Y. Jessica Huang

Dosimetric effects of air pocket sizes in MammoSite® treatment as accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer

MammoSite brachytherapy system has been used as one of the accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques since 2002. The clinical results from several clinical institutions had shown comparable treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity to other APBI techniques. During MammoSite treatment, air cavities had been one of the primary issues causing treatment cancellation or delay. With the tolerance of the air volume less than 10% of the total Planning Target Volume (PTV) set, there is still no data available to show the actual dose delivered to the breast tissue with the existence of the air pocket. In this paper, Monte Carlo N‐Particle version 5 (MCNP5) was used to model a hypothesis MammoSite phantom with different sizes of air pockets, and compared to the calculation results from the treatment planning system (TPS) without heterogeneous corrections. It was found that without heterogeneous corrections, the difference between the TPS and MCNP5 calculations in the air cavity surface doses and PTV point doses can be up to 2.02% and 3.61%, respectively, using the balloon and air pocket size combinations calculated in this paper. Based on the distance from the point of interest to the balloon surface, an approximate dose can be calculated using the linear relationship found in this study. These equations provide a quick and simple way to predict the actual dose delivered to the breast soft tissue located within the PTV. With the equation applied to the dose from the TPS, the dose error caused by the air pocket during MammoSite treatment can be reduced to a minimum. PACS number: 87.53.Jw

Brachytherapy improves survival in primary vaginal cancer

PURPOSE Prospective, randomized data does not exist to guide treatment in primary vaginal cancer (PVC). We evaluated the impact of brachytherapy on survival in women with PVC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Women who received radiotherapy for PVC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. Two retrospective cohorts were created; women who received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone and those who received brachytherapy (alone or in combination of EBRT). Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was used to balance the groups according to measured covariates. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of receipt of brachytherapy on survival. RESULTS Two thousand five hundred seventeen vaginal cancer patients were identified. Squamous cell carcinoma made up 75% of tumors. Median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving EBRT alone was 3.6years (95% CI, 3.0-4.2years) versus 6.1years (95% CI 5.2-7.2years) for patients receiving brachytherapy (p=<0.001). Cox proportional hazard model revealed decrease risk of death among patients that received brachytherapy in the matched cohort (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.86). Brachytherapy reduced risk of death among patients in all stage groups. No patient demographic or tumor variables favored the use of EBRT alone. Brachytherapy was associated with a decreased risk of death for all FIGO stages. Brachytherapy benefited patients with squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.92) and adenocarcinoma (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.95). Tumors larger than 5cm had the greatest benefit from brachytherapy (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Brachytherapy should be encouraged for all suitable patients with PVC.

Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system.

This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (CM) planning target volumes (PTV) and PTVs resulting from uniform margins of 5 mm (5M) and 7 mm (7M) were explored. Through retrospective review of each patients tracking data, an individualized margin (IM) design for each patient was determined. IMRT treatment plans with identical constraints were generated for all four margin strategies and compared. The IM plans generally created the smallest PTV volumes. For similar PTV coverage, the IM plans had a lower mean bladder (rectal) dose by an average of 3.9% (2.5%), 8.5% (5.7%) and 16.2 % (9.8%) compared to 5M, 7M and CM plans, respectively. The IM plan had the lowest gEUD value of 23.8 Gy for bladder, compared to 35.1, 28.4 and 25.7, for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Likewise, the IM plan had the lowest NTCP value for rectum of 0.04, compared to 0.07, 0.06 and 0.05 for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Individualized margins can lead to significantly reduced PTV volumes and critical structure doses, while still ensuring a minimum delivered CTV dose equal to 95% of the prescribed dose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D

Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments.

The purpose of this work is to investigate if the change in plan quality with the finer leaf resolution and lower leakage of the 160 MLC would be dosimetrically significant for head and neck intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. The 160 MLC consisting of 80 leaves of 0.5 cm on each bank, a leaf span of 20 cm, and leakage of less than 0.37% without additional backup jaws was compared against the 120 Millennium MLC with 60 leaves of 0.5 and 1.0 cm, a leaf span of 14.5 cm, and leakage of 2.0%. CT image sets of 16 patients previously treated for stage III and IV head and neck carcinomas were replanned on Prowess 5.0 and Eclipse 11.0 using the 160 MLC and the 120 MLC. IMRT constraints for both sets of 6 MV plans were identical and based on RTOG 0522. Dose‐volume histograms (DVHs), minimum dose, mean dose, maximum dose, and dose to 1 cc to the organ at risks (OAR) and the planning target volume, as recommended by QUANTEC 2010, were compared. Both collimators were able to achieve the target dose to the PTVs. The dose to the organs at risk (brainstem, spinal cord, parotids, and larynx) were 1%–12% (i.e., 0.5–8 Gy for a 70 Gy prescription) lower with the 160 MLC compared to the 120 MLC, depending on the proximity of the organ to the target. The large field HN plans generated with the 160 MLC were dosimetrically advantageous for critical structures, especially those located further away from the central axis, without compromising the target volume. PACS number: 87.55 D‐

Initial experience and clinical comparison of two image guidance methods for SBRT treatment: 4DCT versus respiratory-triggered imaging

For Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) treatment of lung and liver, we quantified the differences between two image guidance methods: 4DCT and ExacTrac respiratory‐triggered imaging. Five different patients with five liver lesions and one lung lesion for a total of 19 SBRT delivered fractions were studied. For the 4DCT method, a manual registration process was used between the 4DCT image sets from initial simulation and treatment day to determine the required daily image‐guided corrections. We also used the ExacTrac respiratory‐triggered imaging capability to verify the target positioning, and calculated the differences in image guidance shifts between these two methods. The mean (standard deviation) of the observed differences in image‐guided shifts between 4DCT and ExacTrac respiratory‐triggered image guidance was left/right (L/R)=0.4(2.0)mm, anterior/posterior (A/P)=1.4(1.7) mm, superior/inferior (S/I)=2.2(2.0) mm, with no difference larger than 5.0 mm in any given direction for any individual case. The largest error occurred in the S/I direction, with a mean of 2.2 mm for the six lesions. This seems reasonable, because respiratory motion and the resulting imaging uncertainties are most pronounced in this S/I direction. Image guidance shifts derived from ExacTrac triggered imaging at two extreme breathing phases (i.e., full exhale vs. full inhale), agreed well (less than 2.0 mm) with each other. In summary, two very promising image guidance methods of 4DCT and ExacTrac respiratory‐triggered imaging were presented and the image guidance shifts were comparable for the patients evaluated in this study. PACS number: 87.55.ne

Detection of late radiation damage on left atrial fibrosis using cardiac late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose This is a proof-of-principle study investigating the feasibility of using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) to detect left atrium (LA) radiation damage. Methods and materials LGE-MRI data were acquired for 7 patients with previous external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) histories. The enhancement in LA scar was delineated and fused to the computed tomography images used in dose calculation for radiation therapy. Dosimetric and normal tissue complication probability analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between LA scar enhancement and radiation doses. Results The average LA scar volume for the subjects was 2.5 cm3 (range, 1.2-4.1 cm3; median, 2.6 cm3). The overall average of the mean dose to the LA scar was 25.9 Gy (range, 5.8-49.2 Gy). Linear relationships were found between the amount of radiation dose (mean dose) (R2 = 0.8514, P = .03) to the LA scar-enhanced volume. The ratio of the cardiac tissue change (LA scar/LA wall) also demonstrated a linear relationship with the level of radiation received by the cardiac tissue (R2 = 0.9787, P < .01). Last, the normal tissue complication probability analysis suggested a dose response function to the LA scar enhancement. Conclusions With LGE-MRI and 3-dimensional dose mapping on the treatment planning system, it is possible to define subclinical cardiac damage and distinguish intrinsic cardiac tissue change from radiation induced cardiac tissue damage. Imaging myocardial injury secondary to EBRT using MRI may be a useful modality to follow cardiac toxicity from EBRT and help identify individuals who are more susceptible to EBRT damage. LGE-MRI may provide essential information to identify early screening strategy for affected cancer survivors after EBRT treatment.

Impact of prone versus supine positioning on small bowel dose with pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy

Purpose To report the results of a prospective study that compares small bowel doses during prone and supine pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy. Methods and materials Ten patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy each had 2 intensity modulated radiation therapy plans generated: supine and prone on a belly board (PBB). Computed tomography on rails was performed weekly throughout treatment in both positions (10 scans per patient). After image fusion, doses to small bowel (SB) loops and clinical target volume were calculated for each scan. Changes between the planned and received doses were analyzed and compared between positions. The impact of bladder filling on SB dose was also assessed. Results Prone treatment was associated with significantly lower volumes of SB receiving ≥20 Gy. On average, prone on a belly board positioning reduced the volume of SB receiving a given dose of radiation by 28% compared with supine positioning. Target coverage throughout the treatment course was similar in both positions with an average minimum clinical target volume dose of 88% of the prescribed prone dose and 89% of the supine (P = .54). For supine treatment, SB dose was inversely correlated with bladder filling (P = .001-.013; P > .15 for prone). For 96% of treatments, the volume of SB that received a given dose deviated >10% from the plan. The deviation between the planned and delivered doses to SB did not differ significantly between the positions. Conclusions Prone positioning on a belly board during pelvic IMRT consistently reduces the volume of SB that receives a broad range of radiation doses. Prone IMRT is associated with interfraction dose variation to SB that is similar to that of supine positioning. These findings suggest that prone positioning with daily image guided radiation therapy is an effective method for maximizing SB sparing during pelvic IMRT.

Comparison of surface matching and target matching for image-guided pelvic radiation therapy for both supine and prone patient positions

We investigate the difference between surface matching and target matching for pelvic radiation image guidance. The uniqueness of our study is that all patients have multiple CT‐on‐rails (CTOR) scans to compare to corresponding AlignRT images. Ten patients receiving pelvic radiation were enrolled in this study. Two simulation CT scans were performed in supine and prone positions for each patient. Body surface contours were generated in treatment planning system and exported to AlignRT to serve as reference images. During treatment day, the patient was aligned to treatment isocenter with room lasers, and then scanned with both CTOR and AlignRT. Image‐guidance shifts were calculated for both modalities by comparison to the simulation CT and the differences between them were analyzed for both supine and prone positions, respectively. These procedures were performed for each patient once per week for five weeks. The difference of patient displacement between AlignRT and CTOR was analyzed. For supine position, five patients had an average difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR along any direction (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral) greater than 0.5 cm, and one patient greater than 1 cm. Four patients had a maximum difference greater than 1 cm. For prone position, seven patients had an average difference greater than 0.5 cm, and three patients greater than 1 cm. Nine patients had a maximum difference greater than 1 cm. The difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR was greater for the prone position than for the supine position. For the patients studied here, surface matching does not appear to be an advisable image‐guidance approach for pelvic radiation therapy for patients with either supine or prone position. There appears to be a potential for large alignment discrepancies (up to 2.25 cm) between surface matching and target matching. PACS number(s): 87.55.‐xWe investigate the difference between surface matching and target matching for pelvic radiation image guidance. The uniqueness of our study is that all patients have multiple CT-on-rails (CTOR) scans to compare to corresponding AlignRT images. Ten patients receiving pelvic radiation were enrolled in this study. Two simulation CT scans were performed in supine and prone positions for each patient. Body surface contours were generated in treatment planning system and exported to AlignRT to serve as reference images. During treatment day, the patient was aligned to treatment isocenter with room lasers, and then scanned with both CTOR and AlignRT. Image-guidance shifts were calculated for both modalities by comparison to the simulation CT and the differences between them were analyzed for both supine and prone positions, respectively. These procedures were performed for each patient once per week for five weeks. The difference of patient displacement between AlignRT and CTOR was analyzed. For supine position, five patients had an average difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR along any direction (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral) greater than 0.5 cm, and one patient greater than 1 cm. Four patients had a maximum difference greater than 1 cm. For prone position, seven patients had an average difference greater than 0.5 cm, and three patients greater than 1 cm. Nine patients had a maximum difference greater than 1 cm. The difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR was greater for the prone position than for the supine position. For the patients studied here, surface matching does not appear to be an advisable image-guidance approach for pelvic radiation therapy for patients with either supine or prone position. There appears to be a potential for large alignment discrepancies (up to 2.25 cm) between surface matching and target matching. PACS number(s): 87.55.-x.

Palladium interstitial implant in combination with external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the definitive treatment of a female urethral carcinoma.

Primary urethral cancer is a rare diagnosis, especially in females. This report presents the utilization of a palladium interstitial implant and a review of the retrospective data published on the management of female urethral cancer. Excellent local control and survival has been obtained with the use of a palladium interstitial implant in combination with external beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. This modality represents a novel and effective way to treat primary urethral cancer in females.

4D CT image acquisition errors in SBRT of liver identified using correlation

In the AAPM Report 80,( 1 ) the imaging modality of 4D CT and respiration‐correlated CT was declared a “promising solution for obtaining high‐quality CT data in the presence of respiratory motion”. To gather anatomically correct data over time, the existence of correlation between the internal organ movement and an external surrogate has to be assumed. For the in‐house evaluation of such correlation, we retrospectively analyzed 21 four‐dimensional computer tomography (4D CT) scans of five patients, out of which the artifacts experienced in three patients are shown here. To provide context and a baseline for the analysis of patient motion, a real‐tissue liver phantom was used with a solid water block and liver tissue. The superior–inferior motion of fiducials in phantom and patients was correlated to the recorded anterior–posterior motion of an external surrogate marker on the chest. The use of a solid water block yielded a measurable correlation coefficient of 0.98 or better using a sinusoidal animation pattern. With sinusoidally‐animated liver tissue, the minimum correlation observed was 0.96. Comparing this to retrospective patient data, we found three cases of a change in the correlation coefficient, or simply a low correlation. The source of this low correlation was investigated by careful examination of the breathing traces and the CT‐phase assignments used to reconstruct the datasets. Consequences of nonregular breathing are elaborated on. We demonstrate the impact of wrong phase assignments and missing image information in the 4D CT phase sampling processes. We also show how daily patient‐based correlation analysis can indicate changes in breathing traces, which can be significant enough to decrease, or completely eliminate, previously existing correlation. PACS numbers: 87.57.‐s, 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.cp, 87.57.N‐, 87.55.Qr