Yasuhiro Mabuchi
Hitachi
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yasuhiro Mabuchi.
ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2013
Masato Yamamoto; Kunio Onizawa; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Takuya Ogawa; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Naoki Miura
Master Curve approach for the fracture toughness evaluation is expected to be a powerful tool to ensure the reliability of long term used RPV steels. In order to get sufficient number of data for the Master curve approach coexistent with the present surveillance program for RPVs, the utilization of miniature specimens, which can be taken from broken halves of surveillance Charpy specimens, is important. CRIEPI had developed the test technique for the miniature C(T) specimens (Mini-CT), whose dimensions are 4 × 10 × 10 mm, and verified the basic applicability of the Master Curve approach by means of Mini-CT and larger specimens for the determination of fracture toughness of typical Japanese RPV steels. A round robin program was organized with the participation of a university, industries and a government institute in Japan. The first-round test results (PVP2012-78661[1]) with limited number of reference temperature To data points indicated the possible loading rate dK/dt dependence in To. However, increasing number of data points in second-round test, which was conducted in specified loading rate of 0.5 MPa m0.5 /sec, ensures that there is no clue of such a remarkable dK/dt dependency. Concerning the effect of large plastic deformation on dK/dt, dK/dt calculated by several definitions were compared with each other. Maximum one order difference was found between dK/dts with and without consideration of plastic deformation. dK/dt - T0 relationships showed similar amount of scatter in T0 regardless of dK/dt definitions. Difference in dK/dt definition seems less effective on scatter of T0 in the present results.Copyright
ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2014
Masato Yamamoto; Akihiko Kimura; Kunio Onizawa; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Takuya Ogawa; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Hans-Werner Viehrig; Naoki Miura; Naoki Soneda
The Master Curve approach for the fracture toughness evaluation is expected to be a powerful tool to ensure the reliability of long-term used RPV steels. In order to get sufficient number of data for the Master Curve approach coexistent with the present surveillance program for RPVs, the utilization of miniature specimens, which can be taken from broken halves of surveillance Charpy specimens, is important. CRIEPI developed the test technique for the miniature C(T) specimens (Mini-CT), whose dimensions are 4 × 10 × 10 mm, and verified the basic applicability of Master Curve approach by means of Mini-CT for the determination of fracture toughness of typical Japanese RPV steels. A round robin program is organized in order to assure the robustness of the testing procedure to the difference in testing machines or operators. The first and second round robin tests (PVP2012-78661 [1], PVP2013-97936 [2]) suggested that the reference temperature T0 evaluation technique by Mini-CT specimen potentially is fairly robust in regard to difference in testing machines and operators, and gives similar loading rate dependency to the larger C(T) specimens. As the final year of the round robin program, “blind tests” were carried out. Here, detailed material information such as the type of materials, estimated T0, existing fracture toughness data for the material, were not given with the specimen, and 6 organizations independently selected the test temperature based on Charpy full curve of the tested material. The selection of test temperature has the variation of −120 °C to −150 °C among the organizations. 8 to 20 specimens in a set were subjected to the Master Curve evaluation and all the 6 organizations successfully obtained valid T0. The scatter range in T0 was at most 16 °C, which was within the acceptable scatter range specified in ASTM E1921-10e1. The selection of test temperature seems to give limited effect as like as that in larger specimens.Copyright
Archive | 2002
Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Takashiro Matsuo; Makoto Senoo; Masanori Suzuki; Yoshitomo Takahashi; 誠 妹尾; 貴城 松尾; 正憲 鈴木; 靖宏 馬渕; 良知 高橋
Archive | 2012
Sho Kuroita; Sadakatsu Sawahata; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Hiroaki Asakura; Fumihito Hirokawa
Archive | 2004
Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Hirokazu Nagaoka; Tsukasa Sasaki; Taiichiro Yamada; 典 佐々木; 泰一郎 山田; 宏和 長岡; 靖宏 馬渕
Archive | 2010
Korehisa Fukuda; Hisamichi Inoue; Michiaki Kurosaki; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Keita Okuyama; Shiro Takahashi; Akinori Tamura; 久道 井上; 圭太 奥山; 明紀 田村; 是寿 福田; 靖宏 馬渕; 志郎 高橋; 通明 黒崎
ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2016
Fumihito Hirokawa; Masaaki Hayashi; Minoru Masuda; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Yukinori Yamamoto; Katsumasa Miyazaki; David Johnson
Archive | 2014
Masato Yamamoto; Kunio Onizawa; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Takuya Ogawa; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Matti Valo; Marlies Lambrecht; Hans-Werner Viehrig; Naoki Miura; Naoki Soneda
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-transactions of The Asme | 2014
Shiro Takahashi; Keita Okuyama; Akinori Tamura; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Teppei Kubota; Kazuhiro Yoshikawa
ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2013
Shiro Takahashi; Keita Okuyama; Akinori Tamura; Yasuhiro Mabuchi; Teppei Kubota; Kazuhiro Yoshikawa