Newburn-Cook; L. Duncan Saunders
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of pregnancy-induced hypertension on fetal growth. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the basis of 16,936 births from January 1, 1989, through December 31, 1990, by means of data from a population-based perinatal database in Suzhou, China. Pregnancy-induced hypertension was classified as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or severe preeclampsia-eclampsia. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of the various types of pregnancy-induced hypertension on gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. RESULTS Gestation was 0.6 week shorter in women with severe preeclampsia than in normotensive women (P <.01). However, the risk of preterm birth was not increased with any classification of pregnancy-induced hypertension (for severe preeclampsia: adjusted odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-3.47). After adjustment for duration of gestation and other confounders, preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia increased the risk of intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight. The adjusted odds ratios of low birth weight were 2.65 (1.73-4.39) for preeclampsia and 2.53 (1.19-4.93) for severe preeclampsia. However, the risk of low birth weight was not increased significantly for gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio 1.56 [1.00-2.41]). CONCLUSION Preeclampsia increases the risk of intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight.
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences | 2008
Xu Xiong; Emily W. Harville; Donald R. Mattison; Karen Elkind-Hirsch; Gabriella Pridjian; Pierre Buekens
Background:Little is known about the effects of natural disasters on pregnancy outcomes. We studied mental health and birth outcomes among women exposed to Hurricane Katrina. Methods:We collected data prospectively from a cohort of 301 women from New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Pregnant women were interviewed during pregnancy about their experiences during the hurricane, and whether they had experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression. High hurricane exposure was defined as having 3 or more of the 8 severe hurricane experiences, such as feeling that ones life was in danger, walking through floodwaters, or having a loved one die. Results:The frequency of low birth weight was higher in women with high hurricane exposure (14.0%) than women without high hurricane exposure (4.7%), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–9.89; P < 0.01. The frequency of preterm birth was higher in women with high hurricane exposure (14.0%) than women without high hurricane exposure (6.3%), with aOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 0.82–6.38; P > 0.05. There were no significant differences in the frequency of low birth weight or preterm birth between women with PTSD or depression and women without PTSD or depression (P > 0.05). Conclusions:Women who had high hurricane exposure were at an increased risk of having low birth weight infants. Rather than a general exposure to disaster, exposure to specific severe disaster events and the intensity of the disaster experience may be better predictors of poor pregnancy outcomes. To prevent poor pregnancy outcomes during and after disasters, future disaster preparedness may need to include the planning of earlier evacuation of pregnant women to minimize their exposure to severe disaster events.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2010
Hairong Xu; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas; Xu Xiong; Hortensia Reyes; Chantal Roy; Pierre Julien; Graeme N. Smith; Peter von Dadelszen; Line Leduc; François Audibert; Jean-Marie Moutquin; Bruno Piedboeuf; Bryna Shatenstein; Socorro Parra-Cabrera; Pierre Choquette; Stephanie Winsor; Stephen Wood; Alice Benjamin; Mark Walker; Michael Helewa; J. Dubé; Georges Tawagi; Gareth Seaward; Arne Ohlsson; Laura A. Magee; Femi Olatunbosun; Robert Gratton; Roberta Shear; Nestor Demianczuk; Jean-Paul Collet
OBJECTIVE We sought to investigate whether prenatal vitamin C and E supplementation reduces the incidence of gestational hypertension (GH) and its adverse conditions among high- and low-risk women. STUDY DESIGN In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, women were stratified by the risk status and assigned to daily treatment (1 g vitamin C and 400 IU vitamin E) or placebo. The primary outcome was GH and its adverse conditions. RESULTS Of the 2647 women randomized, 2363 were included in the analysis. There was no difference in the risk of GH and its adverse conditions between groups (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.26). However, vitamins C and E increased the risk of fetal loss or perinatal death (nonprespecified) as well as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. CONCLUSION Vitamin C and E supplementation did not reduce the rate of preeclampsia or GH, but increased the risk of fetal loss or perinatal death and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey | 2007
Xu Xiong; Pierre Buekens; Sotirios Vastardis; Stella M. Yu
To examine the existing evidence on the relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, we conducted a systematic review of studies published up to December 2006. Studies published in full text were identified by searching computerized databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE). A meta-analysis was performed to pool the effect size of the clinical trials. Forty-four studies were identified (26 case–control studies, 13 cohort studies, and 5 controlled trials). The studies focused on preterm low birth weight, low birth weight, preterm birth, birth weight by gestational age, miscarriage or pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Of the chosen studies, 29 suggested an association between periodontal disease and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome (odds ratios [ORs] ranging from 1.10 to 20.0) and 15 found no evidence of an association (ORs ranging from 0.78 to 2.54). A meta-analysis of the clinical trials suggested that oral prophylaxis and periodontal treatment may reduce the rate of preterm low birth weight (pooled risk ratio (RR): 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30–0.95, P < 0.05), but did not significantly reduce the rates of preterm birth (pooled RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.55–1.11, P > 0.05) or low birth weight (pooled RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.58–1.29, P > 0.05). The authors conclude that periodontal disease may be associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed in this field. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the provision of periodontal treatment during pregnancy for the purpose of reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to state that the published literature is not vigorous to clinically link periodontal disease and/or its treatment to specific adverse pregnancy outcomes, and explain that more rigorous studies with world-wide agreed-upon definitions are particularly needed before periodontal disease treatment can be recommended.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2005
Julie Sénécal; Xu Xiong; William D. Fraser
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of fetal position on 1) second-stage labor duration and 2) indicators of maternal and neonatal morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a database from a previously reported randomized clinical trial. The data set includes 210 women with the fetus in a posterior position, 200 women with the fetus in a transverse position, and 1,198 women with the fetus in an anterior position. Mean durations of the second stage of labor for different fetal positions were compared using Tukey studentized test. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to examine the determinants of prolonged second-stage duration (≥ 3 hours). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to graph and compare the duration of the second stage of labor for spontaneous delivery according to the fetal position at full dilatation and study group. RESULTS: Fetal malposition at full dilatation was associated with a significantly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, oxytocin administration before full cervical dilatation, episiotomy, severe perineal laceration, and maternal blood loss of more than 500 mL (all P values < .01). Compared with the occiput anterior positions, there were significant differences in the duration of the second stage of labor, with a mean of 3.1 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0–3.2) for occiput anterior positions, 3.6 hours (95% CI 3.3–3.9) for occiput transverse positions (P < .05), and 3.8 hours (95% CI 3.5–4.1) for occiput posterior positions (P < .05) in the delayed pushing group. For the early pushing group, means were 2.2 hours (95% CI 2.1–2.3) for occiput anterior positions, 2.5 hours (95% CI 2.3–2.8) for occiput transverse positions (P < .05), and 3.0 hours (95% CI 2.7–3.3) for occiput posterior positions (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Fetal malposition at full dilatation results in a higher risk of prolonged second stage of labor and increases maternal morbidity indicators. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey | 2010
Emily W. Harville; Xu Xiong; Pierre Buekens
Background. The empirical literature on the effects of disaster on pregnancy and the postpartum period is limited. The objective of this review was to examine the existing evidence on the effect of disasters on perinatal health. Methods. A systematic review was conducted by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, PsycInfo), including literature on disasters and pregnancy outcomes (e.g., preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies), mental health, and child development. A total of 110 articles were identified, but many published reports were anecdotes or recommendations rather than systematic studies. The final review included 49 peer-reviewed studies that met inclusion criteria. Results. Studies addressing the World Trade Center disaster of September 11 and other terrorist attacks, environmental/chemical disasters, and natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes were identified. Disasters of various types may reduce fetal growth in some women, although there does not appear to be an effect on gestational age at birth. Severity of exposure is the major predictor of mental health issues among pregnant and postpartum women. After a disaster, mental health of the mother may more strongly influence on child development than any direct effect of disaster-related prenatal stress. Conclusions. There is evidence that disaster impacts maternal mental health and some perinatal health outcomes, particular among highly exposed women. Future research should focus on understudied outcomes such as spontaneous abortion. Relief workers and clinicians should concentrate on the most exposed women, particularly with respect to mental health. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists Learning Objectives: After completion of this educational activity, the obstetrician/gynecologist should be better able to compare and contrast the effects of different types of disasters (hurricanes, earthquakes, chemical spills) on pregnant and postpartum women in order to prepare for patient care in the aftermath of such disasters; differentiate the birth outcomes likely to be affected by disaster, in order to identify patients likely to be at high risk; and assess the extent to which pregnant and postpartum women are a uniquely vulnerable population after disaster, to assist in organizing care under such circumstances.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2014
Elizabeth J. Howard; Xu Xiong; Yves Carlier; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Pierre Buekens
Chagas disease is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and is endemic in much of Latin America. With increased globalisation and immigration, it is a risk in any country, partly through congenital transmission. The frequency of congenital transmission is unclear.
Journal of Periodontology | 2009
Xu Xiong; Karen Elkind-Hirsch; Sotirios Vastardis; Robert L. Delarosa; Gabriella Pridjian; Pierre Buekens
BACKGROUND Few studies have specifically examined the relationship between periodontal disease and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The objective of this study was to examine whether maternal periodontal disease is associated with GDM. METHODS A case-control study was conducted of 53 pregnant women with GDM and 106 pregnant women without GDM at Womans Hospital, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The periodontal examinations were performed by a calibrated dentist who was masked to the diabetic status of the pregnant women. Periodontitis was defined as the presence of any site with a probing depth (PD) >or=4 mm or a clinical attachment loss (AL) >or=4 mm. The severity of periodontal disease was measured in quartiles of PD and clinical AL. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine the relationships between periodontal disease and GDM. RESULTS The percentage of periodontitis was 77.4% in women with GDM and 57.5% in women without GDM, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.5 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.2 to 5.3. After adjusting for confounding variables of maternal age, parity, race, marital status, education, family income, smoking, alcohol consumption, systemic antibiotics during pregnancy, family history of diabetes, income, dental insurance coverage, and body mass index, the adjusted OR (95% CI) was 2.6 (1.1 to 6.1). The adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of GDM comparing the highest-to-lowest quartiles of PD and clinical AL were 3.8 (1.0 to 14.0) and 4.5 (1.2 to 16.9). CONCLUSION This study supports the hypothesis of an association between periodontal disease and GDM.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2009
Emily W. Harville; Xu Xiong; Gabriella Pridjian; Karen Elkind-Hirsch; Pierre Buekens
BackgroundNatural disaster is often a cause of psychopathology, and women are vulnerable to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Depression is also common after a woman gives birth. However, no research has addressed postpartum womens mental health after natural disaster.MethodsInterviews were conducted in 2006–2007 with women who had been pregnant during or shortly after Hurricane Katrina. 292 New Orleans and Baton Rouge women were interviewed at delivery and 2 months postpartum. Depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Depression Scale and PTSD using the Post-Traumatic Stress Checklist. Women were asked about their experience of the hurricane with questions addressing threat, illness, loss, and damage. Chi-square tests and log-binomial/Poisson models were used to calculate associations and relative risks (RR).ResultsBlack women and women with less education were more likely to have had a serious experience of the hurricane. 18% of the sample met the criteria for depression and 13% for PTSD at two months postpartum. Feeling that ones life was in danger was associated with depression and PTSD, as were injury to a family member and severe impact on property. Overall, two or more severe experiences of the storm was associated with an increased risk for both depression (relative risk (RR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–2.89) and PTSD (RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.80–7.52).ConclusionPostpartum women who experience natural disaster severely are at increased risk for mental health problems, but overall rates of depression and PTSD do not seem to be higher than in studies of the general population.