Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Yanle Hu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Yanle Hu.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2016

Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications

Sahaja Acharya; Benjamin W. Fischer-Valuck; R. Kashani; Parag J. Parikh; Deshan Yang; T Zhao; O.L. Green; O. Wooten; H. Harold Li; Yanle Hu; V Rodriguez; Lindsey Olsen; C.G. Robinson; Jeff M. Michalski; Sasa Mutic; J.R. Olsen

PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR) image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) through reporting of our initial clinical experience and workflow considerations. METHODS AND MATERIALS The first clinically deployed online adaptive MR-IGRT system consisted of a split 0.35T MR scanner straddling a ring gantry with 3 multileaf collimator-equipped (60)Co heads. The unit is supported by a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system that allows real-time adaptive planning with the patient on the table. All patients undergo computed tomography and MR imaging (MRI) simulation for initial treatment planning. A volumetric MRI scan is acquired for each patient at the daily treatment setup. Deformable registration is performed using the planning computed tomography data set, which allows for the transfer of the initial contours and the electron density map to the daily MRI scan. The deformed electron density map is then used to recalculate the original plan on the daily MRI scan for physician evaluation. Recontouring and plan reoptimization are performed when required, and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) is performed using an independent in-house software system. RESULTS The first online adaptive MR-IGRT treatments consisted of 5 patients with abdominopelvic malignancies. The clinical setting included neoadjuvant colorectal (n=3), unresectable gastric (n=1), and unresectable pheochromocytoma (n=1). Recontouring and reoptimization were deemed necessary for 3 of 5 patients, and the initial plan was deemed sufficient for 2 of the 5 patients. The reasons for plan adaptation included tumor progression or regression and a change in small bowel anatomy. In a subsequently expanded cohort of 170 fractions (20 patients), 52 fractions (30.6%) were reoptimized online, and 92 fractions (54.1%) were treated with an online-adapted or previously adapted plan. The median time for recontouring, reoptimization, and QA was 26 minutes. CONCLUSION Online adaptive MR-IGRT has been successfully implemented with planning and QA workflow suitable for routine clinical application. Clinical trials are in development to formally evaluate adaptive treatments for a variety of disease sites.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Respiratory Amplitude Guided 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Yanle Hu; Shelton D. Caruthers; Daniel A. Low; Parag J. Parikh; Sasa Mutic

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of prospectively guiding 4-dimensional (4D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image acquisition using triggers at preselected respiratory amplitudes to achieve T(2) weighting for abdominal motion tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS A respiratory amplitude-based triggering system was developed and integrated into a commercial turbo spin echo MRI sequence. Initial feasibility tests were performed on healthy human study participants. Four respiratory states, the middle and the end of inhalation and exhalation, were used to trigger 4D MRI image acquisition of the liver. To achieve T(2) weighting, the echo time and repetition time were set to 75 milliseconds and 4108 milliseconds, respectively. Single-shot acquisition, together with parallel imaging and partial k-space imaging techniques, was used to improve image acquisition efficiency. 4D MRI image sets composed of axial or sagittal slices were acquired. RESULTS Respiratory data measured and logged by the MRI scanner showed that the triggers occurred at the appropriate respiratory levels. Liver motion could be easily observed on both 4D MRI image datasets by sensing either the change of liver in size and shape (axial) or diaphragm motion (sagittal). Both 4D MRI image datasets were T(2)-weighted as expected. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the feasibility of achieving T(2)-weighted 4D MRI images using amplitude-based respiratory triggers. With the aid of the respiratory amplitude-based triggering system, the proposed method is compatible with most MRI sequences and therefore has the potential to improve tumor-tissue contrast in abdominal tumor motion imaging.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a 60Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System

H. Omar Wooten; O.L. Green; Min Yang; Todd DeWees; R. Kashani; Jeff Olsen; Jeff M. Michalski; Deshan Yang; Kari Tanderup; Yanle Hu; H. Harold Li; Sasa Mutic

PURPOSE This work describes a commercial treatment planning system, its technical features, and its capabilities for creating (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans for a magnetic resonance image guidance radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system. METHODS AND MATERIALS The ViewRay treatment planning system (Oakwood Village, OH) was used to create (60)Co IMRT treatment plans for 33 cancer patients with disease in the abdominal, pelvic, thorax, and head and neck regions using physician-specified patient-specific target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) objectives. Backup plans using a third-party linear accelerator (linac)-based planning system were also created. Plans were evaluated by attending physicians and approved for treatment. The (60)Co and linac plans were compared by evaluating conformity numbers (CN) with 100% and 95% of prescription reference doses and heterogeneity indices (HI) for planning target volumes (PTVs) and maximum, mean, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) values for OARs. RESULTS All (60)Co IMRT plans achieved PTV coverage and OAR sparing that were similar to linac plans. PTV conformity for (60)Co was within <1% and 3% of linac plans for 100% and 95% prescription reference isodoses, respectively, and heterogeneity was on average 4% greater. Comparisons of OAR mean dose showed generally better sparing with linac plans in the low-dose range <20 Gy, but comparable sparing for organs with mean doses >20 Gy. The mean doses for all (60)Co plan OARs were within clinical tolerances. CONCLUSIONS A commercial (60)Co MR-IGRT device can produce highly conformal IMRT treatment plans similar in quality to linac IMRT for a variety of disease sites. Additional work is in progress to evaluate the clinical benefit of other novel features of this MR-IGRT system.


Acta Oncologica | 2015

Comparison of onboard low-field magnetic resonance imaging versus onboard computed tomography for anatomy visualization in radiotherapy.

C. Noel; Parag J. Parikh; C.R. Spencer; O.L. Green; Yanle Hu; Sasa Mutic; J.R. Olsen

ABSTRACT Background. Onboard magnetic resonance imaging (OB-MRI) for daily localization and adaptive radiotherapy has been under development by several groups. However, no clinical studies have evaluated whether OB-MRI improves visualization of the target and organs at risk (OARs) compared to standard onboard computed tomography (OB-CT). This study compared visualization of patient anatomy on images acquired on the MRI-60Co ViewRay system to those acquired with OB-CT. Material and methods. Fourteen patients enrolled on a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and undergoing image-guided radiotherapy for cancer in the thorax (n = 2), pelvis (n = 6), abdomen (n = 3) or head and neck (n = 3) were imaged with OB-MRI and OB-CT. For each of the 14 patients, the OB-MRI and OB-CT datasets were displayed side-by-side and independently reviewed by three radiation oncologists. Each physician was asked to evaluate which dataset offered better visualization of the target and OARs. A quantitative contouring study was performed on two abdominal patients to assess if OB-MRI could offer improved inter-observer segmentation agreement for adaptive planning. Results. In total 221 OARs and 10 targets were compared for visualization on OB-MRI and OB-CT by each of the three physicians. The majority of physicians (two or more) evaluated visualization on MRI as better for 71% of structures, worse for 10% of structures, and equivalent for 14% of structures. 5% of structures were not visible on either. Physicians agreed unanimously for 74% and in majority for > 99% of structures. Targets were better visualized on MRI in 4/10 cases, and never on OB-CT. Conclusion. Low-field MR provides better anatomic visualization of many radiotherapy targets and most OARs as compared to OB-CT. Further studies with OB-MRI should be pursued.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for the Delivery of 60Co Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Subject to a 0.35-T Lateral Magnetic Field

H. Harold Li; V Rodriguez; O.L. Green; Yanle Hu; R. Kashani; H. Omar Wooten; Deshan Yang; Sasa Mutic

PURPOSE This work describes a patient-specific dosimetry quality assurance (QA) program for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using ViewRay, the first commercial magnetic resonance imaging-guided RT device. METHODS AND MATERIALS The program consisted of: (1) a 1-dimensional multipoint ionization chamber measurement using a customized 15-cm(3) cube-shaped phantom; (2) 2-dimensional (2D) radiographic film measurement using a 30- × 30- × 20-cm(3) phantom with multiple inserted ionization chambers; (3) quasi-3D diode array (ArcCHECK) measurement with a centrally inserted ionization chamber; (4) 2D fluence verification using machine delivery log files; and (5) 3D Monte Carlo (MC) dose reconstruction with machine delivery files and phantom CT. RESULTS Ionization chamber measurements agreed well with treatment planning system (TPS)-computed doses in all phantom geometries where the mean ± SD difference was 0.0% ± 1.3% (n=102; range, -3.0%-2.9%). Film measurements also showed excellent agreement with the TPS-computed 2D dose distributions where the mean passing rate using 3% relative/3 mm gamma criteria was 94.6% ± 3.4% (n=30; range, 87.4%-100%). For ArcCHECK measurements, the mean ± SD passing rate using 3% relative/3 mm gamma criteria was 98.9% ± 1.1% (n=34; range, 95.8%-100%). 2D fluence maps with a resolution of 1 × 1 mm(2) showed 100% passing rates for all plan deliveries (n=34). The MC reconstructed doses to the phantom agreed well with planned 3D doses where the mean passing rate using 3% absolute/3 mm gamma criteria was 99.0% ± 1.0% (n=18; range, 97.0%-100%), demonstrating the feasibility of evaluating the QA results in the patient geometry. CONCLUSIONS We developed a dosimetry program for ViewRays patient-specific IMRT QA. The methodology will be useful for other ViewRay users. The QA results presented here can assist the RT community to establish appropriate tolerance and action limits for ViewRays IMRT QA.


Medical Physics | 2015

Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.

Yanle Hu; L Rankine; O.L. Green; R. Kashani; H. Harold Li; Hua Li; Roger Nana; V Rodriguez; L Santanam; S Shvartsman; J Victoria; H. Omar Wooten; Sasa Mutic

PURPOSE To characterize the performance of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system. METHODS The imaging performance characterization included four components: ACR (the American College of Radiology) phantom test, spatial integrity, coil signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity, and magnetic field homogeneity. The ACR phantom test was performed in accordance with the ACR phantom test guidance. The spatial integrity test was evaluated using a 40.8 × 40.8 × 40.8 cm(3) spatial integrity phantom. MR and computed tomography (CT) images of the phantom were acquired and coregistered. Objects were identified around the surfaces of 20 and 35 cm diameters of spherical volume (DSVs) on both the MR and CT images. Geometric distortion was quantified using deviation in object location between the MR and CT images. The coil SNR test was performed according to the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) standards MS-1 and MS-9. The magnetic field homogeneity test was measured using field camera and spectral peak methods. RESULTS For the ACR tests, the slice position error was less than 0.10 cm, the slice thickness error was less than 0.05 cm, the resolved high-contrast spatial resolution was 0.09 cm, the resolved low-contrast spokes were more than 25, the image intensity uniformity was above 93%, and the percentage ghosting was less than 0.22%. All were within the ACR recommended specifications. The maximum geometric distortions within the 20 and 35 cm DSVs were 0.10 and 0.18 cm for high spatial resolution three-dimensional images and 0.08 and 0.20 cm for high temporal resolution two dimensional cine images based on the distance-to-phantom-center method. The average SNR was 12.0 for the body coil, 42.9 for the combined torso coil, and 44.0 for the combined head and neck coil. Magnetic field homogeneities at gantry angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° were 23.55, 20.43, 18.76, 19.11, and 22.22 ppm, respectively, using the field camera method over the 45 cm DSV. CONCLUSIONS The onboard imaging unit of the first commercial MR-IGRT system meets ACR, NEMA, and vendor specifications.


Radiation Oncology | 2013

Improve definition of titanium tandems in MR-guided high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer using proton density weighted MRI

Yanle Hu; Jacqueline Esthappan; Sasa Mutic; Susan Richardson; Julie K. Schwarz; Perry W. Grigsby

BackgroundFor cervical cancer patients treated with MR-guided high dose rate brachytherapy, the accuracy of radiation delivery depends on accurate localization of both tumors and the applicator, e.g. tandem and ovoid. Standard T2-weighted (T2W) MRI has good tumor-tissue contrast. However, it suffers from poor uterus-tandem contrast, which makes the tandem delineation very challenging. In this study, we evaluated the possibility of using proton density weighted (PDW) MRI to improve the definition of titanium tandems.MethodsBoth T2W and PDW MRI images were obtained from each cervical cancer patient. Imaging parameters were kept the same between the T2W and PDW sequences for each patient except the echo time (90 ms for T2W and 5.5 ms for PDW) and the slice thickness (0.5 cm for T2W and 0.25 cm for PDW). Uterus-tandem contrast was calculated by the equation C = (Su-St)/Su, where Su and St represented the average signal in the uterus and the tandem, respectively. The diameter of the tandem was measured 1.5 cm away from the tip of the tandem. The tandem was segmented by the histogram thresholding technique.ResultsPDW MRI could significantly improve the uterus-tandem contrast compared to T2W MRI (0.42±0.24 for T2W MRI, 0.77±0.14 for PDW MRI, p=0.0002). The average difference between the measured and physical diameters of the tandem was reduced from 0.20±0.15 cm by using T2W MRI to 0.10±0.11 cm by using PDW MRI (p=0.0003). The tandem segmented from the PDW image looked more uniform and complete compared to that from the T2W image.ConclusionsCompared to the standard T2W MRI, PDW MRI has better uterus-tandem contrast. The information provided by PDW MRI is complementary to those provided by T2W MRI. Therefore, we recommend adding PDW MRI to the simulation protocol to assist tandem delineation process for cervical cancer patients.


Medical Physics | 2016

A GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation platform and its application toward validating an MRI-guided radiation therapy beam model.

Yuhe Wang; Thomas R. Mazur; O.L. Green; Yanle Hu; Hua Li; V Rodriguez; H. Omar Wooten; Deshan Yang; T Zhao; Sasa Mutic; H. Harold Li

PURPOSE The clinical commissioning of IMRT subject to a magnetic field is challenging. The purpose of this work is to develop a GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation platform based on penelope and then use the platform to validate a vendor-provided MRIdian head model toward quality assurance of clinical IMRT treatment plans subject to a 0.35 T magnetic field. METHODS penelope was first translated from fortran to c++ and the result was confirmed to produce equivalent results to the original code. The c++ code was then adapted to cuda in a workflow optimized for GPU architecture. The original code was expanded to include voxelized transport with Woodcock tracking, faster electron/positron propagation in a magnetic field, and several features that make gpenelope highly user-friendly. Moreover, the vendor-provided MRIdian head model was incorporated into the code in an effort to apply gpenelope as both an accurate and rapid dose validation system. A set of experimental measurements were performed on the MRIdian system to examine the accuracy of both the head model and gpenelope. Ultimately, gpenelope was applied toward independent validation of patient doses calculated by MRIdians kmc. RESULTS An acceleration factor of 152 was achieved in comparison to the original single-thread fortran implementation with the original accuracy being preserved. For 16 treatment plans including stomach (4), lung (2), liver (3), adrenal gland (2), pancreas (2), spleen(1), mediastinum (1), and breast (1), the MRIdian dose calculation engine agrees with gpenelope with a mean gamma passing rate of 99.1% ± 0.6% (2%/2 mm). CONCLUSIONS A Monte Carlo simulation platform was developed based on a GPU- accelerated version of penelope. This platform was used to validate that both the vendor-provided head model and fast Monte Carlo engine used by the MRIdian system are accurate in modeling radiation transport in a patient using 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. Future applications of this platform will include dose validation and accumulation, IMRT optimization, and dosimetry system modeling for next generation MR-IGRT systems.


Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2016

Clinical implementation of multisequence MRI-based adaptive intracavitary brachytherapy for cervix cancer.

Jacqueline E. Zoberi; Jose Garcia-Ramirez; Yanle Hu; B Sun; Carol G. Bertelsman; Pawel Dyk; Julie K. Schwarz; Perry W. Grigsby

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical implementation of a magnetic resonance image (MRI)‐based approach for adaptive intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) of cervix cancer patients. Patients were implanted with titanium tandem and colpostats. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5‐T Philips scanner using T2‐weighted (T2W), proton‐density weighted (PDW), and diffusion‐weighted (DW) imaging sequences. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated from the DW images. All images were fused. T2W images were used for the definition of organs at risk (OARs) and dose points. ADC maps in conjunction with T2W images were used for target delineation. PDW images were used for applicator definition. Forward treatment planning was performed using standard source distribution rules normalized to Point A. Point doses and dose‐volume parameters for the tumor and OARs were exported to an automated dose‐tracking application. Brachytherapy doses were adapted for tumor shrinkage and OAR variations during the course of therapy. The MRI‐based ICBT approach described here has been clinically implemented and is carried out for each brachytherapy fraction. Total procedure time from patient preparation to delivery of treatment is typically 2 hrs. Implementation of our technique for structure delineation, applicator definition, dose tracking, and adaptation is demonstrated using treated patient examples. Based on published recommendations and our clinical experience in the radiation treatment of cervix cancer patients, we have refined our standard approach to ICBT by 1) incorporating a multisequence MRI technique for improved visualization of the target, OARs, and applicator, and by 2) implementing dose adaptation by use of automated dose tracking tools. PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.53.Jw, 87.19.xjThe purpose of this study was to describe the clinical implementation of a magnetic resonance image (MRI)-based approach for adaptive intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) of cervix cancer patients. Patients were implanted with titanium tandem and colpostats. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T Philips scanner using T2-weighted (T2W), proton-density weighted (PDW), and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging sequences. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated from the DW images. All images were fused. T2W images were used for the definition of organs at risk (OARs) and dose points. ADC maps in conjunction with T2W images were used for target delineation. PDW images were used for applicator definition. Forward treatment planning was performed using standard source distribution rules normalized to Point A. Point doses and dose-volume parameters for the tumor and OARs were exported to an automated dose-tracking application. Brachytherapy doses were adapted for tumor shrinkage and OAR variations during the course of therapy. The MRI-based ICBT approach described here has been clinically implemented and is carried out for each brachytherapy fraction. Total procedure time from patient preparation to delivery of treatment is typically 2 hrs. Implementation of our technique for structure delineation, applicator definition, dose tracking, and adaptation is demonstrated using treated patient examples. Based on published recommendations and our clinical experience in the radiation treatment of cervix cancer patients, we have refined our standard approach to ICBT by 1) incorporating a multisequence MRI technique for improved visualization of the target, OARs, and applicator, and by 2) implementing dose adaptation by use of automated dose tracking tools. PACS numbers: 87.61.-c, 87.53.Jw, 87.19.xj.


Medical Physics | 2012

TH‐E‐BRA‐07: Initial Experience with the ViewRay System ‐ Quality Assurance Testing of the Imaging Component

Yanle Hu; O Pechenaya Green; Parag J. Parikh; J.R. Olsen; Sasa Mutic

Purpose: The ViewRay system is a MRI‐guided radiotherapy system. The first commercial ViewRay system (pending 510(k) clearance) is under installation at our institution. In this work, we present initial quality assurancetesting of the 0.35T MR imaging component of the ViewRay system. Methods:Quality assurancetesting was performed on an ACR phantom following ACR recommendations. All testing was performed prior to installation of the 60Co sources. The phantom was placed at the isocenter of the MRI scanner. Sagittal localizer, axial T1 and T2 weighted scans were acquired. For all 3 scans, FOV was 250mm×250mm and the acquisition matrix was 256×256. TR and TE were 200ms and 20ms for the localizer, 500ms and 20ms for the T1 scan, and 2000ms and 20ms(80ms) for the T2 scan. The Localizer and T1 scan used spin echo acquisition and the T2 scan used double spin echo acquisition. 25 averages were used for T1 acquisition and 9 averages were used for T2 acquisition. The T1 scan was repeated with the prescan normalization option turned off to estimate the percent ghosting. Seven tests were performed including geometric accuracy, spatial resolution, slice thickness, slice position accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent ghosting and low contrast detectability. Results: All tests passed the ACR recommended criteria. The results and specifications (in parentheses) are listed below. Geometric accuracy was 148.6mm (148mm±2mm) and 190.2mm (190mm±2mm). Spatial resolution was 0.9mm ( 87.5%). Percent ghosting was 0.0016 (<0.025). Low contrast detectability was 10 and 13 (=9). Conclusions: Although the ViewRay system is not designed for diagnostic purposes, our initial experience with its imaging component showed promising results. Quality assurancetesting will be repeated following installation of the 60Co to confirm imaging performance.

Collaboration


Dive into the Yanle Hu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sasa Mutic

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

O.L. Green

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.R. Olsen

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V Rodriguez

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Perry W. Grigsby

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacqueline Esthappan

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Parag J. Parikh

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D Du

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deshan Yang

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Kashani

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge