Y. Manabe

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using a radiobiology-based regimen for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.

The most common regimen of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer in Japan is 48 grays (Gy) in 4 fractions over 4 days. Radiobiologically, however, higher doses are necessary to control larger tumors, and interfraction intervals should be >24 hours to take advantage of reoxygenation. In this study, the authors tested the following regimen: For tumors that measured <1.5 cm, 1.5 to 3.0 cm, and >3.0 cm in greatest dimension, radiation doses of 44 Gy, 48 Gy, and 52 Gy, respectively, were given in 4 fractions with interfraction intervals of ≥3 days.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy using CyberKnife for the Treatment of Large Brain Metastases: A Dose Escalation Study

AIMS To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) with doses of 18-30 Gy in three fractions and 21-35 Gy in five fractions against large brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2005 and 2012, 61 large brain metastases (≥ 2.5 cm in maximum diameter) of a total of 102 in 54 patients were treated with FSRT as a first-line therapy. Neurological symptoms were observed in 47 of the 54 patients before FSRT. Three fractions were applied to tumours with a maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and <4 cm, and five fractions were used for brain metastases ≥ 4 cm. After ensuring that the toxicities were acceptable (≤ grade 2), doses were escalated in steps. Doses to the large brain metastases were as follows: level I, 18-22 Gy/three fractions or 21-25 Gy/five fractions; level II, 22-27 Gy/three fractions or 25-31 Gy/five fractions; level III, 27-30 Gy/three fractions or 31-35 Gy/five fractions. Level III was the target dose level. RESULTS Overall survival rates were 52 and 31% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Local tumour control rates of the 102 total brain metastases were 84 and 78% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Local tumour control rates of the 61 large brain metastases were 77 and 69% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSIONS The highest dose levels of 27-30 Gy/three fractions and 31-35 Gy/five fractions seemed to be tolerable and effective in controlling large brain metastases. These doses can be used in future studies on FSRT for large brain metastases.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using static ports of tomotherapy (TomoDirect): comparison with the TomoHelical mode

PurposeWith the new mode of Tomotherapy, irradiation can be delivered using static ports of the TomoDirect mode. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of TomoDirect plans compared to conventional TomoHelical plans.MethodsTomoDirect and TomoHelical plans were compared in 46 patients with a prostate, thoracic wall or lung tumor. The mean target dose was used as the prescription dose. The minimum coverage dose of 95% of the target (D95%), conformity index (CI), uniformity index (UI), dose distribution in organs at risk and treatment time were evaluated. For TomoDirect, 2 to 5 static ports were used depending on the tumor location.ResultsFor the prostate target volume, TomoDirect plans could not reduce the rectal dose and required a longer treatment time than TomoHelical. For the thoracic wall target volume, the V5Gy of the lung or liver was lower in TomoDirect than in TomoHelical (p = 0.02). For the lung target volume, TomoDirect yielded higher CI (p = 0.009) but smaller V5Gy of the lung (p = 0.005) than TomoHelical. Treatment time did not differ significantly between the thoracic wall and lung plans.ConclusionProstate cancers should be treated with the TomoHelical mode. Considering the risk of low-dose radiation to the lung, the TomoDirect mode could be an option for thoracic wall and lung tumors.

Helical and Static-port Tomotherapy Using the Newly-developed Dynamic Jaws Technology for Lung Cancer.

With the newly developed dynamic jaws technology, radiation dose for the cranio-caudal edges of a target can be lowered in the treatment with tomotherapy. We compared dynamic-jaw- and fixed-jaw-mode plans for lung cancer. In 35 patients, four plans using the 2.5-cm dynamic-, 2.5-cm fixed-, 5.0-cm dynamic-, and 5.0-cm fixed-jaw modes were generated. For 10 patients with upper lobe stage I lung cancer, the helical tomotherapy mode was used. Fifty-six Gy in 8 fractions was prescribed as a minimum coverage dose for 95% of the target (D95%). For 25 patients with locally advanced lung cancer, plans using four static ports (TomoDirect® mode) were made. Sixty Gy in 30 daily fractions for the primary tumor and swollen lymph nodes and 51 Gy in 30 fractions for prophylactic lymph node areas were prescribed as median doses. The mean conformity index of the planning target volume were similar among the four plans. The mean V5 Gy of the lung for 2.5-cm dynamic-, 2.5-cm fixed-, 5.0-cm dynamic-, and 5.0-cm fixed-jaw mode plans were 18.5%, 21.8%, 20.1%, and 29.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with stage I lung cancer, and 37.3%, 38.7%, 40.4%, and 44.0%, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. The mean V5 Gy of the whole body was 1,826, 2,143, 1,983, and 2,939 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with stage I lung cancer and 4,849, 5,197, 5,220, and 6,154 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Treatment time was reduced by 21-39% in 5.0-cm dynamic-jaw plans compared to 2.5-cm plans. Regarding dose distribution, 2.5-cm dynamic-jaw plans were the best, and 5.0-cm dynamic-jaw plans were comparable to 2.5-cm fixed-jaw plans with shorter treatment times. The dynamic-jaw mode should be used instead of the conventional fixed-jaw mode in tomotherapy for lung cancer.

Toxicity and efficacy of three dose-fractionation regimens of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Outcomes of three protocols of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer were evaluated. A total of 259 patients treated with 5-field IMRT between 2005 and 2011 were analyzed. First, 74 patients were treated with a daily fraction of 2.0 Gy to a total of 74 Gy (low risk) or 78 Gy (intermediate or high risk). Then, 101 patients were treated with a 2.1-Gy daily fraction to 73.5 or 77.7 Gy. More recently, 84 patients were treated with a 2.2-Gy fraction to 72.6 or 74.8 Gy. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 54–82) and the follow-up period for living patients was 47 months (range, 18–97). Androgen deprivation therapy was given according to patient risk. The overall and biochemical failure-free survival rates were, respectively, 96 and 82% at 6 years in the 2.0-Gy group, 99 and 96% at 4 years in the 2.1-Gy group, and 99 and 96% at 2 years in the 2.2-Gy group. The biochemical failure-free rate for high-risk patients in all groups was 89% at 4 years. Incidences of Grade ≥2 acute genitourinary toxicities were 9.5% in the 2.0-Gy group, 18% in the 2.1-Gy group, and 15% in the 2.2-Gy group (P = 0.29). Cumulative incidences of Grade ≥2 late gastrointestinal toxicity were 13% in the 2.0-Gy group at 6 years, 12% in the 2.1-Gy group at 4 years, and 3.7% in the 2.2-Gy group at 2 years (P = 0.23). So far, this stepwise shortening of treatment periods seems to be successful.

Spot Scanning and Passive Scattering Proton Therapy: Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio in Cultured Cells.

PURPOSE To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), oxygen enhancement ratio (OER), and contribution of the indirect effect of spot scanning proton beams, passive scattering proton beams, or both in cultured cells in comparison with clinically used photons. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RBE of passive scattering proton beams at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) was determined from dose-survival curves in 4 cell lines using 6-MV X rays as controls. Survival of 2 cell lines after spot scanning and passive scattering proton irradiation was then compared. Biological effects at the distal end region of the SOBP were also investigated. The OER of passive scattering proton beams and 6 MX X rays were investigated in 2 cell lines. The RBE and OER values were estimated at a 10% cell survival level. The maximum degree of protection of radiation effects by dimethyl sulfoxide was determined to estimate the contribution of the indirect effect against DNA damage. All experiments comparing protons and X rays were made under the same biological conditions. RESULTS The RBE values of passive scattering proton beams in the 4 cell lines examined were 1.01 to 1.22 (average, 1.14) and were almost identical to those of spot scanning beams. Biological effects increased at the distal end of the SOBP. In the 2 cell lines examined, the OER was 2.74 (95% confidence interval, 2.56-2.80) and 3.08 (2.84-3.11), respectively, for X rays, and 2.39 (2.38-2.43) and 2.72 (2.69-2.75), respectively, for protons (P<.05 for both cells between X rays and protons). The maximum degree of protection was significantly higher for X rays than for proton beams (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS The RBE values of spot scanning and passive scattering proton beams were almost identical. The OER was lower for protons than for X rays. The lower contribution of the indirect effect may partly account for the lower OER of protons.

Radiotherapy for hilar or mediastinal lymph node metastases after definitive treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy or surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE Management of regional lymph node (LN) recurrence is an important issue in definitive treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated clinical outcomes of conventional radiotherapy for hilar or mediastinal LN metastases developing after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery for stage I NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2004 and 2008, 26 patients with hilar or mediastinal LN metastases without local recurrence and distant metastasis after SBRT (n = 14) or surgery (n = 12) were treated with conventional radiotherapy. Twelve of the 14 post-SBRT patients (86%) were judged medically inoperable at the time of SBRT. All patients were treated to the hilum and mediastinum with conventional daily fractions of 2.0 Gy (n = 25) or 2.4 Gy (n = 1). The median total dose for treating metastatic LN was 60 Gy (range, 54-66 Gy) for the post-SBRT patients and 65 Gy (range, 60-66 Gy) for the post-surgery patients. Only 1 of the 14 post-SBRT patients and 8 of the 12 post-surgery patients received chemotherapy. RESULTS For all 26 patients, the overall and cause-specific survival rates at 3 years from radiation for LN metastases were 36% and 51%, respectively (14% and 39%, respectively, for the 14 post-SBRT patients and both 64% for the 12 post-surgery patients). Three of the SBRT patients were alive at 35 to 43 months with (n = 2) or without (n = 1) further recurrence, and 4 of the post-surgery patients were alive at 36 to 62 months with (n = 2) or without (n = 2) further recurrence. The incidence of ≥grade 2 pulmonary toxicity was 49% at 1 year (53% for post-SBRT patients and 44% for post-surgery patients). A grade 5 pulmonary toxicity was observed in 1 of the post-SBRT patients. CONCLUSIONS Conventional radiotherapy could successfully salvage LN relapses after SBRT as well as after surgery in 7 of 26 patients. Radiotherapy in this setting appears reasonably well tolerated.

Intensity modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy for single or multiple vertebral metastases with spinal cord compression

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) for single or multiple vertebral metastases (VM) with spinal cord compression using tomotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty patients with 40 VM were treated with SIB-IMRT as initial radiation therapy. Either 40 Gy in 8 fractions or 48 Gy in 16 fractions was prescribed depending on the Katagiri prognostic index. The radiation doses to the spinal cord and other risk organs were reduced to tolerance levels using intensity modulation. One to 4 lesions in consecutive vertebrae were treated in 1 course of SIB-IMRT. Radiologic and physical examinations were performed at 1-3 month intervals after SIB-IMRT. The Barthel index (BI) and numerical rating scale (NRS) were used to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL) and pain status, respectively. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 8 months. The NRS significantly dropped at 1 month after SIB-IMRT (P < .0001) and the effect continued for over 2 months. No significant BI decrease was observed at 2 months after SIB-IMRT (P = .7). The 1-year local control rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 70%-100%). No grade≥2 neurologic toxicity resulting from SIB-IMRT was observed. CONCLUSIONS SIB-IMRT could be successfully applied to VM with spinal cord compression in up to 4 consecutive vertebrae. Good ADL preservation and pain control were achieved with acceptable toxicity.

Biological effects of hydrogen peroxide administered intratumorally with or without irradiation in murine tumors

Despite insufficient laboratory data, radiotherapy after intratumoral injection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is increasingly being used clinically for radioresistant tumors. Especially, this treatment might become an alternative definitive treatment for early and advanced breast cancer in patients who refuse any type of surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biological effects and appropriate combination methods of irradiation and H2O2 in vivo. SCCVII tumor cells transplanted into the legs of C3H/HeN mice were used. Chronological changes of intratumoral distribution of oxygen bubbles after injection of H2O2 were investigated using computed tomography. The effects of H2O2 alone and in combination with single or five‐fraction irradiation were investigated using a growth delay assay. The optimal timing of H2O2 injection was investigated. Immunostaining of tumors was performed using the hypoxia marker pimonidazole. Oxygen bubbles decreased gradually and almost disappeared after 24 h. Administration of H2O2 produced 2–3 days’ tumor growth delay. Tumor regrowth was slowed further when H2O2 was injected before irradiation. The group irradiated immediately after H2O2 injection showed the longest tumor growth delay. Dose‐modifying factors were 1.7–2.0 when combined with single irradiation and 1.3–1.5 with fractionated irradiation. Pimonidazole staining was weaker in tumors injected with H2O2. H2O2 injection alone had modest antitumor effects. Greater tumor growth delays were demonstrated by combining irradiation and H2O2 injection. The results of the present study could serve as a basis for evaluating results of various clinical studies on this treatment.

Efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases using dynamic jaws technology in the helical tomotherapy system

Objective: Dynamic jaws (DJ) are expected to be useful in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases (BM). The efficacy and optimal dose fractionation were investigated. Methods: In a planning study, 63 treatment plans were generated for the following 3 conditions: 1.0-cm fixed jaws (FJ), 2.5-cm FJ and 2.5-cm DJ. In a clinical study, 30 Gy/3 fr, 35 Gy/5 fr or 37.5 Gy/5 fr were prescribed depending on tumour size. Clinical results of groups treated with 2.5-cm DJ plans and 1.0-cm FJ were compared. Results: In the planning study, the treatment times in 2.5-cm DJ and FJ plans were less than that in 1.0-cm FJ plans (p < 0.001). The brain doses in 1.0-cm FJ plans and 2.5-cm DJ plans were smaller than those in 2.5-cm FJ plans (p < 0.05). In the clinical study, 34 patients with 68 BM were treated with SRT. Of those, 15 patients with 34 BM were treated with 2.5-cm DJ plans and 19 patients with 34 BM were treated with 1.0-cm FJ plans. The overall survival and local tumour control (LC) rates were 52 and 93% at 12 months, respectively. The DJ system achieved favourable LC and 29% shorter treatment time compared with the FJ system (p < 0.001). Grade 2 or 3 necrosis occurred more frequently in patients with 15 cc or larger tumour volumes (p = 0.05). Conclusion: DJ technology enables treatment time to be reduced without worsening the dose distribution and clinical efficacy. The prescribed doses in this study may be acceptable for patients with small tumour volumes. Advances in knowledge: DJ technology enables treatment time to be reduced without worsening the dose.