Y. Takada

Phase III Study of Concurrent Versus Sequential Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination With Mitomycin, Vindesine, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSEnA phase III study was performed to determine whether concurrent or sequential treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) improves survival in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients were assigned to the two treatment arms. In the concurrent arm, chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29), vindesine (3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36), and mitomycin (8 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29). RT began on day 2 at a dose of 28 Gy (2 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week for a total of 14 fractions) followed by a rest period of 10 days, and then repeated. In the sequential arm, the same CT was given, but RT was initiated after completing CT and consisted of 56 Gy (2 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week for a total of 28 fractions).nnnRESULTSnThree hundred twenty patients were entered onto the study. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. The response rate for the concurrent arm was significantly higher (84. 0%) than that of the sequential arm (66%) (P =.0002). The median survival duration was significantly superior in patients receiving concurrent therapy (16.5 months), as compared with those receiving sequential therapy (13.3 months) (P =.03998). Two-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates in the concurrent group (34.6%, 22.3%, 16.9%, and 15.8%, respectively) were better than those in the sequential group (27.4%, 14.7%, 10.1%, and 8.9%, respectively). Myelosuppression was significantly greater among patients on the concurrent arm than on the sequential arm (P =.0001).nnnCONCLUSIONnIn selected patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, the concurrent approach yields a significantly increased response rate and enhanced median survival duration when compared with the sequential approach.

Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. West Japan Lung Cancer Group.

PURPOSEnIrinotecan (CPT-11) is effective against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) as monotherapy. Cisplatin is also a key drug against SCLC. We conducted a phase II study of CPT-11 combined with cisplatin to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen in patients with previously untreated SCLC.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnSeventy-five patients with previously untreated SCLC were enrolled onto the study. CPT-11 60 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days. Four courses of chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation were given to patients with limited disease (LD) and six courses to patients with extensive disease (ED).nnnRESULTSnThe overall response rate was 84%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 29%. Forty patients with LD achieved an overall response rate of 83% and a CR rate of 30% and 35 patients with ED achieved an overall response rate of 86% and a CR rate of 29%. The median response duration was 8.0 months for LD patients and 6.6 months for ED patients. The median survival was 14.3 months for LD patients and 13.0 months for ED patients. The major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (77%), leukopenia (45%), diarrhea (19%), and anemia (39%). Two patients died with concomitant neutropenia and diarrhea.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis is a new active regimen for SCLC, especially ED-SCLC, with acceptable toxicity. A phase III study that compares CPT-11/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin for ED-SCLC is now being conducted.

Randomised phase III trial of irinotecan combined with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine a standard combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to test the hypotheses that CPT-11+cisplatin is superior to cisplatin+vindesine and that CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to cisplatin+vindesine. A total of 398 patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomised to receive cisplatin+CPT-11 (CPT-P), cisplatin+vindesine (VDS-P) or CPT-11 alone (CPT). In the CPT-P arm, CPT-11 60u2009mgu2009m−2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80u2009mgu2009m−2 was administered on day 1. In the VDS-P arm, cisplatin 80u2009mgu2009m−2 was administered on day 1, and vindesine 3u2009mgu2009m−2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. In the CPT arm, CPT-11 100u2009mgu2009m−2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. The median survival time was 50.0 weeks for patients on CPT-P, 45.6 weeks for those on VDS-P and 46.0 weeks for those on CPT (P=0.115, CPT-P vs VDS-P; P=0.089, CPT vs VDS-P), and the hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65–1.11) for CPT-P vs VDS-P and 0.83 (0.64–1.09) for CPT vs VDS-P. The response rate was 43.7% for patients on CPT-P, 31.7% for those on VDS-P and 20.5% for those on CPT. Major adverse reactions were grade 4 neutropenia observed in 37, 54 and 8% of the patients on CPT-P, VDS-P and CPT, respectively; and grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea observed in 12, 3 and 15% of the patients, respectively. CPT-P therapy produces comparable survival to VDS-P in patients with advanced NSCLC. CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to VDS-P in terms of survival. The CPT-11-containing regimen is one of the most efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of amrubicin in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study

SummaryPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin, (+)-(7S, 9S)-9-acetyl-9-amino-7-[(2-deoxy-β-D-erythro-pentopyranosylu2009)oxyu2009]-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,11-dihydroxy-5,12-naphthacenedione hydrochloride, in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC).n Patients and methods: A total of 35 previously untreated patients with extensive-disease SCLC were entered into the study. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous infusion at 45xa0mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. Unless there was tumor regression of 25% or greater after the first cycle, or 50% or greater after the second cycle, treatment was switched to salvage chemotherapy in combination with etoposide (100xa0mg/m2, days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (80xa0mg/m2, day 1).n Results: Of the 35 patients entered, 33 were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of the 33 patients, 3 (9.1%) had a complete response (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–24.3%) and 22 had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 75.8% (95% CI, 57.7–88.9%). Median survival time was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.9–15.3 months), and 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 48.5% and 20.2%, respectively. The most common toxicity was hematologic. Non-hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or 4 was only seen in 3 patients with anorexia (9.1%) and 1 patient with alopecia (3.0%). Salvage chemotherapy was administered to only 6 patients.n Conclusion: Amrubicin was active for extensive-disease SCLC with acceptable toxicity. Further studies in combination with other agents for SCLC are warranted.

Phase III trial of docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus docetaxel in second-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG0104)

BACKGROUNDnThis trial evaluated whether a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine provides better survival than docetaxel alone in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnEligibility included pathologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, failure of one platinum-based regimen, performance status of zero or one, 20-75 years old, and adequate organ function. Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (day 1) or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8), both administered every 21 days until disease progression.nnnRESULTSnSixty-five patients participated in each arm. This trial was terminated early due to an unexpected high incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and three treatment-related deaths due to ILD in the combination arm. Docetaxel plus gemcitabine compared with docetaxel-alone patients experienced similar grade and incidence of toxicity, except for ILD. No baseline factor was identified for predicting ILD. Median survival times were 10.3 and 10.1 months (one-sided P = 0.36) for docetaxel plus gemcitabine and docetaxel arms, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONnDocetaxel alone is still the standard second-line treatment for NSCLC. The incidence of ILD is higher for docetaxel combined with gemcitabine than for docetaxel alone in patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Phase II Study of Etoposide and Cisplatin With Concurrent Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy Followed by Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902

PURPOSEnWe initially conducted a randomized phase II study to compare irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide (IPE) after etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We amended the protocol to evaluate IP after EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT in a single-arm phase II study because of an unacceptable toxicity in IPE.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPreviously untreated patients with LD-SCLC were treated intravenously with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 with concurrent twice-daily TRT (1.5 Gy per fraction, a total dose of 45 Gy) beginning on day 2 followed by three cycles of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 4-week cycle.nnnRESULTSnOf the 51 patients enrolled, 49 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 88% and 41%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49% and 29.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months. The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 4, 84%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 31%), infection (grade 3 to 4, 33%), electrolytes imbalance (grade 3 to 4, 20%), and diarrhea (grade 3 to 4, 14%).nnnCONCLUSIONnEP with concurrent twice-daily TRT followed by the consolidation of IP appears to be an active regimen which deserves further phase III testing in patients with LD-SCLC.

Phase II Study of 3-Hour Infusion of Paclitaxel in Patients with Previously Untreated Stage III and IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Sixty patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer of stages III and IV were treated with a 210 mg/m2 dose of paclitaxel by means of a 3-hour infusion. The objective respon

Phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study.

SummaryPurpose: We conducted a multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Entry requirements included cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, stage III or IV, no prior therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous injection at 45xa0mg/m2/day for three consecutive days, repeated at 3xa0week intervals. Each patient received at least three treatment cycles. Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 62 registered patients, 60 were eligible and assessable for efficacy, and 59 for toxicity. Overall response rate was 18.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5 to 30.4%) and median survival time was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 10.4 months). Major toxicity was myelosuppression, with incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity of 78.0% for neutropenia, 54.2% for leukopenia, 30.5% for anemia, and 28.8% for thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicities with a greater than 50% incidence were anorexia (69.5%), nausea/vomiting (55.9%), and alopecia (75.9%), but were relatively mild, with grade 3 toxicities observed in only one patient each (1.7%). Conclusion: Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

Randomized Phase II Study of Carboplatin/ Gemcitabine versus Vinorelbine/Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104

Combined gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) and combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) are active and well tolerated chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors conducted a randomized Phase II study of GC versus GV to compare them in terms of efficacy and toxicity.

Activity of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan gemcitabine group (A) phase II study

Purpose: This phase II study was conducted to determine the response and toxicity of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A group of 73 patients were entered into the study. The patients had received no previous chemotherapy and all had measurable disease. The initial starting dose of gemcitabine was 1000u2009mg/m2 per weeku2009×u20093 followed by a week of rest, and was escalated for the next cycle to 1250u2009mg/m2, provided there were no signs of hematologic toxicity (WBC<3000/μl and/or platelets < 70u2009000/μl) in the previous cycle. Results: Among 73 eligible patients, there were 19 partial responses (PRs), with an overall response rate of 26.0% (95% confidence interval 16.5–37.6%). The response rate for stage IIIa and IIIb disease was significantly higher than that for stage IV disease [41.4% (12/29) vs 15.9% (7/44); Pu2009=u20090.028]. The median duration of response in patients showing a PR was 4.6 months (1.7–10.4 months). The median number of cycles given was two per patient (range one to seven). Grade 3 anemia, leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (20.5%), 7 patients (9.6%) and 20 patients (27.4%), respectively. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient (1.4%) which was not associated with any bleeding. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity in the later courses of gemcitabine treatment with regard to leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities, including hepatic toxicity, fatigue, nausea/vomiting and fever were mild (grade 2 or less) and transient. One patient was withdrawn from the trial because of a rash. Pulmonary toxicity was experienced in two patients and one patient died of respiratory insufficiency which was thought to be drug-related. Conclusions: Gemcitabine as a single agent has proven to be an active drug for NSCLC with a favorable, generally mild side-effect profile. Further trials in combination with other agents for this disease are currently underway.