Yassine Lalami

Activity of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

The role of chemotherapy for unresectable malignant mesothelioma is unclear. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the methodological quality of published papers relative to chemotherapy or immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma and to aggregate, for trials having a similar methodology, the response rates in order to identify the most active chemotherapeutic drugs and regimens. The literature relative to this topic, published between 1965 and June 2001 was reviewed. A methodological qualitative evaluation was performed according to the European Lung Cancer Working Party scale, specifically designed for phase II trials. A study was considered as potentially positive if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the response rate was greater than 20% and positive if the lower limit of the 95% CI was > 20%. Eighty-three studies (88 treatment arms) were eligible for the systematic review. Fifty-three arms were considered as positive or potentially positive. No statistically significant difference in the methodological quality was observed between negative and positive studies. Studies were aggregated in four groups according to the presence of cisplatin and/or doxorubicin in the treatment regimen. The combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin had the highest response rate (28.5%; P < 0.001). Cisplatin was the most active single-agent regimen. Our systematic qualitative and quantitative overview of the literature suggests that the most active chemotherapeutic regimen, in term of objective response rate, is the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin and the best single-agent is cisplatin. The combination of these two drugs can be recommended as control arm for future randomised phase III trials.

Outpatient oral antibiotics for febrile neutropenic cancer patients using a score predictive for complications

PURPOSE Since febrile neutropenic patients were recognized to constitute a heterogeneous population, several models have been developed for predicting the risk of serious medical complications. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer score and its derived clinical prediction rules have been validated, but thus far there were no data about its use for simplifying therapy in predicted low-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a single institution, we followed all episodes of febrile neutropenia between January 1999 and November 2003. Those patients predicted at low risk for complications, who were not receiving antibacterials at fever onset and were eligible for treatment with oral antibiotics, were treated with ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanate and were discharged if they were clinically stable or improving after an initial observation period. The primary end point of the study was the rate of resolution of the febrile neutropenic episode without complications, among these early discharged patients. RESULTS Of 383 first febrile neutropenic episodes predicted at low risk of complication, 178 patients (33 men and 145 women, mainly with solid tumors) were treated orally; they constituted the basis of our analysis. Seventy-nine patients (44%) were discharged early (with a median time to discharge of 26 hours); no complications occurred among them but three patients had to be readmitted, resulting in a success rate of 96% (95% CI, 92% to 100%). CONCLUSION Our study shows that oral therapy followed by early discharge was feasible in a small but significant proportion of patients selected by a strategy combining predicted low risk and medical and nonmedical criteria.

Molecular markers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: promising signs in need of prospective evaluation.

The aim of this article is to review recent developments in the biological understanding of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Management of head and neck cancer in elderly patients.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents a heterogeneous group of tumours requiring multimodality approaches. It is debatable whether HNC treatment in geriatric patients should be different to that delivered for younger patients. Furthermore, the risk of death seems to be higher in HNC patients with higher co-morbidity status. Despite the fact that there is no significant difference in outcome in younger versus older patients, older HNC patients are more likely to receive nonstandard, less aggressive therapies than younger patients. Age alone should not be the basis for selecting treatment options in older HNC patients. A thorough pretreatment evaluation of co-morbidities should always be performed, and radical surgical options should not be excluded in older HNC patients treated with curative intent, as postoperative complications occur no more frequently in older patients than in younger patients. Locoregional control and disease-free survival in older patients treated with radiation therapy (either with curative intent or in the palliative setting) are comparable to the results seen in younger HNC patients, with the same acute toxicity profile. In patients receiving systemic therapies, special attention must be given to modification of chemotherapy dosages according to renal and hepatic function. Molecular-targeted therapies appear to be very useful in such patients because of their favourable tolerability. In conclusion, once all physiological and biological risk factors have been addressed, a large proportion of geriatric patients can and should be offered the same HNC treatment as is offered to younger patients.

Best supportive care or chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were introduced in the late 1970s for the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, more than 15 years of randomized trials were required to produce convincing data showing survival improvement in comparison to best supportive care alone. The routine use of chemotherapy in this indication is still the object of considerable debate in Europe and North America as reflected by different recent editorials or reviews (Haskel 1991; Souhami 1996; Vokes 1995; White 1995; Souquet et al. 1995; Sorensen 1997).

The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia : an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BackgroundThe use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia (defined as having a FN incidence of 10% or more) and the respective incidence and clinical management of FN in breast cancer and NHL has not been studied in Belgium. The existence of a medical need for G-CSF primary and secondary prophylaxis with these regimens was investigated in a real-life setting.MethodsNine oncologists and six hematologists from different Belgian general hospitals and university centers were surveyed to collect expert opinion and real-life data (year 2007) on the use of chemotherapy regimens with moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the clinical management of FN in patients aged <65 years with breast cancer or NHL. Data were retrospectively obtained, over a 6-month observation period.ResultsThe most frequently used regimens in breast cancer patients (n = 161) were FEC (45%), FEC-T (37%) and docetaxel alone (6%). In NHL patients (n = 39), R-CHOP-21 (33%) and R-ACVBP-14 (15%) were mainly used. Without G-CSF primary prophylaxis (PP), FN occurred in 31% of breast cancer patients, and 13% had PSN. After G-CSF secondary prophylaxis (SP), 4% experienced further FN events. Only 1 breast cancer patient received PP, and did not experience a severe neutropenic event. Overall, 30% of chemotherapy cycles observed in breast cancer patients were protected by PP/SP. In 10 NHL patients receiving PP, 2 (20%) developed FN, whereas 13 (45%) of the 29 patients without PP developed FN and 3 (10%) PSN. Overall, 55% of chemotherapy cycles observed in NHL patients were protected by PP/SP. Impaired chemotherapy delivery (timing and/or dose) was reported in 40% (breast cancer) and 38% (NHL) of patients developing FN. Based on oncologist expert opinion, hospitalization rates for FN (average length of stay) without and with PP were, respectively, 48% (4.2 days) and 19% (1.5 days). Similar rates were obtained from hematologists.ConclusionsDespite the studied chemotherapy regimens being known to be associated with a moderate or high risk of FN, upfront G-CSF prophylaxis was rarely used. The observed incidence of severe neutropenic events without G-CSF prophylaxis was higher than generally reported in the literature. The impact on medical resources used is sizeable.

Phase I trial combining temozolomide plus lapatinib for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: the LAPTEM trial

BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BMs) pose a clinical challenge in breast cancer (BC). Lapatinib or temozolomide showed activity in BM. Our study assessed the combination of both drugs as treatment for patients with HER2-positive BC and BM. METHODS Eighteen patients were enrolled, with sixteen of them having recurrent or progressive BM. Any type of previous therapy was allowed, and disease was assessed by gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary end points were the evaluation of the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit and duration of response. RESULTS The lapatinib-temozolomide regimen showed a favorable toxicity profile because the MTD could not be reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, diarrhea and constipation. Disease stabilization was achieved in 10 out of 15 assessable patients. The estimated median survival time for the 16 patients with BM reached 10.94 months (95% CI: 1.09-20.79), whereas the median progression-free survival time was 2.60 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-3.37]. CONCLUSIONS The lapatinib-temozolomide combination is well tolerated. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed in a heavily pretreated population, as indicated by the volumetric reductions occurring in brain lesions.

EORTC 24051: Unexpected side effects in a phase I study of TPF induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation with lapatinib, a dual EGFR/ErbB2 inhibitor, in patients with locally advanced resectable larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND In this phase I/II study, the addition of lapatinib (LAP) was investigated in combination with the sequential use of both approaches TPF induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced larynx or hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Objectives were to assess maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to recommend a safe dose of LAP when administered with 4 cycles of TPF followed by CRT. RESULTS Seven male patients were included. Three patients were included in the first cohort, at dose level 1 (LAP 500 mg daily plus TPF). Renal toxicity was observed among these three patients (grade 3 [n=1], grade 2 [n=1] and grade 1 [n=1]), with 1 DLT, leading to treatment interruption in this group. Nephrotoxicity was reversible after stopping LAP and hydration of the patients. In a second cohort of four patients administering docetaxel from the second cycle, 3 more DLTs were observed (grade 2 renal toxicity and grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 anorexia and grade 3 stomatitis, and grade 4 neutropenia). Based on the occurrence of 4 DLTs at the first dose level of LAP, patient recruitment was closed. CONCLUSION These data indicate that LAP cannot be combined safely with full dose TPF.

Recurrent thyroid cancer: a molecular-based therapeutic breakthrough.

Purpose of review Thyroid cancer is a group of heterogeneous rare malignancies, with an increasing incidence. Management of recurrent thyroid cancer not amenable to local therapy such as surgery, radiotherapy or radio-iodine ablation remains very challenging. Indeed, chemotherapy allows a very limited impact on the outcomes of this cancer. Recent findings During the last decade, huge progress has been made for a better comprehension of carcinogenesis and development of new drugs targeting molecular signalling and cancer cell biology, including angiogenesis process. Several agents have been tested in all subgroups of thyroid cancers, leading to promising results in terms of disease stabilization and response, and recently, with an improvement of progression-free survival. Summary Molecular-targeted therapies, in particular multitargeted kinase inhibitors, entered into phase III randomized clinical trials, confirming their great interest for clinical practice.

Does clinical and radiological response predict complete tumor control in N2–N3 squamous cell head and neck cancer after non-operative management of the neck?

Conclusion: A complete clinical and radiological response observed following chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not predictive of the absence of residual disease. Moreover, salvage neck surgery does not always seem to be an effective strategy. Consequently, early neck dissection should be advised for patients with complete clinical and radiological response (CCRR) after chemoradiotherapy for tumors with N2–N3 disease. Background: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 28 patients with N2–N3 disease treated initially with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patients and methods: A neck dissection was performed for all patients with residual disease in the neck. Results: A CCRR in the neck was achieved in 25 of 28 patients. The remaining three patients with residual neck mass underwent a salvage neck dissection: the pathological examination confirmed the persistence of tumoral disease. No regional failure was observed in these three patients. In 25 patients considered to have CCRR in the neck, 5 patients (20%) developed regional recurrence. Successful salvage approach was not possible for any of these patients.