Y. Pointreau

Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil With or Without Docetaxel for Larynx Preservation

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy with cisplatin (P) and 5-fluorouracil (F) followed by radiotherapy in patients who respond to chemotherapy is an alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced larynx and hypopharynx cancer. Data suggest that docetaxel (T) may add to the efficacy of PF. The objective of this trial was to determine whether adding T to PF could increase the larynx preservation rate. METHODS Patients who had larynx and hypopharynx cancer that required total laryngectomy were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of TPF or PF. Patients who responded to chemotherapy received radiotherapy with or without additional chemotherapy. Patients who did not respond to chemotherapy underwent total laryngectomy followed by radiotherapy with or without additional chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year larynx preservation rate. Secondary endpoints included acute toxicities and overall response. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the TPF (n = 110) and PF (n = 103) groups. With a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year actuarial larynx preservation rate was 70.3% with TPF vs 57.5% with PF (difference = 12.8%; P = .03). Patients in the TPF group had more grade 2 alopecia, grade 4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia, whereas patients in the PF group had more grade 3 and 4 stomatitis, thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 creatinine elevation. The overall response was 80.0% in the TPF group vs 59.2% in the PF group (difference = 20.8%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced larynx and hypopharynx carcinomas, TPF induction chemotherapy was superior to the PF regimen in terms of overall response rate. These results suggest that larynx preservation could be achieved for a higher proportion of patients.

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Either Chemoradiotherapy or Bioradiotherapy for Larynx Preservation: The TREMPLIN Randomized Phase II Study

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or bioradiotherapy (BRT) for larynx preservation (LP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Previously untreated patients with stage III to IV larynx/hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma received three cycles of ICT-docetaxel and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) each on day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 through 5. Poor responders (< 50% response) underwent salvage surgery. Responders (≥ 50% response) were randomly assigned to conventional radiotherapy (RT; 70 Gy) with concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1, 22, and 43 of RT (arm A) or concurrent cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and 250 mg/m(2) per week during RT (arm B). Primary end point was LP at 3 months. Secondary end points were larynx function preservation (LFP) and overall survival (OS) at 18 months. RESULTS Of the 153 enrolled patients, 116 were randomly assigned after ICT (60, arm A; 56, arm B). Overall toxicity of both CRT and BRT was substantial following ICT. However, treatment compliance was higher in the BRT arm. In an intent-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in LP at 3 months between arms A and B (95% and 93%, respectively), LFP (87% and 82%, respectively), and OS at 18 months (92% and 89%, respectively). There were fewer local treatment failures in arm A than in arm B; salvage surgery was feasible in arm B only. CONCLUSION There is no evidence that one treatment was superior to the other or could improve the outcome reported with ICT followed by RT alone (French Groupe Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête et Cou [GORTEC] 2000-01 trial [Induction CT by Cisplatin, 5FU With or Without Docetaxel in Patients With T3 and T4 Larynx and Hypopharynx Carcinoma]). The protocol that can best compare with RT alone after ICT is still to be determined.

Dose de tolérance à l’irradiation des tissus sains : le foie

The liver is a large abdominal organ in the right hypondrium. Because of its anatomical situation, it is near many abdominal PTVs as well as some lower thoracic PVTs. The liver could also be at the same time the target (for irradiation of liver metastases or primary liver tumours) and organ at risk (OAR). Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is radiobiologically the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), i.e., the clinical event limiting the total dose that could be delivered. This review describes radiobiological criteria justifying the NTCP data, and recommendations for conformal 3D radiotherapy and stereotactic liver irradiation.

Influence of Nucleoshuttling of the ATM Protein in the Healthy Tissues Response to Radiation Therapy: Toward a Molecular Classification of Human Radiosensitivity

PURPOSE Whereas post-radiation therapy overreactions (OR) represent a clinical and societal issue, there is still no consensual radiobiological endpoint to predict clinical radiosensitivity. Since 2003, skin biopsy specimens have been collected from patients treated by radiation therapy against different tumor localizations and showing a wide range of OR. Here, we aimed to establish quantitative links between radiobiological factors and OR severity grades that would be relevant to radioresistant and genetic hyperradiosensitive cases. METHODS AND MATERIALS Immunofluorescence experiments were performed on a collection of skin fibroblasts from 12 radioresistant, 5 hyperradiosensitive, and 100 OR patients irradiated at 2 Gy. The numbers of micronuclei, γH2AX, and pATM foci that reflect different steps of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) recognition and repair were assessed from 10 minutes to 24 hours after irradiation and plotted against the severity grades established by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RESULTS OR patients did not necessarily show a gross DSB repair defect but a systematic delay in the nucleoshuttling of the ATM protein required for complete DSB recognition. Among the radiobiological factors, the maximal number of pATM foci provided the best discrimination among OR patients and a significant correlation with each OR severity grade, independently of tumor localization and of the early or late nature of reactions. CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with a general classification of human radiosensitivity based on 3 groups: radioresistance (group I); moderate radiosensitivity caused by delay of nucleoshuttling of ATM, which includes OR patients (group II); and hyperradiosensitivity caused by a gross DSB repair defect, which includes fatal cases (group III).

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, phase II GORTEC study

BACKGROUND Cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil is the standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cetuximab and taxane combinations have shown promising activity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of four cycles of docetaxel associated with cisplatin and cetuximab (TPEx), followed by maintenance with cetuximab every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with a histologically confirmed HNSCC with metastasis or recurrence unsuitable for locoregional curative treatment received docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) both) at day 1 and weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) (loading dose of 400 mg/m(2)), repeated every 21 days for four cycles, followed by maintenance cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was done systematically after each chemotherapy cycle. Patients had a good general status (performance status ≤1) and were under 71 years. Prior total doses of cisplatin exceeding 300 mg/m(2) were not allowed. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) after four cycles. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled. The primary end point was met with an ORR of 44.4% (95% CI 30.9-58.6). Median overall and progression-free survivals were, respectively, 14 months (95% CI 11.3-17.3) and 6.2 months (95% CI 5.4-7.2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were skin rash (16.6%) and non-febrile neutropenia (20.4%). There were one pulmonary embolism and two infectious events leading to death. CONCLUSIONS The TPEx regimen showed promising activity as first-line treatment in fit patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Further studies are needed to compare the TPEx versus EXTREME regimen in this population. CLINICALTRIALGOV NCT01289522.

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin (TPEx) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): Final results of phase II trial GORTEC 2008-03.

5567 Background: Cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5FU has become a standard in first-line treatment of patients (pts) with R/M SCCHN. Cetuximab and taxane combinations have shown promising activity. This multicenter phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, docetaxel and cisplatin combination (TPEx) as first-line treatment in pts with R/M SCCHN. METHODS Pts were required to have WHO PS 0-1, no prior systemic therapy for R/M SCCHN, cumulative dose of cisplatin less than 300 mg/m² and no prior anti-EGFR therapy. Pts received docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m² day 1 and cetuximab (400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 then 250 mg/m² weekly), repeated every 21 days x 4 cycles then followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m² every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. G-CSF support with lenograstim 150 microgr./m²/day was delivered after each cycle of chemotherapy. Response was assessed every 6 weeks, according to RECIST. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were safety, best overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival and biomarkers. A Simon two-stage design was used with OR in more than 9/30 pts needed before continuing accrual to the final 54 pts. RESULTS 51 pts have been enrolled to date and 33 pts could be evaluated for primary endpoint: all male, median age 55 years (48-68), 50% metastatic.ORR at 12 weeks was 48.5%. Partial response, stable disease and progression were respectively found in 16 pts (PR 48.5%), 15 pts (SD 45.5%) and 2 pts (PD 6%). There were 18 pts (54.5%) with PR as best response. Treatment related toxicities included G4 neutropenia (n=3). Grade 3 events were skin rash (n=5), hypersensitivity (n=3), mucositis (n=1), fatigue (n=1) and febrile neutropenia (n=1). Alopecia was common. No death was related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary efficacy analysis based on response rate demonstrates that TPEx regimen has encouraging activity as first-line treatment in pts with R/M SCCHN. Toxicity is manageable with G-CSF support. Trial accrual continues up to 54 pts.

Fatal Infusion Reactions to Cetuximab: Role of Immunoglobulin E–Mediated Anaphylaxis

report a fatal hypersensitivity reaction to cetuximab in a 63-year-old patient with metastatic colon cancer and outlined a 0.1% incidence of death in the literature. We greatly acknowledge the authors’ desire to communicate the risk of fatal anaphylactic reaction with cetuximab. Over the past 2 years in our center in Tours, France, four instances of grade 4 anaphylactic reactions occurred in patients treated for head and neck cancer (locally advanced or metastatic), with one immediately fatal; another patient died within 5 days (unpublished data). Seven lethal anaphylactic reactions were registered in a pharmacovigilance survey in France, based on spontaneous declarations (Grandvuillemin et al, manuscript in preparation). Anaphylaxis to cetuximab is a problem that merits serious clinical attention. In the authors’ words, “the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the development of this phenomenon remain to be elucidated.” 1 They raise the hypothesis of immunoglobulin E (IgE) –independent mechanisms, even in the context of a paradoxic atopic history. Moreover, Tronconi et al suggest that the field “search for reliable risk factors that can facilitate the safe selection of patients as candidates for cetuximabbased treatment.” 1 These comments are quite surprising, because they do not integrate major contributions that have been previously published. Indeed, it has been known for 3 years that anaphylaxis to cetuximab is the result of antidrug IgE antibodies present in patient serum before therapy. 2 These IgE antibodies are directed against galactose--1, 3-galactose (3Gal) residues, present in the Fab portion of this monoclonal antibody. 3 Because humans do not express this glycan, anti3Gal IgM and IgG antibodies spontaneously develop, whereas the appearance of IgE is only occasional. The observation that most of the patients developed reactions to cetuximab during their first infusion supports this hypothesis and is consistent with an IgE-mediated event. Environmental factors, such as bites by ectoparasitic ticks, probably explain the heterogeneous proportion of individuals displaying anti3Gal IgE and the heterogeneous incidence of anaphylactic reactions to cetuximab among studies and geographic areas. 2,4-6 History of atopy, age, race, additional therapy (ie, chemotherapy or radiotherapy), sex, and head and neck cancer (rather than colorectal cancer) have also been proposed as factors favoring anaphylaxis to cetuximab, but they remain controversial. 2,4,5

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: a new paradigm.

Five hundred and fifty thousand new head and neck cancer cases are diagnosed each year worldwide. They are mostly locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma with a poor prognosis in terms of locoregional and distant failure. A major challenge for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma is to achieve a high cure rate while preserving functions. Treatment strategies are designed according to the disease stage, primary site, operable status, patient age, and performance status. Surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and more recently molecular-targeted therapies are part of these strategies, but their sequence remains to be defined. Over the last 30 years, induction chemotherapy has attained an important position in the management of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, particularly since the introduction of taxanes. The decision to deliver induction chemotherapy (and its intensification) must be considered in the light of other treatments aiming at better locoregional control (normofractioned radiotherapy, accelerated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy, addition of concurrent chemotherapy, or of targeted therapy) with or without adjuvant treatment. This review summarizes the rationale, these data, and perspectives on induction chemotherapy-based strategies.

Long-Term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, ± Docetaxel for Larynx Preservation

BACKGROUND The purpose of GORTEC 2000-01 was to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (P) and 5-fluorouracil (F) with or without docetaxel (T) for larynx preservation. METHODS Operable patients with untreated stage III or IV larynx or hypopharynx invasive squamous cell carcinoma who required total laryngectomy were randomly assigned to three cycles of induction chemotherapy with either TPF or PF, followed by radiation therapy for responders. The primary endpoint was three-year larynx preservation rate. Secondary endpoints included larynx dysfunction-free survival (LDFFS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional control rate (LCR), cause of death, and later toxicity rates. Survival and other data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Two hundred thirteen patients were treated with median follow-up of 105 months. The five- and 10-year larynx preservation rates were 74.0% (95% CI = 0.64 to 0.82) vs 58.1% (95% CI = 0.47 to 0.68) and 70.3% (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.8) vs 46.5% (95% CI = 0.31 to 0.63, P = .01) in the TPF vs PF arm, respectively. The five- and 10-year LDFFS rates were 67.2% (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.76) vs 46.5% (95% CI = 0.36 to 0.57) and 63.7% (95% CI = 0.52 to 0.74) vs 37.2% (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.52, P = .001), respectively. OS, DFS, and LCR were not statistically improved in the TPF vs the PF arm. Statistically fewer grade 3-4 late toxicities of the larynx occurred with the TPF regimen compared with the PF arm (9.3% vs 17.1%, G-test, P = .038). CONCLUSION Long-term follow-up confirms that induction chemotherapy with TPF increased larynx preservation and larynx dysfunction-free survival. In this larynx preservation approach using induction chemotherapy, TPF should be recommended, followed by radiation therapy.

Prognostic factors of extremity soft tissue sarcoma in adults. A single institutional analysis.

PURPOSE To analyse the prognostic factors for patients treated with limb sparing surgery and radiation for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (E-STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records of 87 patients with limb sparing surgery and radiation for E-STS were reviewed retrospectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated and factors potentially influencing these outcomes were analysed. RESULTS With a mean follow-up of 69months, most recurrences occurred within the first 2years. Extent of resection margin was found to improve DFS (P=0.002) and DSS (P=0.002). Brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) improved DFS (P=0.034) and DSS (P=0.019). Tumor size (<10cm) was related to DSS (P=0.043) and its relation to DFS was almost significant (P=0.057). Short time interval between surgery and radiotherapy (≤50days) had an impact only on DSS (P=0.030). CONCLUSION Extent of resection margin and use of brachytherapy combined with EBRT seem to improve the prognosis of E-STS. Small tumor size and short time interval between radiotherapy and surgery seem also to improve the outcome of E-STS. This study was limited by inadequate power and low number of recurrences. Larger randomised studies are needed to confirm these results.