Y Huo
Dresden University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Y Huo.
Europace | 2015
Marian Christoph; Carsten Wunderlich; Stefanie Moebius; Mathias Forkmann; J Sitzy; Jozef Salmas; Julia Mayer; Y Huo; Christopher Piorkowski; Thomas Gaspar
AIMS Despite the use of established 3D-mapping systems, invasive electrophysiological studies and catheter ablation require high radiation exposure of patients and medical staff. This study investigated whether electroanatomic catheter tracking in prerecorded X-ray images on top of an existing 3D-mapping system has any impact on radiation exposure. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-five consecutive patients were either ablated with the guidance of the traditional CARTO-3 system (c3) or with help of the CARTO-UNIVU system (cU): [typical atrial flutter (AFL) n = 58, drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) n = 81, ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) n = 37, accessory pathways (APs) n = 22, symptomatic, idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) n = 56, ventricular tachycardias (VTs) n = 41]. The CARTO-UNIVU allowed a reduction in radiation exposure: fluoroscopy time: AFL c3: 8.6 ± 0.8 min vs. cU: 2.9 ± 0.3 min, P < 0.001; AF c3: 16.0 ± 1.3 min vs. cU: 6.4 ± 0.9 min, P < 0.001; EAT c3: 23.4 ± 3.1 min vs. cU: 9.7 ± 1.7 min, P < 0.001; AP c3: 7.1 ± 1.2 min vs. cU: 6.0 ± 1.5 min, P = 0.59; PVCs c3: 17.6 ± 2.3 min vs. cU: 15.2 ± 2.8 min, P = 0.52; VT c3: 31.4 ± 3.4 min vs. cU: 17.5 ± 2.4 min, P = 0.003. Corresponding to the fluoroscopy time the fluoroscopy dose was also reduced significantly. These advantages were not at the cost of increased procedure times, periprocedural complications, or decreased acute ablation success rates. CONCLUSION In a wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias, and especially in AF and VT ablation, fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping contributed to a dramatic reduction in radiation exposure without prolonging procedure times and compromising patients safety. That effect, however, could not be maintained in patients with APs and PVCs.
Heart Rhythm | 2015
Y Huo; Marian Christoph; Mathias Forkmann; Matthias Pohl; Julia Mayer; Jozef Salmas; J Sitzy; Carsten Wunderlich; C. Piorkowski; T Gaspar
OBJECTIVE We explored whether the use of a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (F-EAM) system could result in a reduction of overall fluoroscopy time and radiation doses during the whole procedure of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS Eighty patients (44 men (55%); mean age 63 ± 10 years) who underwent catheter ablation due to paroxysmal AF were recruited consecutively in the present study. Patients were randomized (1:1) into 2 arms for AF ablation: one using a conventional 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system and the other using the F-EAM system. RESULTS Fluoroscopy time (10:42 [interquartile range {IQR} 8:45-12:46] minutes:seconds vs 1:45 [IQR 1:05-2:22] minutes:seconds; P < .001) and radiation doses (2440 [IQR 1593-3091] cGy·cm(2) vs 652 [IQR 326-1489] cGy·cm(2); P < .001) in the EAM group were significantly greater than those in the F-EAM group. The majority of reduction of radiation exposure was achieved after transseptal puncture, which was near-zero fluoroscopic exposure. In total, approximately 84% of fluoroscopy time and 73% of radiation doses have been reduced during the AF ablation procedure using the F-EAM system compared to using the conventional EAM system. However, procedure time did not differ significantly (1:39 [IQR 1:18-2:10] hours:minutes vs 1:37 [IQR 1:17-1:50] hours:minutes; P = .362). During follow-up (5.9 ± 1.3 months), 61 patients (76.3%) had no recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. The recurrence rate between the 2 groups did not differ. CONCLUSION AF catheter ablation using the F-EAM system was safe and resulted in a significant reduction of radiation exposure to patients and staff without complicating the workflow of the procedure. A near-zero fluoroscopic catheter ablation procedure could be performed without compromising acute/mid-term efficacy and safety.
Europace | 2018
Y Huo; T Gaspar; Matthias Pohl; J Sitzy; Utz Richter; Sebastian Neudeck; Julia Mayer; Mads Brix Kronborg; C. Piorkowski
Aims To describe the extent and distribution of low voltage zones (LVZ) in a large cohort of patients undergoing ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), and to explore baseline predictors of LVZ in these patients. Methods and results Consecutive patients who underwent a bipolar voltage map guided AF ablation, were enrolled. Voltage maps were conducted for each patient using 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system and LVZ were defined as areas of bipolar voltage < 0.5 mV. A total of 539 patients (309 male, age 65 ± 10 years) were included. Low voltage zones was present in 58 out of 292 patients with paroxysmal and 134 out of 247 persistent AF (P < 0.001). The area of LVZ was larger in patients with persistent as compare to paroxysmal AF, 5 cm2 (IQR 3-18.6) vs. 12.1 cm2 (IQR 3.6-28.5), P = 0.026, respectively. In the multivariate analysis age (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.05-1.10, P < 0.001), female gender (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.38-3.43, P = 0.001), sinoatrial node dysfunction (OR 3.90, 95%CI 1.24-12.21, P = 0.020), larger surface area of left atrium pr. cm2 (OR 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02, P = 0.016), and persistent AF (OR 5.03, 95%CI 3.20-7.90, P<0.001) were associated with presence of LVZ. Conclusion In a large cohort of patients undergoing ablation for AF, the prevalence of LVZ was higher and LVZ areas larger in patients with persistent as compared with paroxysmal AF. The most frequent localization of LVZ was anterior wall, septum and posterior wall. Presence of LVZ was associated with higher age, female gender, larger LA surface area, and sinoatrial node dysfunction.
Europace | 2018
Y Huo; M B Kronborg; J Sitzy; Utz Richter; Julia Mayer; Stefan Ulbrich; L Pu; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski
Europace | 2018
Stefan Ulbrich; Y Huo; Utz Richter; Julia Mayer; L Pu; M B Kronborg; A Zedda; J Guo; J Sitzy; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski
Europace | 2018
Y Huo; M B Kronborg; Stefan Ulbrich; A Zedda; Julia Mayer; L Pu; J Guo; Utz Richter; J Sitzy; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski
Europace | 2018
Utz Richter; M B Kronburg; Y Huo; J Sitzy; L Pu; Julia Mayer; Stefan Ulbrich; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski
Europace | 2018
T Schmidt; Mads Brix Kronborg; Y Huo; J Sitzy; Utz Richter; A Loewen; C. Piorkowski; T Gaspar
Europace | 2018
Utz Richter; Mads Brix Kronborg; Y Huo; J Sitzy; Julia Mayer; Stefan Ulbrich; L Pu; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski
Europace | 2018
Y Huo; M B Kronborg; Stefan Ulbrich; A Zedda; Julia Mayer; L Pu; J Guo; Utz Richter; J Sitzy; T Gaspar; C. Piorkowski