Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Yan Yu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Yan Yu.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

THE AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY POSTIMPLANT DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Subir Nag; William S. Bice; K. DeWyngaert; Bradley R. Prestidge; R.G. Stock; Yan Yu

PURPOSEnThe purpose of this report is to establish guidelines for postimplant dosimetric analysis of permanent prostate brachytherapy.nnnMETHODSnMembers of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) with expertise in prostate dosimetry evaluation performed a literature review and supplemented with their clinical experience formulated guidelines for performing and analyzing postimplant dosimetry of permanent prostate brachytherapy.nnnRESULTSnThe ABS recommends that postimplant dosimetry should be performed on all patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy for optimal patient care. At present, computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetry is recommended, based on availability cost and the ability to image the prostate as well as the seeds. Additional plane radiographs should be obtained to verify the seed count. Until the ideal postoperative interval for CT scanning has been determined, each center should perform dosimetric evaluation of prostate implants at a consistent postoperative interval. This interval should be reported. Isodose displays should be obtained at 50%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescription dose and displayed on multiple cross-sectional images of the prostate. A dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the prostate should be performed and the D90 (dose to 90% of the prostate gland) reported by all centers. Additionally, the D80, D100, the fractional V80, V90, V100, V150 and V200 (i.e., the percentage of prostate volume receiving 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose, respectively), the rectal, and urethral doses should be reported and ultimately correlated with clinical outcome in the research environment. On-line real-time dosimetry, the effects of dose heterogeneity, and the effects of tissue heterogeneity need further investigation.nnnCONCLUSIONnIt is essential that postimplant dosimetry should be performed on all patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy. Guidelines were established for the performance and analysis of such dosimetry.


Medical Physics | 1999

Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64.

Yan Yu; Lowell L. Anderson; David E. Mellenberg; Ravinder Nath; Michael C. Schell; Frank M. Waterman; Andrew Wu; John C. Blasko

There is now considerable evidence to suggest that technical innovations, 3D image-based planning, template guidance, computerized dosimetry analysis and improved quality assurance practice have converged in synergy in modern prostate brachytherapy, which promise to lead to increased tumor control and decreased toxicity. A substantial part of the medical physicists contribution to this multi-disciplinary modality has a direct impact on the factors that may singly or jointly determine the treatment outcome. It is therefore of paramount importance for the medical physics community to establish a uniform standard of practice for prostate brachytherapy physics, so that the therapeutic potential of the modality can be maximally and consistently realized in the wider healthcare community. A recent survey in the U.S. for prostate brachytherapy revealed alarming variance in the pattern of practice in physics and dosimetry, particularly in regard to dose calculation, seed assay and time/method of postimplant imaging. Because of the large number of start-up programs at this time, it is essential that the roles and responsibilities of the medical physicist be clearly defined, consistent with the pivotal nature of the clinical physics component in assuring the ultimate success of prostate brachytherapy. It was against this background that the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine formed Task Group No. 64, which was charged (1) to review the current techniques in prostate seed implant brachytherapy, (2) to summarize the present knowledge in treatment planning, dose specification and reporting, (3) to recommend practical guidelines for the clinical medical physicist, and (4) to identify issues for future investigation.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2001

INTRAOPERATIVE PLANNING AND EVALUATION OF PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY: REPORT OF THE AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY

Subir Nag; Jay P. Ciezki; Robert A. Cormack; Stephen Doggett; K. DeWyngaert; Gregory K. Edmundson; Richard G. Stock; Nelson N. Stone; Yan Yu; Michael J. Zelefsky

PURPOSEnThe preplanned technique used for permanent prostate brachytherapy has limitations that may be overcome by intraoperative planning. The goal of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) project was to assess the current intraoperative planning process and explore the potential for improvement in intraoperative treatment planning (ITP).nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnMembers of the ABS with expertise in ITP performed a literature review, reviewed their clinical experience with ITP, and explored the potential for improving the technique.nnnRESULTSnThe ABS proposes the following terminology in regard to prostate planning process: *Preplanning--Creation of a plan a few days or weeks before the implant procedure. *Intraoperative planning--Treatment planning in the operating room (OR): the patient and transrectal ultrasound probe are not moved between the volume study and the seed insertion procedure. * Intraoperative preplanning--Creation of a plan in the OR just before the implant procedure, with immediate execution of the plan. *Interactive planning--Stepwise refinement of the treatment plan using computerized dose calculations derived from image-based needle position feedback. *Dynamic dose calculation--Constant updating of dose distribution calculations using continuous deposited seed position feedback. Both intraoperative preplanning and interactive planning are currently feasible and commercially available and may help to overcome many of the limitations of the preplanning technique. Dosimetric feedback based on imaged needle positions can be used to modify the ITP. However, the dynamic changes in prostate size and shape and in seed position that occur during the implant are not yet quantifiable with current technology, and ITP does not obviate the need for postimplant dosimetric analysis. The major current limitation of ITP is the inability to localize the seeds in relation to the prostate. Dynamic dose calculation can become a reality once these issues are solved. Future advances can be expected in methods of enhancing seed identification, in imaging techniques, and in the development of better source delivery systems. Additionally, ITP should be correlated with outcome studies, using dosimetric, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints.nnnCONCLUSIONnITP addresses many of the limitations of current permanent prostate brachytherapy and has some advantages over the preplanned technique. Further technologic advancement will be needed to achieve dynamic real-time calculation of dose distribution from implanted sources, with constant updating to allow modification of subsequent seed placement and consistent, ideal dose distribution within the target volume.


Medical Physics | 1996

A genetic algorithm for the optimization of prostate implants

Yan Yu; Michael C. Schell

A genetic algorithm (GA) is presented for the optimization of template- and ultrasound-guided prostate implants. The end points for optimization are incorporated in an objective function of separable cardinal utility terms. As an application of the GA, the minimum 103Pd total source strength required to deliver a given dose was correlated with the average dimension for prostate implants carried out under the current template and seed spacing protocols. Significant improvements in quality were observed, in terms of both the minimum peripheral dose and tumor cell surviving fractions, when GA-optimized implants were compared to the corresponding unoptimized implants for given target volumes. In addition, numerical simulation of source displacements indicates that the dosimetric and radiobiologic advantages of GA optimization can tolerate a reasonable level of seed placement uncertainties observed clinically. In summary, the GA application provides an automated design strategy for prostate implant planning, and at the same time affords the potential for systematic optimization of a set of end points that can sustain practical variations.


Medical Physics | 1997

Multiobjective decision theory for computational optimization in radiation therapy

Yan Yu

Machine-guided iterative optimization in radiation oncology requires ordinal or cardinal ranking of competing treatment plans. When the clinical objectives are multifaceted and incommensurable, the ranking formalism must take into account the decision makers tradeoff strategies in a multidimensional decision space. To capture the decision processes in treatment planning, a multiobjective decision-theoretic scheme is formulated. Ranking among a group of candidate plans is based on a generalized distance metric. A dynamic metric weighting function is defined based on the state energy of the decision system, which is assumed to undergo thermodynamic cooling with iteration time. The decision maker is required to specify a baseline ranking of the objectives, which is taken to be the ground state of the decision system. This decision-theoretic formalism was applied to idealized cases in stereotactic radiosurgery and prostatic implantation, using the genetic algorithm as the optimization engine. The optimization pathways and the outcome at limited horizons indicated that the combined scheme of decision-theoretic steering and iterative optimization was robust and produced treatment plans consistent with the users expectation. The effect of treatment uncertainties was simulated using imperfect objectives; however, certain recurring plans could be identified as optimized baseline solutions. Overall, the present formalism provides a realistic alternative to complete utility assessment or human-guided exploration of the efficient solution set.


Medical Physics | 2006

In vivo motion and force measurement of surgical needle intervention during prostate brachytherapy

T Podder; Douglas Clark; J. Sherman; D. Fuller; Edward M. Messing; Deborah J. Rubens; John G. Strang; Ralph Brasacchio; Lydia Liao; Wan Sing Ng; Yan Yu

In this paper, we present needle insertion forces and motion trajectories measured during actual brachytherapy needle insertion while implanting radioactive seeds in the prostate glands of 20 different patients. The needle motion was captured using ultrasound images and a 6 degree-of-freedom electromagnetic-based position sensor. Needle velocity was computed from the position information and the corresponding time stamps. From in vivo data we found the maximum needle insertion forces to be about 15.6 and 8.9N for 17gauge (1.47mm) and 18gauge (1.27mm) needles, respectively. Part of this difference in insertion forces is due to the needle size difference (17G and 18G) and the other part is due to the difference in tissue properties that are specific to the individual patient. Some transverse forces were observed, which are attributed to several factors such as tissue heterogeneity, organ movement, human factors in surgery, and the interaction between the template and the needle. However, theses insertion forces are significantly responsible for needle deviation from the desired trajectory and target movement. Therefore, a proper selection of needle and modulated velocity (translational and rotational) may reduce the tissue deformation and target movement by reducing insertion forces and thereby improve the seed delivery accuracy. The knowledge gleaned from this study promises to be useful for not only designing mechanical/robotic systems but also developing a predictive deformation model of the prostate and real-time adaptive controlling of the needle.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

Intraoperative optimized inverse planning for prostate brachytherapy: early experience

Edward M. Messing; J.B.Y Zhang; Deborah J. Rubens; Ralph Brasacchio; John G. Strang; Arvind Soni; Michael C. Schell; Paul Okunieff; Yan Yu

PURPOSEnTo demonstrate the feasibility of an intraoperative inverse planning technique with advanced optimization for prostate seed implantation.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnWe have implemented a method for optimized inverse planning of prostate seed implantation in the operating room (OR), based on the genetic algorithm (GA) driven Prostate Implant Planning Engine for Radiotherapy (PIPER). An integrated treatment planning system was deployed, which includes real-time ultrasound image acquisition, treatment volume segmentation, GA optimization, real-time decision making and sensitivity analysis, isodose and DVH evaluation, and virtual reality navigation and surgical guidance. Ten consecutive patients previously scheduled for implantation were included in the series.nnnRESULTSnThe feasibility of the technique was established by careful monitoring of each step in the OR and comparison with conventional preplanned implants. The median elapsed time for complete image capture, segmentation, GA optimization, and plan evaluation was 4, 10, 2.2, and 2 min, respectively. The dosimetric quality of the OR-based plan was shown to be equivalent to the corresponding preplan.nnnCONCLUSIONnAn intraoperative optimized inverse planning technique was developed for prostate brachytherapy. The feasibility of the method was demonstrated through an early clinical experience.


medical image computing and computer assisted intervention | 2006

Robot-Assisted prostate brachytherapy

Yan Yu; Tarun Kanti Podder; Yongde Zhang; Wan Sing Ng; Vladimir Misic; J. Sherman; Luke Fu; D. Fuller; Edward M. Messing; Deborah J. Rubens; John G. Strang; Ralph Brasacchio

In contemporary brachytherapy procedures, needle placement at the desired target is challenging due to a variety of reasons. A robot-assisted brachytherapy system can improve the needle placement and seed delivery resulting in enhanced patient care. In this paper we present a 16 DOF (degrees-of-freedom) robotic system (9DOF positioning module and 7 DOF surgery module) developed and fabricated for prostate brachytherapy. Techniques to reduce needle deflection and target movement have been incorporated after verifying with extensive experiments. Provisions for needle motion and force feedback have been included into the system for improving the robot control and seed delivery. Preliminary experimental results reveal that the prototype system is quite accurate (sub-millimeter) in placing brachytherapy needles.


international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society | 2005

Effects of Velocity Modulation during Surgical Needle Insertion

Tarun Kanti Podder; D Clark; D. Fuller; J. Sherman; Wan Sing Ng; Lydia Liao; Deborah J. Rubens; John G. Strang; Edward M. Messing; Yuji Zhang; Yan Yu

Precise interstitial intervention is essential for many medical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. But accurate insertion and placement of surgical needle in soft tissue is quite challenging. The understanding of the interaction between surgical needle and soft tissue is very important to develop new devices and systems to achieve better accuracy and to deliver quality treatment. In this paper we present the effects of velocity (linear, rotational, and oscillatory) modulation on needle force and target deflection. We have experimentally verified our hypothesis that needle insertion with continuous rotation reduces target movement and needle force significantly. We have observed little changes in force and target deflection in rotational oscillation (at least at lower frequency) of the needle


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

AUTOMATED TREATMENT PLANNING ENGINE FOR PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY

Yan Yu; J.B.Y. Zhang; Ralph Brasacchio; Paul Okunieff; Deborah J. Rubens; John G. Strang; Arvind Soni; Edward M. Messing

PURPOSEnTo develop a computer-intelligent planning engine for automated treatment planning and optimization of ultrasound- and template-guided prostate seed implants.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnThe genetic algorithm was modified to reflect the 2D nature of the implantation template. A multi-objective decision scheme was used to rank competing solutions, taking into account dose uniformity and conformity to the planning target volume (PTV), dose-sparing of the urethra and the rectum, and the sensitivity of the resulting dosimetry to seed misplacement. Optimized treatment plans were evaluated using selected dosimetric quantifiers, dose-volume histogram (DVH), and sensitivity analysis based on simulated seed placement errors. These dosimetric planning components were integrated into the Prostate Implant Planning Engine for Radiotherapy (PIPER).nnnRESULTSnPIPER has been used to produce a variety of plans for prostate seed implants. In general, maximization of the minimum peripheral dose (mPD) for given implanted total source strength tended to produce peripherally weighted seed patterns. Minimization of the urethral dose further reduced the loading in the central region of the PTV. Isodose conformity to the PTV was achieved when the set of objectives did not reflect seed positioning uncertainties; the corresponding optimal plan generally required fewer seeds and higher source strength per seed compared to the manual planning experience. When seed placement uncertainties were introduced into the set of treatment planning objectives, the optimal plan tended to reach a compromise between the preplanned outcome and the likelihood of retaining the preferred outcome after implantation. The reduction in the volatility of such seed configurations optimized under uncertainty was verified by sensitivity studies.nnnCONCLUSIONnAn automated treatment planning engine incorporating real-time sensitivity analysis was found to be a useful tool in dosimetric planning for prostate brachytherapy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Yan Yu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward M. Messing

University of Rochester Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tarun Kanti Podder

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Haisong Liu

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Sherman

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lydia Liao

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Fuller

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge