Yark Hazewinkel

Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations for post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance should be applied only after a high quality baseline colonoscopy with complete removal of all detected neoplastic lesions.1 In the low risk group (patients with 1 - 2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm with low grade dysplasia), the ESGE recommends participation in existing national screening programmes 10 years after the index colonoscopy. If no screening programme is available, repetition of colonoscopy 10 years after the index colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 2 In the high risk group (patients with adenomas with villous histology or high grade dysplasia or ≥10 mm in size, or ≥ 3 adenomas), the ESGE recommends surveillance colonoscopy 3 years after the index colonoscopy (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Patients with 10 or more adenomas should be referred for genetic counselling (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 In the high risk group, if no high risk adenomas are detected at the first surveillance examination, the ESGE suggests a 5-year interval before a second surveillance colonoscopy (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). If high risk adenomas are detected at first or subsequent surveillance examinations, a 3-year repetition of surveillance colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).4 The ESGE recommends that patients with serrated polyps < 10 mm in size with no dysplasia should be classified as low risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). The ESGE suggests that patients with large serrated polyps (≥ 10 mm) or those with dysplasia should be classified as high risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence).5 The ESGE recommends that the endoscopist is responsible for providing a written recommendation for the post-polypectomy surveillance schedule (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).

Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging

BACKGROUND Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSAs/Ps) are premalignant lesions susceptible to being easily overlooked by endoscopists. A detailed description of the endoscopic appearance of SSAs/Ps might help endoscopists to recognize these lesions to improve the effectiveness of colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE To identify various endoscopic features of SSAs/Ps using high-resolution white-light endoscopy (HR-WLE) and narrow-band imaging (NBI). DESIGN Retrospective image evaluation study. SETTING Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Forty-5 patients with serrated polyposis syndrome undergoing surveillance colonoscopies. INTERVENTION HR-WLE and NBI images of 150 polyps (50 SSAs/Ps, 50 hyperplastic polyps [HPs], and 50 adenomas) were systematically assessed by 5 experts using various endoscopic descriptors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS The prevalence of specific endoscopic features observed in SSAs/Ps versus HPs. RESULTS Multivariate analysis demonstrated that indistinct borders (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.57-6.15) and a cloud-like surface (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.21-5.78) were associated with SSA/P histology on HR-WLE. On NBI, a cloud-like surface (OR, 4.91; 95% CI, 2.42-9.97), indistinct borders (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.14-4.96), irregular shape (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.59-6.29), and dark spots inside the crypts (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.02-4.11) were found to be endoscopic predictors of SSA/P histology. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NBI for differentiating serrated polyps containing either none or all 4 endoscopic SSA/P features were, respectively, 89%, 96%, and 93%. LIMITATIONS Retrospective, image evaluation analysis. CONCLUSIONS The current study demonstrates that SSAs/Ps possess several specific endoscopic features compared with HPs. Recognition of these characteristics might assist endoscopists in the differentiation of these lesions and could possibly facilitate endoscopic detection of these rather subtle lesions.

Incidence of Colonic Neoplasia in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome Who Undergo Annual Endoscopic Surveillance

BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) are advised to undergo endoscopic surveillance for early detection of polyps and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The optimal surveillance and treatment regimen is unknown. We performed a prospective study to evaluate a standardized endoscopic treatment protocol in a large cohort of patients with SPS. METHODS We followed a cohort of patients with SPS who received annual endoscopic surveillance at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, The Netherlands from January 2007 through December 2012. All patients underwent clearing colonoscopy with removal of all polyps ≥3 mm. After clearance, subsequent follow-up colonoscopies were scheduled annually. The primary outcomes measure was the incidence of CRC and polyps. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of complications and the rate of preventive surgery. RESULTS Successful endoscopic clearance of all polyps ≥3 mm was achieved in 41 of 50 (82%) patients. During subsequent annual surveillance, with a median follow-up time of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 1.5-4.3 years), CRC was not detected. The cumulative risks of detecting CRC, advanced adenomas, or large (≥10 mm) serrated polyps after 3 surveillance colonoscopies were 0%, 9%, 34%, respectively. Twelve patients (24%) were referred for preventive surgery; 9 at initial colonoscopy and 3 during surveillance. Perforations or severe bleeding did not occur. CONCLUSIONS Annual surveillance with complete removal of all polyps ≥3 mm with timely referral of selected high-risk patients for prophylactic surgery prevents development of CRC in SPS patients without significant morbidity. Considering the substantial risk of polyp recurrence, close endoscopic surveillance in SPS seems warranted. www.trialregister.nl ID NTR2757.

Polyp Morphology: An Interobserver Evaluation for the Paris Classification Among International Experts

OBJECTIVES:The Paris classification is an international classification system for describing polyp morphology. Thus far, the validity and reproducibility of this classification have not been assessed. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification among seven Western expert endoscopists.METHODS:A total of 85 short endoscopic video clips depicting polyps were created and assessed by seven expert endoscopists according to the Paris classification. After a digital training module, the same 85 polyps were assessed again. We calculated the interobserver agreement with a Fleiss kappa and as the proportion of pairwise agreement.RESULTS:The interobserver agreement of the Paris classification among seven experts was moderate with a Fleiss kappa of 0.42 and a mean pairwise agreement of 67%. The proportion of lesions assessed as “flat” by the experts ranged between 13 and 40% (P<0.001). After the digital training, the interobserver agreement did not change (kappa 0.38, pairwise agreement 60%).CONCLUSIONS:Our study is the first to validate the Paris classification for polyp morphology. We demonstrated only a moderate interobserver agreement among international Western experts for this classification system. Our data suggest that, in its current version, the use of this classification system in daily practice is questionable and it is unsuitable for comparative endoscopic research. We therefore suggest introduction of a simplification of the classification system.

Yield of Screening Colonoscopy in First-degree Relatives of Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome

Goals: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopies in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS). Background: Patients with SPS are at an increased risk for colorectal cancer. Although inheritance patterns are unknown, FDRs of these patients have an increased risk for both colorectal cancer and SPS. Prospective studies evaluating the yield of screening colonoscopies in this group are however scarce. This information would be useful to evaluate a possible mode of inheritance and to investigate whether screening colonoscopies are justified in this group. Study: FDR of patients with SPS were invited to undergo colonoscopy. The diagnostic yield was expressed by the number of FDRs with at least 1 significant polyp relative to the total number of included FDRs. Significant polyps were defined adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, or proximal hyperplastic polyp. Tissue specimens were reviewed by one expert pathologist. Results: Seventy-seven FDRs underwent colonoscopy (median age 52 y; interquartile range, 41 to 60). Colorectal cancer was not diagnosed. One or more significant polyps were detected in 43% of FDRs. No differences based on age, gender, or familial relationship were observed in the detection of polyps. Seven first-degree (9%) relatives had multiple polyps (≥5). Eleven (14%) FDRs fulfilled SPS WHO-criterion 2, of whom 1 sibling also met SPS WHO-criterion 3. Conclusions: The yield of a single screening colonoscopy in FDRs of patients with serrated polyposis is substantial, warranting a colonoscopy screening program for these individuals.

Morphological classifications of gastrointestinal lesions

In the era of spreading adoption of gastrointestinal endoscopy screening worldwide, endoscopists encounter an increasing number of complex lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. For decision-making on optimal treatment, precise lesion characterization is crucial. Especially the assessment of potential submucosal invasion is of utmost importance as this determines whether endoscopic removal is an option and which technique should be used. To describe a lesion and stratify for the risk of submucosal invasion, several morphological classification systems have been developed. In this manuscript, we thoroughly discuss a systematic approach for the endoscopic assessment of a lesion, which include location, size, Paris classification, lateral spreading tumor classification if applicable and evaluation of the surface pattern with advanced endoscopic imaging techniques. The use of advanced imaging techniques improves the characterization of mucosal surface patterns and helps to determine whether lesions are amenable to endoscopic resection.

Optical Diagnosis of Sessile Serrated Polyps: Bottleneck for the Optical Diagnosis Paradigm?

Background: Optical diagnosis of diminutive (1 to 5 mm) polyps could result in a more cost-effective colonoscopy practice. Previous optical diagnosis studies did not incorporate the differentiation of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of optical diagnosis of diminutive SSPs on the overall performance of endoscopic polyp differentiation in daily colonoscopy practice. Methods: Endoscopy data were prospectively collected between 2011 and 2014 in a colonoscopy center. Each endoscopist reported a real-time optical diagnosis (SSP, adenoma or hyperplastic polyp) for all lesions in a structured colonoscopy reporting system, using narrow band imaging at their discretion. Study outcomes were accuracy of optical diagnosis, surveillance interval agreement and negative predictive value for diminutive rectosigmoid neoplastic histology based on the optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps compared to histopathology. Results: Of 2853 removed diminutive polyps, 202 (7.1%) were histologically proven SSPs. Optical diagnosis of diminutive SSPs was accurate in 24.4%. Diminutive SSPs determined 6.9% of postpolypectomy surveillance assignments. Inaccurate optical diagnosis of diminutive SSPs led to lower surveillance interval agreement (78.1% vs. 53.3%, P<0.01) and pooled negative predictive value per polyp (84.3% vs. 50.0%; P<0.01) in patients with diminutive SSPs when compared to patients without diminutive SSPs. Accurate endoscopic identification of diminutive SSPs improved from 0% in 2011 to 47% in 2014 (P=0.02). Conclusions: Endoscopic characterization of diminutive SSPs is difficult, impairing overall performance of optical diagnosis in patients with diminutive SSPs. Future optical diagnosis studies should use validated trainings and classification algorithms that include differentiation of SSPs.

Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program

Background and study aims  In an optical diagnosis strategy, diminutive polyps that are endoscopically characterized with high confidence are removed without histopathological analysis and distal hyperplastic polyps are left in situ. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of optical diagnosis. Methods  Using the Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer (ASCCA) model, we simulated biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening in individuals aged 55 – 75 years. In this program, we compared an optical diagnosis strategy with current histopathology assessment of all diminutive polyps. Base-case assumptions included 76 % high-confidence predictions and sensitivities of 88 %, 91 %, and 88 % for endoscopically characterizing adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and hyperplastic polyps, respectively. Outcomes were colorectal cancer burden, number of colonoscopies, life-years, and costs. Results  Both the histopathology strategy and the optical diagnosis strategy resulted in 21 life-days gained per simulated individual compared with no screening. For optical diagnosis, €6 per individual was saved compared with the current histopathology strategy. These cost savings were related to a 31 % reduction in colonoscopies in which histopathology was needed for diminutive polyps. Projecting these results onto the Netherlands (17 million inhabitants), assuming a fully implemented FIT-based screening program, resulted in an annual undiscounted cost saving of € 1.7 – 2.2 million for optical diagnosis. Conclusion  Implementation of optical diagnosis in a FIT-based screening program saves costs without decreasing program effectiveness when compared with current histopathology analysis of all diminutive polyps. Further work is required to evaluate how endoscopists participating in a screening program should be trained, audited, and monitored to achieve adequate competence in optical diagnosis.

Mo1190 Prevalence and Characteristics of Serrated Lesions in Individuals Undergoing Primary Screening Colonoscopy

G A A b st ra ct s 16), were 3.7 for CRCs (95%CI= 2.8 to 4.6, p ,.0001 vs. SNADs), 2.3 for CAs (95%CI= 1.7 to 3.0, p,.0001 vs. SNADs), 1.3 for LPGDs (95%CI= 0.8 to 1.8, p=.0001 vs. SNADs), and 0.3 for SNADs (95%CI= 0.2 to 0.5), respectively. Conclusion: Fecal DNA methylation strategy can robustly detect a variety of gastrointestinal tumors, including pancreatic cancers. Our improved fecal DNA methylation assay provides an effective and promising tool for the non-invasive screening of not only for CRC but also for LPGDs, highlighting its tremendous clinical utility in reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with these malignancies.